Hiii, I made a side blog of my art account @clairer4rt because in this way I can reblog and write stuff without messing the other account 🥰

ellievsbear
One Nice Bug Per Day
noise dept.
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
RMH

No title available
todays bird
★

PR's Tumblrdome
Color Me Curious

@theartofmadeline
Not today Justin
Cookie Run:Kingdom Official!
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
official daine visual archive

tannertan36

gracie abrams

Origami Around
Xuebing Du
seen from France

seen from Bolivia
seen from Argentina
seen from United States

seen from Iraq

seen from United States
seen from Argentina
seen from China

seen from Türkiye

seen from Bangladesh

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Indonesia

seen from Kenya
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Luxembourg
seen from Bangladesh
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
@clairertalk
Hiii, I made a side blog of my art account @clairer4rt because in this way I can reblog and write stuff without messing the other account 🥰
A huge reason why Queen of the Damned (2002) flopped so hard was because they wanted to skip over The Vampire Lestat and focus on rockstar Lestat only (minus the few pieces from TVL that they needed to shittily adapt so viewers had any semblance of context)
And now that’s exactly what AMC did with season 3, too, but instead of having a decent soundtrack and good visuals to make up for some of it, it’s all shit from a butt
Daniel Molloy from The Vampire Chronicles
Daniel Molloy appears in:
Interview with the Vampire (1975);
The Queen of the Damned (1988);
Blood and Gold (2001);
Prince Lestat (2014)
Prince Lestat and the Realms of Atlantis (2016)
When we first meet Daniel, he is just an anonymous journalist to whom Louis tells his story.
At the end of the story, he asks to be turned, which angers Louis, frightened, he flees in search of Lestat.
We know that he will publish the book Interview with the Vampire.
During his search for Lestat, he encounters Armand, who seduces him and traps him in a relationship built on an addiction to his blood. Daniel lives life to the fullest with Armand: he acts as his guide to the modern world, allowing himself to be led by the capricious and curious vampire that is Armand, who is unable to control his sadistic nature or even his true vampire strength.
Daniel, as the classic human victim of a vampire, loves every moment of it, even though he comes out of it frightened, in pain and, ultimately, on the brink of death.
Armand transforms him so as not to lose him, and Daniel is one of the characters whose point of view is explored in The Queen of the Damned. His new life as a vampire and his entirely new perspective on the world fascinate him, he does not share the other vampires’ fear and concern about what is happening to Akasha, on the contrary, he finds it amusing.
On Night Island, he often finds himself talking to Kahyman, one of the oldest vampires, turned by Akasha herself and now a loyal companion and servant of Maharet. Like any self-respecting journalist, Daniel cannot remain indifferent to what such ancient beings might reveal.
We see him again in Blood and Gold with Marius, making miniature models of cities.
He is recovering from a moment of ‘madness’, which often affects young vampires who find their new life too much to bear. Without Marius’s help, he would have died.
In the new trilogy, he is still with Marius and they seem happy in Rio, but in Atlantis it is said that ‘he goes hunting with Armand and leaves Marius to be with Armand’.
In Blood Communion, however, there is no trace of him, Armand is busy with unresolved issues involving Lestat and Marius, and Daniel isn’t even mentioned as a character at all.
To me, Daniel is not only a minor character, but also a ‘tool’ character.
We know nothing about him, he has very little presence compared to the other characters, and his disappearance from the narrative doesn’t help. The fandom jokes that Rice has forgotten him, but I think that (in a rather unprofessional manner) she simply left him out because he no longer served any purpose or she simply wasn’t interested in him at all.
Hence my view of Daniel as an ‘instrument’.
Daniel is important, but not as an independent character.
He is important because he is the means by which Louis tells and publishes his story, and this is how The Chronicles begin.
He becomes the vehicle for Armand to understand the modern era and find a purpose after his separation from Louis and Lestat.
And he becomes the anchor Marius needs once his duty as guardian of the Parents is no longer his responsibility.
But the moment the narrative begins to take a different turn, Daniel disappears.
