Dirty, Flea-Bitten Scavenger

[ovisiphorus]

How can Contra have such good, nuanced takes about so many things but just be utterly dumb when it comes to agriculture and veganism?

Not just her, though, the whole left. This uncritical “veganism is a key component of leftist ideals” shit has gotta cease. Can I get ONE passionately pro animal welfare, anti animal rights leftist (who KNOWS shit about animals) out here??? Hewwo?!?

[graycrayon-deactivated20210124]

It has to do with the disconnect that urbanites have with agriculture. I see this problem most commonly in the left but also sometimes from the right in isolated pockets, certainly not a uniquely vegan issue, which just makes everything worse.

If there’s one thing vegans are right about in certain respects, it’s that a good majority of people either aren’t informed about where their food comes from, or worse, have no personal interest in thinking about it.

It’s frankly becoming an epidemic, this lack of food honesty and education amongst the city-dwelling majority who unfortunately are in the position of passing legislation which fucks over a lot of both rural people and animals alike (Prop 12 in this state is a fabulously shitty example of this; a completely redundant new set of regulations that will put small farms out of business and drive up prices of animal products for the consumer without actually doing much to improve animal welfare), as often the only exposure these people have to the workings of modern agriculture or husbandry are media depictions or like… The Dodo. It makes them very receptive to propaganda, because they have no personal experience with the subject matter. 

And it really doesn’t stop there either. This trend of anthropomorphism is the primary reason people aren’t bothering to educate themselves on even basic animal care, which is the reason animal abuse by ignorance is so common in pet-owning communities. Free roaming cats. Inadequate housing and feed for rodents, reptiles and fish. Impulse buying. 

This is why public school programs that incorporate agricultural education into their curriculums are so, so important. Teach children to garden, how to care for chickens and rabbits, take them on field trips. SHOW them what they are apart of. 

[currnizzum]

I am an anarcho-syndcalist or something, albeit one who considers herself to be still learning.  I am also a dirty, flea-bitten scavenger who thinks backyard hens and goats and bunnies may well be every bit as important as backyard gardens.  If that piques your interest: feel free to hit me up, at least until the site implodes under the weight of its own folly on the 17th.

[salty-vegan]

Anti vegans come at me all god damn day with the same tired arguments & it’s exhausting typing the same shit over and over again to shut them down.

Like okay, we get it, you’re an apex predator who cares about plants rights & has every medical deficiency known to man & you only buy local meat that your neighbor raised in his basement & you hate vegans; give it a fucking rest.

[tyto-the-vegan]

Reblogging because this is literally every person I know who could NEVER EVER BE AS EXTREME AS ME. 🙄🙄🙄 Bitch sit yo artery clogged, earth killing, flesh munching, dusty ass down. Needing cholesterol medication at 32 y/o is extreme.

[currnizzum]

@ableist-vegans, @agro-carnist, @fucknovegans

[jumpingjacktrash]

becoming vegan because factory farming is unethical is like deciding that since walmart and amazon mistreat their employees you are now going to get everything you need out of dumpsters

[jumpingjacktrash]

in a nutshell, instead of reforming the bad parts of your society, you try to opt out of it in a way that has really no effect, and wouldn’t work at all if the majority of people weren’t still part of the industry you dislike.

there was, for a while, a real movement of people who tried to get everything out of dumpsters, as a way of opting out of capitalism. but the problem was that you couldn’t get what you need when you need it, leading to you being kind of a drain on your community, and someone had to buy that stuff in the first place for it to end up in that dumpster anyway. it was Fundamentally Silly.

going vegan to opt out of farming practices has similar problems. for instance: you (hypothetical vegan you) won’t buy honey, but the bees are being used to fertilize the vegetables and fruit you eat, they’re making the honey anyway, all you’ve done is – well, nothing, because you’re not a big enough demographic to make an impact, but even if you were, honey sales are a much smaller part of beekeepers’ income than crop pollination. and beekeeping is not a big faceless corporate interest. it’s not monsanto. it’s a bunch of single-family or partnership business with a truck or two and a couple hundred hives. the bees make honey after a pollinating run, and the beekeepers sell it for a little extra income. if you made a dent in that, you’d be achieving nothing but making joe beekeeper buy his kids’ t-shirts at k-mart instead of target.

animal farming and plant farming are deeply interconnected. plant farmers grow animal feed; animal farmers sell manure for fertilizer. most non-corporate farmers raise both plants and animals. it’s more economic and gives them more resilience.

