taste my steel
No title available
taylor price
official daine visual archive
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
hello vonnie
h
RMH

Origami Around
𓃗
TMBGareOK. The Official They Might Be Giants tumblr
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
★
Show & Tell

shark vs the universe
Noah Kahan
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
untitled

@theartofmadeline

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣

No title available
seen from Bolivia
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia

seen from Canada
seen from Canada

seen from Dominican Republic

seen from United States

seen from United Arab Emirates

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Austria

seen from Türkiye

seen from Tunisia

seen from Ukraine
seen from Türkiye
@dollgirllandsknecht
taste my steel
don't ever look up what your childhood friends are up to now!!!!!!!!!! like girl you're a nuclear safety engineer. i put on matching socks today. we played tag a thousand years ago.
Yeah
scientific fact
fellatio sounds like a supporting shakespeare character rather than oral sex on a penis to be honest
FELLATIO: Have you never taken within your mouth
The tender member of your lady love?
Then be assured its texture is unmatched
Now softened as it is by womanhood
KING: Thou dares impugn the honor of thy queen?!
Were we not so close I would have thy head!
FELLATIO: Tis futile. You may have my head but once,
While I have claimed your wife's a thousandfold
fellatio sounds like a supporting shakespeare character rather than oral sex on a penis to be honest
FELLATIO: Have you never taken within your mouth
The tender member of your lady love?
Then be assured its texture is unmatched
Now softened as it is by womanhood
KING: Thou dares impugn the honor of thy queen?!
Were we not so close I would have thy head!
FELLATIO: Tis futile. You may have my head but once,
While I have claimed your wife's a thousandfold
fellatio sounds like a supporting shakespeare character rather than oral sex on a penis to be honest
FELLATIO: Have you never taken within your mouth
The tender member of your lady love?
Then be assured its texture is unmatched
Now softened as it is by womanhood
KING: Thou dares impugn the honor of thy queen?!
Were we not so close I would have thy head!
FELLATIO: Tis futile. You may have my head but once,
While I have claimed your wife's a thousandfold
fellatio sounds like a supporting shakespeare character rather than oral sex on a penis to be honest
FELLATIO: Have you never taken within your mouth
The tender member of your lady love?
Then be assured its texture is unmatched
Now softened as it is by womanhood
KING: Thou dares impugn the honor of thy queen?!
Were we not so close I would have thy head!
FELLATIO: Tis futile. You may have my head but once,
While I have claimed your wife's a thousandfold
fellatio sounds like a supporting shakespeare character rather than oral sex on a penis to be honest
FELLATIO: Have you never taken within your mouth
The tender member of your lady love?
Then be assured its texture is unmatched
Now softened as it is by womanhood
KING: Thou dares impugn the honor of thy queen?!
Were we not so close I would have thy head!
FELLATIO: Tis futile. You may have my head but once,
While I have claimed your wife's a thousandfold
it pisses me off that everyone proved women like miss forcefem and sam candles completely right
like these women among many others talked about how the specter of the pedophile is almost never used to protect actual children and csa victims. they talked about how the word "pedophile" is used as a trojan horse for harassment against vulnerable groups. they talked about how no one group is intrinsically evil, no one group is solely responsible for csa, and in the former case, that the sexual abuse of children instead stems from a larger problem within society where children do not have the autonomy to remove themselves from dangerous situations without putting themselves in an even more dangerous situation.
and you proved them right! you used them speaking up about this subject as an excuse to harass them. you made a spectacle of their every move, you branded them with words like "pedophile" and "predator" so that you had a justification to stalk them, to keep tabs on their every move. you saw that finally you had a woman you were ALLOWED to stalk without being called a fucking creep. you finally had another woman to put into your modern day freak show. and even so-called "feminists" took that opportunity with glee.
honestly there are no words in the english lexicon that could fully describe how fucking vile you people are. you act so high and mighty and throw tantrums when you get told that your virtue signaling helps nobody and makes it harder for actual victims to speak up. you stalk and pile up as many accusations as you can against the victims that call you out on your bullshit. you're so miserable that you need your fucking punching bag or you'll die. and god i wish you would die
the wringleader of the harassment campaigns actually, seriously, believing in pizzagate was the cherry on top. like just in case you didn't have 100% certainty these people are not working for the Protection of the Children™️
Look at those crow feathers in the spring sun. So beautiful.
If your desires matter more to you than I do, then it was never safe for me to be your woman, or your submissive.
That’s not a manipulation or control tactic. If your wants, matter more to you than my safety and my needs as a person, it was never safe for me to be with you.
If you refuse to show restraint, when restraint is what is best for your partner, it’s not safe for them to be with you. And that includes those of you with emotional/mental kinks.
The second that the thing you want is more important to you than your partners safety and well being, is the moment you become and unsafe partner. Because it’s the moment you’re willing to sacrifice them, and the relationship, for something you want.
