Claire Keane
Mike Driver
No title available
sheepfilms
todays bird

bliss lane
we're not kids anymore.
Xuebing Du

Kiana Khansmith
will byers stan first human second
NASA

No title available
Sweet Seals For You, Always

Love Begins
h
The Stonewall Inn
Fai_Ryy
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
trying on a metaphor
EXPECTATIONS

seen from United States

seen from Brazil

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Germany

seen from Canada
seen from Lithuania
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States

seen from Brazil
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from Brazil
seen from Iraq

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from Maldives
seen from Bangladesh

seen from Germany
@asteroidfield
Study shows Millennial Men do not think of women as their equals
A majority of millennial men failed to see women as equals, according to the study, which looked at how college biology students viewed their classmates’ intelligence and achievements, the Harvard Business Review reported.
Among the findings:
In every biology class surveyed, a man was seen as the most celebrated student, even in instances where women earned significantly better grades.
Men were also found to overestimate the intelligence of their male classmates over that of female ones.
Men continued exaggerating their assessments of the male peers, despite unequivocal evidence that their female peers were performing better.
Women, conversely, weren’t found to display a bias: Their assessments of fellow classmates tended to be spot-on.
The National Institutes of Health researchers pointed out that female STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) majors drop out at significantly higher rates than their male counterparts.
“The reasons for this difference are complex, and one possible contributing factor is the social environment women experience in the classroom,” they wrote.
Still, scores of men are under the impression that they’ve become the target of reverse sexism. Conservative columnist John Hawkins ranted in Town Hall last year:
“Men have it rougher in America than most people realize. In part, that’s because they’re one of the few groups (along with white people, conservatives, and Christians) it’s cool to crap on at every opportunity. In case you haven’t noticed, there’s a nonstop assault on masculinity in America.”
But research has confirmed the reality of gender bias against women. A staggering 90 percent of women reported experiencing gender harassment in the workplace, a 2010 University of Michigan study found. The results suggest that such harassment had the purpose of driving women out of jobs and not the generally assumed motivation of trying to draw women into relationships.
“One could argue that, in these instances, ‘sexual harassment is used both to police and discipline the gender outlaw: the woman who dares to do a man’s job is made to pay,’” the researchers wrote, quoting an article by Katherine M. Franke, an associate professor of law at the University of Arizona College of Law.
As for millennial men specifically, they have been less accepting of female leaders than their older male counterparts, according to a 2014 survey of more than 2,000 adults residing in the United States, the Harvard Business Review reports.
Half of Millenial men said their careers would take priority over their partners’.
Three-fourths of women, on the other hand, said their careers would be at least as important as their husbands’.
oh look its the shit women have been saying all the damn time and antifeminists stamp their feet and cry about
In other news, water is wet
And people dare call these jobs “unskilled labour”
Saw a tweet going around somewhere and had to draw it. lol
50 Shades of Vader
I have come to the conclusion that I’m simply too old to enjoy CW series other than Supernatural. They seem to be writing everything else for a teen audience. Well, except maybe for Arrow, but I got tired of that when it started to feel like it was just about how difficult it is to be a rich straight white man (who sometimes fights crime). That one lady with the glasses was a great character, though.
I tried watching the 100 yesterday and lasted two episodes before I had to give up. It tried to make it seem like it was about survival, kind of like Lost with some Avatar flora and fauna thrown in, but it still seemed to focus more on the potential het teen romance and the testosterone-filled teens doing stupid shit and getting others killed. I felt like the only proper introduction we got into the characters was the divide into team reckless-and-evil-or-stupid or team we-must-trust-the-adults-and-not-be-reckless and who they (may) have a crush on or may end up dating in a future episode. Very little anything of substance.
The only characters who seemed somewhat interesting were the mechanic chick wanting to know what happened to the prisoners, the guy working on the bracelets to signal the space station and the guy they operated on (that one kid’s dad) because they seemed to care about something other than (potential) het (teen) romance and power games, neither of which I find interesting. (The mother was left feeling thin, though the operation scene was good.) Granted, the blond chick and the black guy might have been more interesting in a better setting, plus it’s in character for a bunch of teens to act like idiots, but still… it would have worked better if they had avoided all the romance shit for now and used that time to develop the characters through some other path and thrown in the romance later.
In fact, the main reason why I don’t like most CW series is probably that they start really heavy (in subtext, if not text) with the het romance and love triangles (which I hate) instead of focusing on proper character development first. Why would I care who has a crush on someone or who someone may end up with if I don’t even know who they are? Also, if they are introduced through het romance/attraction rather than actual character traits, that makes it very difficult to read them as anything other than heterosexual, which takes a lot of my interest away. The world is full of explicit, badly-written het romance already. Introduce them as characters and let me see how they interact without any romance in the air and then show me why these people with these personality traits would be attracted to each other and I might be interested. Don’t just throw them together because they are cute or hot or pretty. Show me why they like each other, don’t just tell me or just assume that the actors having attractive faces is enough explanation.
This is the reason why I have so few het ships - most of them are just too badly written. Most of the ones I like are canon ships where the writers actually spent time making it believable. Well, except for Maleficent/Diaval, but that’s nearly canon as it is.
Aaaand I don’t know what CW is but... Have you watched Sense8? Could maybe try. I’ve seen four episodes of it on Netflix (with the free month they have :P ).
