tumblr dot com
NASA

izzy's playlists!
Monterey Bay Aquarium

ellievsbear
Cookie Run:Kingdom Official!
RMH
Doug Jones
Color Me Curious
official daine visual archive
macklin celebrini has autism

Love Begins

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
YOU ARE THE REASON

No title available
ojovivo
todays bird
Fai_Ryy
Mike Driver
The Stonewall Inn
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Russia
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye

seen from Germany

seen from India

seen from Türkiye
@trigunotacureblogs
im literally in tears what the fuck
this is literally just how final fantasy x-2 goes
get lost!
every time
Never Learned - Gator Days
...the alt text?
Every so often online you’ll hear about a woman who spilled McDonald’s coffee on her lap that sued McDonald’s. It’s touted as the prime example of a frivolous lawsuit, and McDonald’s have put in a lot of money to spin the case that way.
I'm sick of seeing that lie peddled by clickbait news sites and popular accounts trying to ridicule her with "Oh you didn't expect coffee to be hot?".
What actually happened should radicalise you.
In 1994, Stella Liebeck, who was 79 years old, spilled coffee on her lap while in the passengers seat of the car. The coffee was dangerously hot and caused third-degree burns over 16% of her body including her inner thighs and genitals.
*Warning - Very graphic images of the burns*
Image 1.
Image 2.
Stella originally tried to settle with McDonald's for the cost of her medical care - $20,000. They only offered her $800.
Throughout the case it was discovered that McDonald's were selling coffee between 30-40 degrees higher than other places. That change in temperature causes third-degree burns much faster, if it had been from somewhere else she would have had roughly 20 seconds to wipe away the coffee and avoid third-degree burns.
McDonald's were behind the smear campaign against her, so whenever you see anyone spread their misinformation, you can now correct them.
Reblogging because I’ve just seen someone doing McDonald’s PR for them *again*
Dungeon Meshi Cookbook - The Process.
I love that thing when people get a little bit tongue-tied and garble what they’re trying to say so they make a little “blegh” 👅 noise and start over. verbal reset button. hitting the top of the tv to unscramble the signal
on sharing one's opinons
Felt like I needed to share my experience as well
i feel like I'm not loudly anti ai enough so here's this
FUCK AI
FIND OUT WHERE THEY'RE PUTTING DATA CENTERS IN YOUR TOWN AND TELL THEM YOU HATE THAT SHIT
EDUCATE FAMILY
CREATE MORE NOW THAN EVER BEFORE
LOVE YOUR ART AND THE ART OF OTHERS
I LOVE YOU
play Kingdom Hearts
Addendum:
Are the same person
Not the same person
Play kingdom hearts
showed this to my brother and he made this
thanks I understand even less
"But AI can't do your job. It can help you do your job, but that doesn't mean it's going to save anyone money. Take radiology: there's some evidence that AIs can sometimes identify solid-mass tumors that some radiologists miss, and look, I've got cancer. Thankfully, it's very treatable, but I've got an interest in radiology being as reliable and accurate as possible. If my Kaiser hospital bought some AI radiology tools and told its radiologists: "Hey folks, here's the deal. Today, you're processing about 100 x-rays per day. From now on, we're going to get an instantaneous second opinion from the AI, and if the AI thinks you've missed a tumor, we want you to go back and have another look, even if that means you're only processing 98 x-rays per day. That's fine, we just care about finding all those tumors." If that's what they said, I'd be delighted. But no one is investing hundreds of billions in AI companies because they think AI will make radiology more expensive, not even if that also makes radiology more accurate. The market's bet on AI is that an AI salesman will visit the CEO of Kaiser and make this pitch: "Look, you fire 9/10s of your radiologists, saving $20m/year, you give us $10m/year, and you net $10m/year, and the remaining radiologists' job will be to oversee the diagnoses the AI makes at superhuman speed, and somehow remain vigilant as they do so, despite the fact that the AI is usually right, except when it's catastrophically wrong. "And if the AI misses a tumor, this will be the human radiologist's fault, because they are the 'human in the loop.' It's their signature on the diagnosis." This is a reverse centaur, and it's a specific kind of reverse-centaur: it's what Dan Davies calls an "accountability sink." The radiologist's job isn't really to oversee the AI's work, it's to take the blame for the AI's mistakes. This is another key to understanding – and thus deflating – the AI bubble. The AI can't do your job, but an AI salesman can convince your boss to fire you and replace you with an AI that can't do your job. This is key because it helps us build the kinds of coalitions that will be successful in the fight against the AI bubble." - Cory Doctorow, The Reverse Centaur’s Guide to Criticizing AI
link to bluesky post
In addition to how to turn various things, it includes:
Other useful AI Removal/Detection links
How to spot AI Hallucinations like a Reference Librarian (originally on Substack)
Library Freedom Project has a lot of handouts about AI on their Resources page
Everyone's Friend