Reposts are appreciated! :)
Check out cheddyju's commissions and portfolio! | Artist who loves the Vtuber and streaming community. She/Her Fun fact: I play the piano an

No title available
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

ellievsbear

oozey mess
occasionally subtle

gracie abrams
todays bird
Fai_Ryy
icyghini twinkie
official daine visual archive
Monterey Bay Aquarium

Discoholic đȘ©
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
will byers stan first human second

â
hello vonnie
macklin celebrini has autism
đȘŒ
sheepfilms
Claire Keane

seen from Germany

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Spain

seen from Singapore
seen from Italy

seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from Senegal
seen from Belarus

seen from France
seen from Argentina
seen from Brazil

seen from Brazil
seen from Venezuela
seen from Iraq
seen from Uzbekistan
seen from Brazil
seen from Denmark
@cheddyju
Reposts are appreciated! :)
Check out cheddyju's commissions and portfolio! | Artist who loves the Vtuber and streaming community. She/Her Fun fact: I play the piano an
hes so silly <3
shakes
emails
whats a stereotype for your country that you absolutely do. mine is that i unironically go "eh" and apologize a lot and i often drink maple syrup straight
The grip that Burger & Big Drink has on the American People cannot be overstated
a more personal reflection in response to mikoto's t3, about how diagnostic labels tend to only be applied after a breaking point, and how societal systems often fail us
you know how sometimes there's characters we find fascinating because their story is compelling, even though they aren't necessarily relatable? and then, there's others that we grow attached to because we see so much of ourselves in them?
i'd always considered mikoto to be in the first category for me, but after seeing the report, i realized there's actually a strong similarity to my own reckoning with mental health. it's left me reflecting on how easily we dismiss things that are unlabeled as insignificant, and even after finding a label that fits, it can feel restrictive, binding. we start thinking of the diagnosis as the source of all issues, rather than recognizing it simply as a term to describe an individual's experience.
i find the claims that "the report says mikoto couldn't have developed DID in childhood" misguided at best and insulting at worst for a multitude of reasons... but what i want to focus on for now is this notion that if somebody is successful in school/work and has little to no social disturbances, then that person must not have any mental disorders. in fact, they have no right to claim any sort of suffering, and it's insulting to those who have real problems.
i've heard this kind of rhetoric for all my life, internalized it as a child, carried that with me through teenage years and into young adulthood, mocked and diminished myself with it even in the absence of others.
i lived in a stable, middle-class home with parents that took care of me, so why would i have any problems? nevermind the fact that i was never taken seriously when i was "too emotional", or that my opinions were often talked over or turned into an argument (which would lead into the "too emotional, you're irrational" problem again), to the point where i'd avoid conversations by zoning out, and never disclosed anything about my personal thoughts or interests, feeling like my family never knew the "real" me.
but hey, we'd always eat dinner together. and if i really needed to buy something, i could always ask and usually get it. and if i got a call from home, i'd definitely pick up and let them know how work was going fine, not to worry about me, because i'd want them to be proud...
oh, right, and there's also the thing about how mikoto thought of himself as a genius, and never had setbacks or disappointments.
i was precisely that stereotype of the asian kid who's better than you at everything. straight As with minimal effort, shelves full of awards for musical performance, mathematics, athletics, so on and so forth. and that didn't end for me after high school, like it does for many "gifted" children. actually, i excelled even more in university, where the only reason my perfect GPA became "blemished" was because of a severe sinus infection during finals, and an unreasonable professor who wouldn't allow me to take the exam at another time when i was healthy. and no, i didn't have to sell my soul pulling all-nighters to study. actually, i spent most of my time having fun with various social circles, and would often skip classes to sleep in after a night out.
i always, always feel an ick when i bring up these facts about my life because there is inevitably someone who sees all this and thinks, "wow, we get it. you're very talented and smart and everything comes easily to you. lay off the bragging, would you? you're not special." idk, maybe that's just the critic in my own head talking, but hey, i got that voice from somewhere for a reason.
i bring all this up because mikoto's spectacular crash-and-burn in his first job after graduating is hilariously and horribly relatable to me.
i'd secured a great position with one of the largest healthtech companies in the country. i'd impressed them during my internship, and felt confident that i could continue doing good work there. and, at first, that seemed to be the case. training went off without a hitch, i was getting along with my coworkers, and i was excited to finally manage my own apartment space...
