The Avatar and The Fire Lord's Relationship
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
h

Janaina Medeiros
Stranger Things
Monterey Bay Aquarium

ellievsbear
Cosmic Funnies
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
$LAYYYTER
No title available
Mike Driver
No title available
styofa doing anything
tumblr dot com
Peter Solarz
wallacepolsom

izzy's playlists!
Today's Document

Product Placement
Jules of Nature
seen from Germany

seen from Poland

seen from Hungary
seen from United States

seen from Thailand

seen from Australia

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Germany

seen from Italy

seen from United States

seen from Hungary
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@aterriblewizard
The Avatar and The Fire Lord's Relationship
This guy doesn’t pull any punches
When Aziraphale says, “the southern pansy,” it is a defining character moment for him. It is proof that he is not obliviously pinging everyone’s gaydar. He is making an active choice to appear as gay as possible, and is proud to do so. He intentionally chose to live in the gayborhood, and go to discrete gentlemen’s clubs, because he identifies strongly with gay culture. In this essay I will
Oh my gosh, DictionaryWrites wrote the essay!
fleabag is very good
Things Terry Pratchett Did
Made fun of the “unnecessarily naked/scantily clad woman,” “sacrificial virgin,” and “sexy heroine” tropes in his first two novels. The first was described as being the most powerful of her clan of dragon-riders and the nakedness was properly treated as unnecessary in a clear parody. The second turned out to be one of the more level-headed (while not well-educated) members of the party after her initial introduction, and also had a spine and knew (and got) what she wanted. The third was described as wearing sensible clothes, was pretty but not sexualized at all, and was practical and smart.
Wrote an entire novel to critique the unequal treatment of “men’s magic” versus “women’s magic” in the fantasy genre. Portrayed witches as just as if not more capable than wizards (when it comes to actually helping people, in particular), and also generally having more common sense than them. Nevertheless created a little girl character with wizard powers, and had her decide neither wizard nor witch magic was sufficient and develop a new kind of magic all her own.
Included sex workers in his worldbuilding. Made jokes about them the same way he did every other kind of person of any profession, but was also highly respectful and never critical of these jobs. Described the head of the ‘Seamstresses’ Guild as one of the most influential people in the biggest city in the world. Never showed or described in detail any sexual violence, including against these workers. In fact, made sure to say that anyone in the city who harmed a sex worker would be dealt with painfully, embarrassingly, and/or lethally by two fearsome elderly ladies. Even his more ditzy stripper character quickly smartened up and learned some true self-respect–not by quitting her job but by realizing she didn’t have to take any shit from men.
Included strong female friendships aplenty. Included female enemies who were enemies over things other than men. In general constantly passed the Bechdel Test and not only that, left it in the dust and had way more meaningful and realistic representation.
Five words: Dwarf Women Are All Trans. More words: And there’s no way to know if some of them were trans in the way we Earth humans would understand it, too, and he clearly didn’t think that sort of genitalia-based gender labeling mattered. Did not turn his trans dwarfs into a joke, but treated them simply as people–including a scientist/forensics officer in a police department, a prominent fashion designer, and the literal King of all dwarfs (who subsequently came out as Queen). Portrayed transmisogynists as unequivocally wrong, and had protagonist characters stand up for and protect their trans colleagues and friends. See also: had genderfluid characters in two of his books and at least one trans man, as well as confirming canonically that there are gay wizards, one of whom is really good at football.
One of his mainest of main characters was a blunt, bad-tempered, prideful old woman who is also good to her core. Didn’t gloss over her unfriendliness or excuse it, but made her complex and interesting and overall likeable despite all that. Also had a very amiable old lady character who also had a temper and would throw hands with anyone who’d mess with her family or best friend. In general, steel-souled old ladies, wow. Also steel-souled young girls.
Said he was incapable of writing a weak, wilting female character, and honestly I can’t think of a single one in any of his books.
Please feel free to add to this list with other Things Terry Pratchett Did because I definitely didn’t say them all!
Said amiable old lady character was also sexually active and encouraged such behavior in all people because it was Fun and not Problematic.
Had two young ladies start out as rivals and end up as friends simply because they grew up and got common sense about it all.
Portrayed the mothers of an entire race as fat and beloved.
Good good additions!
And that last one also reminded me of:
