Yes yes i know love is love. But they are still killing CHILDREN. over this.

if i look back, i am lost

PR's Tumblrdome

roma★
we're not kids anymore.
No title available
Mike Driver

⁂
h
YOU ARE THE REASON
sheepfilms

titsay
Today's Document

★
Stranger Things
NASA
Monterey Bay Aquarium

izzy's playlists!

Discoholic 🪩
$LAYYYTER
No title available

seen from Spain
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from Australia
seen from United States
seen from Italy
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from Indonesia
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from South Korea
seen from France

seen from Germany

seen from France
@fangsroyale
Yes yes i know love is love. But they are still killing CHILDREN. over this.
Omg im blazed and I just saw the fucking scene where lucifer tries to show Chloe his devil face and Chloe asks “are you gassy?”
And I am like if that was really what he wanted to show, that he was gassy, it would be so fucking funny I can’t stop laughing.
“How did you become so good at being a detective?”
Lucifer in his serious British voice “We’ll see…” *patoot*
Okay but imagine there is this vampire club where you’re getting drugged with a mind altering substance that makes you super horny and stupid.
Like you buy a ticket to get in, some DJ is playing tonight. Your ticket gives you a free token for a drink, so you decide to instantly exchange it for a drink.
The music is loud, the people are super hot and some of them are just having sex out in the open, it’s a sight for sure. You’re not sure about staying at this place so you want to quickly finish your drink and go.
As you hurry to the nearest trash can to dispose of your cup, your legs are starting to feel heavy and you get a bit light headed but in a good way.
A hot vampire couple is winking at you, the woman biting her lip and the guy readjusting his massive package.
You start to get aroused, the idea of having sex with those two is very appealing, but what are those weird fangs?
Don’t you worry about it dear…
Okay so im rewatching Lucifer and in season one there is this sex party where they roleplay as a satanic cult and fake sacrifice a girl and the girl was super into it.
Like fuck me I wanna recreate that scene so bad.
I have to take these meds because of my various mental illnesses.
Boring, mundane, feels like you’re an npc.
I was cursed by a higher deity afraid of my full potential, these pills contain the magic essence to help me counteract the curse.
Very cool, main character energy.
poverty is a form of torture utilized by the government to bring about a conditioned response
that conditioned response is considered a form of learned helplessness wherein the victim stops fighting back against what it believe to be the inevitable
but not everyone breaks under torture
And no, I'm not being intolerant, you're being a shitwit.
I wish I took a better pic of this writing in a bar bathroom in toronto bc I think of it so often. Be So Completely Yourself That No One Is Attracted To You Or Wants To Employ You
The above is a video shared by smrchildsadness on Twitter, showing a person participating in a pride parade exchanging a pride flag with a person standing on his (am using his pronoun based on the TikToks/Tweets of what happened) doorway who had a Portuguese flag. There are sounds of cheers and crying and the two people hug each other as they exchange the flags. The man at the doorway then waved kisses to the crowd within the pride parade.
The Tweet says: "NO YOU DONT UNDERSTAND HE WAS WAVING THE PORTUGUESE FLAG BECAUSE HE DIDN'T HAVE A PRIDE FLAG AND THEY TRADED FLAGS AND HE'S SO EMOTIONAL TO GET HIS OWN PRIDE FLAG I'M EMOTIONALLY RUINED"
For context, apparently they were worried that maybe he's a nationalist because he was waving the Portuguese flag and some nationalists opposing the pride march were waving that flag. But upon interacting with him, it turns out he didn't have have a pride flag and he wanted to wave *a* flag in support of the pride march. So they had an exchange and now he has his own pride flag 😭🥹.
The image above is a Tweet by kunwara_ladkaa that says "I'm crying so much right now (Image taken by Manuel Fernando Araújo/Lusa)". The image shows the same man from the pride parade crying as he hugs his new pride flag.
The above image is a Tweet by dudz_zZzz that says "ainda não parei de pensar nele," which according to Google translate from Portuguese to English is "I still haven't stopped thinking about him." The image is a drawing of the person from the pride parade, crying as he hugs his new pride flag.
Posts were made on July 1, 2024.
His name is António Fernandes, and you can find the original article where he spoke about this event here
This elderly gentleman lives alone in Porto, when he saw the march coming up his street all he knew was he wanted to participate, so he ran home to get the only flag he had to wave as they passed by, when they did he was overcome with emotion and called over one of the activists, they hugged and exchanged flags, he felt so overwhelmed that he could only hold it and cry.
This isn't a story about a closeted elderly man, António lives and has been living alone for many years now and that little moment made him feel included in something for the first time in many years.
