Craigmac1989

28, Canada

[ninunque]

Picked a grandma hobby and this is the first actual wearable. I’m fcking proud, but I can’t wear it out 😂

[crayrayy]

Wait I want one in each possible color 😍

[guaplovebaby]

Fucc Donald Trump

[xanaxfarts]

Nintendo: Funtastic Series Transparent Nintendo 64 Controllers (2000)

[crayrayy]

Wish you’d raw me 🥺

[girlmostlikely]

[brbjellyfishing]

and how do you know what that sounds like

[assassinregrets]

[misscrazyfangirl321]

Being an adult will have you unironically craving a vegetable

[rainydayscore]

bothered. unmoisterised. unhappy. out of my lane. unfocused. withering

[love-too]

[charlesoberonn]

Absolutely.

[ifeelsoalpha]

[love-too]

Always thinking about them

[liminally-challenged]

Animal Kingdom Text Memes

[voldemo]

My friend really changed once she became a vegetarian 

[voldemo]

its like ive never seen herbivore

[ezekestiel]

i sighed so loud my mom asked me if i was okay and she’s two rooms away

[f4therlesssss]

this isn’t a “blog” we are having tea together. do you take sugar

[sztupy]

Landmark German ruling declares Google's AI Overviews are Google's own words and makes it liable for false answers

A German regional court has ruled that Google is directly liable for the content of its AI search overviews. According to the court, previou

[ayeforscotland]

Let’s fucking go

[made-in-manetheren]

This is HUGE.

1. The court holds Google responsible for statements made by its AI, considering them Google's statements (search engines have limited liability for results in their engine as they're the words of other sites/companies/people), meaning when their AI lies/hallucinates they're liable for the defamation/harm resulting from those statements.

2. Google's defense that customers are generally aware of the lack of reliability and are responsible for fact checking was dismissed. As the court pointed out, that would "significantly diminish" AI Search's stated purpose and it can't be distinguished from Google's business practices/statements as a search tool.

3. Studies have found about 91% of Google's everyday AI responses are accurate, leaving millions of searches per HOUR with potential liability for falsehoods. 56% of correct responses weren't supported by the sources the AI listed. Both of which mean Google is now liable for a LOT more AI "errors."

4. Google was held liable for 80% of court costs in this case and this precedent is expected to reverberate around the world. This is a massive shift from the 3rd-party search provider role Google has previously played and it comes right as they've tied ALL searches to their AI search.

TL;DR Google reeeeeally stepped in it this time.

[furrypost-generator]

[furrypost-generator]

bitches be sucking farts there

[ravingsockmonkey]

Found the source of the infographic that explains how the results were obtained!

[alexseanchai]

there’s sixteen Colorado counties that their most searched was “wolf furry”, plus thirty-odd counties (not counting either Arapahoe or any of the ones marked here as “Insufficient Data”) which may well have had plenty of searches for “wolf furry”, just fewer than for whatever they’re labeled here

and “skunk furry” searches in Arapahoe County outnumbered “wolf furry” searches in the entire state of Colorado

something tells me Skunks Georg

[headbenzhawk]

we did it, we created furry gerrymandering

[scottsmisadventure]

I need to cuddle with a cute man soon or I’ll wither away

[socialistfremenist]

[i-post-hilarious-tweets]

[depsidase]