Had a fat young woman protagonist who endured fat shaming both external (which was portrayed as ridiculously stupid and unfair to her) and internal (which she later tamed and conquered). Also showed this woman as capable of healthy physical exertion, as practical and capable generally, as incredibly talented in her fields (witchcraft and singing/musical theater) and as an overall good and decent person. ALSO had this very fat woman be unironically desired by a sexy vampire.
Also your first addition made me want to say that Terry Pratchett’s writing is generally “sex positive” in that sex is portrayed as something healthy that a lot of people like to do, that can be fun and funny and that isn’t shameful but simply a part of life for those people. Without writing anything gratuitous, lurid, objectifying, or pitying, he made it clear that some of his characters have sex while others haven’t and don’t want to, and that both groups are Just People doing Things People Do. Plus it’s fun to look for all the silly innuendo puns, of which Nanny Ogg (the aforementioned nice old lady) is the ultimate maste—mistress.
some fool: “infinity war is the most ambitious crossover in history”
eurovision:
When you have a piano on stage during Eurovision and it doesn’t catch fire
Rayane Bacha “Wishful Wanderer” Spring 2019 Haute Couture Collection
Fellas I’m really not trying to sound like that kinda guy but I’m literally gonna lose it
Best case scenario: “Emotiv discovered what kind of stimuli and work environment you’re most comfortable in and can help you reach the best state of mind and get the most and highest quality work done.”
Most likely scenario: “Emotiv recorded you thinking about something other than work for longer than 20 seconds so it automatically deducted a dollar off your next paycheck.”
The 2019 Met Gala || Billy Porter
CIARA AND BIG FREEDIA @ THE 2019 MET GALA
Well I’ll be damned
ciara is so free and happy, i know being loved correctly is apart of that.
From Jude the Obscure by Thomas Hardy (1895).
New series of the walking dead looks shit.
The art of getting the last word. 😸📢😺
So. 10th grade English class. We all come in one morning to find a balloon and a perfectly sharpened pencil on each of our desks. No instructions, no explanation, which is strange, because our teacher is meticulous about that sort of thing. A couple of people try to ask her and she says we’ll get to it. She takes role and then announces that she needs to go to the copy room and she’ll be back in a couple of minutes
Kinda unorthodox, but no one is complaining because this is advanced English and the teacher usually goes kinda hard. So, y’know. Brief respite. We all sit and chat; one of the boys teasingly steals a girl’s balloon, but gives it back to her easily enough; it’s quiet and kind of a nice break. Then the teacher comes back, stops in the doorway, and just stares at us
After a long moment, she says, confused, “You didn’t pop the balloons.”
To which one of the guys about two rows over exclaims, “We’re allowed to pop them?” and immediately turns around and stabs his friend’s balloon with the pencil
There is a vicious revenge balloon-stabbing, and a few more people pop seatmates’ balloons or their own, and the whole time the teacher is just shaking her head. “I can’t believe you didn’t pop your balloons.”
Apparently we were starting Lord of the Flies that day and she wanted to demonstrate the basic concept of kids turning on each other when there are no authority figures present and it was basically my favorite failed social experiment ever
Back in my 10th grade we did a similar things around Lord of the Flies, where we had a test scheduled for that day, and when we walked in, the teacher took role by looking through the window of the door and never entered the classroom. On the board were three tasks written and the teacher had brought in donuts. At first we all sat around and waited for the teacher to come in, but eventually we just started tackling the list of tasks. Task 1- the test. Everybody took it silently, no one cheated, everyone turned it in and we went on to Task Two: tidy up the room. So we did, we split into a couple groups and each one cleaned an area of the room. Task Three: Hand out the donuts. There were 12 donuts, and 30 of us. So we split the donuts into thirds, each took a third, and left the extras for the teacher. After this, the teacher came in absolutely FUMING. She was so upset we had followed all the rules and completed the tasks. Apparently she had been texting kids telling them to start some chaos but they all ignored it because they were too nice. She tried to dock our grades for not going absolutely wild because it meant her class didn’t get the point across
Yeah these sort of experiments neglect the most important part of Lord of the Flies. The kids involved were WHITE, PRIVATE-SCHOOL, BRITISH, BOYS raised during the height of BRITISH IMPERIALISM.
Kids only go wild like that when they have been raised to believe that they are superior for their gender, race, class, and national origin and to defend their so-called superiority through violence.
When the children don’t have an authority figure to DIRECT their violence, they will choose their own victim.
Exactly. Golding was criticizing this type of kid, not every kid.
Crappy teachers who never studied this book in college, is my guess.