The "AFAB-Only Housing" Situation
Inspired by the debate in the notes of a recent post, I think it's helpful to provide some context about this discourse before sharing my own take. That post didn't come out of nowhere- it's in dialogue with other recent posts about "afab housing", like this one.
The discussion continues on May 18th (no images; I only included them so I could properly ID)
This has been a point of discussion for a while- we see a rebuttal on February 3rd. On April 5th of last year, we see this famous comic by CDIGODDESS:
And even 3 years ago we see this Reddit thread
This is a critique of a western, typically US, Canada, and UK problem, but also applies to FLINTA in Germany.
Recently, I saw a post about how people discussing this issue were saying "trans men are actually the real victims here". I don't think anybody is saying that. Therefore, I qualify my comments about "afab only housing" by saying that theoretically:
in a situation where a trans man and a trans woman are homeless;
and only the trans man can access this form of housing given he detransitions, while the trans woman is left homeless;
the trans woman would be in a worse situation than the trans man.
But reality is more complex than this, and it's frankly ridiculous to say the trans man (and/or nonbinary person) has privilege here. Intersex people, as usual, have been entirely cut out of the equation. The post that set this discourse ablaze again on Tumblr says "trans men and trans women are both misgendered but only trans women are denied housing"
This is flat out wrong. I have a post from January sharing my own personal struggles as a trans man trying to find housing. (For context: I'm in the US)
In the end, I did find housing, but my roommate- a cis man- turned out to be trafficking minors, and came to accept rooming with me as a last resort, having been kicked out of his last residence for being a paedophile and assaulting his former roommate. For my safety, I had to move back in with my parents. I know people who don't have that option open to them. This is a danger.
It's clear to me that "AFAB-only housing" is correctly observed to be just a woke way to say "woman only" while excluding trans women from their definition. But people miss that due to erasure, the people who put out ads for "AFAB-only housing" forget the term* typically includes transmascs. In my experience, they don't expect transmascs or otherwise nonbinary people to apply, and if they do, they either exclude them entirely or attempt to detransition them.
*ignoring the obvious issues with the terminology, this is how the term is used by the broader public if they know the term at all