Mike Driver
art blog(derogatory)
No title available
Cosmic Funnies
AnasAbdin
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
if i look back, i am lost
@theartofmadeline
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
izzy's playlists!
Jules of Nature
$LAYYYTER
KIROKAZE
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
No title available
JVL
Three Goblin Art
tumblr dot com
祝日 / Permanent Vacation
todays bird
seen from United States
seen from Czechia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Slovakia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Argentina
seen from Singapore
seen from T1
seen from Singapore
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from Singapore
seen from Canada
seen from Egypt
seen from United Kingdom
@ambitiouswitch
Update: Alina didn't make it.
The aenimia was too advanced for her to survive. But please keep sharing my link. I have another cat that might have the same illness and I want to get her tested before it's too late.
https://ko-fi.com/melodymaymoreno
I mean, Eggers has Romani steal Thomas' horse. In the original, Thomas says he is going to "the land of thieves", but he's not robbed at least.
First, you are already answering what’s the reference for that. Second, the Romani were trying to stop Thomas from going up to the castle and meet with Count Orlok.
They took his horse for that very reason, to leave him without a means of transportation. They weren’t exactly expecting him to venture up the hill on foot (like 1979 Harker). They aren’t stealing Hutter just because or due to racial stereotypes, there’s a whole plot going on here.
How are the crazies that whined about how they would leave the show when TVL got adapted and the third season wouldn't be Louis' third souls searching journey? I mean, apart from still being here whining? Did they get a stroke already? 😂
Did you ever love someone who didn't love you back? I know you know who I'm talking about.
TVL just proving it should have always been the work adapted out of the sheer personality of its premise and main character.
Ways you can support Michael through this Netflix hit piece:
• cancel your Netflix, what are you doing lol
• Go watch the biopic tomorrow, June 3rd! If you can’t actually see the film but you’re able to buy a ticket, it still counts toward sales regardless of whether you show up.
• If you can’t buy a ticket, buy or stream his music.
• Watch Square One on Amazon Prime. If you can’t buy Square One, you can watch the free version on YouTube.
And consider donating to help fund a 3 part documentary that is going to expose the media for how they treated and still treat Michael Jackson
www.takeflight.film … Jin Chohan needs your support for Trial by Media: The Michael Jackson Story DOCU'
And remember, if you can’t financially support, you can still share these links! And you can stream his music, watch his videos, all of which convert to financial support at the end of the day!
Louis is apparently so boring of a character that for his stans, peak love interest is a lawyer with no personality that happens to be played by a hot actor.🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
"Loumuel", please, just write a reader insert like normal people.
What do you think about this thread on gabi/gabistat https://x.com/coldeveryseason/status/2061808613539074111?s=46&t=2AHWnd6Wx64DLwseaUC_3A
Why would I possibly listen to anything Ash has to say. They have been continually making bad faith arguments for years now, under the coat of fighting racism, pointing out the supposed abuse and what not with no consideration for the format of the tale or the actual underlaying books, and were supposedly involved in the SDCC fuckup last year and renamed their account.
Leave me alone with their takes, please.
That interview was so embarrassing, jeez. Since when is considered journalism to push shipping agenda? Wish Jacob had been there with his never ending hatred for Loumand so she would have shut up and ask Assad more interesting questions.
These reviews are giving me life!! I love that they're highlighting Lestat's aversion to ever frame himself as a victim, like yes, THAT is the core of his supposed "unreliability". He wants to turn every trauma into a swashbuckling adventure, he wants it to be entertaining & palatable, he'll romanticize the hell out of the worst abuses he's suffered just to maintain the illusion of agency. YES!
And I wanna say IN YOUR FACE to all the people who've been trying to tell us Lestat's gonna "play the victim to make himself more sympathetic" like that isn't the most dogshit take & fundamental misread of his character!! (And an additional 'fuck you' to all the people who rolled their eyes at the promo & said shit like "there goes our beautiful prestige show...')
the biggest thing im nervous about with the doc is the mention of the books because guilters to this day use this as proof. even if none of the physical abuse happened, they use it as proof of his attraction. given the circumstances of who created the books, the way it was stored, the maid who was friends with n4mbl4 people and she was the only one who had access to it suggesting she was in on it or a pedo herself, the inscription, etc. i feel like we can use the argument that he had thousands of books and these were legal art books as much as we want but at the end of the day that was the point, the two men (convicted pedos) that created them had to make them legal, by mixing them with innocent photos etc, to be able to sell them to other pedos around the world freely. they literally had a mailing list and those books were expensive af for a reason. there's people on twitter already talking about it and when more people find this out i dont think they'll care about anything else, much as guilters and the media did not. the guilters already say his inscription was for plausible deniability and the "fan" that sent it to him as rhonda was code nickname for the actual pedo who sent it to him given the way they capitalised the name rhonda etc and it being similar to his actual name, suggesting mike knew who it was and it had to be sent to him again for plausible deniability. honestly i believe he is innocent but i dont know how to change their minds about these books.
