All Art ⚫ Drawn and mixed only ⚫ 3D and mixed only ⚫ GO posts
Find me on Ao3 ⚫ Buy me a Coffee ⚫ Find me on the sky app ⚫ Find me on the sky app (but it's spicy)
GO 3D Bust Project ⚫ All related posts⚫ All links
Today's Document
Mike Driver
official daine visual archive
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
will byers stan first human second
hello vonnie

Andulka
ojovivo
Noah Kahan
taylor price

titsay
we're not kids anymore.

if i look back, i am lost

No title available
No title available

No title available
$LAYYYTER
Three Goblin Art
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

shark vs the universe
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
seen from Canada
seen from Canada
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia
seen from Russia
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Pakistan

seen from United States

seen from Colombia
seen from Canada
seen from United States
@acatwithstockings
All Art ⚫ Drawn and mixed only ⚫ 3D and mixed only ⚫ GO posts
Find me on Ao3 ⚫ Buy me a Coffee ⚫ Find me on the sky app ⚫ Find me on the sky app (but it's spicy)
GO 3D Bust Project ⚫ All related posts⚫ All links
I hate that thing some people do where it's like. "I left my wallet on the table to see if you'd say anything" or "I wanted to see if you'd wash the car if I stopped doing it"
Cause like
I dont know about anyone else
But I am perpetually hovering three inches above the strong subconscious belief that everyone knows what they're doing at all times except me, so if you change your normal patterns and I notice, then I will assume it is an intentional choice with a thought-out plan behind it and I will avoid interfering
And if I don't notice, because I won't, because why would I, because not much bothers me and if you don't say anything to indicate you are bothered then how would I KNOW
Alternatives to experimenting on me like a lab rat when you suspect me of being inconsiderate:
"I feel like I'm the only one who does this chore. Can we start taking turns?"
"I'd like you to ask me how I'm doing more often."
"It bothers me when this area stays messy so long. Can you do X when Y happens?"
"I feel like the onus is on me to initiate X, and it's wearing me down. Could you try making the first move more? Like 3-4 times a week?"
"I'm feeling upset right now and I'd like to spend some time with you."
"When X happens, I feel like you're taking my work for granted."
"I'm feeling neglected. Could you do X?"
"I'm burnt out and need help."
"I feel like I'm the only one putting effort into X."
"Do you notice this?"
"Are you bothered by this?"
"I am bothered when this happens."
"X habit of yours bothers me."
"When X is like this, I feel bad. Can you [action] when you notice X?"
Oh my God! 😭 You dropped this queen 👑
To think I thought I knew what ethereal beauty was before now. Laughable.
she’s so beautiful i had to include a few more photos
Her instagram is @queennyakimofficial !
Support Black Women!!! Support Black Womens Art!!! Support Dark Skinned Black Women!!! Support Dark Skinned Black Womens Art!!!
🖤🤎🖤🤎🖤🤎🖤🤎🖤🤎🖤🤎🖤🤎🖤
I’ve reblogged her before, but really, you can’t have too many dark-skinned Black queens on your dash.
Hey tumblr friends, in case I haven't told you lately, I have no idea what the FUCK half of you are on about and I WISH I didn't know what the rest of you are on about. Great work. Keep it up.
[ID: first image is a screenshot of Bilbo talking to the hobbits at his birthday party from "The Lord of the Rings: Fellowship of the Ring." The second image is the text of the original post written in a Tolkien elvish script. End ID.]
Went to be emotional support bc a mom needed brain surgery bc of cancer.
...
Ended up being adopted and am now scheduled to partake in a family vacation for a family I only got to know four days ago.
easy to miss that one of the reasons maternal mortality is diminished so extremely by modern medicine is that modern medicine makes it so much more possible to identify the pregnancies that will die and take you with them, or are otherwise unacceptably high risk. and then discontinue those ones safely, before it's too late.
thought about this because it's so frustrating when people argue that 'dying in childbirth' is a historical sort of event that doesn't happen nowadays (false) and therefore is irrelevant to the legal status of abortion, since it's not a real danger.
except it super is, and i think a lot of people haven't noticed that this argument in addition to simply being incorrect is basically the same as when people say we don't need vaccines for deadly diseases because no one gets those now anyway.
like yeah one reason for that is we vaccinate everybody ffs.
Note: after the end of Roe v Wade in the US, the maternal mortality rate (and the infant mortality rate) are showing clear increases in the states with the strictest anti-abortion laws.
Forcing people to carry high risk or non viable pregnancies to term kills.
My teens have been playing a ton of BioShock lately and I was suddenly inspired to draw this!
