I make art but only sometimes but a little more often than that @cottoneye-joe-1 - Tumblr Blog

i was sitting with a bunch of cis people at lunch who think i’m cis and they literally had an entire conversation on how “nowadays you can’t tell who’s transgender” while i there wearing a trans pride flag t-shirt

femonologue

rolaren-deactivated20190821

if you don’t support pebbles the lesbian budgie and her giant wife dni

catchymemes

sashibunbun

Next month?

vikinglumberjack-moved-deactiva

Most 70s and 80s post apocalyptic fiction were set in 2019/2020.

gay-wooloo-deactivated20190801

Alternatively

humansoflatecapitalism

catbountry

The beginning.

fluffmugger

actually IIRC this was the first photo with a specific type of camera or equipment “cos THE progenative shitlord of cat memes was Harry Pointer. And around 1870 he decided that Au Naturelle photos of cats weren’t gonna cut it, and started doing shit like this:

then he realised HE COULD CAPTION THEM

and thus the dignity of the feline was forever destroyed.

cottoneye-joe-1

2 years from now cat memes turn 150 i guess

npd-vriska

NSFW

cottoneye-joe-1

did it work

madeline-kahn

Music in Film: Shrek (2001) dir. Andrew Adamson, Vicky Jenson

killin-the-machine

catchymemes

Chance of a lifetime for an epic trick

The passenger steamer SS Warrimoo was quietly knifing its way through the waters of the mid-Pacific on its way from Vancouver to Australia. The navigator had just finished working out a star fix and brought Captain John DS. Phillips, the result. The Warrimoo’s position was LAT 0º 31’ N and LONG 179 30’ W. The date was 31 December 1899.

“Know what this means?” First Mate Payton broke in, “We’re only a few miles from the intersection of the Equator and the International Date Line”. Captain Phillips was prankish enough to take full advantage of the opportunity for achieving the navigational freak of a lifetime.

He called his navigators to the bridge to check & double check the ship’s position. He changed course slightly so as to bear directly on his mark. Then he adjusted the engine speed.

The calm weather & clear night worked in his favor. At mid-night the SS Warrimoo lay on the Equator at exactly the point where it crossed the International Date Line! The consequences of this bizarre position were many:

The forward part (bow) of the ship was in the Southern Hemisphere & in the middle of summer.

The rear (stern) was in the Northern Hemisphere & in the middle of winter.

The date in the aft part of the ship was 31 December 1899.

In the bow (forward) part it was 1 January 1900.

—

This ship was therefore not only in:

Two different days,

Two different months,

Two different years,

Two different seasons

But in two different centuries - all at the same time!

datarep

Average from a million frames of Last Week Tonight

daggers-drawn

John Oliver trying to communicate through my dreams to warn me about the oncoming apocalypse.

dinotrash

I love the happy endings

dinotrash

I love the happy endings

sliceofppai

TFT POLL OPEN! (SIN EDITION GOODBYE TUMBLR)

Remember to read these rules:

Suggest here, via reply or reblog, one character to be drawn for TFT (No asks).

THE CHARACTER SUGGESTED WILL BE DRAWN AS OPPAI LOLI

At the end of the day I’ll pick them all and choose one of the names at random, repeated names won’t generate more entries for that character.

Check the notes to see which ones were already suggested and then suggest a different one, to avoid wasting your entry.

THIS IS SIN EDITION SUGGEST ANYONE YOU WANNA SEE OPPAI LOLIFIED!

You can suggest your OC but remember they will be rubbing a penis with their boobs and will have cum all over, also the lactation edits that come afterwards. Keep references easy to find in case they get chosen (like, if I put their name on the search bar in your blog they immediatly appear, or you also added a link so I can find them easy).