Fun fact: it’s a myth that Daniel wears glasses, it’s all because of the film, and River Phoenix was originally meant to play the role instead of Christian Slater, but sadly he died in 1993
Marius de Romanus from The Vampire Chronicles
Marius de Romanus, a secondary character in The Vampire Chronicles like Armand, but, like Armand, one of the most important.
His surname is not de Romanus, it is a name he gives himself, we will see how later on.
He appears in:
The Vampire Lestat (1984);
The Queen of the Damned (1988);
Pandora (1998);
The Vampire Armand (1998);
Blood and Gold (2001);
Prince Lestat (2014);
Prince Lestat and the Realms of Atlantis (2016);
Blood Communion: A Tale of Prince Lestat (2018)
Unfortunately, his biography is the one that has been subject to the most minor changes made by Rice, so I might get confused too; I’ll try to stick as closely as possible to what is said in Blood and Gold (rather than The Vampire Lestat and Pandora, and to a lesser extent The Vampire Armand), given that it is the most recent publication and does not rely on the ‘voice’ of other characters and above all, it is presented as a confession to a vampire, Thorne, whom Marius (and the reader) have only just met, rather than as something intended for a wider audience.
Son of a Celtic slave and a Roman senator. His appearance is more like his mother’s, whom the Romans viewed with disdain.
Marius is a free spirit and not very Roman when one considers the way he wanted to live: travelling, discovering new places, studying history and recording it. Marius pays little attention to the social obligations to which the Romans attached such importance, in fact, simply to rid himself of the burden of marriage, he plans to ask for the hand of Pandora, still a young girl, so that he can go about his business without pressure (as expressed by Pandora’s father, who was still known as Lydia at the time).
It is during one of these trips, in Gaul, that he is abducted by Mael, a druid. He is taken prisoner and then turned into a vampire by Teskhamen (whose name is revealed in Prince Lestat), who is regarded as a god by the group of druids to which Mael belongs.
Marius is supposed to take the place of this skeletal, scorched-looking vampire, but Teskhamen tells him he must flee and go to Egypt to save the Parents.
From this moment onwards, Marius is the guardian of Those-Who-Must-Be-Kept, the Mother and the Father, Akasha and Enkil. The primary source of the vampires (just Akasha), who had been exposed to the sun by the previous guardian, causing the death of many young vampires and the burning of the older ones.
All of Marius’s actions over the centuries have been driven by the need to keep the existence of the Parents a secret, and because of this he is forced into solitude and a life of constant travel.
In Antioch, he meets Pandora again, now a woman, who has been led there by Akasha, as if it were she who had wanted the two of them to be together, and Marius agrees to transform her.
Marius and Pandora’s love story is one of ups and downs, arguments and misunderstandings, all of which are constantly linked to the figure of the Parents.
Santino and other vampires like him, who want to see the Parents and cannot tolerate Marius living amongst humans, will also be a constant presence.
He will also spend time with Mael, who has become a vampire, and Avicus, another ‘god’ like Teskhamen, amongst the humans in Italian and Turkish cities.
He then spends a long time asleep. He skips the entire Middle Ages, only to awaken at the end of the 15th century.
Marius sees the culture and history he loves so dearly come back to life, he is captivated by Renaissance art, and this passion is expressed through his own desire to paint and his deep admiration for Sandro Botticelli. His love is so deep that he considers turning Botticelli, but he gives up on the idea, knowing that he could not deprive humanity of such an artist, given that vampires are capable of creating perfect replicas of art, yet these are empty in their own eyes.
The reason he’s called de Romanus is Botticelli. One day he knocked on the door of his workshop and, to introduce himself, the first name that sprang to mind was literally the most banal thing in the world. Talking to crush has that effect.
Marius subsequently settled in Venice and became a well-known figure amongst the townspeople, a wealthy gentleman who acted as a patron to many young boys whom he had rescued from dire circumstances and poverty, with the aim of educating them and giving them a future. Many of them went on to university after leaving his home.
