Jacob Anderson talking about the icons that shaped his Louis — Grace Jones & Eartha Kitt (Part ll)
official daine visual archive

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
art blog(derogatory)
trying on a metaphor

Love Begins
Sweet Seals For You, Always
No title available

★

JVL
Game of Thrones Daily
Mike Driver
🪼
hello vonnie
Sade Olutola
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

No title available
d e v o n
occasionally subtle

#extradirty

seen from Malaysia
seen from South Africa

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Vietnam

seen from Australia
seen from United States

seen from Sweden

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Indonesia
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Macao SAR China
seen from United States
seen from United States
@wolfstarslovechild
Jacob Anderson talking about the icons that shaped his Louis — Grace Jones & Eartha Kitt (Part ll)
The things is, I get what they’re trying to do with Armand and Louis is episode 7. The creators said they were going to move the events of Lestat’s past and the relevant arcs to the present. So they took the past conflict between Lestat and Armand and transposed it onto Armand and Louis instead, since the fall out of that relationship is still a fresh wound for Armand.
The problem is, Armand’s current circumstances are not the same as his circumstances back when he met Lestat. Lestat was a revelation to Armand. He upended everything Armand knew and simultaneously showed him a new way of living. It makes sense that Armand would be so desperately attached to Lestat, not just out of love, but because Lestat was a raft when Armand was lost at sea.
The writers are seemingly trying to show how deranged Armand can get when he has nothing solid to give him a purpose or to keep composure. How does Armand behave when everything falls apart? But that’s the thing, Armand does have a new purpose. Multiple. He’s made his first fledgling ever- one he’s in love with. The great conversion is unfolding in front of him, and he once again has a cult following. Armand, who needs purpose to survive and to feel a sense of stability, is currently rich with purpose. And sure, we’re shown those things do matter to Armand, at least to an extent, but the way his actions are framed in the final, they’re all playing second fiddle to his need to lash out in anger towards Louis. All the narrative build up with none of the pay off.
What’s so frustrating is that there’s a lot I like about the Louis and Armand scene. The concept of Armand being filled with this ravenous resentment, this feeling of emptiness he can’t satisfy, this anger he can’t control of completely understand, is genuinely compelling, and with better build up, it could have worked really well. With a few more scenes, we could have better established Armand’s mindset and why he feels so compelled to go after Louis despite everything else going on his life. Instead they hide most of what Armand’s doing this season, seemingly to set up the twist that he’s the one who brought Regina into Louis life, but it’s ultimately an empty twist, devoid of any emotional satisfaction.
There was so much care spent setting up the reveal for season 2, and it worked because it revealed to the audience a part of Armand he had been hiding while still staying true to his motivations and interiority developed throughout the season. This season, we get none of that context. What purpose did this twist serve beyond confirming what people already knew about Armand? What feeling is it supposed to invoke in the audience except a smug satisfaction that Armand is as cartoonishly villainous as many of them thought? What did we actually learn about Armand from this?
What little narrative momentum and sense of interior we get for Armand this season is completely overlooked for the sake of telling us something we already learned about Armand last season. How much more satisfying would it have been if we got to see Armand struggle between the pain and anger caused by his failed relationship with Louis and his new found sense of purpose. How thrilling would it have been to watch Armand spiral into the inevitable conflict between him and Louis in the final. How much more gratifying would Louis empathy towards Armand have felt with just a bit of set up.
I feel like this is the perfect time to remind people (or inform them in they don't already know) that Armand and Daniel's YouTube video is a direct adaptation of this scene from the Devil's Minion chapter
Devil's Minion has landed, baby!
the plainest outfit we've seen lestat in and it's the episode that he spends with louis. he doesn't sexualize himself around louis like he does around gabriella. right [cocks gun]
kinda nervous about something. don’t know what it is yet
what gets you is not that louis and lestat love each other and still love each other though they hate each other because they cannot live without each other, we knew that. what gets you is that they are friends. it takes us two seasons of toxic gothic "i was under his spell" sort of romance to admit that, beside all that, they just like each other. they feel easy and at home in each other's company. they're giggling and cracking each other up. making easy conversation. they're bantering and bickering like an old married couple, because they ARE, and they DO know each other best of anyone. they DO trust each other above all else. they know which buttons to push to drive each other up the wall, and they know when they need to drop the argument and hold the other close. way beyond words, they know each other. their souls are scissoring. nobody talk to me
happyyyy vampiric birthday to myyy boy!!!!!!!!!!!! 🥺
"thank you for loving him, for loving him the way he needs to be loved"
bickering with his baby in the backseat exactly where he wants to be have you ever seen a more delighted creature in all your life
"also i planted the steins just to fuck with you🥰" what kinda lestat fanfic is that😂
can i assist in your endeavors to free armand from tvl
yes i am putting together a rescue party we ride at dawn
The secret episode is coming (Sherlock anyone? Stranger Things anyone?) and it’s Daniel’s documentary and it’s filmed mockumentary and it fixes everything. Trust me.
Louis and Armand? Actually met in a cafe. It was a very productive conversation. Amends were made. Closure was given.
Daniel? Gets to have one episode where he’s not being cartoonishly bigoted.
Regina? Nothing like Claudia. Actually played by Kirsten Dunst.
Gabriella? Still the worst but not quite so… flat? There’s something likable about her?
Interviews with the band. We get to see how they’ve been adjusting to vamp life. Cue one shot of Salamander making his first kill and it’s just:
Oh and Dm. We get real Dm. Not a whole lot. Maybe just a cute little interview with Armand. It’s early days for them so he’s very bashful around Daniel and it’s very sweet, meanwhile he’s answering questions about the death cult he’s been building.
Everything else as a drug-induced hallucination on Lestat’s part but he was so embarrassed he just decided to go with it as the truth.
no words other than rolin jones + the entire writer’s room you will pay for flattening every single main character, how you write women, brutalizing louis and turning armand into a cartoon villain
Final decision is I think the flattening of the characters was intentional.
I’m not saying that to give the writers more credit. I think this is worse than if it were accidental. They’ve always enjoyed setting up things that have payoff in future seasons, but I think it’s a bad choice because it just makes everyone think you’ve forgotten how to write. Not good for the longterm reputation of the show.
Because what is bad is just too consistent. Everyone is flanderised. I mean they had Armand delivering a fucking evil villain monologue for Gods sake. Is he Heinz Doofensmirtz??? Is Louis his platypus nemesis???
(Jacob and Assad still delivered the most beautiful scene of the season in spite of this. They should be very proud.)
The writers certainly did not consider the racial dynamics. And you could write that off as a Lestat thing because it’s not like he’s not wildly xenophobic about Armand in the books. But even if it’s a choice, if it’s your framing device the you are still just writing racist shit.
Zero consideration of Louis and Armand and how it might make them look. I can see Lestat sensationalising the violence against Louis because he’s in love with him and also has always had a blindspot for racism. But when we saw that in him in season 1, it was filtered through Louis so it made sense. This is just racism. It’s excessive and it’s unfair.
And as for Armand, he is being treated exactly how the books treat him. That xenophobia is converted into racism. He was the plot device to absolve Lestat of his wrongdoings in the books, and in show he’s the cartoon villain Assad has spent so long trying to convince people he isn’t.
Yes, there needs to be more writers of colour. But the white writers should still know better. You cannot be this clever in the first two seasons and then drop the ball this hard in the third. It doesn’t add up. They need to work on this too. It will not be resolved solely through having more writers of colour, though they still should.
IWTV 2x05 — "Don't Be Afraid, Just Start The Tape" TVL 3x07 — "The Failures"