Rebecca Storm (Canadian, b. 1987, Vancouver Island, BC, Canada, based Montreal, QC, Canada) - God Laughs, 2026, Paintings: Oil on Canvas
cherry valley forever
Keni
Show & Tell
Monterey Bay Aquarium
occasionally subtle
Acquired Stardust
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

Andulka
Peter Solarz

No title available
Stranger Things
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
Claire Keane
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
AnasAbdin
taylor price
trying on a metaphor

Janaina Medeiros

shark vs the universe
hello vonnie

seen from United States

seen from Latvia
seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Germany
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Latvia

seen from United States

seen from France

seen from Malaysia
seen from Germany

seen from Ireland

seen from Germany
seen from Brazil

seen from Malaysia
@extraordinarily-average-guy
Rebecca Storm (Canadian, b. 1987, Vancouver Island, BC, Canada, based Montreal, QC, Canada) - God Laughs, 2026, Paintings: Oil on Canvas
Through the fog
The guards in Silvermoon are so mean to my void elf shadow priest wielding Xal'atath for no reason!
what a coincidence! they're mean to mine too. cant fathom why
I managed to finish this just in time! Almost missed MerMay..
Thank you to the lovely person on Patreon that requested a Mer version of the boys <3 I only did Ghost for now but I had SO much fun <3
As always, early access, WIPs and other goodies are on my Patreon!
Waldinneres (In the Forest), 1933 painting by Hans Emmenegger
Thank you @nuka-rockit I was actually going to ask if anyone spoke German and if that translation, which came from Wikipedia, was any sort of accurate. Fascinating. Titles are so important.
illustration from ”The Annotated Dracula” - Wilfried Sätty
Artwork by Jeremy Hush
Daniel Álvarez, “Then she approached the enchanted tree…”
charcoal on paper, 2025
Kākāpō believes in you ☀
Gemini had the fucking GALL to get in my email and summarize a 3-line email, taking up more space than the email did visually.
Hit the “thumbs down.” It’s like, what’s wrong??? Was our summary wrong? Were there offensive words? Thank you for helping us improve our AI tools :)
I selected “other.”
Text box popped up. Please elaborate!
Wrote in “I can fucking read” submit comment
Then had to spend several minutes torching all my settings with a flamethrower. Let me be clear: I’m (a lawyer) notoriously picky with my words FOR GOOD REASON (lawyering) so I overwhelmingly reject Gmail’s “helpful” little assistance. My privacy settings were set to “full paranoia” a little less than a year ago when I saw the writing on the wall and knew public defenders could become a target in the future. Better to lock it all down now.
Gemini had crept in there and turned ALL that shit back on. And showed itself by saying “Jane Doe says she’s so sorry for your loss and offers to reschedule for Thursday at 3” over an email from Jane Doe saying “I’m so sorry for your loss. We could reschedule for Thursday at 3?”
Why would I possibly need this. In what universe would I need this. I have eyes and a brain and a reading speed that twenty years ago was measured at 1500 wpm with full comprehension on dense scientific text. Furthermore! If I read a summary, I’m not reading what they actually wrote. If I’m not reading what they actually wrote, I’m not using my own judgment on the words and phrases that they used.
I literally don’t understand why this is helpful at all. This is just avoidance. Using LLMs to write is specifically Not Writing. Using LLMs to summarize is Not Reading. Using them to make art is Avoiding Making Art. Just READ! Just WRITE! I was not put on this fucking planet to not read and not write and not make art! Avoidance is an anxiety symptom and indulging it gives it more power.
If I had an AI to do my most dreaded task, answer the phone for clients, I wouldn’t use it. Because an AI cannot help them. An AI cannot hear the facts of their case, make appropriate noises, be thoughtful and insightful, and then give them a realistic estimate of what could happen in court. I am unique. I cannot be replaced by machine learning. I have style. I have expertise. I don’t hallucinate unless I’m having a really great Friday night and I’m off the clock.
When I need to outsource tasks from my own brain, I give them to people I know can do them and that I trust to do them right.
Fuck, it just sneaks up on you, doesn’t it?? Goddamn Gemini jumpscare right in my own fucking email
I really feel like we should work more on destigmatizing male virginity, ESPECIALLY when it comes to casting assumptions about their virginity, based on appearance, and the judgements that follow in the aftermath. The conventional idea of the "normal guy" is already off-putting to me (See: fuckhungry poonhounds who have been chasing tail since before they could drink). So why would you make ANOTHER disgusting stereotype for people who are the total antithesis? There's two sides to this. If you're a (normally overwhelmingly cis) guy, and you've entered your 20s without losing your V-Card, then you're cleeeaaarly a "smelly toxic hairy disgusting fatass incel neckbeard" (we'll get to that) who doesn't deseeeerve a woman's touch. (also presumptuous) And on the other side of it, if you're a guy and you aren't the epitome of conventional attractiveness? If you have a double chin? Don't lift every day? Have even slightly unkempt hair? Don't have even facial hair distribution? Don't have some bullshit white collar job? Then you're "probably one of those mouth-breathing D&D-playing cellar dwelling turbovirgins". And buddy, can I ever fucking tell you that these people are among the NICEST people I've ever actually met? The closest friends I have IRL all fit varying bills of the "Loser Male Virgin" stereotypes to a T. And they are genuinely charming, endearing, kind, and funny people. So for the love of God please give these people a break. Am I asking you to go to your local 40K shop and give the closest person you find a sympathy fuck? No. Absolutely not. I'm saying stop judging these people so utterly relentlessly.
