Thus ends 20th century Socialism. Your move, China.
Three Goblin Art

titsay

oozey mess

PR's Tumblrdome
Monterey Bay Aquarium

祝日 / Permanent Vacation
🪼
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
wallacepolsom

blake kathryn
Jules of Nature

Love Begins
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
todays bird

tannertan36
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me

Andulka

Janaina Medeiros
DEAR READER
Show & Tell

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Brazil

seen from United States

seen from Austria
seen from Russia
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Romania

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from France
seen from Colombia

seen from Colombia
@bitbullets-blog-blog
Thus ends 20th century Socialism. Your move, China.
A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace
[I threw this together using a piece of text I found on the internet and ideas from my own brain. The first part which serves as the prelude to the Constitution I wrote is credited to John perry Barlow, the second part (with the decrees in Roman numerals) to bitBullets. I encourage anyone who wants to, to add to this and expand on it and make suggestions. This is in response to a number of things, particularly to SOPA and PROTECTIP and the general mood of online rebellion that seems to be filling the air these days. Thanks for reading.]
A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace by John Perry Barlow <[email protected]>
Governments of the Industrial World, you weary giants of flesh and steel, I come from Cyberspace, the new home of Mind. On behalf of the future, I ask you of the past to leave us alone. You are not welcome among us. You have no sovereignty where we gather.
We have no elected government, nor are we likely to have one, so I address you with no greater authority than that with which liberty itself always speaks. I declare the global social space we are building to be naturally independent of the tyrannies you seek to impose on us. You have no moral right to rule us nor do you possess any methods of enforcement we have true reason to fear.
Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed. You have neither solicited nor received ours. We did not invite you. You do not know us, nor do you know our world. Cyberspace does not lie within your borders. Do not think that you can build it, as though it were a public construction project. You cannot. It is an act of nature and it grows itself through our collective actions.
You have not engaged in our great and gathering conversation, nor did you create the wealth of our marketplaces. You do not know our culture, our ethics, or the unwritten codes that already provide our society more order than could be obtained by any of your impositions.
You claim there are problems among us that you need to solve. You use this claim as an excuse to invade our precincts. Many of these problems don't exist. Where there are real conflicts, where there are wrongs, we will identify them and address them by our means. We are forming our own Social Contract . This governance will arise according to the conditions of our world, not yours. Our world is different.
Cyberspace consists of transactions, relationships, and thought itself, arrayed like a standing wave in the web of our communications. Ours is a world that is both everywhere and nowhere, but it is not where bodies live.
We are creating a world that all may enter without privilege or prejudice accorded by race, economic power, military force, or station of birth.
We are creating a world where anyone, anywhere may express his or her beliefs, no matter how singular, without fear of being coerced into silence or conformity.
Your legal concepts of property, expression, identity, movement, and context do not apply to us. They are all based on matter, and there is no matter here.
Our identities have no bodies, so, unlike you, we cannot obtain order by physical coercion. We believe that from ethics, enlightened self-interest, and the commonweal, our governance will emerge . Our identities may be distributed across many of your jurisdictions. The only law that all our constituent cultures would generally recognize is the Golden Rule. We hope we will be able to build our particular solutions on that basis. But we cannot accept the solutions you are attempting to impose.
In the United States, you have today created a law, the Telecommunications Reform Act, which repudiates your own Constitution and insults the dreams of Jefferson, Washington, Mill, Madison, DeToqueville, and Brandeis. These dreams must now be born anew in us.
You are terrified of your own children, since they are natives in a world where you will always be immigrants. Because you fear them, you entrust your bureaucracies with the parental responsibilities you are too cowardly to confront yourselves. In our world, all the sentiments and expressions of humanity, from the debasing to the angelic, are parts of a seamless whole, the global conversation of bits. We cannot separate the air that chokes from the air upon which wings beat.
In China, Germany, France, Russia, Singapore, Italy and the United States, you are trying to ward off the virus of liberty by erecting guard posts at the frontiers of Cyberspace. These may keep out the contagion for a small time, but they will not work in a world that will soon be blanketed in bit-bearing media.
Your increasingly obsolete information industries would perpetuate themselves by proposing laws, in America and elsewhere, that claim to own speech itself throughout the world. These laws would declare ideas to be another industrial product, no more noble than pig iron. In our world, whatever the human mind may create can be reproduced and distributed infinitely at no cost. The global conveyance of thought no longer requires your factories to accomplish.
These increasingly hostile and colonial measures place us in the same position as those previous lovers of freedom and self-determination who had to reject the authorities of distant, uninformed powers. We must declare our virtual selves immune to your sovereignty, even as we continue to consent to your rule over our bodies. We will spread ourselves across the Planet so that no one can arrest our thoughts.
