Emerging Theory of Counseling & Psychotherapy
We appeal only to the patient's brain if we try to inculcate a truth; but if we help him to grow up to this truth in the course of his own development, we have reached his heart, and this appeal goes deeper and acts with greater force.
This is an exploration of my emerging therapeutic approach, which is deeply rooted in philosophical, psychological, and theological foundations. At the core of my therapeutic philosophy lies the conviction that essence precedes existence, affirming each person's intrinsic worth as a divine gift from a transcendent source. This foundational belief is key as it shapes an ethic grounded in love, equality, and moral responsibility toward ourselves and others. I also recognize that humans are complex beings who operate on multiple levels, symbolically, biologically, and spiritually; therefore, my therapeutic practice emphasizes a holistic integration of mind, body, and spirit.
My approach synthesizes Nancy McWilliams’s (1999) psychoanalytic insights, highlighting the importance of exploring unconscious motivations, enhancing self-esteem, building ego resilience, managing emotional experiences, and accepting limitations, with Jungian and existential principles that prioritize agency, individuation, and authentic meaning-making. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) further enriches this synthesis by equipping clients with practical methods for identifying and challenging cognitive distortions, fostering psychological resilience, and strengthening their internal locus of control.
Aware of my biases and acknowledging my ongoing growth as a therapist, I remain committed to continuous self-reflection and openness to refinement. Ultimately, my vision for therapy transcends symptom relief, aiming instead for genuine transformation, profound integration, and holistic awareness. In alignment with Jung’s insight in the epigraph, I believe therapy achieves its deepest impact not merely by conveying intellectual truths but by facilitating clients’ organic growth toward embodied wisdom, engaging both the heart and the mind, thereby fostering authentic and lasting healing.
Philosophical & Spiritual Foundations
We all have conscious and unconscious theological and/or philosophical premises. We assume that the world is ordered in specific ways, and these assumptions lead to ways of thinking that guide our convictions and patterns of behavior. For instance, individuals who believe in an authoritarian God show heightened limbic system activity linked to fear and aggression, correlated with support for the death penalty and military spending. In contrast, those who believe in a benevolent God exhibit anterior cingulate stimulation, which is associated with empathy and is correlated with tolerance and acceptance of diverse beliefs (Newberg & Waldman, 2010). Ideas influence our brains, and the following ideas have a direct impact on human thought and behavior.
It's essential to highlight the contrast between my theory and its apparent antithesis, as understanding what something is by recognizing what it is not can provide a clearer understanding of its nature. Explicitly highlighting contrasts also helps delineate the boundaries, strengths, and potential limitations of my approach. I am positioned in direct contrast to Sartre’s claim that an individual’s existence precedes any inherent essence, as we emerge without innate purpose or identity and must define ourselves solely through our actions and decisions (Aho, 2025). In other words, each person is a self-defining being, living in a world of their own making for themselves (Olson, 1962).
However, as Sartre’s philosophy is wholly adopted alongside postmodernism, which rejects universal truths and Nietzschean perspectivism, which views truth as a social construct, it has fostered a cultural shift toward isolation and an overemphasis on personal satisfaction (Busacca & Rehfuss, 2017; Nietzsche, 2015). Nietzsche himself proclaimed that God is dead not as a literal statement about the death of a deity but as a philosophical observation about the decline of traditional religious and moral foundations in Western culture, leading to a crisis of meaning (Nietzsche, 1961). Jung, too, critiques extreme relativism, warning that severing individuals from deeper, shared structures of meaning leads to spiritual disorientation, existential angst, and detachment from objective moral frameworks and communal obligations —a trajectory mirrored in the rise of narcissism, weakened social cohesion, and diminished moral responsibility (Jung, 1933). Jung was prophetic as those issues, all of which are consistent with observable social trends, increased narcissistic tendencies, weakened social cohesion, diminished moral responsibility, and eroded interpersonal connections (Twenge et al., 2008).
In contrast to the relativist views outlined above, I endorse Thomas Aquinas’s perspective that our inherent essence precedes our existence. Unlike the relativist emphasis on radical self-definition, Aquinas’s framework provides a foundation for meaning, moral responsibility, and social cohesion, fostering greater personal and societal well-being. For Aquinas, God, from which our essence comes, is ipsum esse subsistens—the ground of Being (Aquinas, 1265–1274/2018). When individuals see themselves not as isolated, self-defining entities but as part of the foundation of all reality whose nature is love, they cultivate stronger relationships, deeper meaning, and greater life satisfaction. Empirical research supports that religious individuals who perceive themselves as part of something greater tend to enjoy higher levels of well-being, mental and physical health, and social connectedness (Koenig, 2012). As I consider my own bias, I realize that what we and our clients need most of all is a balanced perspective. Any idea, element, vice, or virtue can go too far, and the balance of opposites is the beginning of homeostasis.
