Reposts are appreciated! :)
Check out cheddyju's commissions and portfolio! | Artist who loves the Vtuber and streaming community. She/Her Fun fact: I play the piano an
taylor price

★

roma★
No title available
Not today Justin
Mike Driver
The Bowery Presents

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club

Origami Around
Fai_Ryy
Monterey Bay Aquarium
hello vonnie
RMH

titsay
we're not kids anymore.
KIROKAZE

#extradirty

Discoholic 🪩
Cosimo Galluzzi

izzy's playlists!

seen from South Korea
seen from Ecuador
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Netherlands
seen from Morocco

seen from United States

seen from Canada
seen from Poland
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@cheddyju
Reposts are appreciated! :)
Check out cheddyju's commissions and portfolio! | Artist who loves the Vtuber and streaming community. She/Her Fun fact: I play the piano an
TW: vent
I usually feel like I'm. Idk. Walking around eggshells with people. I know certain things can be seen as rude so I don't say them. Recently it seems that this comes off as being passive aggressive, which I should probably fix yk.
But I've been told I don't notice this things because "I don't really care" (in a loving way) but I'm like. I do care. I don't like hurting people. But if being careful comes off as being passive aggressive and not being careful comes off as being pushy/rude then what's the middle point? How do I reach that yk? If I hurt people I want to do better, but the path forward is confusing ig
Trying not to take things personally is hard. I don't like projecting onto others but that's also hard. Life is hard basically.
Trying not to take things personally is hard. I don't like projecting onto others but that's also hard. Life is hard basically.
It's called the Global Justice Report, it is here. This is an actionable plan which can be sent to legislators and demanded of political parties. We could save the world within our lifetimes.
It has always been possible. It is still possible.
(goverment voice) we need to protect the children from pornography so our plan is to remove their eyes so they would never see something so traumatic. if you are against removing children's eyes you are basically a pedophile
hes so silly <3
shakes
emails
whats a stereotype for your country that you absolutely do. mine is that i unironically go "eh" and apologize a lot and i often drink maple syrup straight
The grip that Burger & Big Drink has on the American People cannot be overstated
a more personal reflection in response to mikoto's t3, about how diagnostic labels tend to only be applied after a breaking point, and how societal systems often fail us
you know how sometimes there's characters we find fascinating because their story is compelling, even though they aren't necessarily relatable? and then, there's others that we grow attached to because we see so much of ourselves in them?
i'd always considered mikoto to be in the first category for me, but after seeing the report, i realized there's actually a strong similarity to my own reckoning with mental health. it's left me reflecting on how easily we dismiss things that are unlabeled as insignificant, and even after finding a label that fits, it can feel restrictive, binding. we start thinking of the diagnosis as the source of all issues, rather than recognizing it simply as a term to describe an individual's experience.
i find the claims that "the report says mikoto couldn't have developed DID in childhood" misguided at best and insulting at worst for a multitude of reasons... but what i want to focus on for now is this notion that if somebody is successful in school/work and has little to no social disturbances, then that person must not have any mental disorders. in fact, they have no right to claim any sort of suffering, and it's insulting to those who have real problems.
i've heard this kind of rhetoric for all my life, internalized it as a child, carried that with me through teenage years and into young adulthood, mocked and diminished myself with it even in the absence of others.
i lived in a stable, middle-class home with parents that took care of me, so why would i have any problems? nevermind the fact that i was never taken seriously when i was "too emotional", or that my opinions were often talked over or turned into an argument (which would lead into the "too emotional, you're irrational" problem again), to the point where i'd avoid conversations by zoning out, and never disclosed anything about my personal thoughts or interests, feeling like my family never knew the "real" me.
but hey, we'd always eat dinner together. and if i really needed to buy something, i could always ask and usually get it. and if i got a call from home, i'd definitely pick up and let them know how work was going fine, not to worry about me, because i'd want them to be proud...
oh, right, and there's also the thing about how mikoto thought of himself as a genius, and never had setbacks or disappointments.