We will create a civilization of the Mind in Cyberspace. May it be more humane and fair than the world your governments have made before.
The Constitution of the Internet by: Bitbullets
The internet is a machine, much like the 205 nation-states around the world today, a machine powered by many machines. The internet is a union of millions of servers powered by a conscious citizenry. Without online citizens the internet cannot exist, just as the 205 nation-states cannot exist without their citizens. With regulation and censorship the citizens of the internet cannot thrive and reach their full potential, just as the citizens of the 205 nation-states around the globe cannot thrive under the tyranny of a police state. It is the trend that the lives of many global citizens are going online. It is the trend that more children are being born citizens of the global entity that is the internet more than citizens of physical geography. It is the case that many of our citizens spend more time participating in the online community of the internet than in their national communities. It is the case that our identities, our lives, our relationships are now defined by online interactions, but we do not necessarily have the same freedoms online as we do in the physical world. We the people of the internet have decided that we must claim the independence of the internet from foreign regulation and censorship in order to facilitate our freedoms and privacy as citizens of the internet.
I. Our online privacy is first and foremost essential to our safe and free participation in the online community. It is thus necessary that every citizen of the internet be able to browse anonymously without being tracked by governments, ISPs, corporations, institutions or any individuals.
II. Online tracking by websites and servers must be permission-based to ensure the privacy of our citizens.
III. It is our belief that no single machine is specially protected by any Earthly laws from the intrusion by other machines within the internet. The citizens who operate each machine within the system are solely responsible for the security of their machine and any intrusion by an individual, organization or government cannot be punished by Earthly laws.
IV. Security of individual machines within the internet will thus be self-regulating. Punishment for unjust intrusions will be dealt by public retaliation. No unjust intrusion will go unpunished. V. No foreign governing body, organization, corporation, church or any other institution may censor our freedom of speech as citizens of the internet except by tools and methods that are publically available and accessible to all individuals with access to the internet.
VI. Once information has reached the internet these same institutions may not impede by any means, censor or regulation included, the free flow of information on the internet, as impeding our access to information would effectively be limiting our free speech.
VII. Any attempt to censor information on the internet will be met with public outcry leading to further propagation of the censored information. The internet will employ mirrored websites, public torrents or whatever mode of reproduction is deemed necessary to the protection of our free speech.
VIII. The products of the mind cannot be considered property and the free flow of intellect on the internet is necessary for the flourishing of truth and free speech.
IX. The citizens of the internet will regulate their own speech. That which is deemed good and true will proliferate and that which is deemed bad will fail and die.
X. The internet must remain open, fair and neutral, to maximize potential for innovation, proliferation of ideas and speech which is good and true. Any attempts to affect the neutrality of the internet by Earthly law will amount to a limitation of our free speech.
XI. The internet must remain a bastion of free speech and a legitimate means by which citizens can criticize Earthly institutions.
XII. In shedding the regulatory thumb of the foreign governments the internet will become a bastion of true self-regulated anarchic democracy, where conflict is resolved through the court of public opinion.
XIII. Any attempts by foreign governing bodies, corporations, organizations, churches or any other institution to limit our free speech will ultimately fail, as all have before. We will continue to build the infrastructure necessary to circumvent your regulations faster than you can censor us.
XIV. It is our conviction that any attempt to limit our free speech and invade our privacy, through legislation, executive power, or corporate monopoly, will be met with a general strike, shutting down the vast marketplaces of the internet.
"There are, of course, environmental and aboriginal concerns that need to be addressed, but neither should be allowed to stymie legitimate, environmentally sound infrastructure development. Those who are fundamentally opposed to any expansion of oil sands development will never be satisfied. No process and no amount of consultation will reconcile their concerns." You're wrong, the concerns of the people affected (everyone) should be allowed to stymie legitimate, environmentally sound infrastructure development. But yes, you're right, we'll never be satisfied. Was there ever any pretense otherwise?
Brave New World
Here is a fun game: Centrifugal Bumblepuppy
"A time comes when silence is betrayal." "The moral arc of the universe is long, but it bends towards good."
"The aide said that guys like me were “in what we call the reality-based community,” which he defined as people who “believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality. That’s not the way the world really works anymore,” he continued. “We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality..."" There are no red or blue states, only a purplish hue. The colour of American nobility and oligarchy.
Personally, I find it difficult to believe that US authorities would encourage Communists and social democrats to protest against the centre-right ruling party of Russia. What's worse, Putin or Communists? But then again, any unrest is good unrest when it comes to state enemies.
