I'm sorry about watching the gaylor crash outs after the New York Times interview dropped is hilarious because y'all are acting as if she didn't fire off a huge warning shot with a 1989 prologue. She very clearly does not like the speculation anymore she might have at one point in her life but she doesn't anymore. She probably figured out that do stuff like liner notes wasn't healthy and that's why she hasn't done them in like seven albums now. People change and grow teenage Taylor in early 20s Taylor who would do the secret messages has clearly not existed for a very long time now because she likes her privacy. If you really look at shes done she's kept very consistent with what she said in new heights which is that she never easter eggs her personal life.
If you continue to speculate after Not only the 1989 prologue but now also this New York Times interview you're not a true fan because she's made it clear she's uncomfortable by it.
Ah yes, Prologue Prolapse: the way Taylor's most bigoted fans collectively show their gaping inflamed assholes by reading Taylor's prologues the same way they do their Bibles, picking and choosing the 2 lines they can twist out of context against Gaylors and ignoring the rest.
The 1989 Prologue is about the media. And y'all scapegoating Gaylors over it makes the ACTUAL PEOPLE CAUSING TAYLOR HARM-- the MEDIA-- to keep getting away with it.
If it WAS about the fans, the lines y'all ignore immediately prior would be calling out all the fans who speculate about Joe and Travis and Matty. But y'all never call it up when other segments of the fandom are talking about them, because you don't care what it says, you just wanna "win" against Gaylors.
And the 2 times shes complained about Paternity Testing... that means looking for the MAN INVOLVED IN A SONG'S CREATION, ie the assertion that men are more important to her work than she is. You have to have brain worms to believe that's in any way related to Taylor hating Gaylors.
Because yall Hetlors can't collectively rub 2 brain cells together and you ignore the ACTUAL PROBLEMS, because that would realize recognizing that Y'ALL ARE THE ONE'S TARGETED BY THE PATERNITY TEST QUOTES.
If she "doesn't easter egg about her private life" yall cant have it both ways and say that she can't be flagging queer shit but that she does flag the men. Either you accept what she says or you don't... but you only accept what she says when you think its a win against Gaylors.
But yall don't want to recognize the fact that everything you say about Gaylors includes Taylor because its HER QUEER ASS that put the symbolism there.