if you were a big enough demographic to hit ‘the farming industry’ in its wallet. you would be making things MUCH harder for small farmers than for factory farms. you would be making it easier and easier for factory farms to crowd family farmers out of business. so that’s pretty much achieving the opposite of what you want, right there.

and then there’s the fact that plant farming is just as rife with gruesome factory farm conditions as animal farming, but it’s humans who are exploited in those. i’m not going to level accusations of racism here, but it really is unfortunate how little the vocal internet vegan contingent seems to know or care about the exploitation of the mostly nonwhite workers in the industry. it makes y’all look racist, whether you are or not.

look, i keep saying this, even though folks never seem to hear me: i don’t hate vegans, i’m not trying to stop you being vegan, i do not care what you eat.

my problem is with defensive internet vegans trying to promote their dietary restriction lifestyle as a solution to problems in the real world. it is not. it may create more problems than it solves, or maybe it breaks even, i don’t know. it certainly doesn’t solve anything that can’t be solved just as well without it. it can only look reasonable from a perspective of deep ignorance about where food comes from and how the farm economy works. you basically have to be young, urban, and somewhat privileged to embrace it. and it is, fundamentally, very silly.

[questionablemotivations]

Furthermore I’d like you to look at a sheep farm. Actually look at it.

You CANNOT grow crops there. That’s WHY there are sheep on it.

You refuse to use wool, well aside from.the fact that it’s a fantastic fiber and how polluting polyester and other plastic fibers are, it doesn’t harm the animal to remove and in fact is done for their benefit.

Above - a sheep farm (note steep and craggy hills), an uncompressed bale of freshly shorn wool and some sheep being shorn.

It’s not stressful for the sheep. Sheep are dumb. Be confident, dont hurt them and they’re good. Wool is a good fiber - strong, warm - even when wet - renewable and biodegradable.

My issue with Veganism-As-A-Cult is the lack of critical thinking. By all means eat what you want, wear what you want to wear but a blanket ban on all animal products because they’re HARMFUL is in itself an extremely harmful philosophy.

Do you refuse to eat plants that were pollinated by bees or fertilized by manure since they’re a product of animal labour?

Honey doesn’t hurt bees. Wool doesn’t hurt sheep.

What about animals that are going to die anyway? We are currently in the process of exterminating possums in our country as they are a pest and destroyer of our native species. We kill them humanely but they’re still going to die because its them (introduced pest) or our endemic endangered species. We use the meat for pet food and the fur for a lot of things now - in making yarns or fur items - because the alternative is to let it rot. Which is just bloody wasteful tbh.

What would (generic) you prefer we do here? Let sheep die of over heating or the weight of wet wool? Force bees into swarming (90% casualty rate) so we can avoid taking their honey? Leave pest animals to rot and encourage the use of set-and-forget traps since there’s no incentive to check them?

What’s the humane option?

[house-of-crows]

see: why I hate militant veganism

[kaziusklasterzoroaster]

I just hate vegans because they’re annoying

[currnizzum]

Veganism in theory, in and of itself, is personal principle.  But in practice: it all too often seems to turn absolutist, which is a problem.  And it's further exacerbated when that absolutism then leads to the spread of disinformation and (for want of a better phrase) a sort of weaponized squeamishness.

@fucknovegans, @agro-carnist, @annoying-animal-rights-claims, @dairyisntscary, @ethicallyomnivorous

[pet-related-peeves]

I don’t even know…

[agro-carnist]

This neckbeard just put a piece of spinach in his mouth and tried to pose like he’s a model and we’re supposed to believe this is the face of “TRUE MEN”!!!!

[currnizzum]

Patrik Baboumian is some European powerlifter who’s won a few awards, mostly Germany-specific, and who’s been held up as “proof that vegans are stronger” for a few years now as a result.  (Never mind that some of those awards were from when he was still a vegetarian; and never mind the fact that powerlifters in general are always trying to step up their game).

Also?  At best, he is a PeTA poster boy (as we see here); and he is always comparing himself to various big herbivores as a bragging tactic (”the strongest animals in the world are elephants, buffaloes, and me!” and similar such puffery).  And while I’d take it with a grain of salt unless I get more proof, I’ve also heard rumors that he keeps worse company than PeTA.  So I wouldn’t take his word on anything.

And petition to refer to Ingrid Newkirk as “Nukie” from here on out.