This is the last time I am going to address these fuckass photography books. I am tired of guilters screaming about 60’s retail photography books, when 16 hard drives were finely combed through by the FBI which produced NOTHING!
Every single digital device was seized and forensically analyzed. Over 680GB of data was combed through. Not a shred of evidence was found to substantiate these allegations. No CP, no search for CP, nothing at all!
Not only have I never come across actual evidence to prove that these photography books were created by NAMBLA or edited by convicted pedophiles (the only sources I can find are coming from websites like MJFacts.com which has no primary source for their claim), but these photography books had over 40 photographers around the world that took pictures, and the majority of photographs within these books are candid portraits of kids doing domestic activities. One of these books even features the children that acted in the black and white film for Lord of the Flies.
And it was NOT just these two books seized. They also seized a third photography book that included girls in similar candid portraits, and then ignored it to push this “Michael is obsessed with little boys” narrative that was NEVER SUBSTANTIATED.
These books were sent to Michael by a fan. Detective Smith testified to this during the 2005 criminal trial, stating they were found among other fan mail.
DA Tom Sneddon never even had either of these books tested for DNA/fingerprints and neither seized copy was ever shown to have been looked at by Jackson—no folded corners, no marked pages, etc. Only an inscription of him talking about how he hopes his children can be as happy as the kids appear on the front cover of one of said books, which reads to me as though he was going to send it back to the sender and then forgot about it.
These books were widely sold all over America and even translated into other languages and sold internationally. One of them was reprinted half a dozen times. They appeared in college libraries, for Christ’s sake. They are listed in the Library of Congress.
Jackson owned over 10,000 books. There was no child erotica and no CP ever found. Only vintage retail photography books that any asshat can purchase to this day online. Fucking Amazon had these damn books for sale at one point. And, they were sent to him. He did not purchase them and every subsequent raid after 1993 failed to produce these books again, meaning Jackson never sought them out. There were extensive searches on the internet for pornography of ADULT WOMEN and there was erotica in his possession of ADULT WOMEN. Period!
💬 0 🔁 4 ❤️ 12 · Let’s talk about the two photography books that detractors love to scream about · We will be discussing both the book “Boy
No but I’m seeing MJ fans online saying the Netflix doc has to be a good thing because Michael was found not guilty 😭 honey, no, have we learned nothing about how media manipulates facts when it comes to Michael??? There will be nothing good about it. We know exactly what the narrative will be.
They clearly must have just crawled from under whatever rock they had been living beneath. This documentary is being made by the people behind Leaving Neverland and by Martin Bashir who is personally responsible for igniting the Arvizo allegations and the subsequent 2005 criminal trial. Me when I’m fucking naive and stupid lmao, they’re going to try and spin this like Michael was acquitted when he shouldn’t have been. It’s double jeopardy what they’re doing. And to those of you still doubting it’ll be negative: How many times have you seen a celebrity figure receiving this treatment? I’ll wait… they’re going to take advantage of the fact that most of the global public have not reviewed the actual court documents and transcripts themselves. They are going to take advantage of the fact people don’t know that 2 jurors flipped to sell salacious books and a movie deal. They’re going to take advantage of the fact the media never reported his criminal trial accurately or fairly.
didn’t Chris Tucker, one of Michael’s best friends associate with Epstein multiple times?
Girl wtf, NO?
Chris Tucker flew to Africa in 2002 with Bill Clinton for a humanitarian trip for the Clinton Foundation. The plane was owned by Epstein, which is where Chris Tucker encountered him that one singular time. And Chris Tucker has publicly stated this many times at this point because for some reason, everyone seems to think that anyone who just happened to cross paths with Epstein is somehow connected to what he was doing.
Do you know anything about Epstein at all? He made it a point to surround himself with celebrities, to essentially pay all the bills for everything while letting other people use his stuff. In a way, it was an investment for him. He was one of the wealthiest guys around but was basically unknown to everyone unless they ran in his inner circle. To the public, he was this financier who pretty much avoided headlines but continued to weasel his way into particular places for appearances, etc.
You could have googled this and arrived at your answer within seconds btw. This desperation to connect MJ to Epstein is getting pathetic.
