okay google how do i stop being in love with my ex
TVSTRANGERTHINGS

izzy's playlists!
Show & Tell
almost home
Monterey Bay Aquarium
Keni
noise dept.

Origami Around

Product Placement

shark vs the universe

Discoholic 🪩

JBB: An Artblog!
KIROKAZE
tumblr dot com

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣

★
YOU ARE THE REASON

Kaledo Art

ellievsbear

blake kathryn
seen from United States

seen from France
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Dominican Republic
seen from Honduras
seen from Honduras
seen from Poland
seen from Belarus

seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
@alicedyerappreciator
okay google how do i stop being in love with my ex
some of you dont actually love trans women you just want to fuck them. you’re not an ally you just have unresolved futanari fantasies
ok i made that other post private bc that guy had an “oh im the asshole here arent i” moment but i do still wanna talk about that a bit
sexual desire isn’t allyship and never has been. not least because it means as soon as a trans woman isn’t attractive or sexually available to you, you will stop caring about her if you frame your desire to get topped* by her as supporting her
*because it’s always getting topped. no one ever wants to top the trans girl. hmm i wonder why
see the thing is that once you actually do believe that trans women and cis women are more similar than different everything sorta locks in. in this case, it's the idea that objectification and sexual attraction aren't any meaningful support for trans women, the same way they aren't for cis women. remember that trend a couple months ago with like, the guys who performatively carried around feminist literature to try to make themselves seem safe and approachable to women to try to get laid? it's kinda like that. you have to actually be a (trans)feminist you can't just do it for the sex
Hey, do you have any book recs for having sex with women as a trans woman? I’m nervous as hell and it would be nice
Hi!
I'd recommend Girl Sex 101! It's not the best but its a pretty good read regardless of whether you're having sex with women or not and its very informative in a fairly encouraging way.
Its on the archive for free too!
things going wrong in a relationship cannot change if you do not talk about them
it can feel soul crushing to admit your problems with a partner that you love and adore, to tell them the ways you are upset, i understand that. but if you do not communicate, those problems will only fester and get worse.
there is no healthy relationship where you should avoid communicating a problem for the sake of love.
if you love her, you have to tell her what's wrong.
I stand by this fully. idc. rent lowering gunshots
Watching this scene hurt more than any other scene from any movie I had ever seen, and the more I dug into why the more I realized I was a woman. The sound of her screaming “I’M REAL” was the sound of my egg cracking. Watching this and the rest of the matrix series and I Saw the TV Glow within a couple months was an interesting time for me.
its hilarious how clavicular keeps going to all these lengths to be conventionally "attractive", only to keep being showed up by naturally "attractive" men who also happen to be relatively well adjusted members of society, such as the reporter who did his interview and now this judge
they're doing some greek mythological punishment shit to him and i say keep it rollin baby
hot take all this is doing is reinforcing the worldview you're making fun of him for having 🤭
Literally like. A lot of these ppl are
1. Just into white daddies. And like honestly whatever rocks your boat but i feel like we should be a bit more aware of that fact and maybe question it more. Lest you get coopeted into supporting fascism because a strong attractive masculine white guy told you you should.
2. Very excited to call somebody ugly with no repercussion. Which like again cant tell you what to do. But on one hand have you decided what informs your judgement on ugliness and beauty? Is it not white supremacy and misogyny together. On the other hand, is the muscle to dismiss somebody and what the have to say based on how attractive they are, a muscle you want to train? Do you want it to be easy to call somebody ugly?
they're still terming random transfems as i type this i see which does make quite a statement doing this today specifically
watched three girls who reblogged its new blog mutual aidpost (made literally 15 minutes ago) already disappear from its notifs. transfems are not included in their pride :/
QUITE the statement to be nuking transfems at the current accelerated pace right at the start of pride month like this, isn't it
5th blog in 24 hours btw.
You have to love her. You have to love her when she sleeps til noon because she was up late. You have to love her when she doesn’t have the energy to do anything but lay in bed. You have to love her when she didn’t shave today. You have to love her when her thighs are hairy because the sensation of shaving them is too much for her to handle. You have to love her when she spends a day playing games because working is too overwhelming. You have to love her when people assume the worst of her. You have to love her when the world turns against her. You have to love her when she feels powerless and alone and abandoned. You have to love her unconditionally.
You have to love her when she's plural. You have to love her when she's little. You have to love her when she's racialized. You have to love her when her autism isn't just quirky hyperfixations. You have to love her when her mental health isn't just #Relatable Internet memes. You have to love her when she's disabled. You have to love her when she has chronic pain. You have to love her when she needs help with the little things. You have to love her when she's unemployed, broke, struggling. You have to love her when people ignore her. You have to love her when people talk over her. You have to love her enough to lift her up. You have to love her enough to give her what she needs. You have to love her enough to stand by her no matter what, because no one deserves to be without love.
AND LOVE IS NOT JUST "I love you" EITHER. Love is support. Love is safety. Love isn't just donating to charity. Love is paying for her to eat when you know she won't otherwise. Love isn't just reblogging a positivity post and hoping she'll see. Love is seeking her out and telling her how much she means and how happy you are that she's here.
Love is not just love, love is action. If you don't get that, then you've missed the point.
