Unhappy and Unpopular Opinions Here

Exactly what it says on the tin. This is where I keep unhappy and unpopular opinions. I also keep some of my more +18 things here. A trashy blog for a trash-ass hoebag. Minors aren't welcome here.

[hmmm-official]

hmmm

[gummybearattacktheworldofdespair]

[infectedwithnyanites]

Imagine virtual desensitization training but instead it's for the firing squad who'll eventually execute the middle manager this is for.

[tonysopranobignaturals-deactiva]

Not liking the updates to capitalism we're given lately

[siryouarebeingmocked]

>capitalism bad

You physically can't help yourself, can you?

[jazzmastermind]

Come on, you know Commies only have a hammer and sickle. They can either treat everything like a nail or cut grass to construct their strawmen.

[siryouarebeingmocked]

good one

[crumbummer]

My monkey gamer brain looked at this and thought of what could easily be done in GTA or any game where you can kill people. Augh. I’m probably shooting myself for going to college for business (paying out of my own pocket), but I see this as a good thing as I want to start my own business someday. This is something I’ll have to deal with, so I see this as a helpful exercise at best for anyone else who wants to go that route.

[memecucker]

Fwiw the comic in question is in fact, made by a gay man

[reginaldqueribundus]

“sexualizes homosexual relationships” is absolutely, 1000%, a nuclear bad take you would see here on tumblr dot hell

[reginaldqueribundus]

how could you leave this in the tags

[crashional-thinker]

my problem with the comic is that i don't really care if the author is gay or not, it fetishizes gay relationships. none of the characters even have names. they're all just walking tropes. on top of that it's just plain bad writing, there's no conflict whatsoever, so it doesn't make for a good story

[ryuutchi]

The author is a gay dude. You literally cannot fetishize yourself ffs. You can think they’re cardboard cutout or stereotypes or shallow or whatever, but writing a story about gay characters that you think is shallow isn’t “fetishization” it’s just bad writing. To “fetishize” means to objectify— to treat someone or something as a sexual object. It doesn’t mean a gay man writing a cutesy conflictless romcom. And to continually accuse gay media of “fetishization” no matter how non-sexual, how created within a humanizing milieu by queer authors is to say that no gay media should exist because it will never be untouched by the IDEA of someone jerking off to it.

[crashional-thinker]

you're blowing this out of proportion. i don't think every media with a gay character is fetishization. just because a character is gay does not automatically make them a token, or an object of desire.

but when your webcomic revolves around four unnamed characters, each constantly flirting with each other, making suggestive comments, even fucking each other in the porn that the author of the comic created himself, i don't think it's too much of a stretch to say that this is weird and possibly unhealthy.

you absolutely can fetishize yourself. nobody ever is a smol pure uwu bean that can do no wrong, and this includes you, me, and the author of "boyfriends"

[ryuutchi]

It’s a romcom. Do you think that a hetero story about revolving around four unnamed characters constantly flirting would be “fetishizing” heterosexuals? please please please learn what “fetishizing” is, because it is NOT “a gay dude writing a fluffy flirty romcom comic“. it is a serious experience that involves treating REAL PEOPLE like sex objects. In fact, YOU are doing more fetishizing of gay men than the comic by looking at unsexual, gay-created media and imagining that it could only be about sex and fetishes, instead of… you know. A fluffy romcom in the vein of every plotless straight romcom that’s ever existed. You are the one looking at gay men and thinking entirely about dehumanization. That’s in your brain, not in the comic. You are the fetishizer, thanks.

it’s not “unhealthy” or “fetishization” to read or write fluffy gay comics that you personally think are shallow and poorly written, you absolute blank.

[olderthannetfic]

Wait, I get it now: It’s inherently pornographic filth because it’s poly.

[crumbummer]

Fictional characters are already imaginary inanimate objects. If someone treats another person badly because of what they saw in a work of fiction, that’s on the individual at the end of the day. Not the author. “Fetishize”, “romanticize” and words like that are mud now because so many people have used them in place of “I don’t like it” in order to sound righteous and important these days. And, dare I say it, maybe someone’s “representation” is someone else’s nightmare.

