I don’t think I did so I’m gonna ramble about it anyways
The committe of three seemed to imply Kaisa wouldn’t know who borrowed the book without heavy research “I assume your arrival indicats that at long last you’ll reshelve the missing book” and then later says about “I take it you actually know who has the book” but then Kaisa later says “I’ve known full well who has the book all this time”. It’s a bIT of a stretch but especially since she had the card and was showing it to them, and it’d been so long, it seems to me that, yeah, they didn’t know who checked it out and that Kaisa wouldn’t either
Which leads me to believe that Kaisa wasn’t the librarian when the book was borrowed.
So how did Kaisa know all that time who had the book??? Behold, crack theory time - Tildy took her in as an orphan (or as a kid at least), and thatswhy she was her student and why it meant so much to Kaisa to not let her down about not being the witch she trained her to be. Not only is it letting down her teacher, but the one parental figure she had.
So the book was borrowed when she was a kid, and she knows of it. Later down the line she’s grown up and is the Keeper Of the Books/the librarian, so now it is her responsibility to reshelve the book. The committee of three, I don’t remmeber if it’s implied if they know that Kaisa was Tildy’s student or not, but they seem to assume Kaisa does not know and would need to look into it deeply to find out who has the book to reshelve it
So from this I propose she’s early 30s like Johanna, and this is why, despite not being the Keeper Of the Books for all the time the book was checked out/being the keeper WHEN it was checked out, why she knew all this time that Tildy had the book.
becuase like rt she doesnt look nor act like shes like 50 like cmon-
(and i just love the idea of parental Tildy adopting her and taking her in effectively)
theartofmadeline
prguitarman
izzy806
origamiaround
gummygunk
annaxmalina
dailybridgerton
