Sade Olutola
Cosmic Funnies
Not today Justin
KIROKAZE
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸

shark vs the universe

No title available
art blog(derogatory)
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
No title available
d e v o n

Origami Around
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
Show & Tell

pixel skylines

bliss lane
No title available
Noah Kahan
Monterey Bay Aquarium
untitled
seen from Singapore

seen from Uruguay

seen from Uruguay

seen from Spain
seen from Jamaica
seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from India
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Argentina

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
@transscriptual
Wait wait wait I realised this may not be common knowledge so I want to share it. If you're making something and you want to make sure it is visually accessible contrast-wise, take an image of it and reduce the saturation to zero then stand back to the distance someone would realistically view it.
I should be very clear that this is not an exact replica of how someone with colourblindness of any type or other visual symptoms would see this -- this is just a hack to help a person with normal vision figure out contrast. I have VSS and my other diagnoses affect my eye muscles so having multiple types of contrast (e.g., colour as well as lightness or colour as well as texture) is really important even though my vision is relatively normal by optometrist standards.
This is an idea for checking your visual Accessibility!
This post came up in conversation once and I tried to google and find it but every variation on the caption I typed in made google hit me with their "hey man, maybe stop searching for racist memes" followed by 10,000 explicitly racist memes and, crucially, not this post. While I am glad this is a feature google has, it definitely did not help me find this post (which is not racist) but it did show me a lot memes (that were on purpose racist)
Me: "Damn people are REALLY BAD at knowing when to tag their eyestrain art/images...either that or they just don't care about photosenitive epileptic people like me. I feel really sad now." Person: "But Allison, what if they just don't know or understand what qualifies as eyestrain and what doesn't?" Me: "You know what? That could be a factor...While it is always better to be safe rather than sorry (so YES people should always tag eyestrain even if they're unsure if it "counts" or not) maybe you've got a point?"
Anyways! HERE'S YOUR HANDY GUIDE TO WHAT CAN COUNT AS EYESTRAIN! I'm pulling this straight from the Artfight rules page about what needs to be labeled and filtered as eyestrain because it's VERY helpful and VERY accurate! I also know not everybody has an AF account and might not always have access to this handy guide, and this is an important resource; That's why I'm sharing it here! (under the cut)
PLEASE TAKE THIS SERIOUSLY!!! THIS IS ABOUT THE HEALTH AND SAFETY OF OTHERS!!!
by the way this is medical. this could save somebody from a migraine all the way to a seizure. this has always been serious. treat this seriously.
[PT: all-caps Please take it seriously!! This is about the health and safety of others!
Picture ID below the cut:
How do screenreaders navigate all the complex HTML and UI elements on a webpage? Like header bars and buttons and sidebars and other dividers on a page, and things like that.
This one may unfortunately be a little bit above my pay grade. I don’t know too much about the technicalities of HTML or web coding.
What I can tell you is that most of those elements are announced when we land on one and that we often use shortcut keys to jump to useful elements. We can quickly jump between headings, links, buttons, combo boxes, and form controls. If these things are not marked up properly, it can interfere with our ability to navigate the Page efficiently.
One of the most common accessibility barriers we face is actually unlabeled buttons. This is especially prevalent in mobile apps. It is not uncommon for me to download a new trendy app, only to open it and find that every single button in it is completely unlabeled so all I hear everywhere I touch is “button.” As you can imagine, this can make even the most simple apps completely unusable. Buttons must have accurate labels, not just the visual appearance of one. If the visual image on the button says submit, then the actual label should also say submit. This can also be a problem sometimes with unlabeled links.
Similarly, headings that are not actually marked as headings are a common issue. This is most common in documents rather than proper webpages—often times someone will make a word document and they will make a fake heading by just changing the font size to 40 without actually choosing the heading style. When a heading isn’t actually properly marked as a heading, this means that to a screen reader, all of that text is body text so we cannot use the heading shortcut to skip to different sections with different headings. Jumping between headings is a major way that many of us navigate webpages and documents quickly and get a sense of what kinds of information are present without having to manually arrow through all of it. It’s one of the closest things we have to skimming.
For things like side bars, these are often considered regions which we can also jump to with a shortcut. Sometimes these are also not correctly labeled or marked which can make them a little bit harder for us to find or understand what we are looking at when we are manually tabbing through links on it. However, if by sidebar you meant the visual divider, we do not interact with that element.
Dividers in general are not meant to be interacted with by a screen reader because it just adds clutter. One common piece of accessibility advice given is actually deliberately not to describe purely decorative dividers, such as a swirly line between paragraphs, because it adds unnecessary elements for us to move through and adds no functional benefit to us.
Beyond these things, my understanding of how it all works on a technical level comes to an end. I can tell you how I use a screen reader and I can tell you how I navigate websites in general terms, but I am definitely not a coder or web designer of any kind so I can’t get too far into the weeds of how it all works under the hood. I hope this is a useful enough explanation though to answer the broad strokes of your question.
[ ID: A tweet from @/StructuredSucc.
