block us if you’re anti-zionist. we will not be discussing the topic on this blog, see our main if you want to know our opinions. we will not tolerate or respond to any kind of antisemitic comments or harassment.

Love Begins
Not today Justin

titsay

⁂

Kaledo Art
KIROKAZE
Game of Thrones Daily
d e v o n
RMH
No title available
Sweet Seals For You, Always
Misplaced Lens Cap

if i look back, i am lost

izzy's playlists!

ellievsbear
Mike Driver
wallacepolsom
No title available
DEAR READER
taylor price

seen from North Macedonia
seen from North Macedonia

seen from Sweden
seen from North Macedonia

seen from Morocco

seen from North Macedonia
seen from North Macedonia

seen from Sweden
seen from North Macedonia
seen from United States
seen from North Macedonia

seen from North Macedonia

seen from Thailand

seen from United States

seen from North Macedonia

seen from Vietnam

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from North Macedonia
@yidplural
block us if you’re anti-zionist. we will not be discussing the topic on this blog, see our main if you want to know our opinions. we will not tolerate or respond to any kind of antisemitic comments or harassment.
Shout out to the systems that went through a “I’m fiction kin, oh also im gender fluid, and.. sexuality fluid? My face looks weird but I’m just gonna ignore it. I just have a bad memory, it’s nothing. Why does my name not feel right anymore? I wish I could just wear wigs everyday.” Kind of phase
And all the systems that had a “I refuse to call myself anything other than fiction kin until further notice,OR EVER” phase
this except we were an “irl” in 2020, not fictionkin.
plurality is having someone say "come on, we're getting up" or talking out loud through tasks to help us stay on track and not break down when things are overwhelming. i don't know who does that but thank you
Having no host is nuts, because people truly have no grasp of how plurality works in a system with no host. No matter how extensively you explain it, 9 times out of 10, people immediately start treating us as if the sysmate with our legal name is The Main One (and thus the only one worthy of being spoken to). Or, alternatively, they may also assume that the guy they're talking to (or the guy they think they're talking to) is The Main One.
I find it extremely frustrating, but it's also hilarious. It's like if a guy walked into the US Congress and started asking people who the king of the United States was and whether he could talk to him, and upon hearing "we don't have a king?" invariably from every single person he asked, decided that the janitor must be the king because that's the person he met first.
I think our biggest gripes with the origin label discourse and the general community bend towards "you must categorize yourself under one of two boxes, and the other box is evil" are:
The assumption that experiences have an objective, fundamental truth that allows perfect sorting
The assumption that experiences and understandings of those experiences also never change- that if you can sort yourself into a box, then you should live there forever.
The general "us versus them" of the whole thing.
Point one: experiences of self, identity, consciousness, etc. are all very fuzzy, subjective concepts at the moment. We've yet to pin down what even makes a person conscious, let alone what a person's "I" is. I'm not confident that an objective truth of the self exists.
Maybe some meatspace things do have a usefully objective truth, though more often than not it's filtered through human definitions like anything else- if this desk is a meter long, then how big is a meter, and is a meter truly an objective measurement? Who made it?
What's a person? What's a self? Are those things the same, or different? Where do I end, and where do you begin? Ask ten people and you'll get ten different answers. That's the beauty of it. We don't fully know.
Point two: People change all the time. We are always having new and different experiences in life, and those can shape how you see yourself over time. We used to exclusively see ourselves as a medicalized, psychology-based system. We see ourselves a lot more holistically now, but our life experiences are still just as much a factor as any woo-woo spirituality we experience. That's a change that breaks boxes.
We are not the only system who's changed how they understand themselves over time. Spirituality, medical psychology, and other frameworks are neither mutually exclusive nor fixed in place. Like the framework of plurality, they're a way to understand the world and your experiences in it. They're an attempt to make sense of it all. If it's not working, put it down and try something else.
Point three: it's slowly improving, but the average Joe still has no idea plural people exist outside of horror movie serial killers and shock stories. They don't think they'll ever meet a multiple, and if they do, they're still using Multiple Personality Disorder as a label for it regardless of the system's actual experiences.
We have bigger problems than each other. Biting each other's throats won't help us any more than infighting and scapegoating has helped in any other community. The fact that we're still fighting over this in one form or another 20 years later is depressing.
and its so difficult to want to unmask when people simply. do not believe in plurality lol. and at best usually have no idea how to navigate a relationship with a system, or they'll just like. mock you. on a subreddit nor something. or just straight up not believe you. yk
How it feels when you're technically openly plural but you haven't actually told people what that means yet
Does your system have an alter named after a star?
(Doesn’t even have to be in the night sky)
does your system have an alter...
named after a star?
yeah! (that's so cool!!!)
nope!
maybe?
nuance!!
results
PT: Does your system have an alter named after a star? /End PT
jewish plural culture is headspace minyanim in the front room whenever we daven
Jewish plural culture is…
this well could be a joke, but assuming it’s not…what are the halachot on this? I know almost nothing about “plural” things so please correct my terminology (I think the term is “systems?”) but from what I know, you cant have 10 “head-mates” all answering Amen at the same time, and I think that’s the deciding factor on a minyan. Any corrections or rebuttals are appreciated
okay so For Us. we absolutely don't ever pray as if we're in a physical minyan when we're not. if there's ten alters in/near front (we're polyfragmented/complex so this does happen not infrequently) they may be praying aloud in headspace (so the body is praying silently but we can hear each other in our head), but the body is praying as one person. similarly, even if we were more openly plural, we wouldn't claim that two people being coconscious means that we as an individual count for two people in the minyan. it's not an actual minyan and has no halakhic status at all, but being co-conscious and participating while we pray is a significant way that individual alters in our system connect to judaism and "headspace minyan" is a decent way to explain what's going on there.
