Rogues and research papers
Saw a post by doxxed0367 about how Jervis Tetch/ the Mad Hatter had been researching the brain for years and probably published research papers
And this couldn't leave my mind :
A lot of the Rogues have diplomas that require research and as someone who's currently in a master's degree, it made me laugh because I was imagining being a student there and having to avoid to quote that one person because they became a rogue.
Because as someone's who's done a bit of research, I've noticed patterns such as :
1- the person did a fundamental discovery which led to them being quoted often BUT their moral actions do not matter because they're fundamental anyway and cannot be avoided in the construction of the field or of your research.
2- the work wasn't fundamentally new, it was just a rework or linked to topics not previously discussed.
In the case that the person is morally okay, then, yes it will be discussed. If it's not the case, well, there's a chance people will find the work replaceable.
3- the person and their works are bad and best avoided. By ''bad'' here i specifically mean that it was either conceived poorly and could be taken as problematic or that the work is problematic in itself due to the ideas conveyed.
(for instance, last year I've worked on reinterpretations of Alice in Wonderland and some papers I came across were clearly racist when talking about non-Europeans adaptations)
4- Someone can genuinely choose to work on someone else's work because they like their ideas, and possibly them, if there's known information about the author's life.
5- There's a consensus that this person is/was bad and most of the time their theories are used it's to dismantle them.
Anyway, just imagine being a student in Gotham and having to quote one of the rogues because their work falls under these umbrellas. I think the worst would be 4 or 5 since
4- means that you have to admit that you like the rogue and their ideas and possibly make you seem as dangerous
5- doing your thesis or work that way could get you killed by said rogue.
Just imagine being in science where you probably have to read and maybe quote Dr Pamela Isley if anything you're doing is related to plants, Harleen Quinzel and, way worse, Jonathan Crane, for psychiatry and Jervis Tetch for neuroscience. And that's just a few.
(also imagine doing your work on the rogues or what they've done. And thinking you're dead at any moment because of what you said. I also feel like some would congratulate you for using their research too)
(I'm also pretty sure the rogues are a constant source of academic research in Gotham and in this version of America in general. Maybe even in the world ? )