[currnizzum]

firephox replied to your photo:“agro-carnist: annoying-animal-rights-claims: Regardless of what my…”:

You’re right, humans are not herbivores. We were originally intended to be frugivores, as judged by what natural defenses and attack methods we evolved without the use of tools or weapons in Africa, as part of our ecosystem. With modern advancements, and technology, we’ve been able to adapt for dietary flexibility. Meaning like modifying food scientifically so that we can consume it. 2 thousand years ago if someone ate a box of kraft dinner, they’d probably die.

This again?

“Frugivore” is not a distinct category, for one; it’s an umbrella covering any herbivore or omnivore that will choose strawberries over Brussels sprouts.  On top of that, you’re doing that vegan thing where you say that it’s a distinct category from “herbivore,” but actually define it as a sort of specialist herbivore whose supposed natural diet just so happens to match up to raw veganism.  (No such animal, it should be noted, actually exists—no matter what some self-congratulatory lay-ideologue who grandiosely styles himself “Colin Ahimsa Go-Vegan Wright” and “the Legacy of Pythagoras” may claim.)

We’re apes.  Any species of ape—hell, just about any species of primate—is going to at very least eat insects on a more-than-incidental basis.  And once you look past the over-specialization for tool use (gracile skeleton, hands structured for precision grip, skull that’s mostly braincase), we have more in common anatomically with the more omnivorous species than the more herbivorous ones.  Even if you choose to eat like an herbivore: you remain a dirty, flea-bitten, opportunistic scavenger from a physiological standpoint.

firephox replied to your photo: “anti-veganism: vegan-activist-network: Photo taken from…”:

We’ve adapted for dietary flexibility thanks to thousands of years of hardening our digestive systems. However, If you cannot hunt the animal with your bare hands and rip into it with your finger nails and teeth, you aren’t meant to consume it naturally.                  

In a word: bullshit.  First of all: the appeal to nature is a fallacy for a reason; claiming that we “aren’t meant to consume it naturally” if we require tools is patently ridiculous.  By that logic, we also “aren’t meant to consume” grains (we can’t really eat them raw, after all), sea otters “aren’t meant to consume” hard-shelled bivalves, and crows “aren’t meant to consume” snails.

Secondly: we’ve been overspecialized tool-users since before we were entirely human.  While our being over-specialized tool-users has led to us being a rather physically unimpressive species?  Not only are there people who can catch fish, birds, etc; with their bare hands; and not only are there prey that anyone can catch with their bare hands; but observation of other omnivorous primates—such as chimps and baboons—suggests that our proto-human ancestors would have done just fine hunting with few, if any, tools.  (To say nothing of scavenging.)

ETA:  In certain African nations, baboons raid garbage cans.  They find plenty of processed food there.  It does not kill them.

@fucknovegans, @agro-carnist, @iron-sunrise

[iron-sunrise]

I can’t believe their still pushing this flat out fucking lie. Nary a one of our ape cousins or the common ancestors were frugivores or herbivores. Not one. We dont even have the digestive set up to be herbivores! We’d need to be able to digest a shit fucking load of cellulose.

Which animals do we have the same digestive system type as? Oh, yeah. OMNIVORES.

Quit playing in my face @firephox

[currnizzum]

Just to clarify for anyone reading this: the flat-out-fucking lie to which myself and @iron-sunrise are referring isn’t that humans, in the absence of anything precluding us from doing so, will generally choose strawberries over sprouts (which is what the word "frugivore” actually means).  That’s actually true.  The flat-out fucking lie is in presenting “frugivore” and “omnivore” as mutually exclusive categories. 

For example: around half of the diet of maned wolves in the wild is prey animals such as birds and rabbits.  The other half is plant matter such as tubers and roots; but they have a particular preference for wild berries, especially wolf apples (an edible nightshade, similar to a tomato, which is endemic to their range).  And because they like wolf apples so much, they are generally considered frugivores; but anyone claiming that they’re herbivores on that ground would (rightfully) get laughed at and pointed towards a textbook.

While the exact percentage might vary individually: in terms of dietary needs, we’re kind of like maned wolves.  Or pigs.  Or baboons.

[currnizzum]

firephox replied to your photo:“agro-carnist: annoying-animal-rights-claims: Regardless of what my...”:

You're right, humans are not herbivores. We were originally intended to be frugivores, as judged by what natural defenses and attack methods we evolved without the use of tools or weapons in Africa, as part of our ecosystem. With modern advancements, and technology, we've been able to adapt for dietary flexibility. Meaning like modifying food scientifically so that we can consume it. 2 thousand years ago if someone ate a box of kraft dinner, they'd probably die.