He meets Bianca Solderini, a woman who reminds him of Botticelli’s Venus. He would like to make her his companion, after centuries of solitude, but he knows her mind and thinks she would not be able to cope with the transformation into a monstrous creature.
And here we are, when he hears prayers in the night, whilst alone on a gondola, and rescues a young boy who longs for death.
Marius breathes new life into this angel by Botticelli (a crush is forever) and names him Amadeo, having sensed that, although the boy is at odds with his past, he is deeply devoted to the Christian faith.
Life with Amadeo is happy, Marius struggles with himself not to turn him into a vampire, because the boy is young and, after everything he has been through, he needs to experience life. Marius even comes to accept the possibility that, once he has grown up, he might want to remain human and move on, but Amadeo does not share his view (see the analysis of Armand).
Their relationship is characterised by mutual domination and submission, which is more evident in Armand’s narrative than in Marius’s (to avoid narrative repetition). But here we can see Marius’s inner struggle as a vampire plagued by loneliness and longing for a companion, and Amadeo would be his perfect match.
Santino returns to torment Marius, who miraculously manages to escape this attack and is forced to transform Bianca, but whilst doing so, he thinks back to Pandora and wonders where she might be. (My personal suspicion is that Akasha may also have been manipulating Marius’s thoughts and the events surrounding him here, but this isn’t the right place to discuss it.)
When the he gets better (and many, many years have passed), Marius discovers where Amadeo, now known as Armand, is. Armand has become a ruthless leader of the very same cult that destroyed his home and killed his pupils, going against everything Marius had taught him.
He decides not to approach him, knowing that Amadeo would be capable of freeing himself whenever he chose.
He arrives in Dresden with Bianca, where he knew Pandora was staying with Arjun.
Things don’t go very well, he betrays Bianca’s trust, and Pandora is unable to join him, so he remains alone until Lestat arrives some time later.
The events that follow are linked to Akasha’s reawakening in the 1980s, which was partly due to Lestat and partly to Marius, who, like a father proud of his son, showed the Queen the music videos of Lestat singing about her.
In the end, Marius finds himself without the purpose that had kept him alive for millennia.
And just as with Armand, it’s Daniel who comes to his rescue.
Marius looks after Daniel, who isn’t feeling very well and risks accidentally killing himself if left alone.
The two have a very peaceful (partly because nothing much happens during that period) and tender relationship. They are the support each other needs, and they’ll live together for a long time, until it’s revealed in Atlantis that Daniel decides to leave him.
In Blood Communion, Marius has finally been reunited with his Amadeo (see Armand’s analysis).
And he is the Prime Minister of the great coven they have created, with Lestat as its ‘leader’.
Marius is the wise, ancient vampire whom the protagonist, Lestat, turns to whenever he has a problem. Everyone respects him, except Pandora, though she has her reasons (my favourite divorced couple), but Marius commands respect not by instilling fear, but simply by being wise, except when it comes to himself.
He has a apparently mild-mannered nature, shies away from confrontation and hates himself when he lets his anger get the better of him, which is why, like all people who suppress their feelings, he ends up exploding and overreacting: for example, the fight with Pandora in which Marius impulsively storms off, never to return;,of course, he later regrets it, but it is too late.
His personality is also typically Roman: dutiful, rational, a bit rigid, but also deeply passionate. His narrative highlights a profound self-loathing and a deep-seated hatred of his vampire nature, which he always tries to keep under control and when he gives in to his (always vampire-related) desires, he berates himself harshly.
He is an atheist, but he never does anything to impose his “non-belief” on others; he rejects any form of idolatry towards the gods, even towards the Parents. Marius feels respect for them and knows they are important, but he does not regard them as gods and cannot tolerate the idea that a cult might be built up around them. The fact that he was also “killed” because of a cult worshipping a god in a tree certainly didn’t help.
But with Amadeo, we see that there is respect for his religion, so much so, in fact, that the boy allows himself to be easily swayed by Santino’s religious dictates, because he had never abandoned them, despite Marius having tried to make him forget that more unhealthy aspect which would have led to his premature death had he remained with the monks.