neurodivergent ppl with a diagnosis, was it hard to get?
yes
kinda?
no
mid getting a diagnosis, it's hard
mid getting a diagnosis, kinda
mid getting a diagnosis, no
the process is too hard/complicated for me to get one
not really thinking about getting a professional diagnosis yet
I'm not sure
i don't need a diagnosis/I'm neurotypical/results
ive said this before but it was on my old blog so I'm saying it again
dehumanizing abusers is not effective at doing anything other than make people think they're ontologically incapable of violence
it's also creating a class of people who you can abuse while telling yourself that you're Good and Moral and Not an Abuser.
if you dehumanize the caught abusers then the uncaught abusers will use their humanity as proof of innocence
if you dehumanize the hypothetical abusers you create incentives for false accusations as a means of dehumanization whenever dehumanization is desired for other reasons
This is Tie, she is going to eat all of the notes
reblog to feed her notes
How is she doing this
So I just saw the most incredible production of Macbeth that wove parental grief into the whole regicide plot in such a fascinating way.
So at the very beginning of the play there was a scene where Macbeth and Lady Macbeth are at a funeral as the primary mourners. A stretcher is carried on with a covered body. The body was notably very small. They laid flowers on it and Macbeth immediately left for battle.
Now *I* studied Shakespeare in college so I immediately knew there is one single line that implies that the Macbeths lost a child at some point. Most of the time this isn't utilized in productions; it's just a throwaway line, intended to paint just how determined Lady M is for this regicide thing to work and how furious she is that her husband has cold feet. In this production she delivers "I have given suck, and know how tender tis to love the babe that milks me" nearly in tears. She takes a moment to steel herself before saying, "I would while it was smiling in my face, have plucked my nipple from his boneless gums and dashed the brains pit, had I so sworn" and she very nearly SCREAMED this in Macbeth's face.
Also noted was how the Macbeths looked at Macduff's children. Lady M was clutching her heart, nearly breaking watching them embrace their parents. Macbeth could not even look at them.
At the end of Lady Macbeth's plot, when she is sleepwalking and sleeptalking, she is typically portrayed as speaking to no one or to her husband. However, at a certain point of her monologue she got on her knees, raised her voice to a comforting octave, and began miming tear wiping, hand holding, hair and face stroking, around a child-sized figure. "Wash your hands, put on your nightgown, look not so pale. I tell you yet again, Banquo’s buried; he cannot come out on’s grave." Then she stands and appears to take the child's hand. "Go to bed, go to bed. I can hear knocking at the gate-" then she looks down and realizes that no one is there, followed be the most heartbreaking shriek I've ever heard followed by a full minute of her just weeping while curled up on the floor before she stood up, finished her monologue and left the stage.
Most of the time when the loss of a child is utilized in a performance or adaptation, it is assumed that the child was an infant and lost some time ago. To imply that the child died IMMEDIATELY prior to the events of the play and had been cared for and loved by their parents for a few years adds such a fascinating layer to the desperation to ascend to the throne, Lady M's madness, and Macbeth's initial hesitation into "in for a penny, in for a pound" attitude, Macbeth's fury that Banquo's, not his, children will take the throne, and even Macbeth's eventual demise following a frenzied final battle.
How far will grief push you to fill a hole? How far will grief push you to desperation? And what happens when none of your new pursuits are filling the void left by the one you lost? And what happens when you realize you have nothing left to lose?
It was a PHENOMENAL production.
I have literally been thinking about this post pretty much non stop for what feels like years but is like 2 days and this is the best take on Macbeth I've ever read
And also like proof of how many takes you can project onto a good story.
Turn Undead's verbal component is "Shitty Bullshit Skeletons", a very mean cover of the classic Halloween song
Shitty, bullshit skeletons Are shitters, scum, and slime Stupid skulls to mock and bully Fuck them up tonight
Shitty, bullshit skeletons That shriek like such a bitch They’ll shake and shudder in surprise When you turn this fucking lich
I’m not sorry, skeletons, your jokes are not so good You want to fucking socialize? (Go drown in fucking mud.)
'Cause shitty, bullshit skeletons Shout stupid fucking things They’ll say plural “sarcophagus” Is “sarcophagoging”
Spirits supernatural are dumb, and that’s a plus But osteo-reanimae are all also a wuss
Stupid, bullshit skeletons Aren’t mean; they’re fucking dicks They’ll grab you by your hyoid bone And throw you in the Styx
Sticks and stones may break their bones But we shall break their pride Cause stupid, bullshit skeletons Will run and fucking hide!
they're selling anti-ai slogans on sweatshop-produced t-shirts. i don't need to write the poem for you to get it do i
yellow: this is objectively true and one of the first things you learn about when discussing intersectionality. if you refuse to even acknowledge the privilege you have over over groups, you are unsafe. "check your privilege" isn't just some annoying sjw thing, it's a call to understand that you may be unintentionally hurting someone without even realizing it because of the power you have over them. a real ally would acknowledge that, not deny it
red: okay strawman fallacy. literally who the fuck actually says this? this is going beyond a refusal to acknowledge intersectionality, this is just straight up lying to portray the people you're oppressing as annoying whiney bigots who are so so mean to you. get a fucking grip, man. if you seriously think that the logical extrapolation of discussing intersectionality is that "trans men don't belong in the LGBT community" you're actually a lost cause. and i know you dont actually think that. you're literally just making that up
The fucked up thing about bringing pjackk back is 1. No one wanted it, not even pjackk, it's way funnier to weekend at bernie's the corpse, and 2. Just more ironclad proof that they can bring all the old blogs back that were deleted due to transphobia. And they won't.
Happy pride.