Several Of The Above Points Are Shit-Wrong And Iâm Going To Tell You Why: A Point By Point Dissection By Me
Point 1: âBoth swords were used in totally different time periods for totally different purposes.â
Partially right. Â A rapier is indeed suited to a different fighting style than a longsword. Â The slender, blade with a highly developed tip makes the rapier an amazing thrusting weapon, designed to pierce through the holes in chainmail or the seams between plates. Â They can be used to cut, but their primary focus is to thrust. Â A longsword, however, has a much thicker and heavier blade as well as a longer hilt that gives it the ability to be wielded in one OR two hands (itâs often referred to as a âhand-and-a-halfâ sword because of this) enabling it the leverage and strength to cut (or bash, but thatâs far less ideal as it could damage the blade) far more easily.
HOWEVER, there was at the very least a large period of overlap in the uses of longswords and rapiers. Â The difference in their utility (besides cutting vs thrusting, the longsword was largely a military weapon and the rapier was largely a civilian weapon and for dueling) saw to it that they could coexist. Â The longsword as we know it has been found to date back at least to the 14th century, if not earlier and was used in sporting duels and tournaments up until the 16th if not the 17th century (though its military use ended long before its sport use did). Â The rapier was first created (or at least first recognized by scholars as being created) around 1500 in Spain. Â Even if we take only the centuries during which they saw the most use (longsword = 14th-16th cent. and rapier = 16th-17th cent.) there was still a whole century of overlap.
https://www.albion-swords.com/articles/oakeshott-typology.htm
http://www.e-reading.club/bookreader.php/135704/The_Sword_in_the_Age_of_Chivalry.pdf
http://www.pbm.com/~lindahl/paradoxes.html
http://www.salvatorfabris.org/SectionRapier.shtml
Point 2: Rapiers are lighter than Longswords (and also the point that longswords are âcrazy heavy for a hand-held weaponâ).
This is wrong. Â Rapiers are, on average, around 2-ish lbs (1kg). Â Longswords are also, on average, around 2-ish lbs (1kg). Â This is for your STANDARD LONGSWORD, a hand-and-a-half sword that can comfortably be wielded in either one or two hands. Â Of course, both can reach higher or lower weights, but the top of the weight range for them tends to be around 4 lbs. Â The heavy fuckers youâre probably referring to are true 2-handed swords, such as the montante or the zweihander. Â Even then, they donât get too much above 7 or 8 lbs. Â You know what weighs around 7 or 8 lbs usually? Â Most newborn babies.
(in order top to bottom: a 1-handed sword, a longsword, a montante)
For reference, other hand-held weapons? Â Shotguns run between 5 and 8 or more lbs. Â An M60 machine gun? Â Around 23 lbs. Â Handguns are between 2-4 lbs.
So yes, a longsword is heavyâŠwhen youâre comparing it to, like, a knife or to not wielding anything.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9wDjjLnKRcI&t=1s
http://www.thearma.org/essays/weights.htm#.WMsiVfkrKUk
http://www.ejmas.com/jwma/articles/2005/jwmaart_dawson_0205.htm
http://modernfirearms.net/machine/usa/m60-e.html
http://www.militaryfactory.com/smallarms/detail.asp?smallarms_id=38
http://www.chuckhawks.com/shotgun_weight.htm
https://www.sigsauer.com/products/firearms/pistols/
Point 3: Larger weapons are slower.
Thatâs a video-game-ism so that 1) you donât feel like shit when you get wrecked by an opponent wielding a fuck-off huge sword and 2) they donât have to program in proper form, technique, and handling of said sword.
Point 4: âWomen canât wield longswords.â
(Have some more videos because tumblr wonât let me embed any more.)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W3o5sFI56V8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-nzpvVuSwc0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1bE4v6e6iss