Oh God. It's a mess. Shut it doWN.

Welcome to whinging about tumblr's stupidty. Anti-lots of stuff, including subjects like bestiality, paedophilia and incest that I guess some subhumans believe are okay? Okay. Tagged as #tea [Ask away] if you have any questions

[144-13]

I’ve officially moved over to Twitter now, so if you’re still interested in listening to me fight pedos and SJWisms, go ahead and follow me: https://twitter.com/Kailey_Fx

We can roast freaks together~ 🍵

[foulserpent]

tumblr freak finding out about simulated cp being illegal and involved in criminal prosecutions of irl pedophiles: guys… :(… i think the judicial system is an anti

[betterthanabortion]

“My body, my choice” only makes sense when someone else’s life isn’t at stake.

[fandomsandfeminism]

Fun fact: If my younger sister was in a car accident and desperately needed a blood transfusion to live, and I was the only person on Earth who could donate blood to save her, and even though donating blood is a relatively easy, safe, and quick procedure no one can force me to give blood. Yes, even to save the life of a fully grown person, it would be ILLEGAL to FORCE me to donate blood if I didn’t want to.

See, we have this concept called “bodily autonomy.” It’s this….cultural notion that a person’s control over their own body is above all important and must not be infringed upon. 

Like, we can’t even take LIFE SAVING organs from CORPSES unless the person whose corpse it is gave consent before their death. Even corpses get bodily autonomy. 

To tell people that they MUST sacrifice their bodily autonomy for 9 months against their will in an incredibly expensive, invasive, difficult process to save what YOU view as another human life (a debatable claim in the early stages of pregnancy when the VAST majority of abortions are performed) is desperately unethical. You can’t even ask people to sacrifice bodily autonomy to give up organs they aren’t using anymore after they have died. 

You’re asking people who can become pregnant to accept less bodily autonomy than we grant to dead bodies. 

[albinwonderland]

reblogging for commentary 

[generalmaluga]

But, assuming the mother wasn’t raped, the choice to HAVE a baby and risk sacrificing their “bodily autonomy” is a choice that the mother made. YOu don’t have to have sex with someone. Cases of rape aside, it isn’t ethical to say abortion is justified. The unborn baby has rights, too. 

[fandomsandfeminism]

First point: Bodily autonomy can be preserved, even if another life is dependent on it. See again the example about the blood donation. 

And here’s another point: When you say that “rape is the exception” you betray something FUNDAMENTALLY BROKEN about your own argument.

Because a fetus produced from sexual assault is biologically NO DIFFERENT than a fetus produced from consensual sex. No difference at all.

If one is alive, so is the other. If one is a person, so is the other. If one has a soul, then so does the other. If one is a little blessing that happened for a reason and must be protected, then so is the other. 

When you say that “Rape is the exception” what you betray is this: It isn’t about a life. This isn’t about the little soul sitting inside some person’s womb, because if it was you wouldn’t care about HOW it got there, only that it is a little life that needs protecting.

When you say “rape is the exception” what you say is this: You are treating pregnancy as a punishment. You are PUNISHING people who have had CONSENSUAL SEX but don’t want to go through a pregnancy. People who DARED to have consensual sex without the goal of procreation in mind, and this is their “consequence.” 

And that is gross. 

[thekaraokeninja]

^ THIS. This is this this THIS THIS THIS. THIS!!!!!

[updatepls-deactivated20180722]

This is probably the strongest and well worded/supported argument for abortion that I have ever read.

[boymercuryx]

Absolutely. As vile as the “no exception for rape” people are, at least they’re consistent. These other fuckers actually think pregnancy should be an enforced punishment for sex.

Funny how they don’t apply that reasoning to other “choices”. They don’t say Oh yeah you can’t have bypass surgery because you chose to eat fat and not exercise. Or You chose to drive without a seatbelt so you can’t get your smashed body treated after a crash. Fuck, most of medicine is about correcting for people’s choices, but anti choicers believe sex choices are magical because of their trashy gutter religion.

