Tntblr enjoyer

any pronouns - welcome!! :D I have no excuse for any of this

[werenotacoupleyesyouare]

Hello :D

-You can call me were (or any variation of my username really lol), I am 22 years old and I use any pronouns!

-historically a dsmp account, I am now deep into the Interview with the Vampire/The Vampire Lestat trenches, with a side of The Great on hulu, undertale/deltarune (<- currently playing!), and a bunch of others. I also love the hellaverse but I have a separate sideblog for that

-Armand fan defender and enthusiast. Also Daniel Molloy

-I am a DSMP lore enthusiast! I've been part of tntblr for way too long, but I am also a c!niki and c!clingy enjoyer and connoisseur :3 I focus on the characters alone, I do not support cc!Wilbur nor cc!Dream.

-to be clear, cc!Wilbur Soot/William Gold supporters DNI

-on the topic of mcyt, I also enjoy the QSMP, especially q!tubbo.

-I write a bunch! Here's my ao3 account :D I'm also a volounteer tag wrangler for a bunch of fandoms on there (I do not speak for ao3/OTW in any way)

-I also draw sometimes, and I tag it as #were draws

-I have a sideblog for my Hazbin Hotel/Helluva Boss ramblings and art @muchmorethanmoney :))

that's it for now, hope you have a nice stay! Banners underneath the read more

(qsmp eggs gif by .slimeriana.)

[jackalteacup]

Who even ARE these guys

[ashstfu]

often i am scared for no reason or several reasons

[dsmpartarchive]

30/108 Read from top to bottom

Sorry!! I didn’t think about placement before posting

[b1gm4n1nn1t]

Niki tying up her hair. who is she about to fight?

[an0neemouse]

My darling Ao3ers. With all this Wattpad bullshit going on and the influx of people who don't understand what no censorship actually mean, it is our solemn duty to create disturbing, disgusting, positively unseemly writing for no other reason than to piss them off and prove that we can.

Get freaky my friends.

[minfonica]

mutant woman

[jacobwren]

"But AI can't do your job. It can help you do your job, but that doesn't mean it's going to save anyone money. Take radiology: there's some evidence that AIs can sometimes identify solid-mass tumors that some radiologists miss, and look, I've got cancer. Thankfully, it's very treatable, but I've got an interest in radiology being as reliable and accurate as possible. If my Kaiser hospital bought some AI radiology tools and told its radiologists: "Hey folks, here's the deal. Today, you're processing about 100 x-rays per day. From now on, we're going to get an instantaneous second opinion from the AI, and if the AI thinks you've missed a tumor, we want you to go back and have another look, even if that means you're only processing 98 x-rays per day. That's fine, we just care about finding all those tumors." If that's what they said, I'd be delighted. But no one is investing hundreds of billions in AI companies because they think AI will make radiology more expensive, not even if that also makes radiology more accurate. The market's bet on AI is that an AI salesman will visit the CEO of Kaiser and make this pitch: "Look, you fire 9/10s of your radiologists, saving $20m/year, you give us $10m/year, and you net $10m/year, and the remaining radiologists' job will be to oversee the diagnoses the AI makes at superhuman speed, and somehow remain vigilant as they do so, despite the fact that the AI is usually right, except when it's catastrophically wrong. "And if the AI misses a tumor, this will be the human radiologist's fault, because they are the 'human in the loop.' It's their signature on the diagnosis." This is a reverse centaur, and it's a specific kind of reverse-centaur: it's what Dan Davies calls an "accountability sink." The radiologist's job isn't really to oversee the AI's work, it's to take the blame for the AI's mistakes. This is another key to understanding – and thus deflating – the AI bubble. The AI can't do your job, but an AI salesman can convince your boss to fire you and replace you with an AI that can't do your job. This is key because it helps us build the kinds of coalitions that will be successful in the fight against the AI bubble." - Cory Doctorow, The Reverse Centaur’s Guide to Criticizing AI

[visenyaism]

top five worst ways to be found:

5. out

4. guilty

3. wanting

2. lacking

1. by this email

[nikoco11]

maiden in need of rescue!!! what a horrible terrifying dragon!!!!

[nikoco11]

for anyone curious she is not a princess!!! though she might act like one sometime :3c

[werenotacoupleyesyouare]

Yeah I love that show! Well, I mean, I aknowledge all the ways in which it is Bad. Maybe love is a strong word, I like it well enough. But yeah, I know it's not well written or anything. And the designs are bad! I actually don't even like it, more so I appreciate it critically. From a critical point of view. I look at it through a complex and through critical analysis. It's more of a sarcastic thing, really. I'll watch it, but like, I'm justified in doing so. I enjoy these select elements that my internet ecochamber of people with undiagnosed morality ocd have decided are good. I never enjoy things. I exclusively engage with them intellectually.

And the whole time the show in question is like. Hazbin Hotel

[roycohn]

inspired by a rant i was going on elsewhere bc someone tweeted something very stupid and uninformed about hamlet and it got my back up as someone who took two single-text-focus english literature courses in college and they were on wuthering heights and hamlet, i now put it to all of you on here:

what's "your" shakespeare play?

hamlet

macbeth

the tempest

merchant of venice

midsummer night's dream

twelfth night

richard iii

othello

julius caesar

king lear

another not listed (specify in tags) (i really just put my own top 10 here nbd)

i have no particular feelings about any shakespeare play/results tag

Voting ended onAug 11

[bigjeansss]

I love you means… [devil’s minion animatic]

[bifauxnenarmand]

artist: amfybrahy on Instagram

[softhe4rted]

self-compassion: an antidote to shame mb

[rootingformephistopheles]

I feel it would be good to have a word that's like not ragebait but shamebait, where you can read a post and just go 'ah, this person just wants me to feel ashamed of myself and is not engaging with the issue in a constructive or useful way. I do not have to participate in this actually' and like. move on with your day

[rootingformephistopheles]

I feel it would be good to have a word that's like not ragebait but shamebait, where you can read a post and just go 'ah, this person just wants me to feel ashamed of myself and is not engaging with the issue in a constructive or useful way. I do not have to participate in this actually' and like. move on with your day