[Image ID: a comic panel with two figures visible in the light of a computer screen. One is drawn with black lines to represent the physical body, and one is a teal silhouette looking at the other. In the negative space, there is handwritten teal text that says “It’s weird knowing many of us split to be older than the body back when we were a kid.” /End ID]
[Image ID: a comic panel with two simple figures. One is small with teal lines layering outside of it, and the other is lanky with the lines inside instead. Between them is text that says “We used to always be a bit too big for our own skin. As we grew, some of us kept up over time. Some didn’t. Now, I’m not quite big or small. Just an afterimage left over from a kid’s daydream.” /End ID]
Hi, we're in the middle of syscovery. We think we're a median system with a "host" that is basically a superset of all of us, we just sometimes split into pieces and then mostly co-front until we stick ourselves back together. Sorry if the language here is vague/incorrect, we're still learning.
Anyway, we wanted to ask about is whether it is possible to experience dissociative amnesia not between different aspects, but as a group? We mostly share our memories, so when we experienced a traumatic flashback and things got all fuzzy, based on what we heard from other systems, we started looking for whether there might be someone who holds that memory - but no such luck. If anything, it seemed like a new, before unseen aspect showed up to suppress our collective memory. Is this a thing? We can, albeit in less detail, recall these memories when we are "together/one". I can't comment on whether we would regularly be able to collectively recall because someone in the back (the new guy) is vehemently shouting "not right now" at me as I type this, lol.
(or, I guess he's been around, just not since syscovery. "not right now, keep it together" guy does sound familiar...)
-T&O
As a rule: if you are experiencing it, then it's probably possible.
Global memory loss is actually pretty common in systems affected by memory barriers or trauma to our knowledge, especially if you have PTSD- amnesia can be part of that on its own. Actually, one of the books we read recently on treating dissociation in children noted that sometimes, global forgetfulness can become the best strategy to cope with the child's life if state-based amnesia isn't enough to mentally cope with their environment.
Dissociative amnesia is also its own diagnosis (DID overrules it, but worth mentioning), and it can happen in non-systems. Memory issues can happen for a ton of other reasons that can interact with plurality as well (e.g. depression can impair memory, one system member may be significantly more affected by memory issues from depression even without trauma being involved), so the whole thing is one big mess.
And all of this assumes you even want to use a Western clinical framework! DID is not a universal concept. Dissociative amnesia is not a universal concept. These things vary more than you'd think depending on where you live, who you know, what your background is, etc.
All that said, you're early in discovery, and pushing to find someone holding a traumatic memory before they're ready to come out on their own is usually not the best idea. Digging for trauma is a recipe for retraumatization more often than not, and trying to find someone who wants to hide teaches them that they can't trust you to respect their boundaries. It's possible that someone does have the memory, but feels unsafe being seen because they don't feel safe sharing that memory yet- and saying hello would be more risk than they're comfortable with. They might even see keeping that memory suppressed or hidden to be survival-critical.
It's usually better to take a step back, invite anyone who wants to share, and trust that you will find out when the time is right.
I'll chuck a poll here, though. I'm curious.
Does your ability to remember one or more memories...
Depend on what system members are around
Does not change depending on what system members are around
Some of both
Secret third thing (elaborate in replies)
No amnesia / vanilla extract
Things likely to bias results:
Amnesia often hides itself; you forget that you forgot, essentially.
Memory loss can come from other disorders and conditions (heck, even depression impairs memory on its own), and determining whether it's dissociative, neurological, etc. is messy.
"Dissociative amnesia" is very clinical language. Some people experience memory problems but do not use a clinical framework for their experiences. They may answer that they have no amnesia if they feel the word is wrong for them.
People are often reluctant to label themselves as having dissociative amnesia without a psychiatrist saying so, and access to clinicians is neither universally available nor desired.
your in-system relationships are real relationships, and are more than worthy of being celebrated in every way a relationship can be celebrated.
i said something in our therapy session this week that keeps sticking with me. i wonder if any other "trauma / pain / depression holders" out there could relate. especially if you're in high-achieving systems.
"some of us get to be the ones playing first violin. the ones who can't afford to remember, to feel, to suffer. ...and some of us get to be the ones that have to do all that for them."
i carry memories of times when we were at our lowest. we were suicidal but constantly forced into acting fine. once we had to put on eyeliner and go be first violin in a concert after scream-crying about being suicidal. it never mattered to our guardians. be fine Or Else.
i get why the other parts in our system are so hellbent on functioning. they were the ones who had to show up and perform. but they almost get the privilege of not feeling & remembering because of that. those roles get assigned to me. the short end of the stick.
This
hey online plural community. can we cut the stupid discourse for like. even a week so we can talk about shit that actually matters. nobody outside of tumblr and twitter knows or cares what a radqueer is and if you try to explain to me what a radqueer is on this post i will block you. none of this bullshit translates to real-life social support for systems. it doesn't help anyone recover from trauma. it doesn't make it safe to overtly switch in public. it just fractures the community and hurts usually young, already traumatized systems. grow the fuck up and cut it the fuck out.
When you have a headmate that talks with a certain dialect and you randomly use one of their words mid conversation