[bakwaaas]

@fairycosmos / Comic by @shhhitsfine / Comic by @incendavery

[vbecker10]

[esmereldastudies]

Study Motivators That Work

The 3 Minute Rule

When you have a task that you don't want to complete, just get started and keep going for 3 minutes. If you still don't want to complete the task after 3 minutes, stop and start another task

This method can be very challenging during the initial stages of trying it

When you procrastinate, you tend to find something else to do first to dodge the main task at hand

This rule forces you to immediately avoid any deviation from completing the task for 3 solid minutes with the option to stop after those 3 minutes

Discipline plays a crucial role in this motivation technique as starting the 3 minutes requires you to overcome procrastination

Something that helps in this process is trying to slightly mentally detach yourself from the situation to have an objective view on it

You need to look at the situation and acknowledge that you have the freedom to stop the task after 3 minutes if you truly cannot complete it and that you absolutely must start the task immediately

Often times, I keep going once I start which results in significantly improved productivity

Flexibile Schedules

Often times, I plan out the perfect study and work session with my tasks and times detailed to the second

However, sometimes, life gets in the way of these plans and I'm forced to reschedule everything

Something like this can be extremely demotivating, especially if your day revolved around your very detailed plan

To help solve such issues, there are 2 options for 2 different scenarios

The first option is to prevent the situation from occurring at all

Extremely rigid and detailed plans are very easy to disrupt

Preventing the situation would be done by outlining more flexible study and work plans that can be done at most times and don't rely on strict timings (I will post another article on creating a flexible and functional study schedule)

The second option is how to move forward if you do find yourself in a situation where your study plans have been disrupted and you're demotivated

In this instance, the first step is to list the topics you need to cover and sort them from most important to least important

Estimate how much time each topic will take and look at how much time you have available

Evaluate if the time you have available is adequate to completely cover all of your listed topics

If not, choose as many topics with the greatest priority that will be able to be completed within your available time

Remember, these steps should be completed within 5 minutes at most to prevent you from losing any more time

There's always a plan for every situation. It just needs to be found.

Justify It

If you truly feel like there's no reason to compete the task, find a reason

If the task is important enough for you to lament over it, it's certainly important enough for you to complete it as soon as possible

Clear your mind of any frustration and just relax

Think of what the purpose of the task is

Do you need to complete an assignment that will be a part of your final grade?

Do you need to complete a report for your job?

Will this benefit you in the future - near or far?

If you need to study, what is your end goal?

When I hesitate with my studying, I always remind myself that what I'm learning now will one day help me improve as a doctor

Once you identify a reason, act on it and complete the task

The reason will help you sense that what you're doing has meaning and purpose, making the task less of an inconvenience and more of a duty

Knowledge is always valuable.

[alwida10]

The headcanon in question: Loki’s characterization at least distantly resembling his former appearances. 🙃

Also, no. I didn’t miss Loki developed from a tragic Byronic hero into an incompetent clownish villain. I just didn’t like it.

[lucianalight]

They missed every last scrap of plot/story/character growth/character development.

lol no I didn't miss the pathetic attempt at telling a story by incompetent and inexperienced writers and director. It wasn't a nuanced and complex piece of art that understanding it would be difficult and requires deep thinking and attention to details. On the contrary everything was so on the nose that understating them required the comprehension skills of a five year old.

Moreover it was pretty easy to see the retcons, inconsistencies, terrible writing and offensive messaging. The series was nothing but a goddamn joke. At least with WV and TFATWS they tried to make sth with acceptable quality. With Loki series they didn't even try. If I wasn't invested in Loki as a character for almost a decade, I wouldn't have even tried to watch the series because frankly from the trailers it was obvious it's bad and has nothing to offer.

It's amusing to me that people pretend MCU products they consume is anything more valuable or complicated than popcorn movies. They were more once, at the start when they actually cared to tell compelling stories with complex characters. These days though, with some exceptions, MCU is nothing but shallow popcorn movies with cheap jokes and action scenes that usually fail even at their main goal, to be entertaining.

And if you think what "antis" wanted was to see their headcanons, I'm just going to assume you don't know how writing established and consistent characterization works.