This again?

"Frugivore” is not a distinct category, for one; it’s an umbrella covering any herbivore or omnivore that will choose strawberries over Brussels sprouts.  On top of that, you’re doing that vegan thing where you say that it’s a distinct category from “herbivore,” but actually define it as a sort of specialist herbivore whose supposed natural diet just so happens to match up to raw veganism.  (No such animal, it should be noted, actually exists—no matter what some self-congratulatory lay-ideologue who grandiosely styles himself “Colin Ahimsa Go-Vegan Wright” and “the Legacy of Pythagoras” may claim.)

We’re apes.  Any species of ape—hell, just about any species of primate—is going to at very least eat insects on a more-than-incidental basis.  And once you look past the over-specialization for tool use (gracile skeleton, hands structured for precision grip, skull that’s mostly braincase), we have more in common anatomically with the more omnivorous species than the more herbivorous ones.  Even if you choose to eat like an herbivore: you remain a dirty, flea-bitten, opportunistic scavenger from a physiological standpoint.

firephox replied to your photo: “anti-veganism: vegan-activist-network: Photo taken from...”:

We've adapted for dietary flexibility thanks to thousands of years of hardening our digestive systems. However, If you cannot hunt the animal with your bare hands and rip into it with your finger nails and teeth, you aren't meant to consume it naturally.                  

In a word: bullshit.  First of all: the appeal to nature is a fallacy for a reason; claiming that we “aren’t meant to consume it naturally” if we require tools is patently ridiculous.  By that logic, we also “aren’t meant to consume” grains (we can’t really eat them raw, after all), sea otters “aren’t meant to consume” hard-shelled bivalves, and crows “aren’t meant to consume” snails.

Secondly: we’ve been overspecialized tool-users since before we were entirely human.  While our being over-specialized tool-users has led to us being a rather physically unimpressive species?  Not only are there people who can catch fish, birds, etc; with their bare hands; and not only are there prey that anyone can catch with their bare hands; but observation of other omnivorous primates—such as chimps and baboons—suggests that our proto-human ancestors would have done just fine hunting with few, if any, tools.  (To say nothing of scavenging.)

ETA:  In certain African nations, baboons raid garbage cans.  They find plenty of processed food there.  It does not kill them.

@fucknovegans, @agro-carnist, @iron-sunrise, @ethicallyomnivorous​.

[peacefulveg]

[pet-related-peeves]

Regardless of what my opinions are on hunting, this post is just so full of assumptions, it’s not even funny. In this case, it promotes the stereotype that all hunters must be a bunch of idiotic radical right-wing hillbillies that support Trump, which really does nothing productive to the conversation. Stereotyping people won’t help you, especially if your goal is to change their mind.

[agro-carnist]

What’s this bitch got against coonhounds?? Awesome dogs.

Also, I’m a big fat leftist, and I’d like to be a hunter some day so I can catch my own sustainable food and have the leftover bones and skins as scientific resources.

[currnizzum]

Anarcho-syndicalist or something; would also hunt if circumstances allowed, and the hell with this asswipe for equating hunters with Tяυмραиzεεѕ.

Also: if that “rejection of science and biology” image isn’t more “humans are herbivores” bullshit, I don’t know what it’s supposed to be.

[agro-carnist]

Ok I’m hearing a lot about this Monsanto scandal and cancer victims suing them for knowing Roundup causes cancer but I don’t know of how they found evidence that Roundup causes cancer. I thought Glyphosate was a relatively safe pesticide? Anybody have more info on this?

[thatisnothowthatworks-deactivat]

A quick search on PubMed turned up this 2012 review of human epidiological studies:

Our review found no consistent pattern of positive associations indicating a causal relationship between total cancer (in adults or children) or any site-specific cancer and exposure to glyphosate. - Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2012 63(3):440-52. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2012.05.012 (Abstract, because Elsevier are dicks).

And a 2015 review of rat and mice studies:

The high doses in chronic rodent studies at which no evidence of  carcinogenicity  is  demonstrated  are  at  least  hundreds  of  thousands  fold  greater  than  peak  human  systemic  exposure  levels. Clearly, there is no scientific basis for concern of carcinogenic risk to humans resulting from glyphosate exposure. - Crit Rev Toxicol. 2015 45(3):185-208. doi: 10.3109/10408444.2014.1003423 (If you want the pdf, let me know).

