Marissa Mayer's career has been marked with trail blazing accomplishments such as being Google's twentieth employee and first female engineer after she graduated from university, to her most recent role as CEO and President at Yahoo.
The latter making her one of the most powerful people in the tech industry and unarguably one of the most visibly powerful women in a male dominated industry. In such a fast paced industry like technology, where continual evolution and adaptation is the status-quo progressive thinking, disruption and innovation is the bloodline to its survival and future development. When Mayer was photographed for a shoot in Vogue she was faced with scrutiny and criticism as some feminist deemed it inappropriate behaviour for a CEO and female role model.
The criticism lay in the positioning of her body – the photo shows Mayer posed upside down on a futuristic chaise lounge skewed in an unconventional horizontal angle, wearing a conservative Michael Kors royal blue dress with Yves Saint Laurent black stiletto’s. Her critics felt her shoot undermined her position of authority and power and presents her as being objectified therefore playing into misogynistic stereotypes - especially as men of a similar stature and position would not be depicted as being passive. Whilst she had her detractors, there were other women who were in support and responded positively, believing that woman can be powerful, smart and beautiful and need not be exclusive from one another.
Although, I agree with the latter viewpoint, I am aware that as a cis-gendered man, it would be grossly unfair to speak on the experience of women and would be happily corrected if missing the point. However I would like to add, without sounding like the condescending voice of patriarchy, feel there should be some context added. If this had been a shoot for Forbes or Business Insider I would be inclined to agree with the former. The article to accompany the now controversial photo shoot was about unconventional leadership, which makes sense why the shoot went from sitting upright to the end result of upside down – it ended up being a literal metaphor. It must also be noted that Mayer had previously appeared in Vogue in 2009 whilst still working at Google and the photographs from that shoot depicted her giving a presentation and being in a lab in more conventional and less fashion led poses. I would also think in this instance Mayer’s visibility as a role model, a role that we do not know that Mayer embraces. If for arguments sake she does, she is connecting, engaging and inspiring women on a wider spectrum with different interests and ideas that may be exposed to one type of magazine but not the other.
Those offended by the shoot, are entitled to be and there is definitely credence to their criticism. However, femininity is continuously being redefined. Modern femininity is fashioned in plurality, it is definitely not a clearly defined monolithic set of values, and placing it under such a lens disregards individual or multiple expressions, making it rather exclusive and homogenised.
The fact there is a debate, indicates friction surrounding the wider discourse of contemporary femininity and womanhood with regards to correct and/or incorrect expressions. The Mayer story while intended to be anecdotal, exemplifies the issue of successful woman and societies thinking on how they should behave. Consequently, the issue arises as to whether the notion of women and success is prescriptive. Is there only one type of success for women – success in a male dominated world and is that the barometer of success for all women or even an aspiration.
Dior’s ‘The future is gold’ advert for the J’adore fragrance featuring long-term celebrity endorser Charlize Theron, lends itself to the current tensions around the evolution and thinking behind modern femininity and womanhood.
Dior as a brand has been going through transition since the firing of creative director Galliano in 2011. When Raf Simons took over in 2012, he decided on a markedly different design direction, choosing a more refined modern and energetic style over the flamboyant, theatrical and romantic influences employed by his predecessor. The advert introduces the concept of progress and forward thinking to match the design sensibilities adopted by Simons era at Dior. The Dior brand is rich in heritage and inherently Parisian. Whilst Simons has a taken a modernist approach, he respects the brand lineage choosing to play with historical Dior codes as lateral inspiration to design for the twenty-first century woman. He embodies the spirit of Christian Dior himself; in 1947 Harpers Bazaar editor Carmel Snow christened his first collections as being a ‘New Look’ because of the revolutionary and innovative designs. So it is no surprise that the advert opens with a panoramic view of the Galerie des Glaces (Hall of Mirrors) the central gallery at the Palace of Versailles. The palace, built in the early seventeenth century, acts not only as a symbol of French heritage but a reminder of the Absolute Monarchy under the Ancien Regime, an archaic world before the onset of new thinking that accompanied the age of entitlement, French revolution and eventual establishment of the first French republic. The sound of footsteps in heels in the gallery can be heard before they are seen. The footsteps are those of a steady stride, confident and assured. We then witness the emergence of Theron’s legs through the thigh high split of her unapologetically feminine gold dress. Her legs draped by the willowing ethereal train - skimming the floor with each step in her golden pumps. The dress with its soft shimmering metallic body undoubtedly pays homage to the design of the J’adore bottle.
Theron walks towards the camera, drawing connection to the idea of forwardness and progression. The opening line ‘The past can be beautiful, a memory, a dream, but it’s no place to live’ further substantiates this. As she continues to walk, a satin rope gracefully appears from the ceiling of the gallery to the floor. As she approaches it she casually throws her black shawl behind her as if she was ridding herself of bereft for the past. Theron proceeds to crack her fingers; as a means of demonstrating willful determination before kicking off her heels and tugging the satin rope and wrapping it around her leg, before climbing. As she makes her ascension up the rope, she does so with all the grace and strength of an acrobat, but the task still seems arduous.
A pivotal moment in advert that steers the narrative from simply being about new thinking and progression - and more about modern femininity is when Theron is about halfway up the rope she grabs the multiple strand pearl necklace adorned around her neck and forceful tugs at it breaking the thread with them scattering to the floor alongside her heels.
Pearls have long been associated with femininity and beauty. Her forcefully breaking the pearls is an act of rebellion it indicates a sense of breaking free and gives a feeling of release by removing the burden of societal pressures and expectation held against modern women – tying in with the Marissa Mayer story. Once the pearls have been removed, there is clear sense of relief, almost like it was a neck shackle hindering her journey because she now moves effortlessly; striving upward now defining her success and femininity on her own terms.
As she continues her path up the satin rope, it is evident it is her escape route to leave both the antiquated thinking and world behind. A circle with penetrating light is now visible - it would be safe to say based on the paintings of clouds surrounding it, that it was the entrance to heaven, but it is in fact a portal to a new world and we are told as much from the voiceover narration. This world is far removed from the one she has just left. It is distinguishably modern with design aesthetics we now associate with contemporary architecture. The skyline of this new world would rival any cosmopolitan city like Dubai who prides themselves on their modernity.
It is no coincidence that this new world is visibly brighter compared to the old world left behind, it is illuminated with a gold tinted glow an attribute that is befitting of an enlightened and utopian world.
When Theron pulls herself through the portal she is both literally and figuratively walking on top of the world. You sense this is where she belongs; so much so that the outline of her body resembles the buildings even her dress imitates the glass panes.
When she declares ‘The future is gold’ – the gold in reference does have literal significance relating to the product identity. But the gold spoken of here is used figuratively to define the concept of wealth, reward and success. Although it would be obvious to think that it would refer to financial or material wealth due to cultural cues surrounding gold, this may not necessarily be the case. There is no solid definition of what success or reward is, it is purposefully nebulous and interpretive, after all success is relative and plural just like the women they are communicating with.











