welcome to rii's ravine part 2 electric boogaloo
— •𝒢𝜚 • —
mostly for text reblogs !! and a lot of miscellaneous stuff.

Kiana Khansmith
todays bird
No title available
taylor price
macklin celebrini has autism

No title available
$LAYYYTER

pixel skylines
TMBGareOK. The Official They Might Be Giants tumblr

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club
Sade Olutola
ojovivo
No title available

bliss lane

blake kathryn
occasionally subtle
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
official daine visual archive
Not today Justin
Cosimo Galluzzi

seen from United States
seen from Colombia

seen from India
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Brazil
seen from United States

seen from United States
@enchantedmirage
welcome to rii's ravine part 2 electric boogaloo
— •𝒢𝜚 • —
mostly for text reblogs !! and a lot of miscellaneous stuff.
Marriage is good and weddings are great but I hate modern wedding culture. You don’t need to bankrupt yourself to have a nice wedding. Stop supporting the wedding industry, stop buying outrageously priced engagement rings, stop spending 10k on a dress you’ll only ever wear once.
Coming from a professional event planner - weddings are egregiously expensive because companies openly raise prices at the word “wedding.”
Pro Tip - Never drop the word wedding while planning if you don’t need to. Most things can be for “an event you’re planning.” This obviously doesn’t include things like the venue, DJ (who needs specific wedding songs), and the wedding dress company if you’re going that route versus just buying a dress.
For my wedding I got “discounted” cupcakes, flowers, decor, bridesmaids dresses, groomsman attire, and invitations. I did this by either searching for things that aren’t marketed for weddings or not telling the companies I was working with it was for a wedding. Because honestly, most of the time they don’t need to know why you’re ordering.
These companies target people planning their weddings and markup everything the second “wedding” is said. And it’s said often because people assume the services change exponentially for weddings. They absolutely do not.
The best example are the cupcakes I had for my wedding. I used a designer cupcake store in town instead of spending $1000 on a wedding cake. If you place a large order of cupcakes with a cake tree for display - it costs about $150 for 100 (which is what I did). When you order their “wedding” package - the price raised to a $700 base for 100 cupcakes. The only other perk includes a “tasting.” Forget that. Our tasting was buying a few cupcakes in flavors we thought we’d like and picked three. It cost maybe $20.
What these companies do is scummy and targets people who don’t have information about the event industry.
I will yell it from the rooftops until people realize there’s a better way.
It's amazing how much of our knowledge of "animal behaviour" is based on very old studies that just went "we half-starved these animals and put them in a tiny box together and just assumed that whatever they did reflects their natural behaviours and social structures"
philosophers have this same problem in assessing human nature
It's hard to say this without sounding like a right wing dickhead, but the thing about progressive spaces is that they may naturally attract people who are always on the lookout for excuses to start a fight. Like you can find yourself faced with someone whose political outrage is totally justified, and whose humanitarian ideals are right on the money, but simultaneously they are carrying a ton of psychological baggage about being wronged and getting revenge, and they will exploit literally any opportunity to live out this psychodrama with anyone in their line of vision. I have thought of several related anecdotes since I started typing this post, but I'll limit myself to the thing that inspired it, which is that I just visited this ultra-lefty cafe/bike shop/community gathering space where I've heard that the proprietor is constantly in a fight with everyone around her. When I paid for my stuff I noticed that there was no tip option, but I thought I had heard something about this, so I snuck away to look at the website and it made me really glad I didn't ask! I think there should have been a really enticing and exciting way for her to say "I've decided to be the change I want to see in the world, so I'm paying my baristas a full living wage, I'm making sure EVERYONE feels welcome and comfortable here, and I'm selling products I believe in!" -- but instead all the web copy sounded more like "You're either with me or against me, you're a fucking piece of shit asshole if you can't handle the inclusive atmosphere here, and by the way tipping is for fascist cavemen and if you ever try to tip someone you are refusing to relate to them authentically and you are enforcing a dangerous and evil power dynamic that should be purged from human society (so therefore I pay my staff well)." Like everything she stood for was totally agreeable, but why did she have to put it like it was directed at her worst enemy, rather than at the kinds of people she wants to attract? If the word on the street is to be believed, the reason for this posturing is that she spends quite a lot of energy making as many enemies as possible, and she probably likes it that way. I guess I'm just reminding myself, and perhaps others, that while one might think of "politics" as being broadly social and theoretical, no individual can fully separate the political from the intimately personal. Even somebody who seems to want to uplift and protect their fellow humans may be getting some perverse inner satisfaction out of that valiant crusade, and you may never realize it until you find yourself in a confusing fight with them.