[nikkoliferous]

The irony of the above statement is that I feel like a lot of series fans were so excited/invested in the concept of Loki finally getting some spotlight in the form of his own show that they missed how incoherent the plot was and how non-existent the character development. There was no growth here; if anything, there was regression, and a whole fucking lot of mockery, humiliation and glorification of abuse.

The problem isn't that show antis forgot to pay attention. It's that we DID pay attention. We didn't spend the whole show waiting for our 'headcanons' to come true. We spent the whole show waiting for the Loki we knew and loved to make a single fucking appearance or be allowed any measure of catharsis for the past decade of non-stop pain we've watched him endure. We spent the whole show waiting for "it's not your story" and "this isn't about you" to be proven wrong, but instead they were validated at every turn because it turns out those weren't ironic taunts for the hero character to overcome; they were just the show's mission statement. Well, more the fool us, I suppose. It was silly to expect a show literally named LOKI to be about Loki. Or even like, feature him at all.

[worstloki]

loki has had to deal with thor doing this since the beginning

[good-enemy]

I like how you said “thor needs to think” in the tags, lmao like he knows how

[justarandomgirly]

All these

[worstloki]

[raifenlf]

Fake Reviews?

Okay, so I've heard all the speculation/rumors that there were a lot of fake good reviews for the Star Wars sequel movies. I have speculated as much about Marvel products.

But um, Marvel? If you are paying people to write your reviews, you might want to tell whoever you hired to maybe not just cut and paste the same damn review with very little changes.

Because I was looking at Loki IMDB reviews last night and something felt...I don't know, off about them? So I got curious and checked the user writing the reviews and was very surprised to see super similar reviews to another show. Like, way too similar of reviews for Loki and WandaVision.

Here is one user's Loki review.

And then here is the WandaVision review.

Here is another poster doing the same thing (and, interestingly enough, posting the Loki review and WandaVision the same dates as the other user).

Here is their Loki review

And here is their WandaVision review.

Oh, but I'm not done! Here are some other super similar reviews. But this time it's not WandaVision and Loki, it's Loki and the show Heels. Why is that interesting? Because Loki writer Michael Waldron created Heels, too! Don't know what this means. Is Waldron writing reviews for his own shows, LOL.

Anyway here is the Loki review

And here is the Heels review.

[justarandomgirly]

Loki fighting a literal God

Loki fighting geneticaly modified soldier

Loki fighting dark elves

And then there is Loki fighting an ordinary mortal in Loki series

[callmedarlingsstuff]

I hate how they turned Loki from a literal badass to a sad puppy

[jujianjes]

This is literally the worst downgrade in the history of fiction.

[lokifae42]

Yo I agree with you guys but...

Loki knows this is the variant he's trying to find, would he rather accidentally kill the variant or get his ass beat?

Plus he clearly knows this is enchantment, he may not have been able to do it before (which is a whole ass conversation which I'm salty over but that's for another day) but Loki knows that these are humans that should he fight as he does with Thor, Cap, and the dark elves, he would be able to kill the human, easily. That's why he turns into a sad puppy here.

Do I agree with how shitty they made him fight? Yes

Could it have been different? Yes

But Loki has his reasons for being beaten here. He's more interested in knowledge than being the better opponent. Unlike his brother.

[justarandomgirly]

That means Sylvie is a bitch who doesnt care if variant she enchants get his ass beaten. She doesnt care she puts at risk lives of innocent people. Oh wait. If Loki fought her back and hurt them,he would be the bad guy,right? Not that bitch who enchanted them and used their bodies in fight as a tool in first place.

And

Loki could use telekinesis to for example lift that person in the air or pull away from him so they cant no longer beat him

THESE ARE ALL EXCUSES YOU ARE LISTING

@lokifae42

[littleabriel-blog]

Even if Loki were purposefully holding back, it wouldn’t excuse the writers nerfing him. Also he could have fought defensively, blocking and dodging his opponent’s moves without returning their blows rather than just letting himself get beaten up. Then there’s his magic, which the writers forgot all about. Oh, wait...he used it to summon a Roomba.

Sigh.

[justarandomgirly]

This. Using magic doesnt only mean to attack. Why do people think only of attacking? He could have use his magic defensively in 1000 ways and variant Sylvie enchanted wouldnt even touch him. These are all excuses pro series stans have.

