BRANDY EVE ALLEN
$LAYYYTER
Cosimo Galluzzi

Janaina Medeiros
occasionally subtle

@theartofmadeline
NASA

#extradirty

shark vs the universe

pixel skylines

oozey mess
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
Xuebing Du
Sweet Seals For You, Always

⁂
Mike Driver
One Nice Bug Per Day
DEAR READER
Claire Keane
RMH
will byers stan first human second

seen from Maldives
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Sweden

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Türkiye

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Indonesia
seen from Australia

seen from Germany

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
@tony-starcc
BRANDY EVE ALLEN
The people (me) yearn for animated pjo with 20 episode seasons
half a year of unrelenting genocide in Gaza, please don’t stop caring. they are so tired, they cannot be the only ones participating in their own liberation. we have to keep caring
anyone who calls all individual actions like thrifting, going vegan or using public transport bad or useless, and instead encourages people to just wait for some kind of big revolution to happen before even considering making any change in their own lives is not actually that interested in things getting better
And if someone with a large platform is saying this it's because it financially benefits them.
this is your gentle reminder to stop fighting against your adhd and instead structure your life around it
buy a pack of chapsticks and put one in the pocket of all of your coats and jackets because you always forget to bring one and chapped lips is sensory hell
leave important things where you can see them. if they go in a box or a drawer you will forget they exist
put any appointments or deadlines in your phone calendar As Soon As you get them. set a reminder for a week before, a day before, an hour before, as many as you need as often as you need them.
when that little voice in your head says "i dont need to write that down, ill remember it" that is the devil talking!!! write it down anyway!!
plan for down time. have a few hours at the end of every day to just do fun stuff like engage in your hyperfixations. even if you didnt get all of your work done that day, have the rest anyway. you probably spent the whole day beating yourself up for not doing what you Should be doing, so you still need the break.
if you never eat vegetables because its too much effort to chop and cook them, get the frozen or canned shit. it doesnt go off for ages and you just have to microwave it. theres no point buying fresh vegetables if they just keep going off and being left to rot in the bottom of your fridge
if you struggle to decide what to have for dinner every day, take the decision out of it. choose a set of meals and eat those on rotation until you get sick of them, then choose some new ones and do it again.
its not stupid if it works! our brains literally have a chemical deficiency. you are allowed to accommodate yourself. go forth and stop making your life more difficult than it has to be because "this shouldn't be this hard". it is hard, so make it easier.
Christmas as a cultural icon is starting to get really dystopian in a climate sense, december has historically been a time of year in which there would be snow in a significant portion of europe and north america, and the fact that its not even icy this time of year and all the christmas songs and decorations reference a time of year that will likely never exist in the same way again in my life time is so strange.
I don't think the time you spend on this website is a waste of time, I think time just passes. you can do pretty much whatever you want with your time don't make yourself feel guilty for no reason
Do you call the website "X" now?
Yes I started calling it X
No I still call it Twitter
I call it X in professional settings, but I usually call it Twitter
Other/Results
#he deadnames his child I deadname his website
(...goes off to find out how much popcorn we've got in the house)
sis i don't understand your mentality.. how can you support women but not trans women?? they are STILL women! if you are born with male reproductive organs that just make you feel so confused and horrible and eventually feel so happy by identifying as female, how can you not accept them? *genuine question*
here’s my honest answer.
my beliefs about trans women are only the product of my beliefs about feminism. I fundamentally believe that women are oppressed for their sex, not for their femininity. I believe that the society that fosters this sex-based oppression uses compulsory femininity as a method of oppression. I believe that we need distinct terminology to discuss and try to heal the division between the sexes. As a result of this, I believe that efforts to facilitate confusion of these terms hurts and hinders the progress of feminism. If women are oppressed for their gender and not their sex, then no one except people who wanted to be oppressed would identify as women. I think the root of the reason terfs have the reputation they do is that we just refused to change the terminology, which tras took as a denial of their cause.
I want to ask you, what is womanhood? what is the common trait that all women have that identifies them as the ones men oppress? what does it mean for someone to “feel like a woman” cis or not? if sex has no bearing on gender, what causes the desire to transition sex? what is it about “feeling like a woman” causes people to want long hair and makeup?
I didn’t start off a terf. I was deep in the TRA movement for a long time, genuinely believing their cause. i encourage you to think critically about what a woman is, even if you don’t admit to it.
I support biological females because we share an anatomical trait that has been exploited and abused for millennia, and I believe there should be a designated movement just to support people affected by this. I believe that movement is called feminism. that is how I don’t see the place for trans women in that movement.
