todays bird
occasionally subtle
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
Cookie Run:Kingdom Official!
NASA
shark vs the universe
izzy's playlists!
Color Me Curious
The Bowery Presents
Sweet Seals For You, Always
Monterey Bay Aquarium
PR's Tumblrdome
bliss lane
Keni
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
🪼
Today's Document
tannertan36
noise dept.
d e v o n
seen from Jordan
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Indonesia
seen from Türkiye
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from Malaysia
seen from Japan
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Canada
seen from Indonesia
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from Colombia
seen from Vietnam
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
@diabolicalradfem
A 28-year-old transgender woman is charged with raping a minor. According to court documents, Aliea Rose Brown, who used to go by Albert Allen Brown, identifies a woman but is still legally a man.
They are “women” when they are killing and raping and messing up our crime rate stats but they are “trans women” when they are killed🤔🤔
☝🏼☝🏼☝🏼☝🏼☝🏼☝🏼☝🏼☝🏼☝🏼☝🏼
Unpopular opinion
Homosexuality and straightness don’t exist and we’re all bisexual.
bisexuals really have a superiority complex about themselves
When will they cease
that’s not an unpopular opinion, that’s just a lie
*at best* we’re on a spectrum, especially women, but most people are so low for bisexuality that they identify as straight, and that’s fine
…No. You’re just as wrong and homophobic as op. Except you can add about a pound of misogyny on to your wrongness.
OP I’m a bisexual and you need to shut your mouth, you’re just a homophobe like a normal straightie
Oh hey y'all I changed my lük
Url change from radfemhokage to diabolicalradfem
When you literally hallucinate a terven tulpa on your shoulder to cope
Introducing Riley Zahn, a lolcow whose mental stability recedes at approximately the same rate as his greasy hairline:
“A cis woman who talks too much is a bitch, but a trans woman who talks too much is a man”
Men really be out here feeling sorry for themselves.
Please enjoy the following screencaps from when he makes a suicidal gesture during his slam poem (words that can only be spoken in a world that has descended far beyond the gut of Liberal Hell™ and, presumably, landed somewhere in its quaking bowels)
“I’ve faced similar oppression as her. Look! I’ve even kept the receipts. I’ve framed them and hung them above the mantle as proof of my oppression”
No doubt that this guy has an entire wall dedicated to his gripes with women.
god i fucking hate slam poetry
I have in the past criticized some marxist “takes” on sex work for reducing it entirely to a labor issue and ignoring the ways in which sex/gender manifests in sex work (…duh) that are not simply class matters.
However these days i think a more prominent tendency among self-proclaimed “marxists” with regard to sex work is to completely jettison everything they know about labor in general as well. In other words they don’t even criticize prostitution and pornography as forms of labor anymore. I swear, if you mention something about sex, most “marxists” will happily let their brains fall out and just repeat liberal platitudes.
To make things clear, let’s talk about the shortcomings of liberal theory here and how a genuinely Marxist analysis responds to it.
Liberals like to treat pornography and prostitution as matters of “choosing” and “agency,” “sexual liberation” and “empowerment.” Often, the primary explanation from liberals for why sex workers are oppressed is that sex work is not considered a “real job,” i.e. there’s a stigma. The implication here is obviously that if sex work were legitimized and treated like a “respectable” line of work then the problems would start to go away.
From a communist perspective, it is certainly true that the stigma surrounding sex work makes it harder for sex workers to leave the industry and causes broader problems in sex workers’ lives. However, in our view there are more fundamental problems that would persist even if sex work were considered a “real job.” This is analogous to how, no matter how much “legitimacy” jobs have in capitalism, capitalism remains founded in the exploitation of labor. And there are textile workers in South Asia who make $0.20/hr despite having “real jobs.”
In the first place, there are good reasons to think that sex work is, at least for the vast majority of sex workers, not at all about “choosing” or “agency.” There remain the simple facts that most sex workers are poor and wouldn’t be there if they didn’t feel they had to be, and that the overwhelming majority of sex workers say they would leave the industry but can’t or don’t know how. But at an even deeper level than that, the very foundation of selling sex makes “agency” impossible.
What’s really happening when sex is being sold? It means that access to one’s body can be purchased. One’s body becomes a thing, which is now effectively under the control of the highest bidder. Sex workers can, to some extent, be selective in who they offer services to or what sorts of jobs they take (this ability to choose increases with wealth). But there are limits to this, especially for the poorest sex workers. People have to eat, after all. This means that there is a point, for every sex worker, where giving another person access to her body becomes a business decision at best, and at worst a matter of life and death, which is the reality in the long run for most sex workers (especially globally speaking). An individual may feel like they are choosing in the moment. But how did they end up in that situation to begin with? Why is she the one selling and the other person the one buying? Why does the buyer have the money to buy? Could the worker really refuse and get away with it? What if she refused all customers?
