suì-fēng’s lawyer.

[exrui]

★⠀

yves / twenty / black / bi / rad-lea(r)ning

꒰1꒱ i don’t like to talk, i mostly just reblog. sometimes i make edits or actually utter some blabber. i’m learning more about feminism and socialism and related philosophy in recent times as i’ve grown a bit radicalized with the way things are in the world as i get older. i’m anti-porn & “sex work” industry, as well as pro-resistance. so just a warning blah, blah, blah.

꒰2꒱ tbh, i don’t want nsfw accs interacting with me and those who excuse pieces of fiction on the basis of sexual gratification as they ignore reality. i’m not finna argue about it, i just wanna be left alone lmao.

꒰3꒱ some vague interests : women, drawing, reading, writing, comics, video essays, vidya games, args, history, nature, animals, photography, listening to music, sleeping.

[cyberpsychostims]

Frankly speaking as a trans person who was assigned female at birth, if you crow to me about my "female biology" or "biological reality" or "female socialization" I'll kill you. Like I should get to kill you. You're a TERF.

[opinionatedlesbian]

it’s quite telling to me that you want to kill women because they acknowledge biological reality and female socialisation, and by extension misogyny. He/him pronouns won’t save you from the patriarchy, I know that myself as I’m quite literally a detransitioner. I hope you overcome your misogyny one day and realise violence is not the answer, genuinely.

[kianamaiart]

day off

[dcminions]

JADA    PINKETT    SMITH    &    SIDRA    SMITH    (    1996    )

[liathvim]

kalahari desert, namibia. jawline, hunger.

in the early 1900s, there were over 100,000 cheetahs in the wild. today, fewer than 7,000 remain. over half now live in namibia.

shot on nikon d7500. no post-processing.

[brucefromfamilyguy]

[knightingael]

It’s really no wonder that men cling desperately to the institutions that don’t allow women out from under their brutality. Separatism terrifies them for good reason. Look at single-sex male spaces in prisons, schools, and industries. When men/boys are alone together, they quickly create castes where they treat their lowers like they treat women in broader society - and the abuse knows no limits. It’s often sexual, often fatal, and it always revolves around degradation. Males recreate patriarchy, even when they’re alone together. They’re terrified of their own brutality and need to use women as a buffer.

[theshadowofthephoenix]

I keep seeing posts from people who claim they will be blocking anyone who posts any content from the new Harry Potter show that begins airing in December.

So I wanted to say you’re all being ridiculous. You consume media all the time by actual rapists. You watch movies with actors who have killed people. You read books written by racists and homophobes. All. The. Time. And it is so unimportant to you that half the time, you don’t even know.

This business with JK Rowling is a witch hunt. She follows a different kind of feminism than you do. And sometimes she’s a little rude about it. (But we don’t tone police here.) She has never put hands on anyone. She has started charities with her own money. And she is an outspoken advocate for women experiencing domestic violence.

She has expressed acceptance for LGBT people, yes including trans people. She just does not believe a person can genuinely change their sex, that some ‘inclusive’ terminology dehumanizes women and that sex segregated spaces are necessary to protect women.

There is a reason that JKR is being derided the way she is, and it’s not because she’s the worst person in the world. And if you step back, if you read her words, you’ll see why.

Anyway, keep putting Harry Potter content on my feed.

[vintage-bentley]

Nicholas Brendon, the actor who played Xander in Buffy the Vampire Slayer, died recently. The response was an outpouring of love: fans affectionately calling him “Nicky”, his former costars putting out loving statements about him, fans sharing stories about meeting him, so many Xander scenes and quotes from BtVS being posted. Fans called for mass streaming of “The Zeppo”, a Xander-centric episode. Nevermind that the creator, Joss Whedon, was/is abusive too.

You’d never know that Brendon had physically abused women.