fast-forward a year, and i was struggling to clock in on time. project deadlines felt overwhelming, and meetings were filled with technical jargon that i couldn't parse at all. my peers were being promoted to leadership positions, while i was struggling not to be left behind. i was told that 8 hours a day wasn't enough, because my coworkers were usually working 9 hours at minimum, and i ought to match their efforts, right? i'd often alternate between hours spent zoning out staring at a blank wall, and hours stuck at my desk late into the evening because i'd finally gotten into the flow of things, and if i stopped working now, i'd lose all my progress! only to finally come home to an empty, dark apartment, and realize, "oh, i still need to make dinner..."
the apartment was starting to smell. i was too tired to clean, too tired to cook, too tired to shower. dirty dishes, rotten groceries, infested garbage can. that's disgusting, isn't it? it's ok, nobody noticed, so nobody cared. people are pretty good at hiding the ugly signs of mental illness.
i couldn't even admit it was mental illness at the time. it was laziness, it was burnout, it was... idk. not that bad. it was all my own fault.
once my absenteeism became too much for my company to ignore, i became partially hospitalized for depression. i learned a lot while i was there and started making real connections with people for the first time since graduating, but just when things were starting to look up for me, my insurance coverage was pulled, with the reason being, "i wasn't depressed enough". how did they determine this? by the number i filled out on a 1-10 survey about how much i thought about suicide. ridiculous.
i went back to work feeling betrayed and let down by the healthcare system, and within a few months, i was finally fired. finally, i say, because i felt relieved that it was over. i'd "failed", if we imagine this whole school -> employment pipeline as some kind of massive exam, but i was glad. i could still start over.
looking back, it was only because of this "failure" that i was finally able to consider that i had ADHD in addition to depression, and receive a diagnosis and medication. up until then, i'd always thought, "well, i have some traits that fit the description for ADHD, but it doesn't impair my day-to-day function, so i don't have it!" it was only after i became impaired to the point of partial hospitalization and unemployment that i could even consider a diagnosis. and even after receiving that label, did my issues get magically resolved? absolutely not.
so, what does this mean when we think about what the label of DID does for mikoto?
i like to think about what yamanaka said once about his character writing, which is that rather than thinking of labels first and then working inward, he prefers to start with the character's inner traits and work outward. from there, certain labels will naturally bloom as a result. with this kind of writing, it is easy for a character to be misinterpreted or misunderstood, but it reflects much more accurately what people are like in real life.
we ought to remind ourselves that behind every label is a living, breathing person with a wealth of personal experiences. and just like es said, every person's suffering is unique to them. there is no benefit to playing comparison games where we say, "this person had it worse," "that doesn't count as abuse," "you should be grateful you didn't deal with x," and so on. living comes first; labels come after.
doubting mikoto's experience with DID on the basis of him having a "perfect childhood" is reductive, dismissive, and misinformed.
i've gotten flack for "treating mikoto like a real person" with this line of thought, but does it not make sense to think that if you apply this kind of framework to a fictional character, you might apply it to real people as well? can you understand that people who relate to mikoto's experiences (including pwDID) might feel shut down and invalidated when they see his character getting mocked for being "unrealistic" and "harmful"?
there's a whole other tangent i can dive into about how the label of DID is forced onto mikoto specifically in the context of a criminal justice system, but as that goes beyond my personal experience and has been explored by other people in the community, i won't harp on it anymore.
this is a more vulnerable post for me, who has been scared off from online spaces before, but this kind of self-reflection helps me to evaluate myself and issues we can improve upon on both a societal and personal level, so i hope it helps at least one other person to do the same.
Thinks. Milgram's themes of how the system can bring people to a boiling point (of varying degrees of harm to others or oneself) being so well supported by the fact most of these issues stem from the character's upbringings (positive or negative) or their status as a parent (Shidou, for example). Nods. I like that.
shit non-traumatised people who had perfect lives up until they got a job say (voice dramas, interrogations)
Mad respect to whoever called their game studio "Major Threats". I admire you please hire me
that moment where im trying to google the game development (?) studio major threats and i get articles about actual major threats :rolls eyes:
Mad respect to whoever called their game studio "Major Threats". I admire you please hire me
