sometimes i think those bad woke shows and movies are bad on purpose to make ppl see the left as pathetic and cringe and the right as edgy and counterculture

PR's Tumblrdome
Sade Olutola
Acquired Stardust

Discoholic 🪩
Peter Solarz

JBB: An Artblog!
occasionally subtle
Monterey Bay Aquarium
wallacepolsom
styofa doing anything

No title available
noise dept.
No title available
No title available

Love Begins
tumblr dot com
Jules of Nature
d e v o n

@theartofmadeline
$LAYYYTER
seen from United States

seen from Ukraine
seen from United States
seen from Canada

seen from United States
seen from Türkiye

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Mexico
seen from Türkiye

seen from United States

seen from Indonesia

seen from United States

seen from Brazil

seen from United States
seen from Spain

seen from United States

seen from Singapore

seen from United States
@vulva-holic
sometimes i think those bad woke shows and movies are bad on purpose to make ppl see the left as pathetic and cringe and the right as edgy and counterculture
it’s so annoying seeing comments like this under videos of gay men talking or just walking around bc it’s like. do u think he doesnt know he sounds gay? do u think he doesnt know his mannerism’s make him appear feminine ? “his guns pink” “ur girly pop” “somebody’s fruity” like it’s not even jokes anymore it’s just homophobia he isnt stupid he knows that others will know hes gay that isn’t the point of his video omfg
currently, the mainstream criticism of rape culture essentially posits that 1 in 10 men are the “bad guys” and the rest are complicit bystanders that need to step up and keep the bad ones accountable. idk if its just my trust issues talking but I genuinely believe that the non-rapist men are in the minority. maybe they’re not forceful, but they’re coercive. or they take advantage of people too drunk or high to consent. and if they haven’t done any of that, they’ve at least thought about it.
Men will be like, 🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️ NO ONE HAS EVER SUFFERED AS SILENTLY AS ME. LOOK AT HOW SILENTLY IM SUFFERING. NO ONE CAN TELL I AM LIKE THE JOCKER 🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️
has anyone else noticed the obsession loser men currently have with ana de armas? like specifically when they pit her against zendaya or margot robbie in those “hollywood ‘supermodel’ vs. average mcdonalds cashier” memes. what’s up with that
I'm %10000 convinced that "straight" men's obsession with femboys and trannies is mostly false and just another attempt to get women's self esteem to lower so they'll lower thwir standards too. all this talk about how a hot tranny (oxymoron) is better than an ugly woman and etc is no different from men calling incredibly gorgeous women (margot robbie) mid but actually mid guys (ryan gosling) are sex gods and they'd go gay for him. they know it's not true but men are always gonna push for men to be viewed as thw prize and more sexually desirable than women to try to get even more privilege and control in relationships than they already have. Much to think about
we need to find a way to shutup tiktok skincare girlies
men go so hard for men. the most degenerate, disgusting man could enter the room and you could be like “yo that dude is a creep he asked me for feet pics and I don’t feel comfortable around him” and your friend of ten years will be like “he’s not so bad” because they once had a 10 minute conversation about how awesome a film maker tarantino is or w/e
i rember when i was in high school, hearing a teacher say “lebron james is rich, the guy who hands him his paycheck is wealthy”, and i think that that’s a really simple illustration of wealth and class that a lot of young leftists these days do not understand
i see a lot of young leftists these days thinking that “having a lot of money = oppressor”, which shows a fundamental misunderstanding in how social classes and the dynamics of power in society work, and as a result they go after actors, athletes, even youtubers, but the thing is most actors, athletes, and youtubers don’t actually own capital. actors don’t own disney or warner bros or 20th century fox, athletes don’t own their stadiums or sponsorship companies, and youtubers certainly don’t own youtube or advertising companies that sponsor youtube channels
many highly successful actors, athletes, and youtubers DO start their own businesses once they’ve amassed enough wealth, but it has to be understood that the large majority acquire their wealth through paychecks given to them, rather than through owning the means of production, and it’s the owning of capital that really determines who runs society and who doesn’t, because it’s those who own the means of production who gets to decide the affluence or poverty of those who don’t
Thank you, oh my god. This is the exact post I’ve been wanting to make forever. Nobody who works for a paycheck, even if that paycheck is very large, is a capitalist. Actors and professional athletes and pop stars are not bourgeoisie.
The most accurate term for these people is “labor aristocracy.” The concept of the labor aristocracy is kind of controversial, but it refers to a class of workers who are paid high wages in exchange for being used as a tool of capitalism against their own interests. Lenin particularly wrote about this class being used as a tool for imperialism, and that is absolutely the purpose of American celebrities. (Cultural “soft power” and the creation of foreign markets for American goods/media.) Celebrities are essentially living advertisements for American goods and media. That is what their high salaries are for - they are selling more than just labor time or the products of their labor to the bourgeoisie, they are selling their very selves. That is not what true wealth and power is. They are, in fact, workers. They are workers who live in very nice houses and drive very nice cars and wear very nice clothes, but their relationship to the means of production is more like yours and mine than that of a CEO.