watching twilight and I keep making myself laugh imagining if it was just alucard or any other vampire instead of Edward. POV nausferatu goes to ur school
Aziraphale's bookshop, modeled in Blender.
Closed, as expected, but the lights on the first floor are on.
also, I really don't know how to phrase this but to me the finale misses the joke, you know?
it forgets that the christian cosmology was the setting, told through corporate satire, not the villain. even God wasn’t an active tyrant; she was an absent CEO, leaving individual contributors like Aziraphale and Crowley to realize their job descriptions were irrelevant to the company's bottom line anyway, so they coasted by on minimum effort
that corporate satire was what allowed this to be a comedy, a space to tell a beautiful story about choices, humanity, and love. the finale for some reason treats that background seriously, it turns that setting into an omnipotent, dystopian threat, which completely suffocates both the romance and the humor by replacing a petty system you can outwit, outsmart, outmanouver with a bleak, unearned nightmare where "the company controls your every breath, and you can never clock out"
I wanna go so far and say, S1 was already foreshadowing this happening.
The book ended with the head offices returning to indifference after a short bout of confusion and trying to assert themselves in the moment. Them ultimately keeping the status quo as if nothing ever happened and just returing back to business as usual including keeping their agents as they were was part of the joke.
Don't get me wrong, the ending of S1 still works with the joke IF we would have never gotten S3, Heck even S2 to an extent. And I have been saying this for quite a while .
BUT the ending of S1 ignores the fundamental irony of the massage. Them actually having to evade consequences from their head office and them needing to be freed of them to be themselves (or more themselves) was already undermining it.
If I had any decency, I'd sleep in, have a hangover, feel my age for a sec
But sicke, not me, nahhh, four hours of sleep and then off I go, fresh like the morning sun, two bottles of wine who? Time to go annoy those who drunk less yet are worse off.
World broken, heart broken. I could write essays but I prefer drawing
Happy Pride Month!
Faust is back for the 5th time! If you want to use the flag of your choice as an avatar, they're under the cut. They're free to use as long as it's for personal use only.
“If a society puts half its children into short skirts and warns them not to move in ways that reveal their panties, while putting the other half into jeans and overalls and encouraging them to climb trees, play ball, and participate in other vigorous outdoor games; if later, during adolescence, the children who have been wearing trousers are urged to “eat like growing boys,” while the children in skirts are warned to watch their weight and not get fat; if the half in jeans runs around in sneakers or boots, while the half in skirts totters about on spike heels, then these two groups of people will be biologically as well as socially different. Their muscles will be different, as will their reflexes, posture, arms, legs and feet, hand-eye coordination, and so on. Similarly, people who spend eight hours a day in an office working at a typewriter or a visual display terminal will be biologically different from those who work on construction jobs. There is no way to sort the biological and social components that produce these differences. We cannot sort nature from nurture when we confront group differences in societies in which people from different races, classes, and sexes do not have equal access to resources and power, and therefore live in different environments. Sex-typed generalizations, such as that men are heavier, taller, or stronger than women, obscure the diversity among women and among men and the extensive overlaps between them… Most women and men fall within the same range of heights, weights, and strengths, three variables that depend a great deal on how we have grown up and live. We all know that first-generation Americans, on average, are taller than their immigrant parents and that men who do physical labor, on average, are stronger than male college professors. But we forget to look for the obvious reasons for differences when confronted with assertions like ‘Men are stronger than women.’ We should be asking: ‘Which men?’ and ‘What do they do?’ There may be biologically based average differences between women and men, but these are interwoven with a host of social differences from which we cannot disentangle them.”
— Ruth Hubbard, “The Political Nature of ‘Human Nature’“
It just gets worse when you think about how the ending was sadistically designed to mess with the audience. That became crystal clear in the script excerpt from the scene at the end: "Crowley swallows. Will this be the second kiss, a declaration of love to match Aziraphale's?" NOPE! Neil Gaiman actively encouraged an expectation that they would have a happy ending, only to viciously tear the rug out from under us. Why? Why put them in this fucked up situation in a COMEDY? Well, no one should have trusted an abuser with writing their ending.