[belf-on-the-shelf]

Also fertility treatments usually destroy loads of embryos, but pro-lifers don’t protest fertility clinics because those women are destroying embryos for a reason they approve of. 

[thisbibliomaniac]

We absolutely do protest those, and there are people who adopt embryos.

[secretariatess]

Blood transfusion and organ donating are optional things that can save lives.

Abortion is actively getting rid of a life.

You aren’t responsible for murder by opting out of the first two- you were not responsible for the accident or disease that would require the need of organs/blood from another person.

But by having an abortion, that is actively removing a life.  You aren’t withholding something you can donate.  You’re getting rid of a life for your own sake.

[fandomsandfeminism]

You’re trapped by the trolley debate. The idea that allowing someone to die through inaction is morally different than actively causing a death.

Which is…shakey. And debatable. And also doesnt address the central point of bodily autonomy.

If I woke up in a hospital with a series of tubes connecting me to the person in the next bed, and those tubes were the only thing keeping that person alive, am I obligated to stay there for the 10 months they need to recover? Even as it makes me really sick, makes me diabetic, permanently alters my body, makes it difficult for me to work or see my friends, even if I have to pay for all of it? Is it ethical to force me to let another person live off my body even if I say I don’t want to, I can’t, please don’t make me. Does it matter so much how those tubes got attached of I’m sitting there, sobbing, in pain, pleading to be let go and not held prisoner here?

[zanthador64]

Yes, you literally should be obligated to stay there because the only way your example is comparable to someone being pregnant is if you chose to engage in a pleasurable activity when you knew it could potentially chain you to that person for the next 10 months with all the potential side effects you listed.

There are multiple ways for you to not have to be forced to look after a baby that don’t include killing it. Human life means so little to you because it’ll inconvenience you for under a year. I sincerely hope no one ever gives you any kind of power over them because you’ve proven you’ll do whatever you want, even kill them, and then cry “But what about how this affects me?!?”

[fandomsandfeminism]

And you think its ok to literally hold pregnant people hostage against their will and deny them agency over their own bodies.

And why? Because they had sex. Gasp.

[zanthador64]

Again, literally not against their will. They exercised their free will deciding to have sex. If a life results from that decision the only moral choice is to allow it a chance to survive. If you don’t want to be a part of your child’s life after their birth that’s your decision to make but the fact remains the vast majority of abortions done in the first world are done for convenience, not medical emergency.

[betterthanabortion]

“My body, my choice” only makes sense when someone else’s life isn’t at stake.

[fandomsandfeminism]

Fun fact: If my younger sister was in a car accident and desperately needed a blood transfusion to live, and I was the only person on Earth who could donate blood to save her, and even though donating blood is a relatively easy, safe, and quick procedure no one can force me to give blood. Yes, even to save the life of a fully grown person, it would be ILLEGAL to FORCE me to donate blood if I didn’t want to.

See, we have this concept called “bodily autonomy.” It’s this….cultural notion that a person’s control over their own body is above all important and must not be infringed upon. 

Like, we can’t even take LIFE SAVING organs from CORPSES unless the person whose corpse it is gave consent before their death. Even corpses get bodily autonomy. 

To tell people that they MUST sacrifice their bodily autonomy for 9 months against their will in an incredibly expensive, invasive, difficult process to save what YOU view as another human life (a debatable claim in the early stages of pregnancy when the VAST majority of abortions are performed) is desperately unethical. You can’t even ask people to sacrifice bodily autonomy to give up organs they aren’t using anymore after they have died. 

You’re asking people who can become pregnant to accept less bodily autonomy than we grant to dead bodies. 

[albinwonderland]

reblogging for commentary 

[generalmaluga]

But, assuming the mother wasn’t raped, the choice to HAVE a baby and risk sacrificing their “bodily autonomy” is a choice that the mother made. YOu don’t have to have sex with someone. Cases of rape aside, it isn’t ethical to say abortion is justified. The unborn baby has rights, too. 