Not wanting to hurt innocent people doesnt mean he must come out as idiot.

@littleabriel-blog

[ackermental]

You people are trying to tell me that a thousand years old god-ish being didn't learn the magic of self defence without falling down on his ass?

Pls, try harder.

[justarandomgirly]

@ackermental2

[alwida10]

Yeah, and if they really wanted to show Loki being considerate and holding back there would have been ways to do so. This is just another instance of humiliation.

[lotus-eyedindiangoddess]

Let's not forget that Loki weighs about 500 fucking pounds and has a greater mass than any mere human, so even if he was standing in one spot doing absolutely Zilch, they wouldn't have been able to punch him, beat him and throw him around like a sack of potatoes. If by the logic of the series, ordinary humans can knock him down with a punch, then Jane Foster should have sent him flying with that right hook in TDW. But as I recall, he was barely phased and even LIKED it.

[westrangecollectionkoalaposts]

Not a sack of potatoes, they made him a doll, his fight scenes were all like:

[justarandomgirly]

Ok the last gif😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆

@westrangecollectionkoalaposts

[funnyreclaimed]

[triskeleaficionado]

[hayaang1]

does anyone have more these are great

[evanescentreminiscence]

i’m wheeziNg

[ms-rebelheart]

I always enjoy design fails. 😅

[katsdom]

I had a pretty stressful morning and this little piece made me laugh so hard that much of the stress just evaporated. Humor is a very good thing. So I will add a contribution:

[raifenlf]

Was Loki The Series Truly A Success?

One thing I keep noticing in posts both from people who liked the Loki series and didn’t like the Loki series is that the show was a success. And the show was certainly not a gigantic flop. Just as no one thought a project with Tom Hiddleston as Loki would be.

But was the series a success? I mean, sure, first week, definitely. It had the highest ratings for a premier in Disney+ history. So, yeah, after the first week, you could definitely say Loki was a hit.

But this wasn’t a one-time event. It was six episodes. And ultimately, a show is not judged by the premier ratings. That’s why you can see a show get cancelled after one season after a premier that got amazing ratings. Ultimately, just the thrill of tuning in to see Hiddleston play Loki again is going to wear off. People have to at least somewhat like the actual series itself to keep watching. Or the buzz about the show has to be so great that even if original fans don’t continue watching, new fans will replace them. So did the show do that?

Because it’s not unheard of for a show to do great in a premier and then fall off so hard they don’t last much longer. This is a dated reference so some of you younger fans on here may not know this (or you may not remember this), but have you heard of the show My Big Fat Greek Life? If you haven’t, you can google it. Or I can just tell you about it here.

I thought this show would be a great comparison because there are similarities to it and Loki. Which I know sounds weird, but this show was based on a popular movie (My Big Fat Greek Wedding) with the same actress in a similar type role as the movie. Just like with Loki being a character from popular movies with the same actor in the same role. So both shows had a lot of people interested in the beginning. And the premier of My Big Fat Greek Life was a huge hit ratings wise. But after the premier of My Big Fat Greek Life, people stopped watching and the show only lasted a season.

So how did Loki do after the premier? Well, let’s look at ratings given by Samba TV. They judge viewership by household. All viewers have to be unique viewers. It’s obviously not a perfect way of tracking viewership (what is?) but it gives a good picture of what the viewership looks like.

So, Loki started with 2.5M viewers. And the last episode had 1.9M. Which obviously is a big drop.

Just how big of a drop? Well, to compare it to its two Marvel show contemporaries, look at its ratings projection versus WandaVision and TFATWS. I made this because I think it really shows the difference between the shows:

Sure, the finales of WandaVision and TFATWS also had less viewers than their premiers. But the way that Loki dropped viewers versus the other two shows is kind of mind-boggling, really. TFATWS had a decrease in ratings of about 5.5%. WandaVision had 12.5%. Loki had a 24% drop (!!!). That is really bad. There are no other ways around it.

But ultimately, this is just one number metric. And I’d like to look at more. Because I love numbers. And I had a marketing professor once tell me in college she would also give out a good grade if people had the numbers to back up their point even if she didn’t agree with it.