I ran a LARP for a few years explicitly aimed at being queer friendly and accessible, and eventually cut it short mainly for this exact reason. You wouldn’t believe the amount of abuse my staff and I took for reasons that felt genuinely insane. I got called ableist for telling someone they couldn’t be invincible in my game of make believe, more than once. Defended myself, multiple Jewish players, and a conversion student from accusations of antisemitism based on alleged lore we’d never written / suggested / that simply and plainly did not exist in game. Had a staffer try to talk to someone about how a joke she made was uncomfortable only for this person to retaliate in epic proportions full white woman crocodile tears style, trying to get this staffer removed and eventually escalating into a full public hate campaign when she didn’t get her way. All that’s still just the tip of the iceberg.
Progressive spaces are naturally populated by traumatized people, and unfortunately trauma makes people more difficult. (I’m not excluded in that. No one is.) Running a progressive space is doubly difficult because a lot of left-facing trauma was inflicted by authority, so you’re setting yourself up to be the windmill that someone tilts their displaced rage at. I don’t really know what the solution is, but I do know that this is one of the huge reasons it’s so hard to find community: the people with a bone to pick can’t reach the ones who actually hurt them, but they’ll sure find you along the way, and the safer they feel around you the safer they’ll feel coming after you.
Once again I am begging everyone to read Never Split the Difference: Negotiating As If Your Life Depended On It by Chris Voss.
Voss spent 25 years as a hostage negotiator, meaning that his job was to talk to guys on the phone who had literal guns to innocent people's heads. He KNOWS how to compassionately de-escalate a conflict and have productive, constructive conversations with people who are highly activated and reactive.
Especially if you are neurodivergent, read this book. The communication tools are specific, concrete, easy to implement, and will dramatically reduce the psychic damage you're taking just from trying to navigate the conversation.
As a teacher, it profoundly annoys me when people take on this educational philosophy of exclusive practicality. Everything we learn must be justified by "when will we use this in real life." What a dull, incurious view of life these people have.
You only need to know the science necessary for cooking, or maybe the chemicals in cleaning supplies. You will never be in amazement at the building blocks of the world. You don't need to know how stars are formed; you can't even see them where you live. You just need to know the geography of the land you live on. You will never see anything beyond your lot in life. Why learn complex mathematical equations to test your mental skills? You only need to know how to add and subtract when your boss gives you a paycheck. Why learn history - those people have nothing to do with you - you need to learn how to fill out a tax form.
And English class? Everyone knows that books aren't real life. Your boss at your job will never ask you to identify the theme, so you don't need to know how. Humans have composed literature for as long as we've been able to speak, but that's all going to end with you. You only need to know how to do your job. That's "real life."
Just learn something for the sake of knowledge and stop complaining that I'm trying to educate you.
Children are naturally curious.
So what changed them? What demotivated them? What happened?
You quite accurately described the world they're very shortly getting kicked out into, a world that is increasingly hostile to them starting at birth, and it's fucking awful.
I think maybe it isn't a crisis of indifference or laziness, it's a crisis of hope.
more leftists should be vegan. veganism and leftism operate on the same beliefs. social justice, no exploitation of labor, autonomy, environmental concern, intersectionality, an equal and just living etc. leftist praxis should include veganism
Indigenously: no.