i hope everyone is following TNG Season 8 on twitter because it’s fucking hilarious like
I JUST
lord jesus
sources: eyes // nails
When the path of a man and woman are going to cross, it’s always the woman who’s expected to alter her path to avoid a collision. In addition, women restrict their stride as compared to men, and tend to hunch their shoulders and not initiate or maintain eye contact. So I did this research my friends and I started messing around with this. We found that if you don’t alter your path when walking toward a man, a lot of men will almost run right into you, or bump their shoulder against yours, and then turn and give you this weird look. The weird looks you get are increased if you stand up straight with squared shoulders and take longer strides. I habitually walk this way now, and I continue to get puzzled looks by men who turn around after I pass them and watch me with an uncertain look.
Own Your Space! (via andythenerd)
i LOVE star war!!! PEW PEW, light saver! dark vader and luke skyscraper and obi 1 cannoli and r2b2 and 3pco and tobbaca. i love star trek.
I HAVE BEEN LAUGHINH AT THIS FOR SO MANY YEARS ARE YOU KIDDING ME
friend who lives hundreds of miles away: i made food
me: can i have some
Very few TV series come anywhere near Babylon 5 in terms of willingness to alter the core relationships of its characters and its Shakespearean levels of tragic mistakes, partial redemptions, and inescapable destinies. The character of Ambassador Londo Mollari embodies this in particular. Initially the most ridiculous character on the show, thanks to his bizarre hair and generic science-fiction name, Londo became the show’s soul with time, and actor Peter Jurasik got into the character quickly, devouring scenery and playing up Londo’s humor and flaws, even in the worst early episodes. Meanwhile, his rival, G’Kar, started as a cartoon villain, slowly acquiring depth before making some dramatic changes. The story led these two characters to trade places: The aggressor became the victim; the victim transcended pain; rivalry became friendship. All of this was foreshadowed, surprising, and explicable.
“Babylon 5 redefined TV science fiction, so why isn’t it better known?" by Rowan Kaiser for The AV Club (via upsettingshorts)
there are only 3 types of girls
girls who loved dragons too much in elementary school
girls who loved wolves too much in elementary school
girls who loved horses too much in elementary school
that’s every flavor of girl there is
When I was a freshman, my sister was in eighth grade. There was a boy in two of her periods who would ask her out every single day. (Third and seventh period, if I remember correctly.) All day during third and seventh she would repeatedly tell him no. She didn’t beat around the bush, she didn’t lie and say she was taken—she just said no.
One day, in third period, after being rejected several times, he said; “I have a gun in my locker. If you don’t say yes, I am going to shoot you in seventh.”
You branded yourself as “sophisticated” and “magnificent,” and all the men by your side, shouting “men’s rights! men’s rights!” labelled you as a hero after you died. Because you spent so much money, didn’t you, on trying to get a girl. Your sunglasses were $300, your car a BMW, your bank account drained from how-to books on “getting out of the friend zone” and being a “nice guy” but still, girls chose to walk alone rather than stand by you. You were so sick of not getting what you rightfully deserved. SLUT, you wanted to say, you did not let me sleep with you. SLUT, why are you walking with him? SLUT, I spent thousands trying to impress you, so where’s my reward? SLUT, I am taking what you refuse to give me. SLUT, this is my retribution. SLUT, I’ll take this gun away from your head if you just give me a chance. SLUT, I’m a nice guy I’m a nice guy I’m a NICE GUY- keep telling me “no” if you want to die. Tell me, Elliot Rodger, did you get what you wanted? Did you die the “true alpha male” you hoped to be? You wanted to take a girl on a date, but instead you put six of them in their graves. Tell me, how many like you are still alive? Tell me, how long will they praise you? Tell me, how many times were you validated by others who told you to take what no woman would give you alive? These are not things you thought up yourself. This is not simply an effect of mental illness. These are things we forget to teach. This is an effect of misogyny in our society. To this day, we see women as objects, not human beings. A woman’s life only has worth if she says “yes” to all men’s advances. And her voice will be taken, brutally shot out of her, if she dare use it to say “no.” How many bodies must lie dead and cold before we see that this is not an isolated incident? This is misogyny. This is our society. This is what we teach.
To Elliot Rodger | Lora Mathis ”Elliot Rodger, 22, went on a shooting rampage in Santa Barbara, killing six. Rodger also died of gunshot wound to the head; authorities have not confirmed if it was self-inflicted. He posted a video to social media Thursday in which he rants about how women have rejected his advances. Lamenting that he was a 22-year-old virgin, Rodger promises ‘retribution’ and ‘punishment.’ He says he plans to enter the ‘hottest sorority on SCSB’ and ‘slaughter’ the girls inside.” (Article here.)
Sexuality, too, is fluid, and many people seem to struggle with this, to the point of being actively repulsed and confused by the idea that sexual orientation does not necessarily remain consistent throughout someone’s life. This attitude is harmful for those who do experience shifts in their sexual orientations, but it also stifles conversation and exploration, as people who may be confused about their sexuality who receive this kind of messaging may experience harm that takes years to undo—and in some cases, they may never recover, because they are never given an opportunity to learn who they are and be themselves. Take, for example, the heterosexual woman who later develops an attraction to women, and begins to identify as bisexual or lesbian. She may have experienced this attraction throughout her life and not picked up on it—perhaps she didn’t meet the right woman, or she was living in a repressive environment where homosexuality was not accepted. Or maybe her sexual orientation actively shifted. The attitudes of those around her will be dismissive and unpleasant, as people attempt to erase both her past as a heterosexual and her present as a gay or bi woman. Though her sexuality has shifted, she remains fundamentally the same woman. Her past history doesn’t magically vanish, and she may even look back on it with fondness or gratitude for the relationships she had. Likewise, people may move through other sexual orientations depending on circumstances, their current stage of life, and other factors; the asexual who later realizes he’s gay, the lesbian woman who develops a bisexual attraction.
Yes, Sexuality Changes, and Yes, That Is Okay | this ain’t livin’ (via albinwonderland)