feeling intense stomachache after eating a cheesecake.
update: talked about mikoto with a friend as i was writing this and it died down. I transferred the stomachache. Lets go
I've always been an extremely casual MILGRAM fan, but I want to take a minute to talk about the evolution of my opinion on Mikoto's trial 3, cause I think it's important.
When I saw the report, I literally about threw my phone across the room. I was spinning through the stages of grief like a fucking merry-go-round, telling everybody I knew how bad they butchered my boy.
But then, while looking for people online to validate my frustration (like a complete idiot), I came across some takes from people who... actually looked at something other than the songs (hi new mutuals, that's some of you!). And I realized I completely misinterpreted everything (and made the mistake of having an opinion without having the full picture).
I finally got around to making that longer analysis on Substack.. if anyone is interested click here.
Seeing the way you compared Haruka and Mikoto hit hard because I have always #noticed that the fandom is infinitely more understanding of Haruka than it is of Mikoto. Itâs only gotten worse now, of course, but it was still this way prior to âRequiemâ and âThe Oneâ being released.
Mikoto really does represent children who are abused/traumatized in âordinaryâ homes wellâand, in general, children who experience abuse/trauma that can so easily be ignored. If a child is charming enough, if they can face the world with a smile and perform giftedness, their abusers can get away with pretty much anything.
As you said, it inconveniences adults more to aid a child like Mikoto. It disrupts the illusion of perfection: the happy family with loving parents and the child who flourishes because of them. Illusions like this are pillars of a âperfect, traditional societyâ. Law enforcement is more devoted to protecting these pillars than it is to the protection of the vulnerable and weak.
The Milgram fandomâs reaction to Mikotoâs writing parallels many social issues, and childism is one of them. Good shit.
(Itâs very good how Haruka and Mikoto have such different backgrounds honestly, because you can see the negative impacts the system has on children across all sorts of situationsâthe subtler and the more overt. Thatâs another thing I think about sometimes.)
"i would kill a pedophile to protect my child" ok but would you teach your child how to say no? even to adults? even to adults you like? would you teach your child the words "penis" and "vulva" and then use them? would you let them ask questions about their body? would you answer them honestly? would you learn how to cope with your feelings when you talk about human bodies, so they don't feel ashamed? would you set a positive example for how you talk about your body? would you tell your child they don't have to hug or kiss anyone? would you tell your family the same? would you stand by them when they refuse to hug someone? even someone you know has never done anything to hurt them? would you let your child avoid food they don't like? would you let you child avoid people they don't like? would you believe them? would you sit in the discomfort of not knowing all the answers and not take it out on them? would you love your child the same if someone did hurt them? would you make them feel valued just as they are? would you let them talk to doctors or nurses in private? would you let them express their feelings? would you show interest in their life? would you let your child say no to you? would you help your child feel safe coming to you when they make a mistake? would you apologize to your child? would you believe them? would you put aside your anger to focus on what would make your child feel safe and loved? would you put your ego aside for your child? would you take your child's concerns seriously? would you listen to your child? would you believe them?
I would both do all those things AND kill a pedo to protect my child, if I had to.
Yesss
i'm gonna add this comment by @papercrane:
"Maya angelou's family killed a pedophile that raped her, and that just traumatized her more. "I thought that I had caused the manâs death, because I had spoken his name. That was my seven-and-a-half-year logic. So I stopped talking for five years." Read I know why the caged bird sings."
and here is my comment:
the fantasy of killing a pedophile to defend your child is... an escape from reality. as with all fantasies where a single act of violence stands for a lifetime of effortful care. it lets us off the hook for the day to day labor of actually protecting the human beings around us. it gives us an excuse to look away from what abuse actually looks like.
it allows us to ignore that setting boundaries is a daily practice. it allows us to ignore the subtle ways in which we punish children for having boundaries. it allows us not to think about things we can do, the effort we can put in, in smaller repeated ways, to be kind and caring. to be safe to talk to.
it is a grand gesture that, were you to actually go through with it, would neither prevent the harm that you fear nor help your child to heal from it. it is an idea with no bearing on reality for 99.99% of people, while rape and abuse are a reality for a large fraction of people.
it is not useful to imagine killing a pedophile. it is not useful to claim you would kill a pedophile. it wouldn't be useful to actually attempt to kill a pedophile in almost any situation.