i was precisely that stereotype of the asian kid who's better than you at everything. straight As with minimal effort, shelves full of awards for musical performance, mathematics, athletics, so on and so forth. and that didn't end for me after high school, like it does for many "gifted" children. actually, i excelled even more in university, where the only reason my perfect GPA became "blemished" was because of a severe sinus infection during finals, and an unreasonable professor who wouldn't allow me to take the exam at another time when i was healthy. and no, i didn't have to sell my soul pulling all-nighters to study. actually, i spent most of my time having fun with various social circles, and would often skip classes to sleep in after a night out.
i always, always feel an ick when i bring up these facts about my life because there is inevitably someone who sees all this and thinks, "wow, we get it. you're very talented and smart and everything comes easily to you. lay off the bragging, would you? you're not special." idk, maybe that's just the critic in my own head talking, but hey, i got that voice from somewhere for a reason.
i bring all this up because mikoto's spectacular crash-and-burn in his first job after graduating is hilariously and horribly relatable to me.
i'd secured a great position with one of the largest healthtech companies in the country. i'd impressed them during my internship, and felt confident that i could continue doing good work there. and, at first, that seemed to be the case. training went off without a hitch, i was getting along with my coworkers, and i was excited to finally manage my own apartment space...
fast-forward a year, and i was struggling to clock in on time. project deadlines felt overwhelming, and meetings were filled with technical jargon that i couldn't parse at all. my peers were being promoted to leadership positions, while i was struggling not to be left behind. i was told that 8 hours a day wasn't enough, because my coworkers were usually working 9 hours at minimum, and i ought to match their efforts, right? i'd often alternate between hours spent zoning out staring at a blank wall, and hours stuck at my desk late into the evening because i'd finally gotten into the flow of things, and if i stopped working now, i'd lose all my progress! only to finally come home to an empty, dark apartment, and realize, "oh, i still need to make dinner..."
the apartment was starting to smell. i was too tired to clean, too tired to cook, too tired to shower. dirty dishes, rotten groceries, infested garbage can. that's disgusting, isn't it? it's ok, nobody noticed, so nobody cared. people are pretty good at hiding the ugly signs of mental illness.
i couldn't even admit it was mental illness at the time. it was laziness, it was burnout, it was... idk. not that bad. it was all my own fault.
once my absenteeism became too much for my company to ignore, i became partially hospitalized for depression. i learned a lot while i was there and started making real connections with people for the first time since graduating, but just when things were starting to look up for me, my insurance coverage was pulled, with the reason being, "i wasn't depressed enough". how did they determine this? by the number i filled out on a 1-10 survey about how much i thought about suicide. ridiculous.
i went back to work feeling betrayed and let down by the healthcare system, and within a few months, i was finally fired. finally, i say, because i felt relieved that it was over. i'd "failed", if we imagine this whole school -> employment pipeline as some kind of massive exam, but i was glad. i could still start over.
looking back, it was only because of this "failure" that i was finally able to consider that i had ADHD in addition to depression, and receive a diagnosis and medication. up until then, i'd always thought, "well, i have some traits that fit the description for ADHD, but it doesn't impair my day-to-day function, so i don't have it!" it was only after i became impaired to the point of partial hospitalization and unemployment that i could even consider a diagnosis. and even after receiving that label, did my issues get magically resolved? absolutely not.
so, what does this mean when we think about what the label of DID does for mikoto?
i like to think about what yamanaka said once about his character writing, which is that rather than thinking of labels first and then working inward, he prefers to start with the character's inner traits and work outward. from there, certain labels will naturally bloom as a result. with this kind of writing, it is easy for a character to be misinterpreted or misunderstood, but it reflects much more accurately what people are like in real life.
we ought to remind ourselves that behind every label is a living, breathing person with a wealth of personal experiences. and just like es said, every person's suffering is unique to them. there is no benefit to playing comparison games where we say, "this person had it worse," "that doesn't count as abuse," "you should be grateful you didn't deal with x," and so on. living comes first; labels come after.
