uncensored mel f bomb for your viewing pleasure :)
Cosimo Galluzzi
art blog(derogatory)

No title available
Acquired Stardust
cherry valley forever

pixel skylines
Jules of Nature
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
No title available

Origami Around
wallacepolsom

oozey mess
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
No title available
AnasAbdin
will byers stan first human second

祝日 / Permanent Vacation
noise dept.

izzy's playlists!
Monterey Bay Aquarium
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Singapore
seen from South Africa

seen from Türkiye
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Chile
seen from United States
seen from Canada
seen from South Africa
seen from Latvia
seen from T1
seen from United States
seen from United States
@bigdyke
uncensored mel f bomb for your viewing pleasure :)
happy pride to my favorite gif in the world
what is this genre of photos called
everyone shut da fuck up this is the only thing that matters
Oh My God Damn
I love you, crowsfeet; I love you, gray hairs; I love you, sun spots; I love you, smile lines; I love you, crinkle between my eyebrows; I love you, crooked smile; I love you, visible signs of a life lived
"I can’t wait to love you again tomorrow" by Gatito Sentimental
While its eyes are not as big as its mummy's, this baby tawny frogmouth is still using its beady peepers to see the best it can
❤️💙💛GRACEFUL💛💙❤️
⭐[my social media links]
inbeautmag
What’s your opinions on the handmaiden take? I ask because I watched it only last year and somehow escaped all discourse about it but I thought it was fab
hello. you mean the take from the screenshot?
1. saying that park chan-wook is a straight man with a lesbian fetish is a completely unfounded rumour!!! most likely extrapolated from a popular video essay published on youtube last year that falsely equates it with blue is the warmest colour, another lesbian film where the male director abtellatif kechiche forced the lead actresses to perform multiple takes of the sex scenes over 10 days. the handmaiden sex scenes were shot in one day on a closed set with an all woman crew and not even pcw was present. the actresses were shown storyboards that detailed every shot and knew exactly what the scenes would entail ahead of time before even signing on to the film. there is no evidence of a lesbian fetish in pcw's work bc there simply are no lesbians in his other films, unless you count a few characters in the womens prison in lady vengeance 2005. which btw was co-written by jeong seo-kyeong, a female screenwriter whom pcw has collaborated with on almost all his films since 2005, including the handmaiden, but no one ever mentions that when they want to criticise the film for the male gaze because it doesn't fit their narrative. no better than misogynists trying to erase the work of a woman integral to a mans success.
2. to assume those sex scenes in the handmaiden exist only as fetish content for straight men shows a complete misunderstanding/erasure of the story's core themes specifically about the male gaze and pornography and the many ways lesbian sexuality is affected by those things. by refusing to engage with this fundamental aspect of the narrative, the commenter and other viewers like them have reduced the actresses to sex objects. there's also some underlying racism here as well to see 2 asian women fuck and suddenly the context of the last 2 hours of misogynist lesbophobic abuse you just saw them go through in this movie becomes irrelevant to you and it's all just gratuitous "fetish" content. not everyone with the male gaze is male lol. I think it's also safe to assume the commenter has never even read sarah waters' original novel which is also explicitly about pornography, bc they'd know the handmaiden is an almost perfect visual translation of all those themes which waters herself acknowledges and approves of but again that's just another fact people like to erase bc it doesn't fit into their narrative of a male filmmaker violating a lesbians story which they only cooked up because
3. they're racist prudes seeking a progressive way to justify their discomfort with a graphic sex scene. this is a long answer and I probably sound insane to think it's that deep but I have been in the fucking trenches for this movie for almost 10 years now and it IS that deep and I knowwww exactly what dumb tags like those mean. the commenter saw the movie, thought it "beautiful" but found the sex scenes too graphic (which is fine to think on its own btw!!!) then went on youtube looking for someone to tell them what their opinion should be instead of looking inward and thinking for themselves. they're fucking stupid
OBSESSION (2026) dir. Curry Barker
1930′s Neon Clocks From Let There Be Neon, Rudi Stern, 1979.
Take my hand Let’s lower the birth rate together
*packing my suitcase for a 3 day trip* hm, but what if I need my terracotta warriors..
my cat is completely obsessed with watching the bathroom sink drain and I have started calling this "her shows." as in when I'm in the bathroom and she meows and runs up I'll be like "oh you want to watch your shows?" and run the faucet for an extra few seconds so it fills a little. she will then sit there at the edge of the sink for ages totally entraptured by the drain. blorbo from her sink