If you want people to take your "body positivity" attitudes seriously, then be normal about these guys. Even the weird ones. Stop looking at them as if they're fucking Tighten from Megamind. I will slap you with a rolled up gorilla.
Do better.
So, I want to draw attention to something with this, which is how unnecessarily hostile and cruel the concept of "fragile masculinity" is.
So I'm sure most of you know what fragile masculinity is, but I'm going to define it anyway for rhetorical purposes. Fragile masculinity is the concept that masculinity as an identity status is precarious, which causes anxiety in men as they seek to reaffirm their masculinity constantly. But the problem with the way this concept has historically been engaged with, is that said engagement has been done in the most grotesquely insulting manner possible.
Fragile masculinity is a form of systemic, omnipresent abuse that starts when men are children. It starts with mothers beating you for crying and devolves into actual death and rape threats (or just straight up murder and rape) as you get older. Yes men are often the ones that will straight up fight you for not conforming, but this is the lens through which men experience all abuse, and getting brutalized by another man is much rarer than the million and one micro aggressions men experience every day.
Fragile masculinity is how male victims are silenced and exploited. Fragile masculinity is how the prison system can get away with basically just being a torture chamber for men. Fragile masculinity is why men are terrified of being too conscious of the true nature of the issues facing them. Fragile masculinity is how nations exploit underprivileged men as disposable labor and sources of violence.
And instead of seeing this as an utter tragedy that has been inflicted on men by an abusive system, the number one way "fragile masculinity" as a term is used is as an insult to call men fragile.
Like do you understand how incomprehensibly evil society has to be, that upon realizing literally every man alive is riddled with insecurity and anxiety, that the entire patriarchal system is sustained by the psychological, physical, and sexual torture of boys, everyone's first fucking instinct was "how do I use this to control and hurt men harder." Their first, instinctual reaction to hearing men are suffering is anger and hate.
Like guess what, all that fucked up shit women go through? That also makes them insecure. And the same people that mock men for it endlessly have zero fucking issue crying nuance and grace and context when women act on that insecurity.
Virgin shaming is how men are psychologically tortured into being obsessed with sex. Not because they need it to feel abusive power and control, but because they are not fucking safe unless they act like rabid sex crazed animals.
I know this. I know this from experience. I remember growing up, and realizing as a teenager that I was not ready for not interested in a relationship. And you would have thought I'd said I didn't want to breath and had plans to murder my family. I was not simply made fun of. I was threatened repeatedly with actual fucking rape and sexual assault. Whether it was men claiming that they would get me alone with a prostitute and force me to have sex with her, or women insinuating that they would rape me until I liked it.
But then on top of that, I was also threatened with the "predator" label. Because it made more sense to people that I was lying in some kind of ploy to get access to women so I could rape them than for a man to want to take things slow.
And that's another, critical part of fragile masculinity. Men are not threatened with womanhood. They're threatened with being seen as a predator and a failure. If transphobia has taught us anything, it's that patriarchy, despite it's predilection for punishing deviations from gender norms with cries of "sissy" and "manish", does not actually have a threshold where it will see you as anything other than what you were assigned otherwise at birth.
If radical feminism and proud misandrists have taught us anything, it's that they can and will keep using fragile masculinity as a club to dehumanize, discriminate, advocate for violence against, etc, men but especially men who do not conform to patriarchal narratives.
Men are threatened with a bottomless abyss that involves cutting off access to resources both necessary and extraneous, social isolation, mocking, humiliation, rape myths, psychological abuse, emotional abuse, physical abuse, sexual abuse, and more that has nothing to do with misogyny.
The way you fix fragile masculinity is you let go of those paths patriarchy makes available to you, to hurt or control men. It is not okay just because you're venting your anger at some Manosphere asshole or the orange in chief. You do not hurt them by doing this. You empower them. Because the patriarchy is literally propped up on men hearing you scream about weak chins and testosterone poisoning. It's the same concept as no matter how much you hate Kristi Noem, you only empower the patriarchy by calling her a whore. Drag her ass for being a fascist dog killer, but not for being a woman.