[fandomsandfeminism]

First point: Bodily autonomy can be preserved, even if another life is dependent on it. See again the example about the blood donation. 

And here’s another point: When you say that “rape is the exception” you betray something FUNDAMENTALLY BROKEN about your own argument.

Because a fetus produced from sexual assault is biologically NO DIFFERENT than a fetus produced from consensual sex. No difference at all.

If one is alive, so is the other. If one is a person, so is the other. If one has a soul, then so does the other. If one is a little blessing that happened for a reason and must be protected, then so is the other. 

When you say that “Rape is the exception” what you betray is this: It isn’t about a life. This isn’t about the little soul sitting inside some person’s womb, because if it was you wouldn’t care about HOW it got there, only that it is a little life that needs protecting.

When you say “rape is the exception” what you say is this: You are treating pregnancy as a punishment. You are PUNISHING people who have had CONSENSUAL SEX but don’t want to go through a pregnancy. People who DARED to have consensual sex without the goal of procreation in mind, and this is their “consequence.” 

And that is gross. 

[thekaraokeninja]

^ THIS. This is this this THIS THIS THIS. THIS!!!!!

[updatepls-deactivated20180722]

This is probably the strongest and well worded/supported argument for abortion that I have ever read.

[boymercuryx]

Absolutely. As vile as the “no exception for rape” people are, at least they’re consistent. These other fuckers actually think pregnancy should be an enforced punishment for sex.

Funny how they don’t apply that reasoning to other “choices”. They don’t say Oh yeah you can’t have bypass surgery because you chose to eat fat and not exercise. Or You chose to drive without a seatbelt so you can’t get your smashed body treated after a crash. Fuck, most of medicine is about correcting for people’s choices, but anti choicers believe sex choices are magical because of their trashy gutter religion.

[belf-on-the-shelf]

Also fertility treatments usually destroy loads of embryos, but pro-lifers don’t protest fertility clinics because those women are destroying embryos for a reason they approve of. 

[thisbibliomaniac]

We absolutely do protest those, and there are people who adopt embryos.

[secretariatess]

Blood transfusion and organ donating are optional things that can save lives.

Abortion is actively getting rid of a life.

You aren’t responsible for murder by opting out of the first two- you were not responsible for the accident or disease that would require the need of organs/blood from another person.

But by having an abortion, that is actively removing a life.  You aren’t withholding something you can donate.  You’re getting rid of a life for your own sake.

[fandomsandfeminism]

You’re trapped by the trolley debate. The idea that allowing someone to die through inaction is morally different than actively causing a death.

Which is…shakey. And debatable. And also doesnt address the central point of bodily autonomy.

If I woke up in a hospital with a series of tubes connecting me to the person in the next bed, and those tubes were the only thing keeping that person alive, am I obligated to stay there for the 10 months they need to recover? Even as it makes me really sick, makes me diabetic, permanently alters my body, makes it difficult for me to work or see my friends, even if I have to pay for all of it? Is it ethical to force me to let another person live off my body even if I say I don’t want to, I can’t, please don’t make me. Does it matter so much how those tubes got attached of I’m sitting there, sobbing, in pain, pleading to be let go and not held prisoner here?

[zanthador64]

Yes, you literally should be obligated to stay there because the only way your example is comparable to someone being pregnant is if you chose to engage in a pleasurable activity when you knew it could potentially chain you to that person for the next 10 months with all the potential side effects you listed.

There are multiple ways for you to not have to be forced to look after a baby that don’t include killing it. Human life means so little to you because it’ll inconvenience you for under a year. I sincerely hope no one ever gives you any kind of power over them because you’ve proven you’ll do whatever you want, even kill them, and then cry “But what about how this affects me?!?”

[rromanz]

i will venmo exactly $4 to anyone who can translate this tinder bio into english

[wombyna-ovaryhaver]

Translation: “I’m boring.”