I think the best post with the best numbers is this post on Reddit, so I want to give credit where credit is due. After I messed around looking at the numbers provided by Samba TV, they pointed me to find other useful numbers:

This post shows how Loki’s ratings dropped over lots of different metrics. I definitely recommend a read. One thing I found interesting from reading this post is to look at how the show did post the premier.

Now, if a streaming show really catches on with viewers, people should start watching after the series ends, right? Like, I didn’t watch Stranger Things season one right away but after so much buzz, I tried the first episode and then stayed up all night watching the whole first season. That’s how viral shows work. People like to binge watch and series with good buzz people binge watch, right? Additionally, if the show was truly wonderful for all of Loki’s many fans they’d want to keep watching the show over and over, right?

So one thing I find interesting then is the numbers provided by Nielsen. Nielsen tracks minutes people watch rather than unique viewers like Samba TV. That is why I prefer numbers by Samba TV because it gives you a better indication of overall viewership rather than just what show has huge fans who watch the show over and over. But, it is still definitely worth looking at Nielsen’s numbers. They tell you not only numbers of different viewers but also can show you how passionate viewers are of a show. And the numbers by Nielsen paint an interesting picture. Especially when you look after the show ends.

So I made a chart showing the number of minutes watched during the week of the finale and then the two weeks after that for Loki and for TFATWS and WandaVision.

Now, all three shows had worse numbers after the finale. Which of course makes sense. There were no new episodes to watch and most people (outside of dedicated fans) don’t watch a series over again right after they watched it the first time.

But where it gets interesting is two weeks after the finale. That’s where, if the buzz was good, people should be trying this show and watching the whole season. Or it should be when satisfied fans watch their favorite scenes again and again.

But after the initial drop of views after the finale, when you look at the second week after the finale, the numbers for TFATWS and WandaVision kind of leveled off. But Loki’s numbers continue to nosedive. So much so that Loki had the worst numbers for all three shows two weeks after the finale. Even though they had the best numbers for the finale (and the premier)!

Numbers can always be spun positively. That’s how things work. I took enough marketing classes to know this. But it’s hard to spin those numbers positively. It just is. Numbers don’t lie.

And here are some other numbers that don’t look great for the series. I took this quote directly from the above mentioned Reddit post:

Flexpatrol says Loki dropped out of Disney+ top 10 faster than the other two shows (Loki stayed in top 10 for only 60 days vs 95+ and 105+ days for the other two shows in most territories).

Sorry but again...these numbers don’t paint the story of a show that was successful.

One thing that’s interesting, too, when you look at these numbers is that it’s not people deciding they dislike Tom Hiddleston or anything. Not that anyone would (or should) think that, of course, but if you click here, you’ll see that Tom Hiddleston was, per Parrot Analytics, the most in demand actor for the entire United States for July 20th through August 18, 2021 (and 9th for the world!). So people want to see Tom Hiddleston. Just, it appears, not the Loki series.

And I know I said I like numbers and if you’re like me, you may not take the next information as seriously. But I also noticed some non-number metrics.

From my own eye test, the show didn’t feel like a success. And what I mean by that is word of mouth. I’m talking about with the general public. Not with just Marvel fans.

Now, we are living in a world with a pandemic still going on, so there really can’t be “water cooler” moments like there used to be. A lot of us (myself included) are working out of the home still so we can’t really use office buzz as a metric like we used to. And I don’t go out of the house like I did pre the pandemic.

But I can say from my own experience, during the first two weeks of the show, I did hear random people talking about how good the show was as I went out and about during my day, like in the line at Zaxby’s.

But after the first two weeks? I haven’t heard a peep. I have worn my Loki Mickey ears at Disney World after that. I have gotten compliments on it. But when I have talked to people about It and about Loki I’ve mentioned I didn’t like the show, and the other person without fail always says oh I never watched the show (I promptly recommend to them not to watch it!).

And I do participate in other non-MCU fandoms online. One of those is a Los Angeles Lakers Reddit, and when WandaVision was going, people would talk about that show on the Lakers reddit and someone even posted a video of the trailer redone with LA Lakers players. But Loki the series? The only time someone brought it up was to say the show was dumb. That’s it.

Now, I am not surprised so many people think the show was a success. Disney and Marvel have deep, deep pockets and they work very hard to make sure people think all of their projects are a huge hit. And there are good numbers they can tout, like the numbers for the finale. They brag about the numbers when they can and stay quiet when they can’t, and they spin everything to look as good as possible.