It reads, "Autistic couples out here trading off tags based on each other's sensory sensitivities.
"Me: I'll do the loud task if I don't have to touch [capitals] THAT HORRIFIC THING [end capitals] * gestures at the microfibre duster *
"My partner: [capitals] DEAL! [end capitals]
"Us both, under our breath: Sucker." End ID. ]
how it feels to have no social media presence as an artist
[ ID: A two-panel, black-and-white comic with a person with spiked hair looking at a laptop.
In the first panel, the person gets a notification of "two notes" from the computer.
In the second panel, the person is smirking and pointing at the computer. The person says, "Oh yeah this one's a hit." End ID. ]
I am sorry if I ever put images without IDs on this blog. Sometimes I got to add it to my drafts, and I guess I misclick to post it now or queue it.
If you see that, you can message me.
to anyone reading this: be proud of yourself for continuing on— even when you thought you couldn’t hold on any longer. I see you, I love you, and I am routing for you every step of the way.
[ ID: A tweet from @/theuppitynegro that says "Shoutout to everyone who survived their own suicidal thoughts this year. Glad you're still here!" End ID. ]
Please don't include personal commentary in your alt texts and image identifications. That's what tags or post text are for, not within the accessibility tool.
It's cool that you've never seen polka dots on adults in other comic artists comics or irl and take it as fact that adults wear polka dot shirts because Bill Waterson does include them, but it's really unneeded in the alt text - no matter if you put it in parentheses before you describe the image or not.
[ ID: Four screenshots of a reddit thread and comments and a gif. The thread is from r/ Ask Reddit.
The first image is an ask from gotwire that asks, "What's something you found on a partner's phone that instantly changed the relationship forever -- but they never knew you saw it?"
The second image is from timothywilliams2017, who answers with "A few years ago, I was adding some items to the Notes app grocery list on my wife's phone. The app opened to the most recent list, which was a copy of her wedding vows with the promises she made to me (things like supporting my dreams, being my partner in crazy adventures).
"Beside each one was a list of ideas to match - including some things we had done recently. We were going through a rough patch at the time and seeing that list doubled my resolve to work through it."
The third image is a reply from fameone098 that says, "There was a photo album of nothing but pictures of me and our son titled, 'My Perfect Men.' There were pictures in there I didn't even know about - him helping me wash my car, us laying on the couch, him teaching me Minecraft, me helping him ride a bike, etc.
"I was a mess for a while. Ugly crying. Happy tears, but ugly crying. I had no idea I was loved so deeply by her.
"My wife is quiet, introverted, and didn't quite grow up in an environment that was outwardly loving. I wasn't snooping at all, but asked her to share some pictures of our son after a sports day at his school. I saw her in a different light after that. Our already good marriage hit a level I didn't even know was possible."
The last reply is from Less_Party. It says, "Photo of myself shirtless crudely edited to look like I was making out with Shadow the Hedgehog."
The gif is from the movie Diary of a Wimpy Kid. It shows a kid in a sweater vest waving with a smile, and then he looks down, expression changing to a confused or concerned face. End ID. ]
the constant tension between "users won't click" and "users won't scroll down" and the arguments it causes during design & development makes me want turn myself into a monastery in search of peace. look, if i remove all the clicks, everything has to be on one page—so then you must scroll. if i do the reverse and make it so that scrolling isn't necessary, then i have to ask you to click stuff. not all websites can function like a static social media graphic i am so so sorry :weep:
and really these two issues become small when the third, biggest player enters the ring: users will not read.
[ ID: A person in a green cloak labeled "users don't scroll" standing in front of a large skeleton labeled "users don't read" and many small skeletons. One of the small skeletons has a sword and is in the air in front of the person in a green cape, and it's labeled "users don't click." End ID. ]
pov: you are a piece of shiny plastic
[ ID: A close-up image of a raven staring into the camera. End ID. ]
[ ID: A screenshot of a tweet from @/ ItalianFiesta. The user quoted a tweet that was deleted and added, "Toothpaste was $7.49 da other day. I just stole it. It wasn't even outta my price range. It was just disrespectful to read tbh." End ID. ]
Just a set of quick photos I did for class.
Chronic illness 101.
This is a simple yet beautiful depiction of thousands of people’s daily lives. Everyone who does not understand the Spoon Theory or chronic illness (physical or mental) needs to see this kind of thing.
Some days I start my day in that half-drained yellow stage. Some days I start my day even lower.
[ ID: Five images of an arm with a battery tattoo doing various tasks. The first image is the person lying in bed with a full green battery on their arm. The second image shows the person holding a toothbrush with slightly less green in their battery. The third image shows the person pushing clothes aside in their closet with half of a yellow battery. The fourth image is them grabbing their backpack with an almost fully depleted red battery. The last image is the person reaching for the front door. A watch covers some of the battery but it is fully depleted. End ID. ]
Babe, you okay? you reblogged “and we were nice to each other” like 12 times again
i drew this comic more than 10 years ago :) couldnt even tell u who i was thinking of now cuz i hardly remember… cant believe it resonated with so many people!!!
[ ID: A black-and-white comic strip titled "07:48 AM." The first panel shows a laptop screen with a social media platform open on it. The text reads "We might not be close." The second is a person with long hair lying on the ground facing the laptop, saying "but I'm happy we talked a little." The third panel is the person and laptop from above with the text "and we were nice to each other."
All the text together reads, "We might not be close, but I'm happy we talked a little, and we were nice to each other." End ID. ]