Animal welfare and animal rights are different things; it is good and normal for humans to be slightly anthropocentric while acknowledging our role within the greater ecosystem. Factory farming should indeed be dismantled- I want all animals harvested for food/leather/fur/bones/organs to have full and rich lives with as little suffering as possible before they're harvested. But it is not anti-leftist to live as a predator within the ecosystem. It is not more wrong for humans to eat salmon than it is for bears and eagles to do so.
i used to work in a vegan restaurant and it had basically all the same labor and management problems as the other restaurants i worked at that served meat. obviously. because it was a business in a capitalist system so obviously theres an economic incentive to pay workers the bare minimum and charge customers the maximum you can get away with.
in fact, the restaurant used the vegan identity and environmentalism as fuel for their marketing in quite cynical ways. at the same time they had a deal with Whole Foods (implicated in prison labor allegations btw) to source ingredients, meaning that there were transcontinentally shipped produce lol. for example we used frozen blueberries that were product of Chile. for a restaurant in the pacific northwest region in the united states of america. there are blueberry farms in oregon, washington, etc. But it’s cheaper to exploit south american farms than get local blueberries i guess. (which still by and large exploit the labor of migrant farmworkers from mexico and south and central america, but i digress)
i was vegetarian at the time and i had a lot of deep conversations with my coworkers and manager and the conclusion i came away with is that veganism is merely a cultural practice and is not inherently “leftist” in any way. if you consider human lives equal to animal lives i think that is not compatible with a clear-sighted materialist analysis of the world we live in. its practically a religious belief. which, like, okay, you can be religious, you can have irrational beliefs, but that’s not what “”””leftism”””” is about. that’s not really what any socialist or communist theory is about. it could be syncretized with socialist theory, but it would always merely be an ill-fitting addendum.
I was going to put this in tags but no.
Cashews that make vegan cheese are extremely dangerous to harvest due to the fact they mist be harvested by hand and the fruit has corrosive enzymes. Most workers end up with scars from chemical burns.
Almond farms were linked to the declining bee population due to the number of bees needed to pollinate the plants. Most bee keepers were lucky to get half their hives back after farms rented them.
We all know about how much of the Amazon rainforest has been destroyed to make way for soy farms.
Agave is a main food source for many bats, but no, harvesting excess honey from bees that over produce it is the problem. If bees regularly have a large surplus of honey they swarm, the hive splits and some leave to start a new hive. Problem is that most bees don't survive this process because it makes them vulnerable to other environmental factors. So encouraging farming and over consumption of agave and stopping the consumption of honey, you're actually harming two different populations of pollinators.
"Vegan leather" is mostly plastic, which breaks down and sheds microplasics. Contributing to the ever growing landfill and contaminated water supply issues we have. Meanwhile cow hide is a natural byproduct from the meat industry, and real leather can last decades if taken care of. A single cow can feed 2 families of 4 for a year, and that leather can go towards making belts, boots, gloves and jackets that last decades.
If you want to actually support ethical food production and animal welfare do your research on where your food comes from. Look into local farms and their practices.
Cashews
Member of the same family as poison sumac and poison ivy
Harvesting is dangerous
Harvesting is often exploitative, even done by child labor and forced labor camps
Smaller footprint than other nuts (good thing) 5x less water intensive than almonds
Almonds
"Like sending bees to war." Pesticides, parasites, and other hazards, combined with the huge market for almonds, means it has an especially large impact on swarms used for commercial work
Soy farms and the Amazon
Please forgive me, for my emotional well-being today, I cannot bring myself to source this. I urge you to do your own research. (On all of this, but I can't give you a leg up on this on
Agave harvesting is bad for bats (and humans)
Harvesting is done before bats have a chance to feed
Fantastic plant with many uses that is financially and culturally important where it is grown, making sustainable farming really beneficial both environmentally and for humans, who matter ⬆️
Commercial farming for tequila renders plants sterile, land that formerly held agave that nourished the local wildlife now contributes almost nothing ⬆️
Large companies buy up land, driving prices up and squeezing out local farmers and straining communities that formerly relief on more sustainable practices. This is not the most helpful source, but I'm getting a little stressed rn.
Harvesting is difficult and risky because of the spines, dangerous tools, irritating sap, and field conditions like rough terrain ⬆️
Commercial harvesting is bad for working bees too, but fuck me if I can find the link
Vegan leathers
Oh boy.