There is a hierarchy of needs/wants in a D/s or M/s relationship, that helps to keep it healthy and safe.
Both partner’s needs should be equal. If it’s at a place where needs are incompatible, the relationship should end, as sad as that is. You cannot ask someone to sacrifice a need long term. Short-term, it may be possible. But long term… time will run out.
A D-type’s _wants_ come before the s-types, typically. But this is only safe for the s-type to give when they can trust that their needs are taken seriously by their D-type. When they can trust that they will be taken care of.
Anyone who asks you to give up a hard limit, does not care enough about you to be a safe d-type.
*_*
Transfem peter parker
This...?
(found it here, no idea who the artist is)
I’m not entirely certain but I’m pretty sure this might be the artist here
Someone shared a sequel in a discord I was in
Mammal in a Sunday Dress, by Georgina M. Cox, 2026
Mammal in a Sunday Dress explores the uneasy relationship between femininity, civilisation, and the animal body. At first glance, the figure appears modest and withdrawn. Her posture is composed, her gaze seemingly lowered towards her bare feet, recalling the conventions of nineteenth-century portraiture where women were often depicted as passive objects of observation. Yet as the viewer moves closer, the illusion collapses. Her eyes are not lowered at all. She is looking directly back. The delayed eye contact transforms the encounter. The viewer approaches believing they are safely observing a woman; instead, they realise they have been observed themselves. The work refuses the traditional power dynamic of portraiture, denying the comfort of anonymous spectatorship. Looking becomes a reciprocal act. For Cox, the painting considers humanity's persistent desire to separate itself from the rest of the animal kingdom. The title quietly undermines this distinction. A "mammal" is not another creature—it is us. The Sunday dress, rich with cultural associations of femininity, morality, and respectability, becomes an attempt to distinguish ourselves from nature. Yet clothing cannot alter biology. Beneath lace and ritual remains the same vulnerable animal body. The work also reflects on the historical relationship between women and nature. Across art, religion, and philosophy, women have repeatedly been positioned as closer to instinct, emotion, reproduction, and the body itself, while men have been aligned with reason, culture, and civilisation. Mammal in a Sunday Dress does not reject this comparison. Instead, it questions why proximity to nature has so often been treated as something lesser. Chiaroscuro isolates the figure within darkness, allowing the luminous dress to symbolise the performance of civilisation while the bare feet quietly return the body to the earth. Neither is presented as more truthful than the other. The painting exists in the tension between performance and instinct, refinement and biology. Mammal in a Sunday Dress ultimately asks a simple but unsettling question: if every layer of culture were stripped away, what would remain? Not a king. Not a saint. Not a gentleman or a lady. Only another mammal, looking back.
source
parents are allowed to straight-up torture their kids with zero consequences. they can withhold food and water, lock you out of shelter, confiscate your belongings, bar you from human contact, attack and harm you and exert complete control over your physical appearance. and this is just the norm. if you speak out against it you're seen as a delinquent or a predator. even otherwise progressive people get uncomfortable with the idea of dismantling the nuclear family unit because they still see it as the best way to keep kids safe when that simply couldn't be further from the truth. it's evil.
This is also part of why I'm so loud about homeschool reform, specifically in the USA.
In the US, there is no meaningful legal definition for educational/academic neglect in any of the 50 states or federally. What this means is that a child can be "homeschooled" and exclusively be taught how to cook and clean, reach the age of 18 being unable to read, write, or count, and this alone is not considered neglect. That 18yo, should they even have the knowledge that suing exists, has no legal grounds to sue their parents for denying them an education.
In over 40 US states, a convicted child abuser can homeschool their children. So someone who has done time for child abuse and somehow regains access to their child(ren) can decide upon returning home that they want to "homeschool" their kids. Those children are now locked in a home with their abuser where nobody can see them.
There are no welfare checks.
There are no routine assessments.
There aren't even databases — state or federal — keeping track of how many homeschooled kids there actually are.
Meaning a child can be locked in their home for their entire life with their convicted abuser, learn absolutely nothing, never go to the doctor, and so long as that child is fed, clothed, and the abuse isn't physical or sexual, that child has almost no chance of rescue and no legal ground to seek restitution if/when they escape.
The only way homeschooled children get rescued is if they're beaten, starved, or physically neglected and they're able to get the right person to see that. Otherwise? They have to wait until someone finds out they were murdered as a result of their parents "homeschooling".
And feral homeschool parents love to jump down my throat about this, and then get even more pissed when I tell them I'm a homeschool alumni.
Because I know it's not all homeschoolers. But even one is too many, and the lack of protections should scare everyone. If you're a good homeschool parent, nothing will change. If not, you deserve whatever comes your way as a result of adequate oversight.
Children deserve rights.
It's not all homeschoolers... but it's certainly most of the homeschoolers who don't want protections and regulation. The ones who are homeschooling for the right reasons benefit from guidelines and benchmarks being in place.