Paris and Poppies: Opinions
What happened yesterday was evidently abhorrent and disgusting, the acts of murder that spread over Paris’ starred night was something that caught everyone off-guard. Francois Hollande, the president of France was witnessed to have been attending the football match taking place between France and Germany at the State De France stadium, during which an explosion was heard[1], the game was played out to the end 2-0 to France, following the game when the threat became known fans poured onto the pitch and were subsequently evacuated.
The repercussions of yesterday’s events will be unfathomable and uncountable, firstly for the victims of the attacks and their families, secondly for those migrants currently situated in Europe, the hostility and vilification they have already received is uncanny however following yesterday’s onslaught, the Calais camp was set on fire, thankfully no one was injured according to one report.[2]
However, there is a third demographic that would come under fire that has an ongoing history being abused in such situations- Muslims in general; especially those that proclaim and express their faith openly, the very group that the perpetrators claim to represent. Shaykh Yasir Qadhi rightly listed several problems that would arise as a result of yesterday’s attack[3];
‘1) Increase the resolve of these powers to send even more military might and aid against innocent Muslims around the world
2) Bring about an increase in hate crimes against Muslims in Western lands
3) Increase the paranoia of Islamophobia around the globe
4) Ease the introduction of more and more draconian legislation that unfairly targets Muslims, under the guise of ‘safety from terrorists’
5) Curb more and more speech and dissent that is technically legal
6) Turn the tide against accepting Muslim refugees from Syria and other war-torn zones
…and many, many, many more harms.’
The evidence of islamophobia undeniable- the frequency of the attacks is becoming hard to swallow, to the degree that several organisations are now documenting any hate crimes towards Muslims that do occur.[4] Thankfully legislation has been introduced that gives hate crimes against Muslims their own category in order to establish the extent of the racism in the UK.[5],[6] Considering all of this, the media’s role to create the increasingly inhospitable conditions is evident.
ISIS claimed responsibility for attacks explaining that they were in response to the coalition airstrike campaign. They clarified that France among other countries participating in the bombing would ‘remain at the top of Islamic State’s list of targets’.[7] Yet this begs the question- who’s to blame for ISIS? Is it simply a case of fanatical Muslims that hope for world domination? Surely, such a complex prominent problem cannot be boiled down to something so simple? The unfortunate reality is that those providing information to our government regarding counter-terrorism strategies believe so; as a result the government has spent millions of pounds of the taxpayer’s money creating schemes that will miss their mark due the foundational concepts that they rely on being completely false. The Prevent program was formulated and developed in the face of countless accounts of terrorism experts and academic evidence rebutting the ‘conveyor-belt theory’.[8]
Something that is often heard in the debate of terrorism is that the West’s foreign policy is one of the main factors that has been cited in these situations, the perpetrators almost always cite political reasons rather than religious reasons i.e. Boston bombers, Woolwich attack. Anyone that lives beyond the vacuum of their own lifespan and reads history will understand nothing will ever happen spontaneously on the stage of world affairs. (An important clarification to be made, explaining the causes of something is not the same as justifying it). However, this has been over mentioned and apparently explained away; however recently, both Tony Blair and Barack Obama agree that ISIS exist only because of the Iraq war.[9],[10] The war on terror is often dressed in patriotism, liberal values and poppies, we become blind sighted, condemning others’ acts of violence whilst justifying our own only realise our mistakes several years later, often after many casualties.
With both sides of this conflict considerably at fault, the unfortunate reality is that the victims are often civilians, both directly and indirectly; both non-Muslim and Muslims. As you probably wouldn’t have heard, 43 were killed in suicide bombings in Lebanon on Thursday but there was little to be heard about that. [11]
My condolences are with yesterday’s victims of the terrorism.
My prayers are with those who will have to ‘pay for a crime they did not commit’, tomorrow.
[1] http://www.theguardian.com/world/video/2015/nov/13/explosion-france-germany-football-paris-video
[2] https://www.rt.com/news/321967-calais-refugee-camp-fire/
[3] https://www.facebook.com/yasir.qadhi/posts/10153446102358300
[4] See DOAM at http://www.doamuslims.org/ and MEND at http://mend.org.uk/
[5]http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/anti-muslim-hate-crimes-to-get-own-category-bringing-islamophobia-in-line-with-anti-semitism-a6691811.html
[6] http://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/oct/13/police-must-record-anti-muslim-hate-crimes
[7] http://news.yahoo.com/islamic-state-claims-responsibility-paris-attacks-105251415.html
[8]http://www.claystone.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Claystone-rethinking-radicalisation.pdf
[9] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2a01Rg2g2Z8&ab_channel=VICENews
[10] http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/oct/25/tony-blair-sorry-iraq-war-mistakes-admits-conflict-role-in-rise-of-isis
[11] http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/nov/12/beirut-bombings-kill-at-least-20-lebanon