But you know Disney and Marvel have to notice these numbers. Now obviously the show is coming back for a season two. But from everything I heard before the series even started, that decision had already been made before the first episode aired. So they might be “stuck” with a season two in a way.

But other things we have learned since the show ended don’t exactly paint the best picture in the world. Kate Herron immediately announced she wasn’t coming back. She said it was her decision. And obviously I don’t know her and of course it could be. Though she said it was to do her own projects and so far nothing has been announced.

But it seems like even if she wanted to do her own thing, she could have worked her own things around the schedule for season two. If the show had been really successful in Disney and Marvel’s eyes, you think they would have worked hard to keep her. At the very least, it would have been days before she announced she was gone as they tried to coax her into a salary she couldn’t refuse. But...none of that.

And then there’s Michael Waldron. He said he might or might not be back next year. Why not just say he’s back? If Disney wanted him gone, unlike with Herron, it would be a bit more complicated. Because he already wrote the Doctor Strange sequel before the show aired and the movie is already done. So Disney and Marvel want everyone to think Waldron’s writing was as successful as possible to help the movie. But if they really loved his writing, wouldn’t they have secured him for season two? And why would be so vague? Wouldn’t Disney and Marvel want fans to be reassured at least Waldron was coming back if they thought fans really liked season one?

And then’s look at what Feige said recently about season two. Here’s a snippet from this Collider article:

As for when Loki Season 2 might start filming, Feige promised he’s “not being evasive” but said he’s “not sure exactly where it falls between next year and the year after.”

Okay, now it sounds like there are a lot of things up in the air about season two. Which doesn’t seem likely if Marvel and Disney were happy with season one. I do understand that in the MCU it’s trickier than with standalone shows and everything has to work together on a schedule. But at the same time, if it was a big hit, you’d think they’d want to get a season two out as soon as possible.

I’ve paid a lot of attention to Disney as a company the last few years because I am a super business nerd and I know a big part of their business plan is wrapped up in Disney Plus. They believe streaming is the future. They have assured their shareholders that this will earn them a lot of money. If they thought Loki really helped Disney Plus, they would be begging Marvel to get a second season out as soon as possible. But, they’re not.

Which of course leads me to believe that Disney does not view Loki as a success. They had already renewed the series. And they know the potential of the show. They saw the early numbers. So that makes me think wonder if there is a break because Disney wants Marvel to retool the show. Because Disney saw the numbers that are out there and can plainly see no matter what they tell us viewers and (more importantly to them) their shareholders, they know the show did not live up to its potential and it needs to be changed if it is to be successful. Because season one, by all metrics I can see, just wasn’t.

TLDR: Marvel & Disney want you to think Loki was a success. And initially it was because of Loki & Tom’s popularity. But if you look at lots of numbers, the ratings declined at rates far worse than WandaVision & TFATWS which really makes you think the show wasn’t as big of a success as Disney & Marvel would have you believe

[latent-thoughts]

The sad thing is that they had all the ingredients of a successful show with them. They had an established character people already loved a lot, they had a great actor portraying him, they had the budget for producing something breathtaking, and yet, they blew it all like a grenade.

[justarandomgirly]

They blew it because they didnt not even consider they could fail.

[valtsv]

i can’t talk shit about the pirates of the caribbean films as if elizabeth swann becoming pirate king didn’t hand my entire ass to me and make me the gay i am today

these 2 looks basically defined my sexuality and i’m not afraid to admit it

things pirates of the caribbean got right:

1. will and elizabeth’s love story

2. elizabeth becoming pirate king

3. avoiding sexualizing elizabeth or the other female pirate characters in the first 3 films by allowing them to wear period-accurate pirate outfits that aren’t tailored to be revealing and impractical for ‘sex appeal’ just because they’re women

4. hans zimmer’s entire score but especially the iconic ‘he’s a pirate’ main theme

[prismatic-bell]

5. When the movie came out, morally-gray characters like Jack were actually not really a thing yet in pop culture, and it’s not Pirates’ fault that there are a ton of stupid shitty copycats out there.