The bottom line is, there are sexual acts these workers would not perform, and people these workers would not have sex with, if their lives did not depend on it. The pathway through which sex workers end up in their position in the first place, the clients they take, the acts they are “willing” to perform, are all structured by an entire economic and political system that sex workers are not at all in control of and which does not work in their benefit. There’s no other way to say it: prostitution and pornography is coerced sex, i.e. rape, no matter how any individual might feel about it. The reality of the situation is that “agency” is severely limited by the threat of starvation, and by the commodification of the body itself (which, in conjunction with capitalist labor relations, places the body out of one’s own control). And this is all central to the labor relation at a basic level. No matter how “respectable” sex work is this will still be true.
Note also that all of what i have just said is true to one extent or another of capitalist labor relations in general. So in the dominant forms of “marxist” discourse on this subject, where “marxists” simply adopt the liberal framework, they have to forget basic tenets of their supposed standpoint. Wage labor is source of the emiseration of the majority of the world and should be abolished, except for sex work. Got it.
Then on top of all of this there’s the role that pornography and prostitution play in constructing women specifically as sexual objects whose purpose is to be accessed. This is the gendered aspect of the relation and it has implications throughout society. That is worth talking about as well, and at one time that’s where i wanted to place focus. I’d assumed that a critique of sex work within the framework of capitalist labor relations in general was already taken for granted among communists but i think i was wrong about that. To a large degree i think it is necessary to go back to step 1 and really spell this out for liberal “marxists.”
On that point, why is it that many on the supposed “left” have so much trouble with this? Is it because they want to keep buying access to women’s bodies in communism? Or better yet, have free communal access to women?
Im sorry, but anyone who fuckin reblog s this is on my permanent shit list and is definitely getting blocked. I can guarantee you OP is not a sex worker and is probably a SWERF, and quite frankly, I don’t want this on my dashboard or anything like it on it. I’m not here to engage with material that devalues my existence.
This caliber of substanceless whining really is all pro-prostitionists can muster. It actually makes the eloquence of the OP stand out more. Night and day.
When you say “witchcraft is for females” does it mean only women can peform any kind of magic, or can men too (as long as they don’t call themselves witches or do any female-centered magic of course)?
I’m on the fence on that tbh but if men can perform magic, it won’t be as strong as females. We can give birth, we are a portal from the other world, to here.
Men shouldn’t be allowed to have or use magic they’ll just use it for evil
Yeah you’re probably right
Men’s magic tends to be demonic and negative.
honestly? i've noticed men tend to be much more interested in "high magic" (heavy eyeroll) i.e. goetic summoning, occult rituals etc. that involve summoning a demon or an entity to do their bidding. or self-enrichment spells with material or social gain as a goal. compare that to health and wellness-focused "low magic" or women's witchcraft. someone write an essay on this i'm lazy.
i got your back sisters !!
AND ANIME WOMEN AJHSJKAHDAJKHKAHSJK THEY DO THIS SHIT TO THEMSELVES
I’m a female who compares myself to anime girls. It makes me dysphoric. Why can’t I have bug eyes and breasts with the consistency of pudding? I am a trans anime girl and I need surgery to turn me into a 2 dimensional baby-faced noodle-legged kawaii doll or i’ll kms
これは文字通り暴力です。あなたの言葉があたしを殺してる。ブログを削除してください。
the real honest to god tea is that all men have womb envy because somewhere deep in their psyche they know how much more important women are to the whole of humanity thanks for coming to my ted talk
Men wish they could create life. Since they cannot they want to feel control over life and creation. They find that in war and taking life away.* And they continue to attempt to control women, our bodies, our wombs and our innate god-like power of creation.
(*I read this statement put much more eloquently than I and it’s stuck with me. If anyone knows the source please share it with me)
uhhhh some people have war in their countries
The whole concept of “cis” is so incredibly moronic. “Identify with your birth sex” what the fuck does that even mean? You identify with your genitals? Or is this conflating sex and gender, which then means you identify with the set of roles placed on you at birth because of your sex?
Like so because I don’t want to chop off my breasts and mutilate my vagina somehow that means I am comfortable with myself? That I’m privileged?
That’s like saying a person without depression is oppressing me, or has some kind of power over me, someone who does have depression.
Utter nonsense. But what else could you expect from trans activists?
we’re watching the new season of queer eye and my dad is actually crying over the ep with the trans dude, like he’s talking about his top surgery and my dad is in tears going “when you sculpt marble the sculpture is already inside, you’re just getting rid of what isn’t part of it! he’s just getting rid of what isn’t part of him!”
so from my oldass 70 year old dad to all my trans followers, y'all are marble sculptures and you’re perfect
Self mutilation is serious sign of mental illness and should not be applauded or encouraged????? How dare you say you claim to love trans identified females and encourage their mutilation?