Don’t suggest other people’s OCs as they might not like them in lewd situations or with huge boobs.

cottoneye-joe-1

mero from monster musume

snowflakeeel

- @jistring

wizzardbaby

PUT YOUR HAND IN THAT CRACK

AND YOU WONT GET IT BACK

chickenwhite

WHEEEEN THE JAWS OPEN WIDE

AND THERE’S MORE JAWS INSIDE

your-mouths-a-constellation

WHEN IT SWIMS ON A REEF

AND HAS TWO SETS OF TEETH

snowflakeeel

maykitz

bi / lesbian jock solidarity restored

madeline-kahn

Music in Film: Shrek (2001) dir. Andrew Adamson, Vicky Jenson

killin-the-machine

knifefightscene

Superheroes that are like “if we kill them we’re just as bad as they are uwu” ? Micro dick energy

aspiringwarriorlibrarian

The only exception is Aang, whose whole “I’m not gonna kill him if i can find another way” thing is less false moral equivalency and more “I’m twelve and I have been through way too much bullshit this year to add ‘commit my first murder’ to the list.”

we-are-monk

I do respect superheroes who don’t kill, and I really think “we’re as bad as they are if we do it” is a terrible oversimplification of why someone would come to that moral conclusion.

Three reasons why a hero might not kill:

1. They are not granted by their society a “licence to kill.” Many (not all) people accept that a soldier or a judge might need to kill a wrongdoer in the course of their duties. Those people (should) act under strict rules and processes to determine when a death is just. A society, to be peaceful, usually functions under a guarantee that people won’t on their own judgement decide to off people. Vigilantes don’t usually have state-sanctioned authority, but they do rely on public goodwill to be counted as heroes and not menaces or even villains. A hero, especially an independent, self-proclaimed one, may lack the authority or judgement to serve as executioner. Most just societies require a trial before delivering a sentence.

2. They don’t need to. Paradoxically, or maybe not so much so, the stronger a hero is, the less they need to kill. One of the most common defenses for a murder is “self defense,” the idea that the person making the plea was in so much danger from the deceased that killing them was justifiable. But once you’re a swordsman swift enough to cut bullets or a muscleman strong enough to lift trucks, who’s that big a threat? As your control over your power and your ability to master an opponent both increase (and barring completely wild or uncontrolled abilities, these two are very linked) the easier it becomes to hold back, to subdue with the minimal amount of damage and to render even the worst villains neutralized without going nuclear. 3. The power to kill is bad for their mental health. Not everyone can perform even a “just” killing with a clean conscience. A hero might fear the trauma of killing, and seek to avoid the damage. Or a hero might introspect, and realize that, should they kill today, tomorrow the choice will be easier. Killing an opponent, rather than subduing them, is often the easy way out, and a hero who comes to rely on that solution might find themselves killing more and more, Even if killing isn’t addictive, a hero might still fear that mindset.

Now, a common version of this problem is Batman, who wouldn’t kill the Joker even if the Joker is at maximum edge, dealing out huge terrorist acts and body counts. The best reason for Batman not to kill him isn’t “I am as bad as the Joker if I kill,” but more, “I am a man who uses superheroism as a trauma coping mechanism, and if I start committing extrajudicial killings my mental state and my loose alliance with the police will both deteriorate.”

harlequinhatter

THANK. YOU.

theamazingsallyhogan

I mean, there’s a bunch of things going on here.

Right off the bat, superheroes are vigilantes working in modern society. The biggest problem with vigilantes is that they always assume they’re only going to hurt bad guys that deserve it. That’s not realistic. We humans have a very long history of accusing/attacking/imprisoning the wrong person, and there’s no telling how many innocent people have been executed. Superheroes in a “modern world” going around dispensing lethal vigilante justice is a pretty toxic fantasy.

But it gets messy, because superhero books keep re-using bad guys that were popular, and keep raising the bar on what those villains do in order to make things more dramatic. Making things worse, almost any effort to “reform” a villain is pointless. I can point to a dozen or so times a writer put effort into crafting a story where a villain worked hard, did soul-searching, and turned their back on their evil ways, only for a new writer to come along and go “well I don’t give a hoot if they’ve redeemed themselves, I liked them as a villain.” So not only is there a constant push to make supervillains into bigger threats to sell books, the justice system is hobbled to be especially bad at reforming bad guys, and even worse at preventing them from striking again.

The industry has created a no-win scenario. You let heroes go around killing, you’re giving in to the most violent anti-social vigilante justice fantasies. And if you don’t do that, the industry-wide trend to push for more shocking Events is going to turn small-fry bankrobber villains into blood-drenched monsters.

Still, I’ve gotta side with the classic superhero sentiments.