I don’t know how anyone took these allegations seriously back then. Some of these “witnesses” came up with the most ridiculous shit I’ve ever heard to sell to tabloids, like that one maid who said Michael planted his wife lingerie on his bedroom and sprayed her perfume all over the place to trick her into thinking Lisa Marie spend the night. Like, lady??? The man ain’t got no time for that and who are you?? Why would he want to trick you? lmao
Yeah, and these maids were part of the Neverland 5 who all tried to sue him for wrongful termination. Adrian McManus and Sandy Domz both, who both try to make claims that Michael was supposedly planting Lisa Marie’s underwear and shit. It’s absolutely insane lmao. Why would bro take his wife’s underwear, spray it with perfume ???? and then strategically hide it around his room to convince people they were having sex 🤣 Lisa DID spend nights at the ranch, there’s plenty of pictures of her with Michael and her kids there. And Lisa in her own words said that Michael often came to her place, too. We all know Michael and Lisa were having an affair after they met in November of 92. And we know that even after they legally divorced, they were STILL having an affair well into the late 90’s, and that it ended somewhere around 2000. There’s dozens of photos of them throughout all of those years. There’s love letters Michael wrote her that she had to personally stop from being auctioned off. They were in love with each other, obviously they had sex 🥴
ok I’m getting sick of seeing this rumor being perpetuated by people claiming to be fans of Michael Jackson, because there is literally zero evidence to suggest that
1) Michael Jackson ever had a relationship with Shana Mangatal!
2) there is no fucking evidence or truth to the rumor that Michael Jackson was unfaithful to Lisa Marie Presley or that he would have cheated on ANY woman he was romantically involved with!
Shana Mangatal met Michael Jackson in 1993 when she was cast as an extra to play a townsperson in his video Is It Scary (later renamed Ghosts). She was hired by one of Michael’s managers. Filming for this ended when the Jordan Chandler allegations began, and then she was rehired by the same manager to refilm in 1995. Before this, she met Michael backstage at a fan meet and greet on the Dangerous Tour.
She first started to attempt to gain fame in 2003 when giving media rounds claiming she was his “secret lover”. She has also tried to claim she is Bigi’s mother (Michael’s 4th child). There is absolutely ZERO evidence that any of this is true. She literally has ONE picture with Michael, which is this back stage photo above. She was just hired as an extra for a video, not even by Michael himself. She claims they had a love affair for 2 decades yet she didn’t have a camera? Yeah, I call bullshit. She wrote a book trying to get money from her alleged relationship with Michael, which is full of lies and inconsistencies, and contradictions. Only delusional fangirls read this book let alone believe in it. Stop spreading this stupid shit. Shana Mangatal is a fucking liar, period! Her stories in her book straight up read like a Wattpad fanfiction.
If Shana were really Michael Jackson’s lover, she wouldn’t have been fishing out fucking yogurt cups out of the damn trash that Michael had eaten from, and stealing fax documents Michael sent his managers that she worked for that were NOT meant for her. She also wouldn’t have been able to be in contact with Michael without signing a nondisclosure agreement. Michael made everyone sign one; he was very distrusting of people, and for good reason. The story she spins of not being made to sign one because “he thought I was different” is delusional as fuck.
She’s literally a delusional fangirl to the highest degree imaginable. She met Michael a couple of times and was lucky enough to work for him very briefly, and has since deluded herself into believing they were “meant for each other” which is honestly insane, and extremely creepy and stalkerish. She is quite literally the exact same as Tatiana, who also tried to claim she was Michael’s “lover” or that he was in love with her when in reality, Jackson fired her and then she too made media rounds and then wrote a book full of lies to cash in on her brief interactions with MJ.
🙄🙄🙄
I’m exposing Shana’s bitch ass even more LOL
She quite literally has an entire private “book club” group on Facebook where she and other so called “fans” literally do nothing but make fun of Michael and his appearance. These are not the only comments from her; there are dozens and dozens of them.
First of all, one fans comment stating Michael’s appearance changes due to lupus flares is actually true; she denies this, though. She claims Michael had tons of plastic surgeries and shit which is absolutely not true. She takes pictures from the worst period of Michael’s life when he stood trial and degrades him and treats and speaks of him as if he is subhuman.
But on her public page, you won’t catch her talking about him in this way. But in her private fangirl group where everyone in it sucks her ass and helps pay her bills by buying her bullshit? Well that is all she does is degrade and dehumanize a man she claims she was romantically involved with for 20 years and that she claims she had a CHILD with. Very odd; I’ve never seen Lisa Marie Presley speak about Michael Jackson’s appearance like this. In fact, I’ve only ever heard LMP state that she thinks Michael was attractive, period. I’ve also never heard Debbie Rowe say shit like this about Michael. That’s weird, considering these two white women were married to Michael, and yet this loser Shana claims she was involved with him for TWO DECADES and speaks like this about him?
She has also privately in this group stated that he deliberately changed his skin, fed into the idea that he was ashamed to be black, made fun of him for being a burn victim, made fun of him for being disabled, flat out DENIED that he was disabled, made fun of him for being gender nonconforming, quite literally said he “wanted to be a woman”. NEED I GO ON?