This is frankly disgusting and terrifying. People will think these claims are absurd but voter suppression happens everywhere. When the aim of the game is to win at all costs, politicians and CEOs will cheat. The principle should be that every citizen have equal and easy access to the voting booth. Political participation is not something that should be challenging, it is something that should be accessible. Also, if you find the claim that Blacks and Hispanics in the United States could lose the right to vote, remember, 'full' voting rights only came to African-Americans in 1965. Fourty-six years isn't too long a time, more ancient traditions have been overturned. If voter suppression based on class and race continues, American democracy will be but a pale shadow of what it could be. Imagine Obama loses the next election amidst widespread vote fraud on top of voter suppression of African-Americans and Hispanics. That could be just the catalyst necessary to bring radical democratic change to America. Liberal democracy fails because it can be corrupted by political ambitions and corporate interests.
"Power concedes nothing without a demand." That's the part which hits me the hardest. There is much talk of whether the Occupy movement should make demands and this seems to scream out, "Yes!" Maybe it should, but I still think the Occupy movement provides an important umbrella, a primary movement to expose us to the problems we face in our societies and to educate us about these problems. The problem with this model is that a number of very talented and intelligent activists are now wrapped up unable to lead the secondary movements that will challenge the traditional power with demands. Can Occupy make demands without becoming factionalized? Can disagreements among Occupiers be reconciled by adherance to the original Occupy campaign in the event that it does become factionalized? Already I think Occupy represents a very specific set of values. I think the hesitation to make demands is not for fear of splitting up the group, which largely shares the same values, but it is an attempt to not limit future growth by becoming marginalized by more moderate citizens who have yet to join the cause. This is the link to the original speech without the theatrics: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=colcD8UVr90&feature=player_embedded
What would it take?
What would it take, for the Obama of 2008, the world's best hope for turning things around to take a stand? He claims that he wants environmental activists to push him and they have. In alliance with groups in Nebraska they had the Keystone XL pipeline decision delayed. What would it take to tell the world that America is committed to deep carbon cuts? What would it take to live up to his election promises and the high-minded rhetoric of his 2011 State of the Union? What would it take to push the rest of the West and to show citizens and politicians everywhere that the political will and the environmental necessity is there to act now? What would it take for him to do his job as a leader instead of acting like he's trying to win a popularity contest? We won't roll over Obama, we've pushed, now do your part.
#OccupyCOP17
During the French Revolution the people routinely stormed the National Assembly to force the hand of government. This direct radical activism was ended with Napoleon a general at the time, the man who invented firing on his own citizens. Since then no body international or otherwise has allowed the mob to force the hand of government negotiations. The riot police were invented to keep the mob in check and out of sight. If only it were possible to keep the delegates at the Durban climate summit as long as it took to come up with an agreement that satisfied the mob. All I can say is Occupy the Conference of Polluters as long as possible, we must be heard.
Our way of life is unsustainable
Unsustainable - as in we can't sustain living this way.
WHAT IS YOUR FAVORITE INANIMATE OBJECT?
That's tough, something practical. Sheep shears. I could use some for my flowing locks of hair.
"Capitalism is necessarily the most destructive, idiotic and ill-conceived economic system ever devised and our salvation as a species lies in one thing, conscious evolution. We must recognize that long-term survival depends on a no-growth, steady-state economy."
Revolution 2.0
Since 1776 the country had been run by a political elite under the ancien regime. The regime had worked with varying degrees of success and the country had grown to be the most powerful in the world by 1945. From this time a conscious philosophical movement seeking enlightenment was steadily growing, spread through art. Great artists taught them new values that did not align with the old way and they longed for structural reform of the ancien regime. Some minor incremental changes had come over time, but large reforms, like those their neighbours celebrated were entirely unseen in the Kingdom. The previous Kings had used the minority Huguenots as justification for consolidating more power in the monarch, while launching wars against its religious enemies. The King and his Allies had become increasingly embroiled in foreign wars to maintain its colonial and imperial strength. The wars left the Kingdom and its King in great debt, under threat of sovereign default to foreign powers. The Parlements would not pass the Kings reforms to raise taxes on the wealthy elite to balance the budget and so he convened, on August 2, 2011, a new council called the Assembly of Notables. The Assembly, designed and hand-picked to pass the Kings reforms could not agree and resoundingly rejected the King's debt proposal. Now what will the King do? If his country faces sovereign default will he call the ancient institution of the Estates-General last called on May 14, 1787? What will this mean for the hungry Third Estate who comprise 99% of the countries population? What will become of American nobility and the ancien regime? The narrative is unfolding, as it has before. This is the point of no return.
“1/6th gravity apparently translates to 15/6th WASTEDDDDDDDD. Haha! Shit Buzz, what did you put in these brownies? Buzz. BUZZZZZ. I swear to god I can’t even see straight. I’m just gonna lay down for a minute, just to get my bearings. Which way to Detroit? HAHA!! Oh man… So what’re we supposed to do up here? Occupy this moon or somethingAUUUAHAGAHAGAHAGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH”
My favourite of the new cop-non-chalantly-pepper-sprays-people meme.