Having established my philosophical and spiritual orientation, I now address how these principles shape my therapeutic practice. By affirming our embeddedness in relationships, meaning, and a transcendent moral order, therapy fosters genuine growth, resilience, and transformation rather than merely managing symptoms. The following section outlines key therapeutic principles, including increasing client agency, integrating unconscious material, and facilitating authentic meaning-making.
Key Principles of Therapy
By synthesizing analytical (Jungian) psychology, Frankl’s logotherapy, CBT, mindfulness, and somatic awareness, I aim to empower clients to cultivate agency, lead meaningful lives, and develop an internal locus of control. The therapist's role is not to lead clients passively through challenges but to serve as a knowledgeable and compassionate guide who illuminates pathways toward self-discovery and healing—much like Virgil, who skillfully guides Dante through the complexities of the Inferno, enabling him not only to navigate the darkness but also to gain wisdom and transformation through the journey (Alighieri, 2006).
Client Agency and Locus of Control
I believe that fostering an internal locus of control is essential for empowering clients’ agency and helping them recognize their ability to influence their experiences, rather than viewing themselves as passive recipients of external forces (Rotter, 1966). Nancy McWilliams (1999) also notes that clients seek therapy not just to mask symptoms but to reclaim mastery over their lives. This process begins when a counselor recognizes that each client carries within them the seeds of their own healing. By guiding clients to acknowledge and grieve unrealizable desires, it frees psychological energy to pursue realistic, self-directed goals (McWilliams, 1999).
Unfortunately, our zeitgeist often fosters and even promotes an external locus of control, facilitating an endless pursuit of safety and avoidance of discomfort. The story of Sleeping Beauty illustrates this well: by keeping her in a perpetual safe space, her parents left her unprepared for the realities of life. When she inevitably encountered adversity, she fell into a deep sleep, symbolizing her lack of resilience and powerlessness to help herself. Although folk wisdom advises, “Prepare the child for the road, not the road for the child,” overreliance on “safe spaces” and labeling microaggressions does more harm than good. Often, what triggers someone is not the real problem, but rather a sign of unresolved wounds that need healing. McWilliams (1999) cautions, “It can be a malignant kind of projection to assume that because one is experiencing certain affects, the person inducing them is (consciously or unconsciously) intending that reaction” (p. 107).
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) explicitly and effectively targets cognitive distortions, including emotional reasoning, catastrophizing, overgeneralizing, dichotomous thinking, labeling, negative filtering, discounting positives, and blaming (Leahy et al., 2011; Butler et al., 2006). Our culture and sociopolitical discourse are increasingly normalizing these distortions through shifts toward radical individualism, relativism, and uncritical acceptance of subjective feelings as objective truths. While these tendencies are most visible in certain progressive ideologies, conservative frameworks are not immune; philosophical commitments to rigid traditionalism, idealized notions of a fixed moral order, and resistance to ambiguity or complexity can also reinforce distorted thinking. In both cases, foundational beliefs—whether grounded in individualism or an inflexible metaphysical certainty—can contribute to a cognitive environment in which nuance is lost and polarization thrives. By encouraging clients to evaluate their emotional responses rather than reflexively validating or suppressing them, CBT bolsters psychological resilience, emotional balance, and a robust internal locus of control, empowering them to confront life's inherent difficulties and enhancing their agency.
Moreover, McWilliams’s (1999) emphasis on ego strength and self-cohesion is a core aspect of my emerging framework. Recognizing that self-esteem can unravel in the face of unexpected criticism, the therapist’s role includes modeling imperfection—acknowledging fallibility to show that self-regard can coexist with human flaws—and fostering an atmosphere where even shame-colored experiences are explored as part of the human condition rather than catastrophic failures. These elements ultimately strengthen clients' ability to confront internal conflicts and develop a unified sense of self (McWilliams, 1999).
I also hold a therapeutic disposition of going slowly and avoiding assumptions before diving into the deep waters of the unconscious. Drawing on McWilliams’s caution against attacking clients’ defenses head-on, I begin at the surface, addressing the immediate concerns or coping styles before guiding clients to uncover deeper material. This stance resonates with Jung’s method of gradually integrating repressed shadow material before dialoging with the anima/animus (Jung & Franz, 1964). It ensures the therapist and client build trust and rapport before venturing into more vulnerable territory. McWilliams shares a case in which a client’s suicide kit gave him a feeling of ultimate control and autonomy (McWilliams, 1999), highlighting why we should not be quick to strip away protective defenses.