There are many varieties with varying impact, but these things are generally true:
Primarily petroleum based leathers or leathers that incorporate petroleum products are harmful because petroleum products are harmful. These are not the future of vegan leather and vegans SHOULD oppose them. They're terrible.
Reality check: Ongoing research into non-animal leather alternatives is promising!
What vegan leather is easily available to buy is generally not as durable as animal leather, and needs more frequent replacing, which is costly financially and environmentally
Real high quality animal leather can last a long time if cared for properly
Reality check: animal leather isn't environmentally great, either
Animal hide tanning involves pollutants that are bad for humans, communities, and the environment. Vegetable tanned leather is better than chrome tanned, so check what you buy
Reality check: while much animal leather does come from animals raised primarily for meat, that is not universally true; some animals are farmed primarily for their skin, like gators or even calves. Animal hides add a meaningful amount to the profit margin for animal farming. Animal leather in general is not a true waste material, the animal was not "already dead/going to die", the value of its hide absolutely went into the math of the value of that animal's life.
Reality check: "real leather" may mean technically there is leather but it is backed or surfaced with plastic.
Reality check: bio-based vegan leather uses plant byproducts; these can probably be improved to yield an affordable product that is less polluting to produce; IMO vegan bio-leather is probably going to wind up being a much more ethical product all around once we get the hang of it and we should be happy about advances that get us closer to that.
Reality check: secondhand animal leather is IMO the best alternative to both animal and non-animal leather available to most people. Hard-wearing, requires no new harm as it already exists, costs less in general, keeps items out of the landfill for longer while remaining biodegradable.
Using neither kind of leather and opting for other textiles is maybe what we should be doing? But then you get into the clothing industry and fiber farming and that's miserable.
Ultimate reality check for everyone:
Corporate greed, industrial farming and manufacturing's indifference to human and animal suffering and indifference to environmental harm, all for profit, is the villain in all of this. Because of cost-cutting at the expense of living things and our world, products that cause harm are currently cheaper than alternatives that do not.
The vast majority of us cannot, under the current system, financially afford to make many ethical choices. All we can do is try, even if that means choosing only one area to focus on. Food is a good place to start, but "never eat or use anything an animal died or labored to make" is not the best way to determine if something is ethical. Production of plant products is often horrendous for wild animals, humans, and the land. Most vegetarians do eventually return to eating some meat or animal products because that sort of diet is often really hard and for some people impossible to sustain for many reasons.
Many people reducing animal use is a realistic, fantastic goal that has a broader impact than the total abstinence of the few who can do that. It acknowledges the impact one person can have and empowers them to make a difference by acknowledging that difference exists. It prioritizes animal well-being over moral absolutes, and prioritizes the environment that lets all life exist over a smaller portion of that life. When the rest of the diet is at least somewhat ethically sourced, that makes it even better.
Some people medically can't subsist on a vegan or vegetarian diet, and many more find their health at least somewhat affected, which we should not require one another to endure. For those people, we NEED to consider how to make animal exploitation as non-exploitative and affordable as possible. Horrible truth. This isn't easy.
Indigenous peoples often have an entirely different relationship to animals and the environment than nonindigenous people, often relationships that emphasize care for the land, and these need to be respected. These communities have a lot to teach about animals/the land AND social justice.
Some people are so softhearted (/positive) they cannot emotionally bear to use animal-related products and will take pains not to. Many are okay with others doing so, many are not. All that is understandable and we should also respect that, as we should cherish and learn from ALL gentleness. They have much to teach.
Some people are opposed to using animals for anything at all, and believe we have no right to force animals to do anything or use them for anything. Domesticated livestock should eventually no longer have to exist. Some think we should not even have pets. There is room for that viewpoint too, as long as those people are willing to accommodate others, value others, and help them as part of their praxis. I happen to be closer to this viewpoint than any other (I have nuanced but differing views about domesticated animals that make people on every side of this issue angry, it's a little amazing). Yes, even though I eat animals, wear them, own them, all of that. I am just...realistically not able to survive without them at this time. And I'm not about to stop living. I deserve to exist and be comfortable and safe as much as a cow or elephant or lion or stray cat. We all do. If I were helped, and I dearly wish someone could, I would happily do better. That is true of nearly everyone, I think. That most people would make different, more sustainable choices if they could or knew how or understood it is necessary. Removing barriers makes more ethical choices possible.