Says the article:
"The act was "of support”, guarantees the man, especially because “each one is as they are and we are all the same”. “The joy I felt at this moment. I cried,” he recalled, still emotional when looking at the photograph offered to him during this report.
However, even though it reached thousands of people, the moment screams a feeling of belonging, of joy and also a portrait of loneliness as a consequence of aging.
Behind that door, whose image spread across the country, António is the portrait of a condition that affects many others like him. He lives alone, but the walls of his home are full of memories of a life shared and full of love. “Memories I preserve,” he stresses.
He's not gay, nor does he need to be to support and respect the cause.
“We all have the same color blood. We are all the same.”
Still with an emotional look glued to the photograph that immortalized his gesture at the march, António remembers: “I felt embraced by all of them”. After a sigh, he says: “See this photo? I want to take it to my coffin.”
Okay but imagine there is this vampire club where you’re getting drugged with a mind altering substance that makes you super horny and stupid.
Like you buy a ticket to get in, some DJ is playing tonight. Your ticket gives you a free token for a drink, so you decide to instantly exchange it for a drink.
The music is loud, the people are super hot and some of them are just having sex out in the open, it’s a sight for sure. You’re not sure about staying at this place so you want to quickly finish your drink and go.
As you hurry to the nearest trash can to dispose of your cup, your legs are starting to feel heavy and you get a bit light headed but in a good way.
A hot vampire couple is winking at you, the woman biting her lip and the guy readjusting his massive package.
You start to get aroused, the idea of having sex with those two is very appealing, but what are those weird fangs?
Don’t you worry about it dear…
Halsey and Avan Jogia for Halloween 2025, photographed by Sarah Pardini
God im so hot for Avan Jogia. That man is so fine. Same goes for Elizabeth Gillies. Those two really were my bisexual awakening
I really ought to write more transfem vampires. As of lately I’ve been enamoured with Morgana Ignis, she’s so pretty and funny and really hot as a demon coming for your chocolate.
"I don't want to read this" is totally valid.
"This is disgusting to me" is totally valid.
"I don't want to read this because it is disgusting to me" is totally valid.
"I don't think anyone should be allowed to read or write this because it is disgusting to me" is authoritarian.
"I don't think anyone should be allowed to read or write this because it is disgusting to me" is authoritarian.
Bro, blocking someone and then using their tag like this is, all offence, weak as fuck. Like all you had to say was, na bro I don't promote pedo protags on this here blog, because I wholly agree with the premise of your argument given contexts (i.e., writing abusive relationships to show the evils, great; writing abusive relationships to show the romance, yikes).
This response is so, so comically shitty within the context of that tag, oh my god.
"I don't think anyone should be allowed to read or write this because it is disgusting to me" is authoritarian.
"I don't think anyone should be allowed to read or write this because it is disgusting to me" is authoritarian.
"Censorship of some topics in fiction and art is good and I would be happy if it were to be enacted in a way I approved of"
and
"some things should be banned from ever being written or read about in fiction"
are both authoritarian viewpoints to hold and express, even if you don't have the power to enact them.
If you hold these viewpoints you are holding authoritarian viewpoints.
DUDE IT’S PEDO FICS EVERYBODY THINKS THEY’RE NASTY
Let me explain this to you in simple terms.
Something being nasty is not a good reason to ban fiction about it.
If we accept that "something being nasty is a good reason to bad fiction about it" then we give a foot in the door for all the people who truly, genuinely believe that queer people are nasty to ban all queer literature.
This is not about defending bad people this is about defending the freedom of good people from tyranny, you moron.
I think if you take it to its logical extreme. Say, banning people from writing stories of sexual abuse. That could then be said "well ANY talk about sexual abuse is bad."
And from that, you could ban books that talk about it irl. Or books like how to recover after being abuse. If its not something to be discussed AT ALL.
The fact that I’ve seen this post in some form on my dash like 100x and each time there’s new idiots who do not get that you can’t have *some* censorship.
Either you’re for it or you aren’t.
The moment you agree that something should never, ever exist in fiction is the moment that anything can be banned.
Remember a while back how Tumblr banned a bunch of tags, including many popular innocuous ones that even people who are for censorship used and were upset about?
When censorship happens, stuff YOU like can and will be banned. That’s how it works.