Nietzsche famously said, “A man who has a why to live for can bear with any how” (Frankl, 1966). Mental health is not about being happy, for happiness is a transient emotion. It is the meaning in our lives that truly sustains us, even in concentration camps. Frankl's Logotherapy emphasizes that meaning can be discovered in three primary ways: creating something valuable, encountering someone or something meaningful, and adopting a resilient attitude toward unavoidable suffering (Frankl, 1966).
This core principle is supported by research indicating that approximately 40% of our happiness stems from intentional choices, while the remaining 60% is influenced by factors beyond our immediate control (Waldinger & Schulz, 2023). Furthermore, the concept of a “happiness set-point”—the stable level to which we revert following emotional extremes—aligns with opponent-process theory (after every emotion, we come back to baseline), reinforcing the inadequacy of happiness as a singular life goal (Mineka & Kihlstrom, 1978; Solomon & Corbit, 1974). Thus, my therapeutic approach does not merely chase ephemeral happiness. Instead, following McWilliams (1999), I emphasize awareness of what cannot be changed and focus on the 40% within our control toward enduring growth, purpose, and fulfillment.
As noted earlier, therapy should focus on enhancing clients' ego strength, self-cohesion, and resilience (McWilliams, 1999). Many individuals face psychological difficulties due to a fragmented sense of self and a disjointed understanding of meaning, which can help them navigate life's inevitable challenges. Therefore, creating meaning serves as a remedy for psychological disintegration. Frankl (1966) argues explicitly against pursuing a "tensionless state" (p. 105), instead urging us toward actively striving for worthwhile, meaningful goals and willingly accepting life's inherent struggles—what Dostoevsky poignantly described as the fear of "not being worthy of one's sufferings" (Frankl, 1966, p. 66).
Christ, as the quintessential embodiment of an internal locus of control and the ultimate archetypal symbol of wholeness for Jung, showed us that voluntarily carrying our cross, as it were, is essential to a fulfilling life and a balanced psyche (Jung, 2010). That archetypal pattern is an axiomatic truth embedded in reality. Just as physical growth requires tension—microtears in muscle fibers, for instance, produce greater strength—psychological growth demands a similar willingness to confront discomfort. Therapists are like architects strengthening a fragile structure by carefully increasing its load; they should embrace creating constructive tension in therapy, gently guiding clients toward deeper meaning and resilience.
Jung & Yoga: A Holistic Approach to Healing
I do not seek to be only a clinician. My role is as an advocate for social change and a counterforce to cultural factors that can perpetuate psychological distress. Beyond the cultural elements discussed earlier, two pervasive schisms remain: one between mind and body and another between ancient wisdom and modern scientific thought. My emerging therapeutic modality endeavors to repair these ruptures, in part, by merging Jungian principles with Yogic psychosomatic philosophy.
Both analytical psychology and Yoga affirm that humans are not singular, static entities. While our ego tends to fix our identity as “I, me, and my,” we are, in truth, a dynamic interplay of conscious and unconscious forces. Jungians locate this dynamism in archetypal material, such as the shadow, complexes, and the collective unconscious (Jung & Franz, 1964); yoga describes it through multiple koshas, or layers of physical and spiritual existence. Jung’s concepts of the ego and the Self closely mirror the yogic notions of Asmita—the constructed sense of self around which we orbit—and Ātman—the deeper, unified wholeness akin to the imago Dei, respectively. In essence, Jung’s individuation and Yoga’s very name (from the Sanskrit yuj, “to unite”) both emphasize integrating these disparate parts into a cohesive whole (Sommers-Flanagan & Sommers-Flanagan, 2015; Stone, 2008).
This integration process demands an encounter with what is hidden, suppressed, or feared within us. As Jung notes, "No tree can grow to Heaven unless its roots reach down to Hell" (Jung, 1969, as cited in Peterson, 2018, p. 180). Just as psychological growth requires confronting our unconscious darkness, the shadow, so does Yoga engage this reality. At the end of a Yoga session, we practice Savasana (the corpse pose)—a physical surrender, a symbolic death before renewal. In both traditions, descent precedes ascent; we can only move toward wholeness and transformation by acknowledging and integrating what lies beneath the surface. This archetypal pattern is powerfully embodied in Christ, whom Jung regards as the ultimate symbol of the Self, the archetype of wholeness. The harrowing of hell—a pivotal descent between death and resurrection—illustrates that to reclaim wholeness, one must first journey into the depths.