These are HUGE issues. Complex issues, with terrible choices we may have to make to improve them. All I can say, after decades, is that money and greed are evil, and what capitalism has done is horrendous. Money. Just...it's all over money. The systems and people that wield it without decency value nothing. That is where the deepest villainy lies. Urge people to make less harmful choices, yes, HELP THEM, but we have to dismantle what keeps us from being able to choose, or seeing the value in doing so.
We can do better. We CAN.
My thumbs are tired. I am hungry. This may have been unnecessary and meaningless. Goodbye, and if you read this far, here is a cat I fostered who looked a bit like a hamburger for some reason. I would hold him gently like a burger and he would purr. This should please everyone regardless of their vegan-ness?
Burgerboy!!!
how I love Boston
In some ways, my experience has been a shockingly powerful affirmation of that old Margaret Mead quote- "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it's the only thing that ever has." They pass it around endlessly as a vague affirmation, but holy crap is it true.
Like, much is made of Current Politicians suddenly erupting with comments and views that were recognizably incubated in our local subcultures, and that is such an endlessly weird feeling to me. I really did not have any sense, twenty years ago, that we were playing with live ammo in that way. Retroactive empowerment, I guess is the feeling. In retrospect, I'm really glad that younger!Toggle took his words very seriously, and that he mostly tried to make sure that whatever contributions he made to his community were considered, honest, and generous.
Speaking up, breaking silence, sharing the thoughts that nobody else has, resisting the dominant currents of discourse- these have a way of feeling small and personal in the moment, but you're always so much closer to changing the world than you think you are. Words and ideas have a power to them, even in the babble of social media or the dusty corners of some old bbs, a power you invoke every time you speak with intent. Ideas are worth being unpopular for, being disliked for, making enemies. When I was young, I don't think I quite knew this in the same way that I do now, not really. But I acted like I did. And that's made all the difference.
naorinmoon
Quick Decor BO Did forr Fun!! F2U! Credit Not Required But Appreciated ~ Check out BOs ArtFight ♥︎
so in the uk you will be ably to apply to join the army at 17 but not use your phone after 8:30pm. that makes sense
um actually you can join the army at 16
but you need your mum to write you a permission slip
fun fact: no matter how much you support other trans people, if you don't respect trans women, you are a transphobe and a transmisogynist. no amount of "but look at all these TME trans people I support!" will ever change that
being trans yourself does not change this either. there is no substitute for respecting trans women and treating us right
Ok but like. What the fuck is there to do on the internet anymore?
Idk when I was younger, you could just go and go and find exciting new websites full of whatever cool things you wanted to explore. An overabundance of ways to occupy your time online.
Now, it's just... Social media. That's it. Social media and news sites. And I'm tired of social media and I'm tired of the news.
Am I just like completely inept at finding new things or has the internet just fallen apart that much with the problems of SEO and web 3.0 turning everything into a same-site prison?
Long collection of resources under the cut.
You're right that the internet is smaller than it used to be, but there's still some cool stuff left in the corners. I'd recommend checking checking out Neocities if you haven't--it's an independent web hosting platform like Geocities of the old web, and there are hundreds of interesting and active pages discoverable both through their search function and through web buttons (links attached to small pictures with the title of a website) within the websites themselves. Here are three examples of web buttons you may find in link pages:
Most Neocities websites have link pages or button collections with anywhere from tens to hundreds of these. Don't be afraid to explore!