In fact, when a handful of women pointed this side of him out and cautioned people about pouring love out for an abuser…they’d be told that it’s a complicated situation, that he was a complex person, that it’s okay to mourn the person he once was and just put aside that pesky woman-beating side of him. After all, the poor sweet man was troubled.

Watching this all unfold really put into perspective for me how little people care about women, especially compared to how much they care about worshipping men no matter what they’ve done. You can’t even mention Harry Potter or god forbid JK Rowling without people jumping on you to lecture you about how she’s evil and unredeemable and needs to die. I’ve even seen people call for boycotts of brands just because they did a HP collab. Yet you can post a loving tribute to “Nicky” and people will join in supportively, never once mentioning that he abused women. You can separate the art from the male artist, but don’t you dare suggest doing the same for a woman.

[teddykaczynski]

a tumblr fetish account is not a civil right

[timelesslysparklingdoom-deactiv]

Women now have to grow out their hair and dress a certain way to be women, apparently. If you’re not overtly feminine you’re “non-binary”.

Trying to force a detrans female back into a box which made her try to transition in the first time is why so many of us no longer support gender ideology, we no longer want to follow these misogyny, backwards views. The more people see this movement for what it is the better.

She is a female whatever she dresses like.

[gender-apostate]

4k likes on a tweet that essentially amounts to "only boys can have short hair" / "girls can't wear pants" in a year that begins with the number 2 is so disturbing to me.

[0utrenoir]

gay man blog: full on dick and balls pictures. hairy ass. fat guy without a shirt. another ass.

lesbian blog: lesbian art. gif sets from lesbian movies. women kissing sloppy style. stylish nudes pictures.

tif blog: poorly drawn yaoi art of video game characters. fanfic of shitty american tvshow made in a lab for tumblr girls. male character with zipper tits. post about how valid tims are.

tim blog: women are inferior to animals. hentai featuring child characters. anime lesbian content with more underage looking character. porn gifs. naked selfie of some beast. incel manifesto about raping your sister.

[gendiebrainrotreceipts]

I saw a post where you were confused on why transmen would be less effected on misogyny and I don't know if you'll entertain my point but I'll raise it anyway

The only part of womanhood a completely untransitioned trans man identifies with is having boobs and not having a dick. That's it.

Misogyny, of course, attacks women in ways extending far beyond their genital characteristics. Misogynists deride women's speech patterns, women's clothing, women's social expieriences, hobbies and jobs that have been traditionally done by women. To speak broadly, misogyny attacks women-specific culture.

Transmen as a group are alientated from this culture, at least from our internal perspectives. We don't have the expiernces of finding community in women only social situations/circles, in feminine clothing or makeup, or other similar things. So when misogynists attack women for their clothing, socilization, or whatever else, it doesn't really affect transmen.

For an example: say someone saids that dresses make someone look submissive and weak and that's why their women's clothing. This would rightfully make a lot of women uncomfortable and upset, because a lot of women enjoy wearing dresses. But a transman probably would associate dresses will feeling weak, unable to stand up for oneself, and embarrassing, so that comment wouldn't be very impactful. It might even feel vindicating.

A lot of modern trans spaces like to pretend women and men aren't different at all and this is why trans people are possible, so I get why this stuff can be annoying and confusing. Just wanted to share my two cents though.

Misogyny is hatred of female people, not hatred of femininity (even if that’s where men’s hatred of femininity in other men stems from)

The hatred of female ‘culture’ stems from hatred of the female body, of female people; it did not come from nowhere. It’s like saying racism is solely hatred of black culture and it has nothing to do with black people themselves, or that black people who are ‘culturally’ white don’t suffer racism.

Disliking or disassociating oneself from, what is for women, their own oppression(ie femininity) is a natural response. It does not mean that person is not part of their biological group or that they don’t suffer the oppression that group suffers, esp since it’s on the basis of said biology

[hats4rats]

The dress example is really interesting because many women *do* associate dresses with limited movement and restriction. That example of the parents who didn't let their daughter play with another girl because her dress would get dirty comes to mind.