Marius is also the one who will tell a female vampire in clear terms that she can be whatever she wants: a man, a woman, neither, or both.
Vampirism allows them to be free from everything that society imposes, especially on women. (A theme which, if I get this far, will be explored with Queen Gabrielle.)
Unlike Louis, who has remained human at heart, Marius loves humans. He loves to be surrounded by them, to be amongst them, and to take part in human life. Despite the long periods he has spent alone, Marius has always tried to fight loneliness, at least by drawing closer to humans, and this is the advice he gives to Lestat before the latter sets off for New Orleans.
Most sensual or erotic passages of Marimand?
For me, every time Marius and Armand talk to each other, it’s a sensual scene.
Since TVA has the most erotic scenes, while B&G is more romantic, I took some excerpts from there 👀
There are others, but Tumblr only lets me post 10 photos 🙃
Serge and Gilbert
I missed them🤎💛
🥺🥺
THE QUEEN OF THE MYSOGENISTS HAS BEEN ANNOUNCED LOLOL
Since I'm not like you, who name names and provoke people into shitstorms and insults, I've deleted any reference to the person who wrote the post:
Okay, let's analyze the famous scene:
If you interpret this scene as a sexual assault, it's because you WANT to see it that way.
Until then, Andrei had refused to “work” in the brothel, to let anyone touch him, or to eat, and he was letting himself die. He was surrounded by many people who wanted to take advantage of him. And according to some people, he wouldn’t have reacted or screamed if he hadn’t wanted Marius to touch him.
According to some people, this is the description of someone paralyzed by fear. The same person who screamed at the very Turks who raped him and sold him. Maybe you want Andrei to be a helpless little puppy, but he fought until the very end, and when he found himself in Marius’s arms, he thought he was Jesus Christ.
And okay, then he thought Jesus was giving him a blowjob, but there are people who have been made saints for that.
Of course, they’ll say: He’s a traumatized child, and Marius took advantage of him.
But let’s consider the possibilities:
1. It’s more likely that Andrei fell in love at first sight with a man who looks like Jesus Christ and in fact, he thinks, “Kiss me again,” and all he wants is to be alone with him, and he isn’t afraid for a moment. Because he’s already realized that Marius isn’t human, and that’s wonderful. Anne Rice wrote an erotic, gothic novel, and it's a carnal love story with a monster, not an older man (for that, there's "Belinda" lol)
2. Or perhaps the narrative is romanticized and told from the perspective of a victim who, after 500 years, is still unable to understand what happened to him (what the antis say, as if it were an unquestionable truth)
Could it be that you want it to be that way because this scene turns you on and makes you uncomfortable, and so you have to interpret it as something negative... Or are you making Jesus cry? Or again, you live in such an isolated world that you shut yourselves in sectarian communities where you all have to think the same thing and prove that you all think the same way, for example, by all posting the same pathetic messages where you "face" reading TVA as if it were a trauma, and when it comes to Marius or Marimand, you’re incapable of forming your own thoughts, to the point that you just parrot the words of others.
I'm asking for a friend.
P.S.: I won't respond to insults, I'll reply to every offensive anon or reblog with a song by Raffaella Carrà.
ARMAND USES THE FORBIDDEN TECHNIQUE - "JOKES ON YOU I'M INTO THAT SHIT" 💀💀💀
Yes, decapitation does happen to vampires in the Chronicles, in Blood & Gold Marius is even asked to help with some reattaching since it can be messed up (an experience that Armand has made, which is part of why he's so upset here). This time Marius is the victim, and I can't imagine how it would actually happen otherwise.
Louis de Pointe du Lac from The Vampire Chronicles
Louis de Pointe du Lac is the protagonist of Interview with the Vampire (1975), the first book in The Vampire Chronicles series. The book was not intended to have any sequels, which is why we see a change in the leading role, from Louis to Lestat.
Louis also appears in most of the following books, with the exception of:
Memnoch the Devil (1995);
Pandora (1998);
The Vampire Armand (1998);
Blood and Gold (2001);
Blackwood Farm (2002);
Blood Canticle (2003)