that doesn’t mean I don’t support trans women. They are helping to break down the gender barriers assigned to the sexes by engaging in activities that men consider “womanly” and simultaneously “weak.” however, engaging in activities that men historically limited women to does not make you a woman. the insinuation that being drawn to girly things (the products of a culture bent on keeping girls pretty and vacant) makes them women is misogynistic in itself.
I am all for the trans community- a large part of the people I love and care about are trans including some of my past lovers -and I would never purposefully do or support anything that goes against their wellbeing. But, this has me at a crossroads.
Honestly, I’ve never done much research on terfs so I’m not very educated on this subject. I’ve just heard that they’re transphobic and I immediately coined terfs as people I shouldn’t and/or don’t support or associate with. But, this post right here has made me think and I really would like to respectfully talk about this with a few people without stepping on anyone’s toes.
my two cents: the interesting thing is that a lot of radfems say they don’t want trans ppl in the feminist community, because it takes away from the discrimination that women face by adding “men” into the mix. however, trans women literally go through 100x more of a struggle and face more discrimination- both for being women and for being trans. so, by including trans identities in your feminism, you are actually adding much more validity to the statement that women are oppressed by society. sure women are oppressed in some ways due to their genitals, like regarding periods and period products. but CIS men are the main detriment to women’s rights, and i genuinely feel like you don’t lose anything by being just slightly more inclusive to trans men who have periods, or trans women expressing identity.
I don’t have the time right now but can someone please give this person the actual stats about rates of violence against women vs rates of violence against TW? It is absolutely crazy to claim TW experience 100x more violence than ALL FEMALES IN THE WORLD. (And frankly these precise stats do not exist.) 3 women per day are murdered in the US. 33 TW were murdered in the US in one year. (2022). Why do you think the MMIW genocide continues to happen daily and barely anybody talks about it, but everytime a TW is murdered it makes the news?
And dude, this may be shocking to you since you seem to believe the opposite but trans men are included in radical feminism BECAUSE THEY ARE FEMALE. It doesn’t matter if we as radfems agree with them or their religion/politics, or even like them. They are female and thus included. Feminism is for all females, regardless of politics, race, religion, sexuality, gender identity, mental illness, or even how despicable they are. Yeah radical feminism includes ultra right wing tradwives, crazy tankies, ultra left anarchists, scientologist women, Muslim women, trans men, bisexual women, baby murderesses, female CEOs, female prostitutes, etc etc etc ANY FEMALE. Even the women that hate us and completely disagree on absolutely everything.
Idgaf about their mental illness or pronouns. None of that is external material reality either from a biological or sociological perspective. All radical feminism includes trans men automatically on account of them having female bodies and being women oppressed under patriarchy. You can claim that cuz they call themselves “he/him” and “men” makes them not women or female, but no. Men know exactly who to oppress and it’s gor nothing to do with wearing a suit or cutting off your breasts. Men oppress all female people. Period. Patriarchy is just like that. And if you truly think trans men are not on predatory straight males radar, I have a bridge to sell you lol
Men are murdered at the highest rate, bc they murder each other. Next, women are murdered by men, bc men hate women. After that, by slightly less percentage, transwomen and transmen are murdered, by men, bc men are homophobic.
Transwomen are not murdered at a higher rate than women, and, actually, most transwomen who are murdered are mostly murdered for their involvement in the sex industry by homophobic men, so if you really want to compare their murder rates honestly, you would compare the number of transwomen prostitutes murdered to the number of female prostitutes murdered, and then, I assure you, you will find that females are murdered at a higher rate in that industry, after adjusting for percentage of the overall population.
Transwomen do not experience medical misogyny, and are not under threat of a loss of bodily autonomy from government based on their natural biological state.
Transwomen are male by definition, and whatever “misogyny” they experience, is, in fact, homophobia. No one views or defines or treats transwomen as women, bc they simply are not women; that level of pretending is impossible. They do not experience workplace misogyny, they do not experience the issues that women face in poverty, and they do not experience the social hatred that women do, bc these are all things rooted in the material reality of female biology and male assumptions about a person based on the material reality of female biology. Which, again, transwomen, by definition, do not have and never will, no matter what drugs they take and surgeries they undergo.
The only difference between men and women is biology; misogyny is based on the male perception that the female body is inferior to their own. It is literally nonsense to even suggest that transwomen are oppressed for being trans (how is it transphobia and not homophobia, when there is literally no form of violence or supression that transwomen face that gay men do not also face in the same numbers??), and further psychotic to posit that they experience any form of misogyny. They are male, and so are incapable of both having female biology and being oppressed for having it.