[ribellenm]

I dreamed of this scene last week and it stays in my mind I have to draw it down

[sadiepickles]

“Don’t use your mental illness as an excuse” means “Change your behavior, apologize, and do better next time.” 

“Don’t use your mental illness as an excuse” DOES NOT mean “Your symptoms are your fault, your disorder is not even an explanation, and you are a bad person if you behave less than neurotypical”

[the-rice-cat-deactivated2021070]

thank   y o u

[nest-deactivated20181209]

not joking, not lighthearted, fuck tumblr staff. it’s inexcusable to be so fucking incompetent that enough child. pornography. gets through the filters that apple has to remove the app from the app store. you cant just throw your hands up and say “we tried our best!!! some stuff just slips through the filters!!! :(” it doesn’t with other sites of this size! at least not to a degree where APPLE HAS TO DELETE THE FUCKING APP FROM THE APP STORE! fuck this terrible website and the people who run it

[nest-deactivated20181209]

for ppl asking for a source

[tocatchapedophile]

oh this is why it took them over two months to delete an active pedophile who was being reported for new pedophilic content almost daily

[anotherangryblackwoman]

Hit the nail on the head honestly.

[inked-up-gentleman-deactivated2]

 Most adoptive parents (73 percent) are non-Hispanic white adults, according to a study by the Barna Group.

[regressingprogressionalists]

Stop giving a shit what race they are if they want to adopt don’t fucking judge them for it

[white-is-for-transitioning]

radfems be like xXwombynXx are weak and fragile

[kokichi-ouma-ad]

But also wombynnnn are strong yet oppressed

[slumberinggirl-deactivated20210]

But also we support wombmyn unless they don’t agree with us but we support wombmyn UwU

[144-13]

Yeah can I fucking uhhhh dropkick myself back in time to before there were humans?

[url-killer]

Only by eliminating the stigma surrounding minor attraction we can ensure that both maps and children (and maps who are children) are safe. 

[lammy-hates-pedos]

There is no stigma. It’s a fact that having thoughts about having sex with children is fucked. You guys aren’t oppressed. You need THERAPY. You need HELP.

[activemapstoblock]

what. the. actual. fuck.

Everyone please report think-breathe-forget to https://report.cybertip.org/index.html. I know she was on a blocklist before, but she seriously needs to be reported now that I know lolicon can be reported.

Her blog has suggestive lolicon and actual lolicon porn.

@maphatingcharacteroftheday @anti-pedo-patrol @blockthismap @anti-pedo @anti-pedo-magical-girl @maphatingobjectoftheday @antimapprincess @anti-map-and-pedophile @report-a-predator @map-hating-characters-of-the-day @pedophiles-arent-kawaii @children-against-pedophiles @chris-hansen-the-pedoslayer @castiel-smites-pedos @ripple-vs-maps

[maphatingcharacteroftheday]

What the fuck. What the Hell. Report them here. Dear god.

https://www.fbi.gov/tips

[anti-pedo-patrol]

C A L L O U T P O S T

[bapouro]

[weirdmageddon]

[pumakaji64]

Evidence

[tenseoyong]

children’s safety > pedophiles’ feelings

[deletepedophiliaontumbr]

Always. No matter what!

[goblinqveenn]

“There’s no such thing as reverse racism”

[trashprince420-deactivated20160]

ohhhhhhh myyyyyyy goddddddddddd. PoC making jokes about white people isn’t racism. While white people are so mad about a few mayo jokes, PoC are being murdered. There is no such thing as reverse racism.

[goblinqveenn]

“Making jokes” literally a death threat was made

[eyes-wide-open-always-hoping]

lol and yet if you make a joke about a black person or any other ethnicity it’s suddenly racism. y’all and your double standards

[siryouarebeingmocked]

>“There’s no such thing as reverse racism”

That’s correct. It’s just ‘racism’.