Remember how a bunch of people had their accounts terminated here only last year for writing about their own sexual abuse?
When you ban “pedo” topics, say, any talk of child sexual abuse in any form, that means people can no longer write about their own experiences. It means people cannot educate others so they can learn how to protect themselves or get help from these situations.
Censorship is authoritarian. Full stop.
Even if “everyone” agrees something is “gross” and “shouldn’t exist,” that does not fucking matter.
Do you know who generally believes queer people are gross and shouldn’t exist??
The same people who are banning books left and right solely because they have queer characters or relationships.
The same people who attack and kill queer folk for simply exisiting.
This is not just some fandom matter or a case of being chronically online.
Protecting freedom of expression is essential, and if you do not get that, I don’t know what to say to you.
And the people who keep bringing up child sex abuse as a reason for censorship are doing it very specifically because everyone feels like then they HAVE to agree with the person in favor of censorship.
It’s not that there isn’t widespread societal agreement on this. It’s that they want you backed into a rhetorical corner where you feel compelled to agree with them.
Also, like, we KNOW how this shit shakes out in fandom because it's happened before.
In 2007, Livejournal capitulated to the "pedophilia and sex crimes!" cries of (hate group) Warriors 4 Innocence, and you know what communities got shut down? Slashfic communities. Sexual assault survivor support communities. Authors who'd written non-smut m/m fic even got caught up in it. It was DEVASTATING to fandom spaces. I think pretty much everyone knew at least one person whose account was literally DELETED, or were a member of a community that was wiped off the map because they were considerate enough to include topics like "sexual assault" or "BDSM" in the profiles under the badly-named category of "interests" to indicate that posts on said blogs or communities may include discussion of things like that. Even if it was for a SUPPORT group. And it was because a group of religious bigots came to LJ and said essentially "EVERYONE thinks it's gross and that it's promoting CSA, we should ban it."
Like, strikethrough and boldthrough were a large part of what propelled AO3 out of a more unfocused conversation on one person's blog about hosting a site INTENDED for fandom content, into being an actual archive and nonprofit. And it's a large part of why you won't find AO3 banning topics that you find "gross".
Censorship is authoritarian and it will ALWAYS have more collateral damage than you can imagine.
Going to add that fiction which had sexual abuse and communities which played around with it as a writing topic are the very things that protected me from irl sexual abuse when I was a teenager. I was in a dicey situation, and realized that while my situation did not match up to any of the superficial or textbook cases mentioned in passing (if at all) through school, it matched up a LOT to what I'd learned about irl sexual abuse through works of fiction and the rhetoric of my communities. I got out of that situation and dodged what was, in retrospect, one hell of a nasty bullet. If it hadn't been for that "nasty" fiction and those "nasty" communities, I would very likely have been abused, and subject to further violence spiraling out from that abuse.
you can’t have *some* censorship.
Yup! It really is, in fact, pretty much that simple:
"I don't think anyone should be allowed to read or write this because it is disgusting to me" is authoritarian.
That reminds me. So earlier today I had some of thoughts about how I am a anarcho socialist but how one thing on the ‘left’ (read liberals) can’t agree with and that is tone policing when it comes to ableism for example. Like they’re upset when you say “good god trump is a fucking idiot” because idiot is a word that was historally used to bladi Bladi blah.
like im queer and neurodivergent and I use the word fag a lot and teasingly use the word gay as an insult around my other queer friends. Do these people realise that doing that is what allowed us to claim bad words like fag and the way the word gay is used as an insult? If we always censor ourselves we can never read or learn about things, think about them and change things about them.
Like all censorship is bad, you can’t just have some and by choosing censorship you also take away the good things that reclaiming those words can do.
Okay I just perfected my writing setup.
Distro: Debian 13
Desktop Environment: XFCE
Theme: Chicago 95
Obsidian Theme: Retro 98
Font: Less Perfect DOS VGA
Like this just reminds me so much of the old pc that my grandparents had. It didn’t have an internet connection so all I could do was write.
I put this on my writing desktop and made Seamonkey the default browser so I can only browse distraction-free websites.
Now all I need is like a second hand netbook or something to put this on or maybe like a framework 12 and I’ll have the ultimate portable writing device.
Me stepping onto the balcony to address my followers