it is useful to think about how you can help your child know they can get help. they can say no. they can tell adults to stop. they deserve to be comfortable. they deserve to be informed.
the entire point of the post is that your child will not be saved by your imagined wrath. the entire point is that your day to day actions, and your attitude towards children as people, are more impactful to your child's well-being. far more realistic. more important.
not least because your child doesn't need you to be wrathful. they need your love. they need care. they need attention.
meanwhile, the public performance of wanting to kill child abusers doesn't do anything to child abusers. most child abusers believe they are doing the right thing for their children.
saying you want to kill abusers doesn't signal anything good to children, either. as others have said, it makes children more afraid to speak up and ask for help. that might be their mom, their coach, their troop leader. it gives those abusers leverage; the children cannot tell if they want things to be stable.
and it makes it harder for adults to BELIEVE children, too! because if their child was really abused, then they've staked their honor on committing that violence, even if it was against their brother or spouse or grandpa or pastor or neighbor or their other kid's favorite babysitter. and if they don't want to do that, well... then they must decide whether they believe completely their child, or whether their child's boundaries must really be respected, or... if maybe it's impossible to know.
how many abuse survivors have tried to disclose, only to be told that so-and-so wouldn't do that, or they didn't mean it, because so-and-so loves you and we all like so-and-so. this dichotomy goes both ways, psychologically. if a child abuser is entirely evil and has to be killed, then someone who's not entirely evil and i don't want to kill can't be a child abuser. this must be something else. there must be a mistake.
you can not adequately protect your children from abuse if you hold on to this idea. i am telling you. your insistence that killing pedophiles will protect your children is holding you back. it is not useful. it is not cute to talk about how much you want to do a single act of violence to abusers as if that would ever be enough to outrun the culture of abuse and the dehumanization of children in our society. you cannot cling to this like a talisman that would ward off any harm your children may come to. you cannot escape reality by telling yourself you'd be a total badass and kill that bad guy dead. this is not helpful.
(i doubt mikoto was written to be a programmed system but this is a general statement directed towards this sentiment) there is really smth to be said abt how the assertion that ALL depictions of DID associated with perpetrating murder & violence should not EVER exist is erasing the experiences of a significant portion of systems whose identity is built on exactly that but i cant quite put it into words lmfao
the same group of ppl that earlier ideas of DID was based on? this isnt a whataboutism or appealing to an outlier this is an established demographic like bro survivors of extreme abuse are way more likely than the average person to be extremely messed up. sorry these survivors of being brainwashed into perpetration/ killing & threatened with death or worse if they dont comply end up being violent & unpalatable
if you lived thru abuse that forced you into scenarios unthinkable for the average person that divided ur brain into such extremes you will almost certainly end up with strong contradictions between the ''normative'' parts that want to be as removed from the abuse as possible & the ''programmed'' parts that are directly affected by it & to an outside observer (& even to urself at times!!!!!!) you might just fit perfectly into the good alter evil alter trope
Incomplete thing I was gonna put on Reddit but I didn't feel like dealing with Reddit and it's been a few days
I will be parroting a few opinions from systems on Tumblr since I think their input is really helpful to understanding where my head is at with this.
I think that Mikoto has DID. I also think that he formed a new alter because of his new abusive job. I think that Mikotoâs life wasnât actually that great and the report is presented in a manner similar to cases presented by the prosecution. A report meant to ignite disgust in people and as consequence leave them fuming in the wake of what Mikoto did.
Recently I learned that the top reason for forming DID in Japan is neglect. Itâs sometimes been floated around here and there that he was parentified by his mother, since the only man in the house left during the divorce and Mikoto was left to assume every single role people wanted him to fit into. I feel like the report even hints at Mikoto having a very loose, fluid sense of self, suggesting that he has a self for every situation he could get into and thatâs what helps him be popular in school and other situations.
I think that it isnât too much a stretch to suggest that Mikoto has always been dissociative throughout his life, constantly molding himself around his environment to avoid stirring the pot and making people unhappy, people-pleasing until thereâs no one left to people-please and he can finally rest. Heâs an upstart, he gets a job, he wants to make his mom and sister proud⊠But thereâs one problem. No, make that many, many problems. His boss is a workaholic and transfers that attitude to all of his workers. He is loud and berating and he pushes Mikoto to take on hours that are torturous in nature. Mikoto goes through grueling hours and intense sleep deprivation for 100 days. He is shown to be afraid of dying because of how vicious his job at the time was.