If you're looking for something more like a search engine, I can point you towards Marginalia. It's not a particularly smart engine, but it's perfectly usable if you've ever been taught to use search engines back when they were mostly run through keywords instead of full sentence comprehension. There's also an "about" and "tips" section on the front page with more information. The algorithm of Marginalia can be filtered by the user to allow, disallow, or require JavaScript depending on your needs, plus there are filters designed specifically to prioritize web 1.0 sites or mostly text-based ones. It is possible to search for modern websites with it, but it can return websites from just about any decade (since the invention of the web, obviously) so long as they contain the information you're looking for. For example, here are some random interesting sites I've found using Marginalia:
Native Languages of the Americas: Native American Cultures
BASIC HTML COMPETENCY IS THE NEW PUNK FOLK EXPLOSION!
Earthbound Text Labs by Bill Eager
The possibilities for discovery are truly endless.
Now you might want to know about directories. These make browsing for websites easier, but require you to read through and judge which ones to visit, as there aren't algorithms ranking the sites besides the whim of whoever coded the directory. Some of them have themes, others don't. Here are two that I've used:
Yesterlinks Directory
Ichigo Directory
Directories can be harder to come by just by surfing the net, but they aren't impossible to find. Many personal websites have their own directories of interesting sites hidden within them.
Webrings are similar to directories, but are actually more community-based. You have to register your website to be a part of a webring, usually by sending an email to whoever runs it and meeting some kind of entry criteria. For example, my personal website used to be a part of a webring called Sweet Dreams, which was for websites that heavily utilize color palettes and images of cute things, particularly sweets. Webrings will give you access to a widget upon entry that allow visitors and other members to browse between the registered websites in a massive ring, ergo, where the term gets its name. Webrings can have any theme or criteria for entry. If you can make a website about it, you can find a webring for it.
Now, you might be wondering about social media alternatives. I can't offer much, but I can nudge you towards the idea of forums. Here's one I found that could really use some traffic. I also browse a bit on MelonLand forum, which is actually closed right now--it's currently closed on Mondays--but on any other day of the week, you can find a fun community there dedicated to web revival. You can find it through MelonLand's main page. I'd also recommend checking out SpaceHey, which is a MySpace clone that's customizable and easy to use.
I hope this is of some help to you. The internet may feel less magical than it used to be, but that doesn't mean that the spark has completely died out. These types of indie websites need more attention if we ever hope to reverse the damage done to the internet by centralization and corporate interest. People are trying to make the web a cooler place to be, but we're going to have to do the work of finding and interacting with these projects in order to get them off the ground someday.
ALSO you should consider browsing Virtual Pet List and seeing if there are any pet sites you might be interested in playing. There is a whole genre of browser games right under your nose
Another one that I just found recently is this, which is a whole collection of blogs, organized by topic!
A collection of 1,966 blogs about every topic
Look guys the real internet IS STILL THERE I'm going to cry
Getting off of twitter and onto neocities has really healed me and I am so glad to see it is healing other people too ;u; let's retreat into the self-made digital woods and away from corporate bs pls, I am so tired
REBLOGGING
Please stop being nonbinary too. God only created one gender. You must conform to that.
THERES ONLY ONE NOW?????
i was talking about this on my server earlier but i really think "cozy" is one of the worst genre labels out there in the gaming space. like people dunk on the terms "metroidvania" and "first person shooter" a lot for being uncreative or limiting but at least those are like... falsifiable descriptors. you can look at a game and go "yeah this game's mechanics and core gameplay loop generally operate like metroid/castlevania" or "yeah this game primarily uses a first person camera paired with some sort of projectile weapon" so i don't think they're completely useless. but "cozy" is just nonsense. fully subjective. i see a lot of games popularly labeled as "cozy" that share almost zero mechanical features between them and don't even always match in tone or aesthetic. hearing a game described as "cozy" doesn't tell you anything about what to expect as a player beyond maybe giving you a sort of forewarning about the fanbase and their discomfort tolerance. "cozy" is not a quantifiable metric. like imagine if someone offered to buy you takeout and asked you what kind of food you'd like and you told them fully unironically, and with no further elaboration, "i want to get yummy food." that's what hearing "cozy games" sounds like to me
Dress made by me, end of 2025, photographed by Casey Kerr and Rory Casey, early 2026. Modelled by Jay Katherine Amusan.
(Thanks Jay (o: )
“Kids shouldn’t learn about periods” what
what do you even mean. I got my period at 11 and know people who got it younger