I thought very similarly to anon while I identified as trans. I remember arguing with someone on dress codes targeting female people because I'm female and never once wanted to wear such clothes. The words used were AFAB and I was arguing for including men who identify with feminine signifiers like clothing, or just male people who identify as women in general. This conveniently obscures the reason clothes like that are made in the first place, to fit female people and to sexualize them. Meanwhile I was holding out hope T would "unfuck" my waist-hip ratio so I could be comfortable in men's pants. Ha.

I thought since most women are happy with that state of affairs and even take pride in it, there was something seriously different about me. That on top of my preexisting revulsion from my body led me to internalize that I'm not like those women but like other female people who feel similarly to me, and they tended to not call themselves such. Fuck there's a lot I want to say but I'm struggling with wording it because there's so many fucking taxonomies and vocabulary sets where each word I could use means something different to a radfem vs a trans activist.

I just want to get across that femininity is external to being female. Even the women who enjoy it didn't come to it independently following from some property of being female.

Part of the confusion might be the third wave feminist movement that did defend these choices as integral to womanhood and called criticism misogynist. And granted there are many ways criticism towards these things can take on misogynist qualities given why the criticism would come about. Reminds me of "slutshaming," astrology discourse and "cult of women's intuition"

[kiefbowl]

I think it’s evil to try and make women feel insane for not wanting their boyfriends and husbands to watch porn

[thebroccoligoblin]

Hmmmm. They’re definitely not insane. I’d love to see everyone opinion on this. To me this feels like men not wanting their girlfriends to wear revealing outfits. Either way it’s a discussion that should be had between partners

[kiefbowl]

your feels like machine is broken

[cisthoughtcrime]

women not wanting their boyfriends to watch porn: "I don't want to be with someone who is aroused by and masturbates to video/images of women raped, degraded, and objectified, women who can't revoke their financially-coerced consent and whose pay can be withheld if they do not tolerate enduring extreme sex acts they often aren't told will occur in advance, women who frequently depend on substance abuse to get through the production of the pornography, women who often speak out after getting out of porn against the industry's integral reliance on the sexual commodity that is eroticising women's pain."

men who don't want their girlfriends to wear revealing outfits: "I view women's clothing as an invitation, and my woman's clothing shouldn't invite men other than me. I should be in control of this so other men know she is already owned."

dumbshit fucknuts: "This feels the same to me."

[majchic]

@gendiebrainrotreceipts

[gendiebrainrotreceipts]

They’ve always been like this 🙄

[swaglet-moved-deactivated202603]

instagram shows me bangers occasionally

[shoppinghauer]

It just grinds my gears because for YEARS women in here have pointed out the link between sex work is work activism, child abuse and shady NGOs but were ignored and called swerfs and terfs.

Everything people are "discovering" wrt the Epstein files, so called terfs were saying 5 years ago...

[estrellabelle]

This problem has been happening for centuries.

This is more than just sex trafficking its ritualistic blood cults.

[shoppinghauer]

No theyre not. I agree its a centuries old problem but because misogyny and child abuse are a centuries old problem, not because there is an illuminatti level conspiracy. Is stuff your uncles, your coworkers, everyone around you have been doing but its "my 17 year old gf" being a 30 year old man. Its the professor abusing his students, the father trafficking his daughter. No need to add sensationalist satanic panic spectacle, men have been doing this on their bedrooms and basements, churches and schools instead of private islands

[directactionforhope]

"Women are inherently less violent than men" is in fact an anti-feminist position and should be more often treated as such???

Like. That's literally just radfem shit. That's literally just cult of domesticity shit. That's literally just wildly ahistorical and incorrect, too.

[quinntheestallion]

Men are vastly more violent than women” is a statical fact that’s grounded in long term scientific observation as well as historical documentation. Denying this fact is not social justice or activism. Y’all desperately want to make “social justice” into reality denial. It’s not. To do so is to pervert and mis-use justice frameworks.