[beardedmrbean]

This just keeps on happening

[crumbummer]

[bettedavisgf]

i know this is coming from a place of like intense sexual objectification and homophobia and racism not to mention the world ending efforts of big oil but unfortunately it is so funny

[such-justice-wow]

Extracting oil from tar sands uses 10s of gallons of water per gallon of oil and involves strip mining large acres of earth to access. It also causes extreme amounts of heavy metal contamination to the water required and is in general an ecological nightmare

[yokelfelonking]

I wish I was extreme amounts of heavy metal contamination to required water

[such-justice-wow]

Unfortunately humans can never even begin to reach the heights of heavy metal contamination that tar sand extraction run off does :(

[crumbummer]

Suddenly, Jesus Christ: Vampire Hunter makes sense. One of the plot points was that Canadian lesbians were missing. Turns out, they were being converted into day-walking vampires. That movie is a wild ride.

[radicalgraff]

‘Arm Trans Women, Disarm Cops’

You can buy copies of the sticker here

[buckythirteen]

Don’t??? Arm anyone????? Get rid of your fucking guns??????????

[gorps]

No

[ace-pervert]

No

[drdrunkpigeon-phd]

No

[libertarianblue]

No lol

[crumbummer]

No. And keep that shit away from Sailor Moon. Or fandoms/hobbies in general.

[crazy-brazilian]

[siryouarebeingmocked]

They've never actually produced anything.

...Yet.

[zombiemanateegiraffe]

Does it count as cannibalism?

[siryouarebeingmocked]

[crumbummer]

Jonathan Swift from his grave:

[frawgs]

urban outfitters is smoking dick if they think i’m gonna pay 400$ for cum shorts

[weenis]

outfit idea 😳😳

[aflo]

[happys-hall-of-horrible-things-2]

NONONO

[send-assistance]

I kept trying to reblog it using the fucking image of the reblog button by #it’s all cumming together Jesus Christ I need to go to bed

[crumbummer]

Ah, I see that Slaaneshi drip is finally dropping.

[anghraine]

I really wish fandom would distinguish more between found family and … y’know, having friends.

[liz-squids]

Venn diagram that’s overlapping circles of “found family”, “having friends” and “oh no this is a cult”.

[bizarrolord-deactivated20241123]

You forgot “queerplatonic”.

[misshorrorotaku-deactivated2024]

Isn’t found family very commonly almost entirely overlapped with having friends? Speaking personally, I feel a far more familial attachment to my friends, even ones I’ve only had a short time, than I do my blood relatives.

[crumbummer]

That’s what I thought the concept of found family was. “Blood of the covenant is thicker than water of the womb” kinda thing, unless I’m doing the saying wrong. You’ve gone from acquaintance to a friendship with low investment, and maybe work your way up to “ride or die” high investment. ...Investment sounds transactional, but I mean this in the sense of regular bumps and valleys in general dealings--between the arguments and the hugs, stuff like that. Forgive me for sounding weird about it, as I’ll admit, I haven’t had the chance to experience that until my later years in life. Friendships and rapport--well, relationships, romantic, platonic, business even--take time and have their ups and downs. I do enjoy the “oh no this is a cult” aspect in stories, though. Makes for some good tragedy and horror sometimes. But that’s a different point, I suppose.

[plebcomics]

IT SQUICKS ME OUT, THAT MEANS ITS WRONG THE SOURCE–and it’s archive, lol

[cedfiaisabadship-deactivated201]

Incredible. 

[rickmorty-isdead-blog]

Why waste artistic talent on strawman comics *?

[nonbinary-pacifica-deactivated2]

please tell me more, op

[modernwolfman-deactivated201811]

i honestly look forward to the ship discourse strawman comics bc they always get meme-ified 

[yyyyyyyyyyyyy6-deactivated20201]

what’s even funnier to me is that the op was trying to make the strawman look bad/wrong, but the strawman actually had very valid points that made logical sense while the op’s character kept responding with “um no sweaty :/ u dont even kno what a pedophile is lol”

[noblepeasant]

“I like the design and personality of this character, but I SPECIFICALLY don’t like how young they are. I will SPECIFICALLY change them from being a child into an adult, because I don’t like children”

How is that paedophilia? That’s literally the exact opposite.

[stop-stalin-and-suck-my-dick]

“I aged them up so they can do adult stuff as adults”

“PEDOPHILE”

[imonlyadumpling]

What straw man, it’s literally sourced?? Lmao ppl really don’t read on this site

[gholateg]

She literally created an archive of her sources.

These are things actual people have said.

[dangerbooze]

You’re expecting the idiots to be capable of actually having basic reading comprehension to even know that.