For patriarchy to end, men have to heal from the wounds inflicted on them. Healing does not happen in isolation, and it cannot happen under assault. You have to be able to look at a man with insecurities, and see those insecurities as something to have empathy for, not a weakness you can attack.
Fragile masculinity will never get better until people (both men and women) stop acting like chuds who see weakness as an opportunity to be a bully.
You have to be able to look at a man with insecurities, and see those insecurities as something to have empathy for, not a weakness you can attack.
👏👏👏👏
i spent two years after coming out working myself back into the closet; dressing as femininely as possible, wearing makeup, acting "femininely". essentially i tried to forcefem myself, and ended up COMPLETELY miserable.
why did i do this even though i knew deep down what i was? because of radfems. because of anti-masculinity and transandrophobia within my own community. i constantly felt like i had to apologise for being a man, and for being attracted to them. i overcompensated so much - "at least i'm a feminine man!" -> "at least i'm not a binary man!" -> "at least i'm not a man!"
even when people weren't being malicious, there was such a lack of masculine representation in queer spaces that i didn't physically know how to accept myself. i was more confused and self-hating than ever in my life.
so to have so many trans women on tumblr tell people like me "just try to be a girl", "being a girl is better", "masculinity is a prison" feels like it's just pushing similar people out there further into their own personal prison.
your masculinity is PERFECT. you do NOT have to apologise for being who you are. you deserve a place in this community.
I think a lot of y'all need to realize that being a trans women/fem is not an act of transfeminism, just as how being a women isn't an act of feminism. Just as how being a trans man/masc isn't an act of transmisogyny, like how being a man isn't an act of misogyny. The same applies to works made by people. Stop judging people based off of their gender and start judging them based on their actions.
It is water time, fill a bottle and keep it near you if you haven't! Remember that adding flavor or drinking juice also works if you prefer
As AI art gets harder to clock, I feel like we are going to need to have a discussion about attribution and it's probably going to bum some people out.
Because the surest way to avoid platforming, reblogging, or encouraging AI art posting is to know where every image you share originated and that's 1) boring, tedious research and 2) extremely limiting in what you feel you can reblog. But if unattributed images never gets traction, people will start attributing their images.
I've been guilty of this in the past, but for a while now it's been my policy that if I can't verify the origin, I don't share the image. That goes for stuff like screen grabs of headlines too -- more than once I've avoided spreading misinformation by saving a post to research before I reblog, then seeing the post refuted before I've been able to verify it.
And I usually try to attribute photos I take -- case in point, the "woman with shrimp" post gets a lot of attention but not one comment about it being AI, despite it being pretty similar to something you'd get from an AI. That's because I clearly state it's in a museum and link to its catalogue page.
I'm not saying this to scold anyone -- I think yelling at the Internet to cite its sources is very much a losing game -- but because I don't see this discussed much. We're such fertile ground to be fooled by AI art because we've grown accustomed to not questioning the origins of any given image. And of course I also want to encourage both OPs to attribute their images and rebloggers to verify unattributed ones.
guys do we remember when the woke take was that trans people shouldnt have to out themselves to be allowed into queer/trans safe spaces? this also applies to trans men. this applies to cis male passing trans men. this applies to trans men who look like cishet dudes. this applies to trans men
hey guys do we remember when the woke take was that you shouldnt ask trans people what genitals they were born with/what gender they were "born as"? this also applies to trans men and trans women who support trans men. this also applies to intersex and nonbinary people. btw
"more importantly, women deserve to be comfortable" this may be controversial but i dont think women just get to force marginalized men and especially trans men out of queer spaces because we dont look like we'll kween out with them. like i understand that a lot of women have trauma with cishet men but like so do a lot of queer and trans men and we dont deserve to be forced out of queer spaces because on a basic level you are uncomfortable with our presentation
Actually nah I'm petty about this. Hot take: nobody "deserves to be comfortable." Everybody deserves to be RESPECTED, to be treated with dignity, have basic rights, etc, but "comfort" is not a right. If your "comfort" comes at the expense of somebody else's rights and safety, sorry, they take priority over you.
"Women deserve to be comfortable" is the logic that murdered Emmett Till.
in 2026 DO NOT ask yourself whether your art is GOOD
instead ask:
is it SINCERE
was it CATHARTIC
was it FUN TO MAKE
is it MADE BY ME
and don't forget to stay silly