doubting mikoto's experience with DID on the basis of him having a "perfect childhood" is reductive, dismissive, and misinformed.
i've gotten flack for "treating mikoto like a real person" with this line of thought, but does it not make sense to think that if you apply this kind of framework to a fictional character, you might apply it to real people as well? can you understand that people who relate to mikoto's experiences (including pwDID) might feel shut down and invalidated when they see his character getting mocked for being "unrealistic" and "harmful"?
there's a whole other tangent i can dive into about how the label of DID is forced onto mikoto specifically in the context of a criminal justice system, but as that goes beyond my personal experience and has been explored by other people in the community, i won't harp on it anymore.
this is a more vulnerable post for me, who has been scared off from online spaces before, but this kind of self-reflection helps me to evaluate myself and issues we can improve upon on both a societal and personal level, so i hope it helps at least one other person to do the same.
Thinks. Milgram's themes of how the system can bring people to a boiling point (of varying degrees of harm to others or oneself) being so well supported by the fact most of these issues stem from the character's upbringings (positive or negative) or their status as a parent (Shidou, for example). Nods. I like that.
shit non-traumatised people who had perfect lives up until they got a job say (voice dramas, interrogations)
Mad respect to whoever called their game studio "Major Threats". I admire you please hire me
that moment where im trying to google the game development (?) studio major threats and i get articles about actual major threats :rolls eyes:
Mad respect to whoever called their game studio "Major Threats". I admire you please hire me
feeling intense stomachache after eating a cheesecake.
update: talked about mikoto with a friend as i was writing this and it died down. I transferred the stomachache. Lets go
I've always been an extremely casual MILGRAM fan, but I want to take a minute to talk about the evolution of my opinion on Mikoto's trial 3, cause I think it's important.
When I saw the report, I literally about threw my phone across the room. I was spinning through the stages of grief like a fucking merry-go-round, telling everybody I knew how bad they butchered my boy.
But then, while looking for people online to validate my frustration (like a complete idiot), I came across some takes from people who... actually looked at something other than the songs (hi new mutuals, that's some of you!). And I realized I completely misinterpreted everything (and made the mistake of having an opinion without having the full picture).
I finally got around to making that longer analysis on Substack.. if anyone is interested click here.
Seeing the way you compared Haruka and Mikoto hit hard because I have always #noticed that the fandom is infinitely more understanding of Haruka than it is of Mikoto. It’s only gotten worse now, of course, but it was still this way prior to “Requiem” and “The One” being released.
Mikoto really does represent children who are abused/traumatized in “ordinary” homes well—and, in general, children who experience abuse/trauma that can so easily be ignored. If a child is charming enough, if they can face the world with a smile and perform giftedness, their abusers can get away with pretty much anything.
As you said, it inconveniences adults more to aid a child like Mikoto. It disrupts the illusion of perfection: the happy family with loving parents and the child who flourishes because of them. Illusions like this are pillars of a “perfect, traditional society”. Law enforcement is more devoted to protecting these pillars than it is to the protection of the vulnerable and weak.
The Milgram fandom’s reaction to Mikoto’s writing parallels many social issues, and childism is one of them. Good shit.
(It’s very good how Haruka and Mikoto have such different backgrounds honestly, because you can see the negative impacts the system has on children across all sorts of situations—the subtler and the more overt. That’s another thing I think about sometimes.)