6. I run a corseting panel at cons and literally use Elizabeth’s lace-up scene as a video clip of what historical corseting was actually like, because the only thing they got wrong in this scene is that tightlacing wouldn’t be a thing for about another 200 years (and you couldn’t tightlace with the corset style Elizabeth is wearing anyway). It’s one of the most accurate corseting scenes I’ve ever seen.

7. Will’s hat.

8. That scene with all the pirates on the gallows where that little boy starts singing Hoist the Colours? Yeah, that’s fucking legendary. The rest of AWE was kind of a trash fire, but that scene gave me goosebumps.

9. There’s this great shot in the first one where they really drive home the class differences inherent in this time period by having the governor talking about progress and civilization to Elizabeth in their carriage, and then they cut to a shot outside the carriage where a beggar gets splashed by mud from the wheel. It’s a perfect way to underline that everything is not, in fact, a nice little upper-class fairytale, and to give some weight to Will’s storyline, because he has a lot more in common with that beggar than with the governor.

10. For its time, the CGI was fucking amazing.

11. And let’s not forget the work of the makeup department, which had to actually invent new ways of putting on makeup for this movie.

12. The governor’s death scene. Holy shit.

13. They could have gone with a Jack/Will/Elizabeth love triangle, but they didn’t. There are some hints Jack is in love (or at least in lust) with Elizabeth, but he recognizes that she loves Will, and that’s that.

14. You’ve got to admit that wedding was unique.

[math-is-magic]

15. The introduction of fantasy elements to historical fiction outside of Tolkein-esque fantasy, and how it contributed to and expanded the Fantasy Media boom we’re still enjoying today.

[paddysnuffles]

1. They had a woman of colour play a goddess.

2. They had a woman pirate right in the first film, when the tradition is to only show male ones (hell, the PotC ride at Disney had a wench auction scene until recently). And it was a female pirate of colour at that!

3. Elizabeth may not have known how to fight in the first film, but she wasn’t helpless either. Her first instinct was to fight, but she also had the brains to recognize when it was best to hide instead. Plus when given the chance she stabbed Barbosa that one time.

4. Elizabeth’s lack of fighting ability was not simply because she was a woman, it was clear it was due to her societal circumstances, since we saw other women of different socioeconomic backgrounds being able to fight (and when given the opportunity to learn Elizabeth took to fighting like a duck on water).

5. The Hoist the Colours scene where we see pirates of multiple ethnicities and their varying flags, reminding us that pirates came in all shapes and sizes and weren’t just white men.

6. One of the Pirate Lords being yet ANOTHER woman of colour. She may not have had much of a speaking role if memory serves, but even her presence is already a big deal.

7. The pirates accepting their King is a woman without much fuss.

[chubbyooo]

Pirates is amazing I will not here a bad word

Davy Jones CGI is legendary and a ton better than some of the stuff done today 😄

[the-unnecessary-commentary]

I’m pretty sure that female Chinese pirate was a nod to a real, documented female pirate king who was Chinese and had a whole fleet of ships at her disposal but I can’t remember her name rn

[kintatsujo]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ching_Shih

[real-jaune-isms]

My favorite part about the Bretheren Court voting wasn’t that they were against Elizabeth for becoming King as a woman and newcomer. They were pissed at Jack for being a chaotic neutral who broke the decades long tradition of an egotistical stalemate by voting for someone besides himself.

Also, the deleted scenes from Black Pearl and At World’s End that divulge more of Jack’s troubled past, like how he was branded as a pirate by the East Indian Trading Company because he stole a ship full of slaves and freed them.

[mistermaf]

[supercalifragilisticosteoporosis]

“People aren’t cargo, mate.”

[cawareyoudoin]

Love these movies.

[ginazmemeoir]

OH OH OH AND ALSO : INDIAN PIRATE LORD SAMBHAJI ANGRIA

Indians almost never get any representation - it’s either poor savages or audaciously rich royalty. And even though the accent was ridiculous, I love the fact that the creators knew and showed Indian pirates (given we’ve had a historically rich history of piracy)

[shambelle97]

LOKI - GLOVE OF INFINITY (FAN ART)

PH: “Skaiwitch”

[sosuperawesome]

Miniature Embroidered Pillows

Miniarthouse on Etsy

[inglorious-purpose]

One scene from the first Thor movie that lives rent-free in my head is where they’re going to Jotunheim and Loki tries to sweet-talk their way past Heimdall, and Thor shouts “Enough!” and Loki just immediately shuts down, stops talking, stops moving, eyes downcast. Then Volstagg taunts him about his silver tongue turning to lead and Loki doesn’t make a sound. He’s worn down from centuries of being ignored, belittled, and degraded, and has probably been scolded whenever he tries to stand up for himself, so he just doesn’t bother anymore.