No offense but everything down to your hair follicles and skin flakes are either XX or XY coded. No amount of surgery, hormones, makeup, wigs, or any other altrications will change that. Your blood runs with your biological reality - I just wish people would stop feeling like they have to reject it to feel secure.
Actually, biological phenomena don’t necessarily fit into human-ordained binary categories. So while humans insist that you’re either male or female – that you have either XY or XX sex chromosomes – biology begs to differ.
For example, genetic men with Klinefelter syndrome possess an extra X chromosome (XXY) or more rarely, two or three extra Xs (XXXY, XXXXY); they typically produce low levels of testosterone, leading to less-developed masculine sexual characteristics and more-developed feminine characteristics than other men. In contrast, some men receive an extra Y chromosome (XYY) in the genetic lottery, and while they have been referred to as “supermales” that is more sensationalism than science.
Genetic women with Turner syndrome have only one X chromosome; they often display less-developed female sexual characteristics than other women. And people with a genetic mosaic possess XX chromosomes in some cells and XY in others. So how do we determine if they’re male or female? Hint: Don’t say that it depends on the chromosomal makeup of the majority of their cells, since women with more than 90 per cent XY genetic material have given birth.
Even if you get the “right” combination of sex chromosomes, it’s no guarantee that you’ll fit into the carefully circumscribed human definitions of male and female.
For example, genetic women (XX) with congenital adrenal hyperplasia produced unusually high levels of virilizing hormones in utero and develop stereotypically masculine sexual characteristics, including masculinized genitals.
(See sources: here, here, and here)
Intersex disorders happen in less than 1% of the population, everyone else is XX or XY coded.
Will people stop with this shit already? Everyone with more than the bare minimum knowledge of biology knows that chromosomal anomalies exist in some extremely rare cases. And save for the even rarer cases of chimerism, this rule still applies to them - all of their cells carry their sex chromosomes. Your genes are your biological reality, and guess what? Even with a chromosomal anomaly, you can be categorized as male or female!
Last month, 13-year-old Izabel Laxamana put on a sports bra and some leggings, took a picture, and sent it to a boy at school. Soon, administrators at Tacoma, Washington’s Giaudrone Middle School, where Izzy was poised to finish her seventh-grade year, heard about the picture. Izzy’s parents were called. As Tacoma police would later report to the News Tribune, the Laxamanas expressed concern that their daughter had been sending selfies of any kind. They had warned her against using social media. If she disobeyed, they had told her, they’d cut off her hair.
Back at home, Izzy’s father, Jeff, made good on the threat. On May 27, he cut her hair to her shoulders, leaving just one long strand untouched. Then, he started filming. His camera panned from Izzy’s downcast face to the heap of glossy black strands at her feet. “The consequences of getting messed up. Man, you lost all that beautiful hair,” her father said. “Was it worth it?”
“No,” Izzy replied softly.
The next morning at school, staff members helped weave Izzy’s hair into a French braid in an attempt to hide the damage. But a new humiliating social media artifact—her father’s video—was now being passed from phone to phone. School administrators heard about that, too. This time, they called child protective services. School counselors were dispatched to aid Izzy. The next day, just before school let out, Izzy wrote eight notes on her iPod to family and friends, passed the device to a friend, headed to a bridge over the highway that separated the school from the mall, and jumped. She died in the hospital the next day.
I think it’s important, in this discussion, to consider the implications of ownership of the bodies of young girls and women that is being asserted by the parent and by society here. Public shaming is predicated on moral standards that are often applied specifically to girls and women who assert control over their own bodies and sexuality.
Thoughts?
-Spider-
This is terrifying, what kind of sadistic person FILMS himself torturing and mocking and taunting and punishing his THIRTEEN YEAR OLD DAUGHTER, and on top of that is narcissistic enough to post it online for attention? Parents (esp fathers) raise their daughters to be neurotic about their looks and then torture them about it, and disrespect their bodily autonomy to feel superior and in power, thus teaching these girls controlling their own bodies is a luxury.
So because his daughter felt horribly pressured by society to use her beauty as an object for a boy, he thought it would be funny to shave away her hair, one of the very things tied to her societally-designed ideas of beauty and thus spiralling her into even more insecurity? This isn’t a punishment this is just a cruel reinforcement of why she did what she did in the first place.
he wanted attention so bad, i hope he’s getting it now. I hope no one ever stops looking at him for how he treated her, or let’s him forget about it
Hope he fucking dies and suffers very badly!!
Cut off his dick and film it
Intemeresting that the trans women who are the most vocal about how lesbians should suck dick are always dating “cis” women 🤔🤔