Again, the only systemic oppression transwomen face as a group is homophobia. And a good portion of them aren’t even ssa, so could easily opt out of facing persecution if they would simply quit their fetish of larping as women.
@tony-starcc Read the above. (Thanks, @thecoloredcanvas !)
No. I will not “agree to disagree” about literal facts. You are categorically wrong.
TW are not the most oppressed people ever and radical feminism does include trans men. Period. Those are facts.
I will not argue further about literal facts with you. It’s a waste of my time and you’re just being manipulative.
unfortunately i did not mention that trans women were the single most oppressed group, but simply said that by using laws of intersectionality, they face high social oppression. furthermore, i never once mentioned that trans men are not part of feminism at all- rather, i said we could include all trans people in feminism, but still highlight the struggles of cis women to a higher degree whenever necessary.
however, you believe trans people are playing pretend, and i do not.
that is where we fundamentally disagree- not about the nuances of feminism. in that way, i highly doubt we will manage to convince each other, but thank you for the debate, and for calling me names.
sis i don't understand your mentality.. how can you support women but not trans women?? they are STILL women! if you are born with male reproductive organs that just make you feel so confused and horrible and eventually feel so happy by identifying as female, how can you not accept them? *genuine question*
here’s my honest answer.
my beliefs about trans women are only the product of my beliefs about feminism. I fundamentally believe that women are oppressed for their sex, not for their femininity. I believe that the society that fosters this sex-based oppression uses compulsory femininity as a method of oppression. I believe that we need distinct terminology to discuss and try to heal the division between the sexes. As a result of this, I believe that efforts to facilitate confusion of these terms hurts and hinders the progress of feminism. If women are oppressed for their gender and not their sex, then no one except people who wanted to be oppressed would identify as women. I think the root of the reason terfs have the reputation they do is that we just refused to change the terminology, which tras took as a denial of their cause.
I want to ask you, what is womanhood? what is the common trait that all women have that identifies them as the ones men oppress? what does it mean for someone to “feel like a woman” cis or not? if sex has no bearing on gender, what causes the desire to transition sex? what is it about “feeling like a woman” causes people to want long hair and makeup?
I didn’t start off a terf. I was deep in the TRA movement for a long time, genuinely believing their cause. i encourage you to think critically about what a woman is, even if you don’t admit to it.
I support biological females because we share an anatomical trait that has been exploited and abused for millennia, and I believe there should be a designated movement just to support people affected by this. I believe that movement is called feminism. that is how I don’t see the place for trans women in that movement.
that doesn’t mean I don’t support trans women. They are helping to break down the gender barriers assigned to the sexes by engaging in activities that men consider “womanly” and simultaneously “weak.” however, engaging in activities that men historically limited women to does not make you a woman. the insinuation that being drawn to girly things (the products of a culture bent on keeping girls pretty and vacant) makes them women is misogynistic in itself.
I am all for the trans community- a large part of the people I love and care about are trans including some of my past lovers -and I would never purposefully do or support anything that goes against their wellbeing. But, this has me at a crossroads.
Honestly, I’ve never done much research on terfs so I’m not very educated on this subject. I’ve just heard that they’re transphobic and I immediately coined terfs as people I shouldn’t and/or don’t support or associate with. But, this post right here has made me think and I really would like to respectfully talk about this with a few people without stepping on anyone’s toes.
my two cents: the interesting thing is that a lot of radfems say they don’t want trans ppl in the feminist community, because it takes away from the discrimination that women face by adding “men” into the mix. however, trans women literally go through 100x more of a struggle and face more discrimination- both for being women and for being trans. so, by including trans identities in your feminism, you are actually adding much more validity to the statement that women are oppressed by society. sure women are oppressed in some ways due to their genitals, like regarding periods and period products. but CIS men are the main detriment to women’s rights, and i genuinely feel like you don’t lose anything by being just slightly more inclusive to trans men who have periods, or trans women expressing identity.
I don’t have the time right now but can someone please give this person the actual stats about rates of violence against women vs rates of violence against TW? It is absolutely crazy to claim TW experience 100x more violence than ALL FEMALES IN THE WORLD. (And frankly these precise stats do not exist.) 3 women per day are murdered in the US. 33 TW were murdered in the US in one year. (2022). Why do you think the MMIW genocide continues to happen daily and barely anybody talks about it, but everytime a TW is murdered it makes the news?