NG really said "I'll give you a kiss, but you won't want it", for season 2, and then he gave us the South Downs ending that no one wanted (though some have accepted or embraced it, happily for them).
In a story where funny twists or loopholes like "actually you're not my father" and "isn't the great plan also the ineffable plan?" saved the day before, there would have been countless different endings that could have stayed true to the ending that Pratchett allegedly wanted, without falling into NG's grim, sadistic, darkness.
💔💔💔💔💔💔💔💔💔💔💔💔💔💔💔
So before he knew he was going to be outed as a monster
Why would he want to emotionally upset his fans? 🤔
And divide the fandom?
I imagine the fandom split would be much worse if he was still revered the day before the season dropped (Also as 6 seasons it prob would have been better written since while s2 wasn't great writing it was better written than s3)
...Presumably picturing that the "good" fans would get to be in his golden book
...and the "bad" fans would be going to him for explanation
It's just gross all the way down
I honestly believe that he wanted to prove that he is just as good of a writer as Terry.
I mean that was his whole thing with GO. The story of an underdog lifted up by some big shot. NG emphasized it every time. It was Terry's wish, Terry's vision, Terry, Terry, Terry. Without STP people wouldn't have trusted him with GO in the first place. Bc it's a very Pratchian Story.
NG wanted to finally make it his own. And finally show the world that he too can be a great writer just like Terry. Except he never could, he lacks the wit.
Just look how he handled the shit! script that he had done in the 90s . Tried to soft launch it a few times only to back pedal the moment fans got upset.
I genuinely believe he thought he had done something great with the ending. That he had finally cracked the code to be on the level of STP while also spitting his fans by twisting it into a very Gaiman form . He thought he was clever . He was not.
The Malice of the Finale from Gaiman
Despite the fact that Gaiman didn't write the final script, it was based on 6 finished scripts he wrote, so it feels safe to assume the core ending was his idea. Former fans of his writing said the ending's nihilism felt like something he'd do. Various facts such as director Rachel Talalay saying there was no kiss in the script and she was told she couldn’t add one, Gaiman basically saying post-s2 about the kiss that he wanted a way to give fans what they wanted without giving them what they wanted, and David Tennant telling fans at a convention back in 2024 that the ending might not be what fans wanted, indicate that Gaiman never intended to give Aziraphale and Crowley the happy, romantic ending he chose to set up.
The question is: why would a writer do this? In response to shippers back with the first season in 2019, Gaiman could’ve simply said, “I understand fans feel very passionately about their relationship, but Terry and I didn’t write it that way and I don’t want to rewrite their dynamic without him here.” But he didn’t do that. He played a fool by twisting himself into knots to say he wrote them secretly holding hands and would comment on fan posts “confirming” their headcanons, and then went out of his way to textually change the dynamic with an explicitly romantic kiss at the end of s2, but evidently, had zero intention to make them do it again, perhaps not despite fans wanting it, but due to fans clammoring for it. But let's emphasize this: no one made him do this! He could have capitalized on fan excitement and shipper feels, written two more seasons full of subtext, and never changed the nature of their relationship. The finale’s human marriage is cute, but he must have known it was not what fans wanted with the cottage. The lack of kiss and verbal love confession, along with him killing the audience's version of the characters, feel deliberate. You have to go out of your way to squander the s2 cliffhanger and not make them kiss again, kill the version of the characters everyone loved, and screw with the cottage ending
