Cindy Snuts

25 | they/any | Personal Blog | Cassidy | if The Thoughts (READ: about fandom) are hitting me this is where they go but I try to be funny too. Also you get whatever dashboard stuff I like idc

[gin-juice-tonic]

[gin-juice-tonic]

[gin-juice-tonic]

It wont come to that, thankfully

[gin-juice-tonic]

next

[backsack]

the nintendo switch's primary purpose is to be a background prop in furry porn

[cheeeezu]

highkey love full magical girl aika

[paper-mario-wiki]

K.K. Dancing

[crimewave420]

[beardedmrbean]

[theradicalace]

we cannot live in chains

[nostalgebraist]

If Pikachu were real, it would not be a very pleasant animal. An enormous mouse that shocks you like an electric eel. I would run from these beasts

[transmortifried]

[bunnymedley]

so she's the fat dog and i'm supposed to what? ragebait the fat dog?

[armydreamerr]

this is my favourite post ever

[escuerzoresucitado]

[airmetsierra]

[dogpuppy]

[vedajuno]

the “morbin time” tweet gets its dues for tricking Sony into making a movie bomb twice but we don’t talk about how there is a billion dollar cost franchise of films in theaters right now that only exists because James Cameron saw this tweet and got really really mad

[becomeanunconsciousman-deactiva]

if karl marx was born today he would be a baby. and it would be his birthday

[sheishine]

I just made another guy with very strong-looking teeth. I definitely wouldn’t want to get bitten by him...

歯が丈夫そうなやつをまた作ってしまった。噛まれたくない…。

[redstonedust]

if youve ever heard of weird polycule drama u gotta understand its less 'poly people are bad partners' and more 'statistically if you have five girlfriends thats like 5x the likelyhood of one of your girlfriends doing something batshit" . like thats just basic math. rollin the dice. you hit the snake eyes buddy. sorry try again.

[madnessofmen]

Statistically, what you're describing is actually the probability that at least one partner does something batshit. This can't be done by simply multiplying by the number of partners you have; if the probability is 10%, and you have 11 gfs, you'd get 110%, which doesn't make sense. What you need to do is use a cumulative binomial probability.

These are kind of annoying to calculate, so to avoid it, I'll use binomial manipulation wizardry to convert it to its equivalent: calculate the probability that all partners don't do something batshit, and take the complement

1 - (1-p)^N

where p is the probability of a single partner doing something batshit and N is the number of partners. Graphing different values for N and p (valid only for x≥2)

However, this assumes that the drama is generated independently from a single person alone. If the drama is interpersonal, then it is dependent on the number of interactions, which increases as the square of the number of partners.

For simplicity, let's assume all interactions have the same probability of causing drama. The probability of at least one interaction causing drama is equivalent to the complement of no interactions causing drama.

1 - (1-p)^(N(N-1)/2)

At a 10% chance of conflict arising between any two people, with five partners, the probability of drama increases eightfold to 80%

To account for both single person and interpersonal drama, you can combine the two, with different values for p1 and p2, but the change as a result of p1 is small compared to p2, especially for p1<10%

1 - (1-p1)^N · (1-p2)^(N(N-1)/2)

[manyblinkinglights]

#notably only fractionally dating someone can produce negative drama#this is the benefit in friends with benefits

[s-lycopersicum]

I'm not really a fan of the Colorpicking From Differently Lit Scenes school of skin tone comparison, but every time they pull out that crispy white pharaoh its always such an open-and-shut case, there's really no room to argue...

[gharibajameel]

do u remeber sucklet.... my firend sucklet he was like this •.•