The thought of this going to trial worries me. The law and science are two differnt things, and in the past courts haven’t always come to scientifically sound conclusions.

(That said, I’m not a biologist. I think that @biologyweeps would would be better suited to this)

[fractiousrvt]

If I recall the article correctly, it’s not the glyphosate itself but secondary chemicals in the spray that *are* known to cause cancer. These studies specifically focused only on the glyphosphate and didn’t take into account the other carcinogens. So yeah, the active ingredient is safe. The rest of it is considerably less so.

[currnizzum]

Ah,okay; it being Roundup as an entire formula rather than glyphosate as a specific ingredient makes sense. (And I’d also speculate that such formulae are none too pollinator-friendly.)

[agro-carnist]

Ok I’m hearing a lot about this Monsanto scandal and cancer victims suing them for knowing Roundup causes cancer but I don’t know of how they found evidence that Roundup causes cancer. I thought Glyphosate was a relatively safe pesticide? Anybody have more info on this?

[currnizzum]

IIRC, caffeine has a lower lethal dose.  But IIRC, glyphosate is delivered in larger doses; they suggest wearing gloves, masks, and so on when using it. As far as I know, it's not a proven carcinogen; it might, however, be dangerous in other ways.

The main issue with Monsanto, last I checked, was predatory business practices.  They’ll alter seeds to do anything from the relatively innocuous (grow plants that can’t produce viable sees of their own, thus keeping farmers on the hook) to worthy of Poe’s Law (killing pollinators).  I mean, most of the worry about “GMOs” is unfounded scaremongering (orange carrots and seedless bananas are the product of selective breeding; and every citrus fruit that’s not a pomelo, tangerine, citron, or kumquat is a hybrid of two or more of the above); but I think that it should be used for improving hardiness or the content of certain nutrients—not fleecing farmers.

[vegan-activist-network]

Photo taken from @aesthetickale 🌱🙌🏻

[ethicallyomnivorous]

1. Humans can eat and digest raw meat – or are you forgetting that the world doesn’t consist solely of privileged white cultures living in temperate suburban/urban areas? Inuit consume quite a bit of raw meat, as do the Maasai if you’re talking about humans eating raw meat fresh from an animal. There are also plenty of raw meat dishes from around the world that people prepare: 15 Raw Meat Dishes from Around the World.

2. There are plenty of processed plants and grains that humans eat all the time – even and especially vegans. Bread, pasta, tortillas, baked goods like muffins and cookies, not to mention things like rice, corn, quinoa.. most people are not eating these things raw. 

[theonlinevegan]

[currnizzum]

@agro-carnist, @fucknovegans, @annoying-animal-rights-claims, @iron-sunrise, @ableist-vegans: check it out, someone else posting Vegan Sidekick’s straw with no hint of irony!  Enjoy.

[magicalvegan]

Consuming animal products directly funds animal agriculture, which is one of the leading causes of climate change. Animal agriculture is responsible for at least 18% of all global greenhouse gas emissions, which is more than the exhaust fumes of every car, boat and plane on earth combined. It is also responsible for 51% of all worldwide greenhouse gas emissions, and 65% of all human-related emissions of nitrous oxide.

Things are set to get worse, with emissions from animal agriculture projected to increase 80% by 2050. The situation is now so dire that even if we completely stop all fossil fuel use now, we will still exceed our 565 gigatonnes CO2 limit by 2030, just from raising animals for food. This is why the United Nations have told us that with reference to climate change, “a substantial reduction of impacts would only be possible with a substantial worldwide diet change, away from animal products.”

Source: https://acti-veg.com/welcome/why-go-vegan/

[currnizzum]

@agro-carnist, @dairyisntscary, @the-pig-with-a-blog, @iron-sunrise, @fucknovegans: found this bit of disingenuousness (and its two remarkably similar siblings born of the same blog) gunking up the solarpunk tag.  While the facts that it includes a Vegan Sidekick comic and links a Yourofsky apologist speak volumes in their own right: any further thoughts?

[pet-related-peeves]

@agro-carnist, @currnizzum, @avatar-dacia, @dairyisntscary, @discourseful Any thoughts on this news?

[currnizzum]

PeTA praising an ableist and thoughtless workplace policy on the grounds of the superficially high-minded motive behind it?  I am Jill’s complete lack of surprise.