Jung asserts that “the body means little to us without the psyche, as the latter does without the body” (Jung, 1933, p. 75). Critically, a Yogic lens also highlights the body’s importance, offering practices, such as postures (asanas), breathwork, and mindful awareness, that release tension, create physical space in the body for emotional processing, and cultivate a clearer, more compassionate self-understanding. Mindfulness, in particular, has been empirically demonstrated to reduce stress and improve emotional regulation (Robins et al., 2012). Rather than treating mind and body as separate, Yoga asserts their inextricable connection—not only to each other but also to nature’s broader rhythms, as seen in Ayurveda and Traditional Chinese Medicine, which regard individuals as microcosms of the macrocosm (Lad, 1984; Beinfield & Korngold, 1992) When woven together, these approaches encourage clients to recognize the mental grooves, or samskaras, shaping their patterns of behavior; by consciously engaging with these impressions—whether we call them complexes or samskaras—clients exercise greater agency over their emotional and physical states.
Ultimately, blending Jungian and Yogic perspectives, whose efficacy is well documented (Keller et al., 2002; Cramer et al., 2018), supports the broader goals I have already outlined: deepening insight into unconscious motivations, fostering emotional resilience and self-cohesion, and guiding clients toward a lived experience of wholeness by validating the realities of both mind and body while bridging ancient wisdom with contemporary knowledge. Yoga views healing as an ethical action, and this integration offers a potent path toward healing not only the individual but, through ripple effects, the communities and systems in which we live.
Conclusion and Looking to the Future
Therapy is a profound responsibility that demands both skill and self-awareness. As I refine my emerging therapeutic framework, I recognize that it is shaped by a unique blend of influences: analytical psychology, existential philosophy, CBT principles, and holistic practices like Yoga, while also reflecting on my own cultural, spiritual, and personal biases. To ensure a genuinely client-centered ethical approach, I must remain vigilant about how these influences manifest in practice.
Further grounding my orientation are the objectives McWilliams (1999) highlights—insight development, increased agency, enhanced emotional awareness, ego strength, and self-cohesion—which inform my goal of guiding clients toward an internal locus of control. I demonstrate to them the effectiveness of “taking up their cross” and transforming challenges into catalysts for growth, aligning with Frankl’s (1966) emphasis on finding meaning over fleeting happiness. At its core, therapy is a dialogue between the conscious and the unconscious—between the executive function of the ego and the deeper, unseen forces that shape us. True healing requires engaging with suffering, integrating our repressed parts, and discovering a purpose that transcends mere emotion. In keeping with Jung’s view that individuation involves acknowledging all facets of ourselves and echoing McWilliams’s (1999) recognition that we must accept what cannot be changed, therapeutic growth becomes a process of reconciling polarities and embracing the responsibilities of living, ultimately guiding clients to explore deeper purpose, resilience, and authenticity in their lives.
Given the weight of such a responsibility, I commit myself to two core values: consistent self-care and humility. My emerging theory of counseling incorporates clear biases and firm dispositions. I emphasize an inherent worth given to us by a divine creator; I am weary of extreme ideology and have a relatively unique blend of ideas and lived experiences. Therefore, I understand that many of my clients may not view the world in the same way I do, and it would be unethical and negligent to attempt to sway them in my direction. I will avoid this pitfall at all costs as I work through countertransference and other challenges in my personal therapy.
While this paper represents my current understanding, my framework will continue to evolve as I gain experience, engage in self-reflection, and remain open to new insights. Moving forward, several key questions remain. One ongoing consideration is how different theoretical frameworks—psychoanalysis, existentialism, cognitive-behavioral approaches, and holistic traditions—can be more seamlessly integrated to provide a richer, more adaptable therapeutic model. Another important question is how spirituality can be incorporated ethically into therapy, particularly given my comfort with interfaith dialogue. Additionally, I must continuously examine how to balance compassion and boundaries, ensuring that empathy does not become enabling or rescuing. Beyond these immediate concerns, I wonder what other disciplines, such as neuroscience, anthropology, or comparative mythology, can further enrich my therapeutic approach and deepen my understanding of the human experience.
Although I may not tell my clients explicitly, I believe that in this work, I am not merely dealing with neurosis, pathology, or mental health issues; I am coming face-to-face with people’s souls. As an advocate, I confront hidden, malevolent forces and help the world heal. As I use the word “I” here, I remember that the self-gratifying ego can often get in the way. I intend to wake up each morning with the attitude that it is not I who is healing the client. I am helping them come in contact with a perennial source of wholeness within themselves to which they have ready access; they might just need help remembering the way back to it.