She also tried to imply in her book that Michael was supposedly more “interested in boys” than he was in her. Oh, she has also been chummy with Wade and company. It’s clear Shana wants to play both sides of the field. Those of us seasoned fans know the facts, so for those of you who are new here or who don’t know, maybe you should consider listening to those of us who have been here a long time.
I don’t know why some of y’all so called MJ fans support or believe this woman. She’s a LIAR! She uses MJs name for clout and money, she has no proof they ever dated, she body shames and dehumanizes him for being disabled, she flat out LIES on him to continue to degrade him. Who the fuck would ever speak about someone they claim to love like this?! There is no proof she is Bigis mother, by the way. Anyway, after she got exposed like this with her private posts being screenshotted and passed around MJ fan groups, she tried to delete all of it. But we have the screenshots 😉 so keep it cute Shana Whateverthefuck
bringing this back AGAIN because I am STILL seeing y’all wack ass “fans” uplifting this vile bitch! listen to those of us MJ fans who have been here for years! LISTEN TO US! WE ARE NOT LYING TO YOU! WE KNOW MORE THAN YOU AND I DONT MEAN THAT IN A MALICIOUS WAY! WE ARE TRYING TO EDUCATE YALL 😩😒
I’ll go ahead and say Jordan Chandler should have come clean about his father’s allegations long ago. This mess started because of him and he kept his mouth shut for decades. I don’t know how he sleeps at night, in either scenario of innocent or guilty. Michael is innocent, so he just allowed for an innocent man to get lynched for decades, and even in death. Some people who know Chandler, have said he told them Michael didn’t do anything but that’s not enough because it doesn’t come from his own mouth.
Yes, witnesses on the Defense list were there to testify against Jordan Chandler had he shown up to court, because they stated that he privately admitted to them that Michael never abused him. This is discussed by some trial witnesses in the Square One documentary, so I recommend those of you that haven’t watched it to give it a watch.
Not only did Jordan personally confide in people he knew as an adult (according to them), but he also told Michael’s Private Investigator the same thing, that Michael did not abuse him and that his biological father wanted money. Which is easily proven by looking at the timeline, listening to the taped phone call from Evan, reading through the book the Chandler family wrote, looking at their behavior legally, looking at their actions during the litigation, etc. They wanted one thing: money, and the second they obtained it, they refused to cooperate with law enforcement. They also fired their attorney Gloria Allred after she gave a public statement saying she didn’t care about the civil trial and cared more about the criminal case. They literally fired her for saying she cared about helping them get Justice against Jackson. Because they didn’t give a damn about that, they only cared about forcing him into a corner to get a civil settlement.
Jordan Chandler is a coward of the highest degree. He knows it is all a lie. He knows what he was forced to do, but he’s probably afraid that if he does come forward, he will be sued by the estate or someone else, or prosecuted for making false allegations. That and, if he works in the industry at all, every bridge he has will burn overnight.
Still, my conscience could never handle living with a lie of this magnitude. These lies helped put Michael in the ground before his 51st birthday. His death is partly on Jordan’s hands, just as it is on the rest of that disgusting family. Evan killed himself months after Jackson was murdered. Jordan could give one faceless public statement and end this madness after 33 years, and forever clear Jackson’s name. There is no excuse anymore in my opinion, and whatever sympathy could be held for him for having been forced to lie initially is nonexistent now. Because Michael Jackson is still actively being lynched. Jordan could stop it if he had even an ounce of integrity.
He is his parents' son: a piece of shit without a lick of moral that doesn't care about the blood he has in his hands.
Also, he is a failed music producer, so yeah, he is in the industry. But he is a talentless loser just like every single one of his accusers.
I’m curious to know if the Cascio family are too stupid to remember the facts of the 2005 criminal trial or if they think that everyone in the public are ignorant to those very facts. We are at the dawn of another smear campaign with Jackson, spearheaded by the Cascio children, with a Netflix “documentary” set on attacking the criminal trial. And yet in that criminal trial, not only was Frank Cascio specifically accused by name alongside Jackson by Star and Gavin Arvizo, but Frank Cascio remained an un-indicted co-conspirator of Jackson, who was accused of conspiracy against the State. These people remained un-indicted co-conspirators to discourage them from giving valuable testimony for the Defense, which the prosecution did to numerous other people in this trial. So yes, they were alleged to have aided him in his abuse and imprisonment of the Arvizo family. With the Cascio kids now accusing Jackson, they are implicating their brother Frank Cascio of showing the Arvizo boys pornography, of him holding the Arvizo’s hostage, implicating Marie Nicole (one of the Cascio accusers) of aiding her brother Frank which Janet Arvizo alleged in her testimony, etc 🥴 ah, these pesky little details!