[skepticsub]

Shout out to powtothenuts who came in with the “I agree its totally a strawman but also their points are totally valid and I agree with them.”

[justaskhoneydew-deactivated2022]

Nothing screams “strawman” quite like putting on the plaid shirt, overalls, and hat themself; going out to the hay field; rolling around in all the straw; and then hoping up on a post to scare all the crows away.

[banned-books]

— Andrea Dworkin, from an interview with Norman Mailer in 1978

[misshorrorotaku-deactivated2024]

Andrea Dworkin, ladies and gentlemen. Never forget this woman advocated genocide and called the relationship between parent and child “erotic.”

Makes it pretty clear just how detatched from reality she, and everything she has or had to say, is.

[bizarrolord-deactivated20241123]

“Men control reality” is a flimsy excuse for “I was hurt by a man and can’t get over it, or dick on my brain”.

Plus she hated men enough to marry one. So not a whole lot of hypocrisy there.

[misshorrorotaku-deactivated2024]

Knowing what she advocated for, it wouldn’t surprise me if she was an abuser.

[crumbummer]

[siryouarebeingmocked]

Billie Eilish: I saw porn when I was a literal child, and I got twisted ideas about how women’s bodies work.    

Some radfem: Clearly, this proves porn is bad (for women).    

Me: Why exactly do you think porn is called “adult entertainment”? 

Me: Do you think it could possibly have that name because it’s not for kids?

Also, porn isn’t realistic, and it’s one of the most basic facts about porn. Not just about sex and bodies, but basic characterization. Porn is not sex ed.

I actually agree that porn can be and often is harmful. But this is not a good way to prove it.

Also, five bucks says OP wouldn’t’ve cared if a man said the same thing, but about dicks. Or about romance novels, which are mostly written by and for women.

[siryouarebeingmocked]

That was very difficult back in my day. Heck, I struggled to monitor my nephew’s net usage when he came to our house, and that was in 2015. And he’s older than Eilish. 

Now his little sister has a cell phone and she’s not even old enough to drive.

[crumbummer]

Yeah, and even then, kids would find a way around it. I remember using AOL as a kid back in the dial-tone days; parental controls were a thing, and I think I remember at one point using a kid account had a key logger to track what kids say. But the parental controls were so finicky and that it blocked Dr. Martin Luther King’s speeches and his letter when I had an assignment to do once. Parents could make exceptions to this, though, so it wasn’t too much of a problem. But I’d only connect to the internet through AOL and get around that by using Internet Exploder/Explorer and Nutscrape/Netscape to play some Lenny Loosejocks and JoeCartoon games. Either way, her parents are still responsible for that.

[pennywise-fucker]

People acting as if female pedophiles don't happen or are just "too rare" to talk about is why female pedophiles feel so comfortable openly offending and why so many victims of both genders either fear coming forward, or don't even understand they were violated due to lack of information.

Both genders can be pedophiles. Any offense committed by a pedophile is disgusting and harmful to a child's mental health. Every pedophile deserves to be locked up, and every victim deserves to be helped.

[cisnowflake]

There are a lot of people out there that are more concerned with their perceived gender war than actual victims and it's really sad.

[siryouarebeingmocked]

Heck, even some of the ones who claim they want to help female rape victims will throw actual victims and productive work under the bus if it makes The Cause look bad.

[dankmemeuniversity]

[omghotmemes]

It’s all good eating. Gordon Ramsey Approved.

[whoreiaki-kakyoin]

I would like to propose: restraining McQueen’s hands and straddling him, grinding directly against his aching cock but refusing to let him cum or touch you as he whimpers and cries and whines for you. When he’s been edged to the point that he doesn’t think he can take it any more, lower yourself onto him slowly and stay there for a few moments without moving. Feel him twitch inside you as he feels how hot and tight you are around him. Then, ride him as slowly as you can until he can’t hold back, cumming deep inside you.

[ndiecity-deactivated20241101]

You can't even tell people on Tumblr to watch shows aimed at their age demographic because then they'll go on here and bitch about said show depicting crimes

[crumbummer]

Every now and then The Satanic Panic and and Video Games Cause Violence reinvent themselves when it comes to media. Perhaps doubly so if the media is outside of their own country, because they believe they know better with their morality. And anyone who does enjoy those shows gets branded as a heretic among the “pure” herd.