I saw great tags about this on a post that had reblogs disabled, so I assume the OP doesn't want attention and I won't mention their url here. But they were right: Neil Gaiman simply lied to the fandom. He lied about Good Omens always having been a love story, he lied about bringing Aziraphale and Crowley together romantically being Terry Pratchett's dying wish, and he lied about fans' headcanons being true. Obligatory disclaimer: what he did in real life to women is on a different level and cannot be compared to writing choices, but this lying is not unrelated to his sinister side. He was manipulative and calculated towards his fan base (and the tumblr fan base primarily consisted of women), and knew exactly what he was doing. He got off on fans worshipping him and seeking his validation, but had enough disdain for them to openly say he didn't want to give them what they wanted even though he knew how much it meant to them. Writers aren't obligated to give fans what they want, but again: he went out of his way to pander to fans at the end of s2. You can't do that, hang around fans on tumblr to drink up their praise, and turn around and say "nah, fuck the fans" after that, unless you're actually an asshole who enjoys toying with people. I don't believe he intentionally made the ending bad—I think he's enough of a hack that he thought the retcon would be a good plot twist—but I do think he intentionally fucked with fans when he rewrote the premise of the cottage and didn’t make them kiss. Can’t you picture a real-life abuser wanting to mindfuck a bunch of women, especially when he did literally abuse some fans? Keep in mind this is the same guy who wrote a gomens movie script in the 90s out of spite, too
You know, there are some YouTube video essays talking about other showrunners being shitty towards their fan base, and a lot of those have little actual evidence. This, however, should be a case study in a creator who hung around tumblr way too much to soak in fan worship turning around to spite them. I don’t think people who never saw his weird behavior on tumblr truly get it. I did not know Gaiman was secretly a violent man, of course, but I did see him as a liar who had a big ego and loved attention from fans to a creepy degree way back in 2019; when he made them kiss in 2023, I thought his desire for fan worship outweighed his obvious discomfort with fans reading Aziraphale and Crowley as gay, but it really should not be surprising that he did not intend to give these characters the kind of happy ending the fans wanted, because he never wanted it and he clearly resented fans who said the "representation" in s1 wasn't enough. But like I said: no one forced him to write the characters kissing! This was so deliberate and feels so malicious.
As a scholar of the failed movie script from the 90s I can only say that there is a long history of weirdness surrounding NG and his relationship to Good Omens that did not just start on Tumblr.
I'd even say Tumblr was just the platform he ended up clinging to bc he found the most success here. And while I'd reckon that the 90s script wasn't written out of spite, it was supposed to be a shared effort at first but Terry saw the writing on the wall and left the project after the first draft got rejected, it definitely reads like an attempt at pushing his own importance in the matter. Just as with him basically making himself the news outlet for another potential adaptation by Terry Gilliam in the 2000s. For which a surprising amount of information stems from only his mouth and where he constantly found ways to hype the project even while answering completely unrelated questions. All this AFTER publicly stating that Terry and him didn't want anything to do with any screen adaptation bc of their experience in the 90s.
Even back then he rode the coat tails of the story of an insignificant author being lifted out of obscurity by another bigger author. Putting up an air of gratefulness while also trying to dominate the conversation around Good Omens in multiple small ways.
Then there is the way the 90s script got published. How the few surviving reviews for it praise it but are also oddly critical of Terry as author. How even in that publication there is a note of "look at me in the shadow of Terry, but do look at me", all copies being signed while still expressing that he isn't exactly proud of it in the preamble. A strange two tracked narrative that prevailed into his Tumblr days. Where he proudly threw around the idea of publishing that script once more (for charity) while still joining in with the bashing of the work when fans pointed out their displeasure with the script. (And also threatening with copyright takedowns "for our own protection" only after more and more people voiced how crappy they thought the whole thing was).
I already made another post about how the TV show has some markers that show an influence from the shit!script. And I stand by that. Especially after S3.
To me all of it reads as an author well aware that his own writing can never capture what another author put in to make a joined work great. Yet he was trying to make the whole thing mostly his bc he was striving for grandeur. It reads as someone incredibly insecure and spiteful who thought himself clever by pandering.
In retrospect it reads exactly like that type of person NG turned out to be. But that's in retrospect. Back then it bc community NG latched onto was already starving and an enthusiastic author on Tumblr actively interacting with the fans, who occasionally even reminded everyone you should never trust an author seemed annoying but not something to be too weary about.