Letâs not address the dissociation for now. I imagine itâs hard to picture happening for people who donât go through it. Instead, focus on the sleep deprivation. The constant verbal abuse. What were likely conflicting and confusing directions, only to be berated for not immediately picking up on the subtleties workers with seniority likely picked up over time. The constant piling on of more and more work, the shots of false relief only to be cruelly corrected and then cast back on the course with all the ferocity of a drill sergeant. Letâs not take this as an angle of mental illness, because oftentimes people focus singularly on the idea of a mentally ill person. What I want you to focus on is the following:
Would you be okay after 100 days of cruelty, torture, and constant stress that made you feel like you were going to die?
I understand the disappointment. Clinical diagnostic materials are quite often treated as gospel because they do help improve a lot of peopleâs lives. However, itâs important to address that we really donât know everything there is to know about dissociation yet. On top of that, Mikoto was only diagnosed with DID after being brought into MILGRAM. This means that he went his entire life potentially having symptoms and sometimes wondering why he does certain things or forgets certain things, but never having an actual answer until heâs inside of an abusive prison system. He genuinely may have had symptoms and irregularities appear completely normalized to him, and only have something as severe as Johnâs actions brought to his attention upon his entry into MILGRAM.
When heâs brought into MILGRAM, heâs so confused by the situation that he literally has no clue whatâs happening and assumes itâs some prank show or reality television show. Es in Trial 1 fully embodies the system as it operates typically. It is very unmerciful to Mikoto, so Es is similarly unmerciful. When Mikoto is lackadaisical in the face of what Es knows to be a very serious situation - one in which everyone present has taken at least one human life - Es is disgusted and insulted and insists that Mikoto admit to his crime.
Itâs not that Mikoto faked it, or doesnât have it, or is a poor representation of it. To me, I think he could represent someone out there. Not in the sense that someone out there with DID became a spree killer after 100 days of legalized torture, but rather, he could represent someone who is constantly forced to march in line towards a painful, miserable existence that literally everyone around himself seems to expect him to be fine with.
I also feel like I need to talk about how Mikoto gets diagnosed in the first place. There are no doctors in MILGRAM (who know of the condition at the time), in the moments of the diagnosis it was literally just Kotoko and Es. Kotoko and Es, the latter of which whoâd gotten attacked by Mikoto moments earlier and who had still been insisting that Mikoto remember his crime. I donât think Es even really knew what DID was when Kotoko came in, Es is amnesiatic, they are introduced to the concept of MILGRAM and never ask questions about going home or going anywhere else. Es seems to exist solely within the world of MILGRAM and further likely had to be introduced to different concepts over time.
So, Kotoko is the one to bring up the possibility of DID in Mikoto, and Es agrees to it because her definition of it and her explanation of it makes sense to them with the behavior that Mikoto showed.
Mikoto during Trial 1 was never formally diagnosed with DID by a doctor, he was diagnosed with DID by Kotoko, a character who seems to be a sort of way for the story to criticize punitive justice and how MILGRAM itself works. Kotoko even discusses possible discussions of whether or not Mikoto is culpable because of his diagnosis as a sort of angle, as if sheâs fascinated with what conclusion Es will come to. If viewing the voice dramas in order, we wouldnât know what Kotoko does to guilty prisoners quite yet. We only become cognizant of what she does to guilty prisoners once the guilty prisoners have been punished by a wild and free Kotoko. Sure, maybe we could try piecing together from her music video what her idea of justice is, but Iâm giving people the benefit of the doubt because frankly I donât think people wouldâve voted anyone guilty if they knew Kotoko was going to near-fatally assault a character like Mahiru.
All of this is to say, Kotoko posits the idea of having Es debate whether or not to hold Mikoto culpable for his crime because he has a dissociative disorder. Kotoko is also the prisoner who viciously derides the fact Es was merciful to literally any of the other prisoners in Trial 2. I feel like between Trial 1 and Trial 2, Kotoko found herself disgusted in the affirmations of the innocent verdicts and thus began calling for us to tell her to bare her fangs for our sakes again. Kotoko is punitive justice, Kotoko is the audienceâs shadow, Kotoko is what the audience becomes when they vote in order to punish or kill a prisoner, rather than to engage in the idea of affirming or disaffirming beliefs within them.