It’s a hot take, OP, but it’s a very good one.
"cunty" just say fashionable you sound so fucking stupid
currently very annoyed at the reddit people posts on this site its always “hur dur what do we do here im so clueless teehee” and then thousands of women descend on the post to treat the unwashed reddit moid like he’s one of their precious blorbos
IM FUCKING CRYING
on the subject of individual actions, they do matter, which is why men flip out when the measured birth rate stagnates/doesn’t increase or drops. they worry and they get upset and they cry and they scream and they publish articles about how men are in a crisis and it’s all our fault because we are making selfish individual choices that don’t benefit their collective. it adds up. you may not think your individual impact is much, but men as a group, especially men in high places, usually pay a whole lot more attention to the individual choices of women than you might think. and they react. that’s all i’m saying
Hey, Depp Cult: It’s over, and you got nothing that you wanted.
The appeal is settled. That means Depp’s case is dismissed with prejudice and he signed a settlement in which Amber Heard denied liability. After spending 26 million dollars on lawsuits in two countries, all Depp has to show for it is a twice-upheld ruling that he’s a wife-beater and also a piece of paper that says seven idiots agreed with him. He can wipe his ass with that or roll a blunt, it’s his choice.
Amber is free. He can’t relitigate their relationship anymore. She has no gag order, no injunction, no NDA. She did not accept guilt. On Instagram today, she stated that the UK court found she had been subjected to domestic and sexual violence, and he can’t touch her for saying that. He’s toothless.
She’s not paying a cent; her insurance is. Depp spent 26 million and got one million back. What a deal.
Oh, and her countersuit still stands. He still owes her two million. So let’s take a tally: Judge granted Heard a restraining order, UK judgment (upheld twice on appeal) found Depp was a wife-beater and rapist, VA jury found that Depp defamed Heard through Waldman, and now Depp’s verdict against her no longer matters and isn’t worth the paper it’s printed on. That’s Amber: 4, Depp: 0.
Depp will never have a career resurgence, because in his own words, he’s “never getting clean and sober.” Big studios won’t touch him. He’s out of Pirates. He’s out of Fantastic Beasts. He’s already ruining his reputation in the European indie scene with his horrible behavior on set. His music is shit. He looks like his liver is trying to claw its way free of his body.
Meanwhile, Amber’s still Mera in Aquaman. She has about as much screen time in the sequel as she did in the original. She has another film, In the Fire, coming out in 2023. She’s free to resume her activism work. And one day she’ll write a tell-all book and be the star of multiple documentaries about how she was vilified and wronged, and maybe you remoras will feature in those documentaries, dressed as poop or giggling over a victim describing her rape.
(Don’t forget, the Internet is forever! One day your kids will see that, and then they’ll go no contact.)
And let’s not forget that now, thanks to your efforts to unseal court documents, the whole world knows that Depp’s dick doesn’t work.
Bravo.
Why do you think patriarchy is not natural?
Because patriarchy forms a massively complex and intricate social system in which men can structurally and individually oppress women. I believe the formation of patriarchy is historical rather than natural and that the biological differences between men and women do not automatically form power systems ruled by men.
As much as we say, "Oh it's a disadvantage that women get pregnant and men don't have to and men are stronger." The most important thing in any group context is communication, not brute strength. and women's pregnancies allow them to know who their children are with absolute certainty and have access to a matrilineal lineage while for men their paternity is never certain. It took a lot of different major developments in order to build the structures that allowed men to treat and control women as resources. Patriarchy is especially reliant on men knowing who their biological heirs are, and it is not a simple matter to break up and delegitimise the maternal line and sufficiently isolate women from each other, in order to create societies based around the ever so tenuous father's right.
Men have never been moral lol. So when they insist on a return to “traditional values” they are neither talking about morality nor about themselves lol. There has never been a time when men were different from the way they are. What they want is compliance. And the vast majority can no longer afford to buy the compliance their fathers and grandfathers bought. Nor are they able to steal it w as much impunity as their fathers and grandfathers enjoyed. But bc of the way men are and always have been, they will continue to try. And the wider women’s eyes have gotten, the more brazen they have become. W a huff they have dropped the pretense they thought they were so generously affording us. I think it’s about time we dropped the pretense ourselves