@fucknovegans, @iron-sunrise, @ableist-vegans

[scoutsmoocrew]

Think humans are the only species to consume milk as adults, and the only species that consume other species milk? Think again.

[currnizzum]

So no shit: some vegan on another site insisted that this didn’t count because the animals in question were “desperate,” and that it was going to make them sick (on the grounds that humans are supposedly the only species with lactase persistence in adulthood).

[vegan-revolution-now]

[the-westwind-deactivated2018120]

No, the real reason I hate veganism is because:

1.) most vegans I see/know are moralizers. meaning that they feel they are ‘holier than thou’ simply by their dietary choices. Which is not remotely true. Pretty sure Hitler was a vegetarian or some shit - doesn’t mean he was right. (my example may be off, but my point still stands: you can be as moral and preachy as you want - that doesn’t make you right. Also, you sound like an asshole.)

2.) veganism doesn’t give a flying fuck about humans. Only animals.

Look, I care about animals as much as the next humane individual, but not at the cost of human life/quality of life. All that quinoa you fucking vegans are so proud of? Yeah, that comes from somewhere. And the people who live in that nebulous ‘somewhere’ are starving so that your lily white ass can eat, because they’re shipping all their food in order to sell it to you.

3.) complete veganism Is. Not. Possible. We literally do not have enough arable (read: farm-able) land on this fucking planet to support an entirely vegan population. It cannot be done.

4.) veganism is generally incredibly ableist/classist.

Some people cannot keep to a vegan diet for health reasons, no matter how much they might want to. In addition, being vegan is fucking expensive (I know, because my fiance was vegan at the start of our relationship). All that quinoa I mentioned earlier? It’s not cheap, and neither are most other meat/dairy substitutes. Some people simply cannot afford to be vegan.

And to add to that, some people live in apartments, and don’t have the ability to supplement whatever they can’t afford to buy with home-grown vegetables (like, how long is one tomato plant supposed to last? because unless you live on a farm, growing your own garden is not a viable solution).

That’s most of why I hate veganism.

But sure, you go ahead and believe you’re morally superior - no one’s stopping you.

[currnizzum]

I’d disagree that a lot of the louder militant vegans actually do care all that much about animals (humans are animals, but whatevs) at all.  What they do is use animals (usually pigs and cows, and always portrayed in the most sanitized and idealized possible light) as props for their egos: look at me, look at how righteous...I mean compassionate I think I am for being in a position to participate in what (when it comes down to it) is essentially a consumer boycott; everyone else should be more like me, accessibility (which isn’t an issue anyway, because I say so) be damned.

And of course, there’s some vegan derailing about bacon in the notes.  Get a new straw-proxy already.

@fucknovegans, @agro-carnist, @iron-sunrise, @the-pig-with-a-blog.

[vegan-activist-network]

[pet-related-peeves]

I’m trying really hard to spot something that’s actually anti-vegan here. The only thing I see is a herd of malnourished strawmen.

[currnizzum]

Yep; that’s classic Vegan Sidekick for you.

“Even if you try to be 100% vegan, slaughterhouse workers would have sore udders.”

“You vegans don’t realize that vegans would have sore udders.”

“But if I don’t get to eat my bacon, plants would have sore udders.”

“If everyone went vegan, B12 would have sore udders.”

(Seriously: the “sore udders” option on any of the listed subjects—except the very generic “animals,” maybe—ends up being comedy gold.)

@agro-carnist, @dairyisntscary, @iron-sunrise, @fucknovegans

[ingystardust]

That vegan life. He he he. Will mever stop fighting for them. #Repost @vegancommunity • • • • • 24/7 Vegan life ▪️ Credit to @Veggie_scapes ▪️ #Vegan #GoVegan #VeganCommunity #PlantBased #VeganFoodShare #WhatVegansEat #VeganFood #VeganLife #HappyVegan #VeganWoman #VeganTips #VeganGirl #VeganDaily #VegansOfIg #VeganLifeStyle #VeganForLife #VeganForAnimals #VeganMessage #VegansOfInstagram #TheFutureIsVegan #VeganActivist #MeatFree #Herbivore #Veganism #Vegans #AnimalLiberation #CrueltyFree #AnimalRights #Species #StopAnimalAbuse

[currnizzum]

@agro-carnist, @fucknovegans, @iron-sunrise: where to start.