Louis is a character I’ve come to appreciate as I’ve grown up, because it was only once I’d reached a greater level of maturity than I had when I first read Interview that I was able to relate to him almost as an equal.
Louis tells his story to an unnamed journalist in San Francisco. A shabby room, a tape recorder, cigarette smoke and his story create the perfect atmosphere. We are immersed into the life story of an immortal man who sees his immortality as a curse.
Unlike the other vampires in the series, Louis has always been a human trapped in the body of a vampire who remains frozen at the age of 25, the age he was when Lestat turned him. He is the narrator, but he is also the reader, who recognises in a vampire’s words his own existential questions and sees how these might be addressed through the possibilities offered by eternal life.
Louis is captivated by death, which offers eternal life, embodied by Lestat, a charming vampire who asks his permission before turning him. But Louis has been caught at a vulnerable time in his life: his brother Paul has died, he blames himself for it, and he has lost all interest in anything or anyone. The only solution for him is death.
But the life Lestat has promised turns out to be a trap for Louis. The magic Lestat held over him vanishes the moment he enters his same world of darkness and he speaks of his companion in a not-so-flattering words.
With Louis, there is the moral question of what constitutes a monster, what makes a person evil, who has the right to decide on the death of others, and where is God in all this?
But Louis also proves to be very hypocritical in his behaviour. He lets events flow over him, he criticises others, but does nothing to stop them. He lets Lestat do as he pleases, without really trying to put an end to his wicked deeds against humans.
Louis is passive. He is passive both as a human and as a vampire.
Although he has all sorts of harsh things to say about Lestat, he doesn’t leave him, because leaving him would mean being alone (but he keeps control of the money to stop Lestat from spending it all or running off).
He is passive when Lestat traps him with Claudia. He stays out of a sense of duty and because of the guilt he feels at having attacked a little girl, but he is still playing Lestat’s hands.
He is passive when Claudia decides to eliminate Lestat. He would never have done so himself, but the moment someone else takes charge of the situation, he lets things happen.
And in the end, he is passive with Armand. He agrees to spend years with him so as not to be alone, knowing full well that it was Armand himself who was responsible for Claudia’s death. And even when the two part ways, it is thanks to Armand, who takes the initiative.
From that moment on, Louis wanders alone, leaving even Lestat behind, and arrives at that room in San Francisco.
His aim is to make it known that immortal life is a curse, an eternal suffering in despair, a feeling of being a monster amongst humans.
In the following books, Louis will never again be the narrator. We see him through the eyes of those around him, and they are all enchanted by him: the human vampire.
Together with Lestat, he forms the iconic couple of the Chronicles, with little moments of tenderness that we’ll see right up to the end. Their banter about who has omitted or distorted their story together is amusing, but never too serious.
In The Body Thief, we see once again how Louis is still in denial about his vampire nature and refuses to lend a hand to Lestat (even though he had previously advised him not to do what he did), who has gone to his house to ask for help once he realises that Reglan James has run off with his body and he is trapped in the human one. For Louis, what Lestat has is a gift he must take advantage of (though perhaps it could also be a small act of revenge), because he can once again live as a human, something that is denied to all of them.
A second important book for Louis’s character is Merrick. Through David Talbot, Louis meet with Merrick Mayfair, a witch who might be able to help him make contact with Claudia’s spirit.
Claudia’s loss has always been an unhealed wound for Lestat too, but it is Louis who has been truly scarred by it. Through him, we once again face the theme of loss and that desire to be able to contact those who have passed away once more, to find out morel. Yet, despite the premise, the book itself reminds us that this is not possible. Claudia returns and reveals that she has always hated Louis, she manipulated him because he was the weaker of the two, and Louis is devastated. Merrick warns him, telling him that the spirit was probably not Claudia at all, but a malevolent spirit who knew what Louis was thinking and said exactly what he thinks of himself.