"i would kill a pedophile to protect my child" ok but would you teach your child how to say no? even to adults? even to adults you like? would you teach your child the words "penis" and "vulva" and then use them? would you let them ask questions about their body? would you answer them honestly? would you learn how to cope with your feelings when you talk about human bodies, so they don't feel ashamed? would you set a positive example for how you talk about your body? would you tell your child they don't have to hug or kiss anyone? would you tell your family the same? would you stand by them when they refuse to hug someone? even someone you know has never done anything to hurt them? would you let your child avoid food they don't like? would you let you child avoid people they don't like? would you believe them? would you sit in the discomfort of not knowing all the answers and not take it out on them? would you love your child the same if someone did hurt them? would you make them feel valued just as they are? would you let them talk to doctors or nurses in private? would you let them express their feelings? would you show interest in their life? would you let your child say no to you? would you help your child feel safe coming to you when they make a mistake? would you apologize to your child? would you believe them? would you put aside your anger to focus on what would make your child feel safe and loved? would you put your ego aside for your child? would you take your child's concerns seriously? would you listen to your child? would you believe them?
I would both do all those things AND kill a pedo to protect my child, if I had to.
Yesss
i'm gonna add this comment by @papercrane:
"Maya angelou's family killed a pedophile that raped her, and that just traumatized her more. "I thought that I had caused the man’s death, because I had spoken his name. That was my seven-and-a-half-year logic. So I stopped talking for five years." Read I know why the caged bird sings."
and here is my comment:
the fantasy of killing a pedophile to defend your child is... an escape from reality. as with all fantasies where a single act of violence stands for a lifetime of effortful care. it lets us off the hook for the day to day labor of actually protecting the human beings around us. it gives us an excuse to look away from what abuse actually looks like.
it allows us to ignore that setting boundaries is a daily practice. it allows us to ignore the subtle ways in which we punish children for having boundaries. it allows us not to think about things we can do, the effort we can put in, in smaller repeated ways, to be kind and caring. to be safe to talk to.
it is a grand gesture that, were you to actually go through with it, would neither prevent the harm that you fear nor help your child to heal from it. it is an idea with no bearing on reality for 99.99% of people, while rape and abuse are a reality for a large fraction of people.
it is not useful to imagine killing a pedophile. it is not useful to claim you would kill a pedophile. it wouldn't be useful to actually attempt to kill a pedophile in almost any situation.
it is useful to think about how you can help your child know they can get help. they can say no. they can tell adults to stop. they deserve to be comfortable. they deserve to be informed.
the entire point of the post is that your child will not be saved by your imagined wrath. the entire point is that your day to day actions, and your attitude towards children as people, are more impactful to your child's well-being. far more realistic. more important.
not least because your child doesn't need you to be wrathful. they need your love. they need care. they need attention.
meanwhile, the public performance of wanting to kill child abusers doesn't do anything to child abusers. most child abusers believe they are doing the right thing for their children.
saying you want to kill abusers doesn't signal anything good to children, either. as others have said, it makes children more afraid to speak up and ask for help. that might be their mom, their coach, their troop leader. it gives those abusers leverage; the children cannot tell if they want things to be stable.
and it makes it harder for adults to BELIEVE children, too! because if their child was really abused, then they've staked their honor on committing that violence, even if it was against their brother or spouse or grandpa or pastor or neighbor or their other kid's favorite babysitter. and if they don't want to do that, well... then they must decide whether they believe completely their child, or whether their child's boundaries must really be respected, or... if maybe it's impossible to know.
how many abuse survivors have tried to disclose, only to be told that so-and-so wouldn't do that, or they didn't mean it, because so-and-so loves you and we all like so-and-so. this dichotomy goes both ways, psychologically. if a child abuser is entirely evil and has to be killed, then someone who's not entirely evil and i don't want to kill can't be a child abuser. this must be something else. there must be a mistake.
you can not adequately protect your children from abuse if you hold on to this idea. i am telling you. your insistence that killing pedophiles will protect your children is holding you back. it is not useful. it is not cute to talk about how much you want to do a single act of violence to abusers as if that would ever be enough to outrun the culture of abuse and the dehumanization of children in our society. you cannot cling to this like a talisman that would ward off any harm your children may come to. you cannot escape reality by telling yourself you'd be a total badass and kill that bad guy dead. this is not helpful.