Speaking as a transfem that mostly tries to stay out of discourse too, from what I understand it was mainly coined somewhat the way you were figuring, but the fact that it pretty clearly takes its syntax from âtransmisogynyâ caused some backlash because that term is used to describe an intersection of two types of societal oppression (transphobia and misogyny). And âandrophobiaâ isnât really anything societally like that bc men as a group arenât societally oppressed on the basis of being men.
It kind of just ends up feeling like itâs just âtransmisogyny for boysâ and imo some people have gotten really weirdly mra about it and aggro against transfems who have an issue with it.
I do agree that there are specific experiences that are unique to different parts of the community and it can be useful to delineate, but I donât know if itâs necessarily a good idea to coopt syntax from a term used to describe an intersection of societal oppression.
Sorry thatâs a lot of words oops
no, that makes sense! I do wish there was a better term available. I think "oppression" might feel like a really strong word for it, and it's stupid and pointless to start doing trauma olympics with other trans people when we're all (pardon the term but it feels accurate) degenerate according to the state. Still, there is a particular appearance to the set of social fears and struggles that trans men and transmascs face that is distinct in some ways from the struggles that trans women and transfems face, and I don't blame people who are experiencing a new social role for wanting a term for their experience. Taking into account that "passing" is a state of being that's precarious and situational, I would argue that transmascs who don't pass are still at risk of experiencing direct effects of misogyny, and transmascs who do are more likely to experience the kind of gender expression policing that homophobic patriarchal structures create for men.
Cis men run into this policing all the time, but it's a more intricate system than it looks like from the outside, much like how "correct" performances of femininity are socially enforced quietly and unconsciously by cis women. This can be jarring for anyone transitioning in either direction. Encountering a wide gulf between "Real Man" or "Real Woman" and "what I am right now" is frequently a powerful dysphoric feeling, no matter which direction you're approaching from. In medical and legal settings, the risk for discriminatory behavior and barriers to care/service access increases even further.
It's a half-inverted mirror of the struggles that transfems face, and it baffles me why this is producing intracommunity strife rather than empathy and understanding and solidarity. I figure that if someone understands what you're going through, but you privately expect they might not have it quite as bad as you, the strategic thing to do is make an ally of that person and hope that their lower day-to-day stress lets them keep more energy up to help fight for you when things get too bad. If you're on the flipside of that, and you think whoever you're talking to has it worse, you should take on some level of responsibility for helping if/when you're able, simply because that's the kind thing to do for another human being.
Anyway, thank you for your response. it's rough to have calm and grounded discussions about topics like this on this website in particular because some people post fully developed and reasoned arguments with sources, and some people are just writing in their public diary out of raw emotion, and there's no way to know how earnestly held or well-thought out one's beliefs are from a single post until you talk to them. I wish discussions on here were more respectful and curious, but the internet outrage machine is hungry and so everyone has to fight all the time.