Later, when Loki tries to defuse the tension between Laufey and Thor, and Thor tells him to “know [his] place,” Loki doesn’t push back. He does know his place; no doubt Odin reinforced this countless times, taking Thor’s side regardless of how reckless and foolish Thor could be. The way Thor talks back to Odin after they return to Asgard, and seems so dumbfounded when Odin actually punishes him, suggests that Thor has rarely been reprimanded for his past misdeeds. Classic golden child vs scapegoat. I can’t help but wonder if someone on the writers’ team for this movie experienced this sort of toxic family dynamic, bcs they got this completely right.

This is one thing that bothered me so much while watching the Loki series. Knowing what Loki has been through … and yeah he didn’t handle it well to say the least, but still … then watching him be humiliated and punched around so much just broke my heart. That scene with Sif where he gets repeatedly slapped and kicked – that was hard to watch. Of course, if the showrunners had honored Loki’s actual backstory instead of insisting that he was just a power-hungry narcissist, they wouldn’t have been able to play that scene for laughs. It would have been seen as gratuitously cruel – bcs it was gratuitously cruel.

And every time Sylvie belittled him or mocked him or showed him up, that hurt too. Yeah, she was nice to him for a total of maybe 10 seconds of screen time, when she wasn’t sneering at him or using him for her own selfish goals. And yeah I know she’s got issues, but damn. At the end, she betrayed and rejected him, and yet Loki will probably go right back to her in season 2. As for the self-love metaphor, I simply don’t see it even if I squint real hard. Is Loki supposed to fall in love with his mean streak? Come to an understanding and acceptance of his snarky violent side? I really wanted to root for Loki and Sylvie as a couple, but I just can’t do it. She’ll need one helluva redemption arc and personality adjustment for the relationship to be anything but toxic. 

Seems like a lot of people ship them hard, and that’s cool, good for you if you do. I’m not trying to say no one should ship them (and for the record I’m not into Lokius either). It just didn’t work for me.

[inglorious-purpose]

Reblogging bcs I was just thinking about the scene where Loki and Sylvie are about to enter the citadel at the end of time, and Loki asks her if everything’s ok bcs she’s hesitating, and she says “Loki shut up.” He immediately goes quiet, casts his eyes downward, and looks totally defeated. Same dynamic as in Thor1, when Loki tries to talk his way past Heimdall and Thor bellows “Enough!” By the end of the Loki show, he’s back to being meek, unappreciated, and disregarded. And they say he’s learned to love himself? Ladies and gentlemen, this is some bullshit.

[justarandomgirly]

What a shock. Another toxic person next to him that people (and writers) ship him with.

[wanderingtrickster]

This is why I personally fucking hate sylki and lokius and Im fed up w ppl that ship it because 9/10 times its ppl that refuse to acknowledge that CANONICALLY those relationships are fucked up and not the “cute and fluffy and wholesome” they (shippers) try to sell it as but most pro series people have brainworms anyway

[tomhiddleslove]

Some new BTS pictures from set of 'Thor' and 'Avengers'.

[darkestcinema]

renaissance in the 21st century

[blogitalianissimo]

[tinyphantomsalad]

some more

[kitsunebattleboxer]

the WHAT??

[personification-of-anxiety]

okay, found her

[whenstarsfall]

[whenstarsfall]

some more good replies from the notes

[whenstarsfall]

[sosuperawesome]

Jemlington on Instagram

[peculiaritybending]

Ali lives in a nice house with his wife and baby. He gets to raise his child with the woman he loves and lives a long happy life. Sae-byoek & Ji-yeong are living together on Jeju island. They have movie nights with mojitos every Friday. Gi-hun got his mother into hospital and gets his daughter a great present and fried chicken for her birthday next year. Love the canon ending of Squid Game so much, guys.