Louis, however, decides to die and immolates himself in the sun (yes, they tend to try that quite often), but Lestat wakes from his coma and saves him. He gives him new life, new blood. He becomes his father a second time.
As a result of this event, Louis comes out of it a stronger vampire.
In Prince Lestat, we learn that Louis left Lestat alone for a bit and lives with Armand at Trinity Gate. Armand often finds himself acting as a mental intermediary between the two, as they cannot communicate with one another (and Lestat doesn’t even know how to send an email).
Louis isn’t particularly interested in the events of the final trilogy. By the end of Prince Lestat, he finally accepts who he is and remains by Lestat’s side until the very end, when, given his love of isolating himself to read, he is kidnapped by Roshamandes and presumed dead.
Thanks to Louis, there will also be a resolution to the problems the vampires face with their connection to Amel (see, reading is good).
Louis, as mentioned in the analysis of Lestat, is the stereotype of the romantic hero: he dwells on his pain, is drawn to darkness, yet rejects it at the same time. He is searching for answers he will never find.
If Armand is the Gothic figure on the side of evil, Louis is the Gothic figure on the side of good, in accordance with the Gothic narrative structures of the previous century (XIX).
Bonus:
Louis solves his problems in only one way:
We're approaching the final few Marimand mondays........... But plenty of time for a dance!
Amc TVL so bad that let Marius live and made Armand a villain more than he was in the books.
They started with fanservice for losers and then made the total opposite
Now, how much time we have for resting?
Yestarday an 18yo tried to lecture me a 26yo about Marius. When I realised who I was talking to I had chills, ew go away
Deleted their comments and blocked for peace of mind
This show's fandom is so hypocritical when it comes to which characters it wants to be accurate and the ones that can somehow be OCC and nobody gives a fuck about it.
Lestat has to be accurate but Louis and Claudia don't have to be because 'Louis in the book was a slave owner! We cannot depict slave owners be the good guys!' Which makes no sense because Louis was never supposed to be good guy, and because 'Claudia was a child in the books! Letting her be played by a child would be creepy!', and why would it be creepy? Because Rolin wouldn't be able to sexualize and do the disgusting rape subplot if she were a child?
I also noticed this double standard when it comes to Daniel, Armand and Marius.
An annoying as fuck 70 year old Daniel and a mustache twirling Armand is fine but Marius has to be accurate? I've seen posts say that Marius was exactly the same as he was in Blood and Gold, a book they haven't even read and about a character they think it's satan incarnate.
Not to mention Gabrielle, thankfully I've seen some say that it's a misogynistic caricature of her and I agree! Having her in the last ep force child Lestat to watch the burning of a friend of his, that GabriellA orchestrated by the way, was unnecessarily cruel and just another nail in the 'Rolin is a misogynist' coffin.
I wish this show does not get renewed but unfortunately I think it will.
I agree with you 100%
That fandom is toxic and stupid as fuck, I don't even try to be respectful anymore because they are showing hoe they lack of the bare understanding. Now they noticing problems, like racism and misogyny, which were present from ep 1 of s1. They are present in the production, in their fandom since always.
Then...GABRIELLA DOES WHAT? GOD I HATE THEM
And yes, the show will go on, I am sure of it. At least we will have a bit of peace in between
Rice on Adaptation
What movie do you not want to see?
I don’t understand: now Rolin Jones is a performative man because he went around with TVL book, but only because you guys hated the season
Ok
But, why amc TVL should have been LIKE the book while amc IWTV was not and that was ok?
Like which is the logic behind believing amc TVL would have been faithful to the book while all what happened before wasn’t? Amc Lestat CAN'T be Lestat, he is different so his story, his personality are different too like amc Louis was different from Louis. Why amc Louis was considered a better version because different, but amc Lestat needed to be like Lestat?
I have always said this: you can't overlap canon over something that has been completely changed, it can't work, because you are talking about two different thing, that need different things.
And all this problem many have with amc TVL was predictable since amc IWTV but everyone just ignored it and kept using books to understand this fanfiction of a show