And dude, this may be shocking to you since you seem to believe the opposite but trans men are included in radical feminism BECAUSE THEY ARE FEMALE. It doesn’t matter if we as radfems agree with them or their religion/politics, or even like them. They are female and thus included. Feminism is for all females, regardless of politics, race, religion, sexuality, gender identity, mental illness, or even how despicable they are. Yeah radical feminism includes ultra right wing tradwives, crazy tankies, ultra left anarchists, scientologist women, Muslim women, trans men, bisexual women, baby murderesses, female CEOs, female prostitutes, etc etc etc ANY FEMALE. Even the women that hate us and completely disagree on absolutely everything.
Idgaf about their mental illness or pronouns. None of that is external material reality either from a biological or sociological perspective. All radical feminism includes trans men automatically on account of them having female bodies and being women oppressed under patriarchy. You can claim that cuz they call themselves “he/him” and “men” makes them not women or female, but no. Men know exactly who to oppress and it’s gor nothing to do with wearing a suit or cutting off your breasts. Men oppress all female people. Period. Patriarchy is just like that. And if you truly think trans men are not on predatory straight males radar, I have a bridge to sell you lol
we might have to agree to disagree because i don't have the energy to argue. however, one point sticks out to me-
"And if you truly think trans men are not on predatory straight males radar, I have a bridge to sell you lol"
to me, straight men will go after cis women, trans men AND trans women.
you argue that they go after cis women and trans men because they are both AFAB. i argue that they oppress cis women because cis women are women.
i argue that cis men oppress trans men not because they are AFAB, but because they are trans.
i argue that cis men oppress trans women by virtue that they are both trans AND women.
this is where intersectionality and the magnification of oppression come in.
which is ALSO why it is not productive to exclude trans women from feminism and womanhood, as they experience this intersectional and magnified version of unique oppression (barring reproductive oppression). furthermore, we can include trans men in feminism in order to adequately advocate for their AND cis women's reproductive rights.
feminism need not be so restrictive that it excludes trans people, as their inclusion ensures their safety but also reinforces the legitimacy of feminism. but i will concede that feminism need not be so all-inclusive that it dilutes the reproductive experiences of cis women either. in conclusion, there is a balance to be struck where everyone's experiences are included, but the most pressing and all-encompassing are prioritized (this is somewhat subjective, unfortunately).
lonely people are like nooooo i love the silence i love being by myself and then you ask them how their day has been and they tear up a bit
I am learning to imagine the future:
My sycamore tree began life in the gravel at the edge of a parking lot. If trees can feel pain, that is a painful, unlucky death. I carefully dug it up and put it in a pot I made out of a disposable cup.
Hello small one. This world may be cruel, but I will not be.
I decided to take care of it, not expecting it to survive, and when my sycamore tree unfurled one tiny leaf and then another, it chiseled a tiny foothold in my terrified brain, the kind of brain that doesn't remember a world before the atomic bomb and before 9/11.
I googled the lifespans of trees. My neurons had to stretch and expand to accommodate what I learned: My sycamore tree may live five hundred years. It's hard to think something so big. In twenty years, my baby sycamore tree will be three stories tall, and the home of many creatures. In five years, my sycamore tree will be taller than I am. In one year, it will be summer.
There's this concept called sense of foreshortened future where people who have lived through trauma can't conceptualize a future for themselves because deep down they don't expect to survive, When I look forward, all I see is fire and death, melting ice and burning sky. We were raised Evangelical. All we see is Judgment Day, except there is no heaven.
But now there is a tiny gap in the wall, a crack in the door of my cell
and on the other side, I see a tree
There is, in the future, a great old sycamore tree, full of clean winds and the stir of a thousand wings. A hundred years from now. Fifty years from now. There will be forests in that world. There will be a world.
It takes courage, but we have to imagine it.
Most tree species can live in excess of three or four hundred years. I think I'm learning something. I think there are ancient voices saying hello small one, touch the dirt and the leaves, for now you are part of something that cannot die
in 2030 I will be thirty years old and the world will not have ended and there will still be hummingbirds, and we will have photos of the stars more beautiful than we can now imagine.
I planted an Eastern Redcedar; they may live nine hundred years. There will be nine hundred years. The people in that time will remember us. Maybe we will meet the aliens (hi aliens!).
I will blow out the candles on many birthday cakes in a world where there are wolves in dark forests far from home. I am learning to imagine the future. I learned recently that elk were reintroduced to the Appalachian Mountains after over a hundred years of extirpation, and that they are expanding their range.
That tiny crack I can see through now opens a tiny bit more:
Maybe elk will pass through my hometown, maybe there will be a forest where the pasture is on the high hill that I can see from my home
say it, say it, say it: ten years, thirty years, a hundred years from now
I am learning to imagine the future. There is a crack in the wall of this prison, of this machine, of this darkness, and through it, I see a tree.
this year, the titanic film (1997) turns 25. meaning, it's time for leonardo dicaprio to break up with it.
this year, the titanic film (1997) turns 25. meaning, it's time for leonardo dicaprio to break up with it.