KIROKAZE

No title available
untitled
𓃗

@theartofmadeline
$LAYYYTER
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
macklin celebrini has autism
No title available
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
No title available
Sweet Seals For You, Always
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
art blog(derogatory)
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
todays bird

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣

titsay

if i look back, i am lost

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club
seen from Malaysia

seen from Russia

seen from Venezuela

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
seen from India

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Lebanon
seen from United States
seen from Bangladesh

seen from Hong Kong SAR China
seen from Netherlands

seen from Russia

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
@electriclute
Sounds like more lies from big alive
school uniform codes extending to what colours you’re allowed to dye your hair, and what piercings you can have and stuff is so crazy. you HAVE to go to school and you’re not even allowed to have pink hair or pierce your nose about it????
“oh it’s to prepare you for the workplace” okay. i don’t think any workplace should be dictating what you can and can’t do with your body either and i think it’s strange to decide to teach children that their body is not their own
If the woman that JK rowling posted an upskirt photo of had been a cis woman snopes wouldn't have said this was "mixed" and you know it.
Not that it was necessary, but I looked up definitions, and yeah, obviously "taking a photo under someone's skirt" is literally it. Fuck Snopes so fucking hard. I need them to explain to me how it doesn't fit the definition to a fucking t:
And what the FUCK do they mean, "public setting"?? Yeah, upskirts are mistly taken in public fucking settings! That's not an eycuse, that's part of the fucking issue
And truly what do they mean it was in public? Does that mean that the upskirt photos people take on subways dont count because other people are around? OF COURSE IT WAS IN PUBLIC THATS HOW THE PHOTO GOT TAKEN IF SHE HAD BEEN PHOTOGRAPHED AT HOME IT WOULD HAVE BEEN BREAKING AND ENTERING
what do they mean "it wasn't taken surreptitiously"? there isn't any implication here except that because Freda Wallace was in public, she consented to any pictures that might be taken of her? this is just "look at the way she* was dressed". snopes is doing rape culture.
https://archive.is/Nv1K1
according to archives the first version of the snopes article listed it as "true," but it seems to have been changed. given rowling's widely known history of extreme and aggressive litigiousness i'd be willing to bet her legal team probably objected and snopes caved
incredible innovations on the beverage front
straight men enduring 24/7 sexual assault each other in order to not be labeled faggots is honestly the best example of how masculinity operates. the other day before work a coworker fr shoved a finger in another coworker's ass (above pants) as one of their little "ha ha you're gay" jokes. fuck is wrong with them. equal parts disgusted and fascinated by their behaviour.
of course these people are fucked up and unable to hold healthy relationships grounded in mutual respect! they're constantly assaulting and being assaulted by their friends just to Not Be Gay/Like A Girl!!!
the biggest reason men refuse to recognize a lot of what they do to women as sexual harassment/assault is bc of their misogyny and wanting to maintain our power over women, 100%. BUT can i just point out that maybe a smaller but not-insignificant reason might also be that they can't even recognize sexual assault when other men do it to them???? i didn't tell that coworker bc he's an asshole, but i have had to tell other guys at work "hey what they're doing to you is terrible and you shouldn't have to put up with it you know" which most of them hadn't ever been told before because """""roughhousing""""" is part of that "boys will be boys" thing that makes everyone ignore our abuse
"boys will be boys" okay well maybe boys should be shot
a fated pair of star-crossed bunnies 🩷🐇
This is a literal sexual harassment training video we had to complete
i assumed this was porn
genuinely really funny when twerfs believe that porn is what proliferates misogyny. how do they think this interacts with gay men and their misogyny. like do we think it's perhaps from societal structures, centuries of discrimination leading to straightforward advantages for men (and sometimes women) for performing misogyny (which also affects marginalized men who, you know, sometimes, wouldn't ever really interact with porn about women) or is it the consumption of erotic art which often has women in it or is just straight up made by women. which not every man consumes.
noticing that porn often has misogyny in it and concluding that it is a corrupting force that causes or exacerbates misogyny, and not like, concluding that societal forces of misogyny cause people to put misogyny in their porn
do we kill fashion as an artform because fashion has a lot of misogyny in it
A Cop Is A Kind Of Human Trafficker, Or, Why Talking to the Liberals I Love Feels Like Grinding My Face Into Concrete
I was having a conversation with my dad a while back, and the subject of the police came up because my then girlfriend's abusive ex was squatting at her house and neither of us wanted to call the police. He knows I'm an abolitionist, its probably my single most vocal belief. And he says, "I know you've had bad experiences with cops but they're not all bad."
And thats when it occurs to me that he hasn't just disagreed with me during our past conversations on the matter, he literally was not listening. Or, he wasn't equipped to listen. I'll explain later on.
When I was arrested, I was not treated particularly bad by the police, and I've never claimed to have been. I was white, and I was in the closet. From the back of the van they loaded me into after cuffing me, I saw first hand how much worse they treated the black man they arrested on the way to taking me to jail, not even allowing him the dignity of stepping inside his home to dress.
When a liberal hears someone say ACAB, they think they're hearing someone say, in addition to being a police officer, every police officer is a bad person. They're all corrupt, they all beat their partners, etc. And thats closer to the truth than not, genuinely, but its still not what we have ever been saying.
Its not the fault of the acronym, that would be a goofy claim. But a more accurate one could be ACIAKOHT: A Cop Is A Kind Of Human Trafficker.
One of the main things a cop gets paid to do is traffick human beings to do forced labor. When they do this to trans women, this forced labor is sexual, it is sexual slavery, something that the vast majority of people I love will risk in every single interaction they are ever made to have with a police officer. Its a matter of policy, its called V-Coding, google it. Even in cases where no forced labor occurs, they are committing kidnapping.
I love my father, but he isn't equipped to understand this, even to understand that this is the position an abolitionist actually holds, no matter how directly it is stated, because he is white, cis, straight, and petit bourgeois. Every axis he exists on incentivizes him not to understand. Because to him, a cop is someone who exists to protect you and your stuff. Because for someone in his position, thats what they are. I could only hold a negative view of the police, in his mind, if I experienced some particular abuse at their hands. I didn't, except for the part where they kidnapped me. Which is what they get paid to do.
some kind of amphibious two-stroke engine
top 10 bunny sleepy moments
[white man voice] Number 5: The Sleepy Bunny who Happened to Flop Over
Number 6: the little bunny who was so kind and sweet it stretched its whole body out and got long enough to go to sleep
she literally was too short to sleep so she stretched out long enough until she was able to sleep
You have to stop what you’re doing and watch these reels with me…