I think itâs interesting that the prisoner who embodies the crueler side of the institution the most is the one to assign that label to Mikoto. Because even if it may be accurate to him, a label such as âmentally illâ in literally any respect often causes people to do a double-take. Itâs often the subject of headlines when something bad happens. Mental illness diagnosed following a crime is usually to immediately explain why someone lashing out in a violent way happened. It isnât that the world theyâre living in pushed them to react this way, itâs that they had something wrong with themselves. Kotoko is the system pushing the label onto Mikoto because he behaves in ways she thinks she can prescribe a definition onto. It helps her dismiss him easier. It helps her justify to herself that assaulting him is a normal and fine thing to do because heâs dehumanized to her by the diagnosis.
i cried everytime i have to correct and debate with those who have EXTREMELY poor reading comprehension and taking their assumption as the official 'implication' or even 'CONFIRMATION' Y'ALL ARE SPREADING MISINFO AND BLAMING IT ALL ON YAMANAKA SOBS VIOLENTLY
nodding. that sort of fan aggression towards a creator is a known form of parasociality and also indicative of emotional immaturity in that, rather than examining one's discomforts or disappointment, aggression is directed towards the author to try and demand things to go one's way. MILGRAM is an interesting paradox of when the fans deem the Death of the Author being relevant or not.
i do understand though that not everyone was taught or developed adequate reading comprehension skills to engage with a media like MILGRAM. you can't really fault people for not having had the opportunity to develop critical thinking and reading comprehension from inadequate educational systems and a global push for anti-intellectualism for the sake of technofascism (which is a whole other essay) but, regardless of reason, they're skills that would benefit anyone to have and learn. especially with MILGRAM.
I honestly think that being disappointed or disliking the developments is a valid feeling. But some people really do not understand that even if it's a valuable thing to give criticism to something you believe is flawed, Yamanaka doesn't owe you that. He is not your therapist, and you are not entitled to the writing you had made up in your head, as much as you might like it better.
If MILGRAM is being detrimental to your mental health just. Don't engage with it. It's ok. But you have no right to demand a rewrite (like some people on Twitter believe they do)
Tumblr Sexyman Contest 2026 Final Round
Senshi (Dungeon Meshi)
Ryland Grace (Project Hail Mary)
Mr. Ant Tenna (Deltarune)
Tenna art by @9Aaaalt29 on twt
âAnd if youâll give me 40% of the MOST POPULAR VOTE, Iâll give you my SPECIAL REWARD... A yearâs supply of NON-GLOOBY SLIME!!! Never or BARELY used!!!â Tenna concluded his speech with a huge smile, jetting his hands up in double peace signs.
The crowd roared in confused enthusiasm as Tenna gave a gracious flurry of low-FPS bows, pausing only for the occasional stink-nose at his audience plants who werenât throwing enough 3D roses.
Eventually, the room fell silent. It was Senshiâs turn to speak.
He puffed out his chest, took a long, sweeping look over the audience⊠and shook his head.
âI can see not all of you are eating properly.â
The crowd murmured with embarrassment.
âI donât know who needs to hear this, but itâs time to take the turkey out of your icebox. I have seen the ingenious technology with which your people store food... and I have also seen the waste which results from such convenience.
âThe food you take had a life. Beasts grew fat on the grass of the field, plants grew from the sunâs rays, and mushrooms grew from minerals in the cracks of caves. And yet, it sits in your iceboxes, collecting moisture until it perishes.
âEat what is given to you. Because its life will make you stronger, too.â
Without another word, Senshi left his podium and stepped away from the stage. The crowd murmured in confusion. âIs he really like that?â somebody said. âI only remember reblogging the photosets of him tripping and showing ass.â
--
Back in the Green Room, Tenna wrung his antennas nervously.
âY-y-you think they liked me!? They HAD to!! I mean, I donât know what Asgore was thinking, getting that weird haircut and running that food waste campaign, but⊠YOU thought I did good, didnât you, Kris?â
Laios nodded aggressively, a streak of blue face paint peeling from his forehead.
âYou did AMAZING, Tenna! By the way, now that weâve seen all your insider campaign secrets, do you have any more videos of Susie? Especially her tail... If I could get a look at that, I could finally tell if sheâs a dinosaur or --â
THWACK. Fake antlers butted Laiosâs head.
âLAIOS?? Werenât we dressed up to help SENSHI???â Marcille hissed, gesturing awkwardly with her hooves.
Suddenly, Tenna turned to the two adventurers.
âHey, WAIT a second. SOMETHINGâs not right here...â
Laios and Marcille held their breath.
âWhere the heck are my POINTS!?â
Just then, the door opened. Chilchuck took one step into the room, whistling and holding a large bag.
Everyone turned to him.
Chilchuck paused, took a step backwards, and closed the door.
âCHILCHUCK!!!â yelled Tenna.
âHow come Chilchuck got to stay Chilchuck!?â yelled Marcille at the same time.
--
Meanwhile, in outer space somewhere, some guy was making out with a rock.