Aho, K. (2025). Existentialism. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2025 Edition). Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/existentialism/
Alighieri, D. (2006). The divine comedy (R. Kirkpatrick, Ed.; R. Kirkpatrick, Trans.). Penguin Publishing Group.
Aquinas, T. (1265-1274/2018). Summa Theologica (Fathers of the English Dominican Province, Trans.). Coyote Canyon Press (I,q.4,a.2).
Beinfield, H., & Korngold, E. (1992). Between Heaven and Earth: A Guide to Chinese Medicine. Random House Publishing Group.
Busacca, L. A., & Rehfuss, M. C. (Eds.). (2017). Postmodern Career Counseling: A Handbook of Culture, Context, and Cases. American Counseling Association.
Butler, A. C., Chapman, J. E., Forman, E. M., & Beck, A. T. (2006). The empirical status of cognitive-behavioral therapy: a review of meta-analyses. Clinical Psychology Review, 26(1), 17–31.
Cramer, H., Anheyer, D., & Saha, F. J. (2018). Yoga for posttraumatic stress disorder–a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry, 18(72), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1650-x
Jung, C. G. (1933). Modern Man in Search of a Soul (W.S. Dell & C.F. Baynes, Trans.). Harcourt, Inc.
Jung, C. G. (2010). Answer to Job: (From Vol. 11 of the Collected Works of C. G. Jung) (R. F.C. Hull, Trans.). Princeton University Press.
Jung, C. G., & Franz, M.-L. v. (1964). Man and His Symbols (C. G. Jung & M.-L. v. Franz, Eds.). Random House Publishing Group.
Keller, W., Westhoff, G., Dilg, R., Rohner, R., Studt, H. H., & the Study Group on Empirical Psychotherapy Research in Analytical Psychology. (2002). Efficacy and cost-effectiveness aspects of outpatient (Jungian) psychoanalysis and psychotherapy—A catamnestic study. In M. Leuzinger-Bohleber & M. Target (Eds.), Outcomes of psychoanalytic treatment (pp. 186–197). Philadelphia, PA: Whurr.
Koenig, H. G. (2012). Religion, Spirituality, and Health: The Research and Clinical Implications. ISRN Psychiatry, 2012, 1-33. https://doi-org.ctproxy.palni.edu/10.5402/2012/278730
Lad, V. (1984). Ayurveda: The Science of Self-healing: A Practical Guide. Lotus Press.
Leahy, R. L., Holland, S. J., & McGinn, L. K. (2011). Treatment Plans and Interventions for Depression and Anxiety Disorders. Guilford Publications.
McWilliams, N. (1999). Psychoanalytic Case Formulation. Guilford Publications.
Mineka, S., Suomi, S. J., & DeLizio, R. (1981). Multiple separations in adolescent monkeys: An opponent-process interpretation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110(1), 56-85. https://doi-org.proxy.ulib.uits.iu.edu/10.1037/0096-3445.110.1.56
Newberg, A. B., & Waldman, M. R. (2010). How God Changes Your Brain: Breakthrough Findings from a Leading Neuroscientist. Random House Publishing Group.
Nietszche, F. (1961). Thus Spoke Zarathustra: A Book for Everyone and No One. Penguin Classics.
Nietzsche, F. (2015). Human, All Too Human and Beyond Good and Evil. Wordsworth Editions.
Olson, R. G. (1962). An Introduction to Existentialism. Dover Publications, Inc.
Peterson, J. B. (2018). 12 Rules for Life: An Antidote to Chaos (N. Doidge, Ed.). Random House of Canada.
Robins, C. J., Keng, S. L., Ekblad, A. G., & Brantley, J. G. (2012). Effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction on emotional experience and expression: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 68(1), 117-131. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20857
Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80(1), 1-28.
Solomon, R. L., & Corbit, J. D. (1974). An opponent-process theory of motivation: I. Temporal dynamics of affect. Psychological Review, 81(2), 119-145.
Sommers-Flanagan, J., & Sommers-Flanagan, R. (2015). Counseling and Psychotherapy Theories in Context and Practice, with Video Resource Center: Skills, Strategies, and Techniques. Wiley.
Stone, M. (2008). The Inner Tradition of Yoga: A Guide to Yoga Philosophy for the Contemporary Practitioner. Shambhala.
Twenge, J. M., Konrath, S., Foster, J. D., Campbell, K. W., & Bushman, B. J. (2008). Egos Inflating Over Time: A Cross-Temporal Meta-Analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality, 76(4), 875–902. https://doi-org.ctproxy.palni.edu/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00507.x
Waldinger, R., & Schulz, M. (2023). The Good Life: Lessons from the World's Longest Scientific Study of Happiness. Simon & Schuster.
