compare.

izzy's playlists!
Fai_Ryy
Misplaced Lens Cap

oozey mess
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

bliss lane
NASA
đ©” avery cochrane đ©”
occasionally subtle
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her

Love Begins
official daine visual archive
đ

PR's Tumblrdome
No title available

@theartofmadeline
No title available
sheepfilms
No title available
Claire Keane

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Brazil
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Laos

seen from United States

seen from Vietnam
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Italy
@fauxrest
compare.
THIS.
I stand by this message whole heartedly but also I thought this said âI canât eat applesauceâ and I was so fucking confused.
Oh my god it doesnât say applesauce-
it doesnt say applesauce????????
Something that really annoys me is when someone learns something detailed and then everyone scoffs at them because they already had a broad understanding of the facts.
Like if someone goes âWhoa, there are more than 20,000 different species of fish in the ocean!â and someone is like, âOkay EVERYONE knew the ocean has a lot of fish.â âA lot ofâ and â20,000+â is different, and just because someoneâs impressed by the detail doesnât mean they didnât know about the broad truth that there are a lot of fish in the ocean
Similarly if someone is like, âThis person/company has done the following heinous things,â and if someone goes âYeah EVERYONE knows person/company is sketchy.â Again, completely different things to delve into the detail of a particular fact and knowing the general picture.
(Also maybe someone DIDNâT know something that was obvious to you. Who cares? They know now. But specifically Iâm talking about people who conflate general knowledge with more granular info)
A story that may have relevance for others, or then again, maybe not:
When I was in college, about ten or so years ago, I was a history major. I wanted to learn to dance, so I joined a swing dance club on campus. To my surprise, this club had about twice as many men as women (in high school, the last time Iâd tried dancing, the ratio had gone the other wayâlots of girls, and boys only that you could drag by their ears).
But apparently, there had been some kind of word spread specifically to the STEM guys that dance was a way that they could meet girls.
So anyway. I joined the swing dance club, and met a few guys. And at one point, when socializing with the guys outside of dance class, one of them asked me what my research was on. (I had already established that I was an honors history student doing a thesis, just as he had established that he was an honors⊠Iâm not sure if he was CS or Math, but it was one of those.)
So I gave him the thumbnail sketch of my research. Now, to be clear, an honors senior thesis, while nothing like what a graduate student would do, was still fairly in-depth. I had to translate primary sources from the original late-Classical Latin. (My professor said, basically, that while there were plenty of translations of my source material, that Iâd only be able to comfortably trust them if I had at least made a stab at a translation of my own. And he was right.) And there was so much secondary material, often contradictory, that I had been carefully sorting through.
But I was able to sift it into a three-sentence summary of my senior thesis work, you know, as one does.
So I gave him that summary, and then askedâsince he was also an undergraduate senior doing an honors thesisâwhat his research was on.
âOh,â he said, âyou wouldnât understand it.â
Reader, I went home in a frothing rage. Because I had thought we were playing one gameâa game of âletâs talk about what weâre passionate about!ââ and he had been playing another game, which was, one-upsmanship. I had done my best to give a basically understandable brief of my researchâand he had used that against me. As if my research, my painstaking translation, my digging through archives and ILLs of esoteric works, my reading of ten thousand articles in Speculum (yes, the pre-eminent medievalist journal in North America is called Speculum, Iâm sorry, itâs hilarious/sad but also true), and then my effort to sum it up for him, was nothing. Because his research into some kind of algorithm or other was just too complex for my tiny brain to conceive of. Because I just couldnât possibly understand his work.
Now, the important note here is that the person I went home to was my senior year roommate. She was a graduate studentânormally undergrads and graduate students couldnât be roommates, but weâd been friends for years, and the tenured faculty-in-residence used his powers for good and permitted us to be roommates that year. Anyway. My senior year roommate was basically⊠in retrospect I think possibly an avatar of Athena. She was six feet tall, blonde, attractive in a muscular athletic way, a rock climber and racquetball player, sweet but sharp, extremely socially awkward, exceptionally kind even when it cost her to be kind, and an incredibly brilliant computer science major who spent most of her time working on extremely complicated mathematical algorithms. (Yes, I was a little in love with her, why do you ask? But she was as straight as a length of rope, and is now happily married, and so am I, so it worked out.)
(Still, yes, she is my mental image of Athena, to this day.)
Anyway, I came home in a frothing rage to my roommate, the Athena avatar. And I said, âHe made me feel like such an idiot, that I could sum up my research to him but his research was just too smart for stupid little me.â
And she shut her book, and smiled at me, with her dark eyes and her high cheekbones and her bright hair, and said, âIf he canât explain his research to you, then heâs not nearly as smart as he thinks he is.â
Now I hesitated, because Iâd be in college long enough to have sort of bought into the ridiculous idea that if you couldnât dazzle them with your brilliance, you should baffle them with your bullshit. But she said, âLook, Iâve been doing work on computer science algorithms that have significantly complicated mathematical underpinnings. What do I do?â
And I said, âGenetic algorithmsâthat is, self-optimizing algorithmsâfor prioritization, specifically for scheduling.â
âRight,â she said. âYou couldnât code them because youâre not a computer scientist or a mathematician. But you can understand what I do. If someone canât explain it like that, it isnât a problem with you as a person. Itâs a problem with them. They either donât understand it as well as they think they doâor they want to make you feel inferior. And neither is a positive thing.â
So. There.
If you are looking into something and have a question, and someone treats you like an idiot for not understanding right away⊠here is what I have to say: maybe it isnât you who is the idiot.
ATTN: ALL COLLEGE STUDENTS EVERYWHERE PLS READ
HEED ATHENA AVATARâS WORDS BBCAKES EVERYWHERE.
As an academic working in academia: this this this. Never buy into the elitist bullcrap of âoh, you wouldnât understand.â And never perpetuate that crap yourself, either out of pretension or even simple laziness. If you canât explain it to a ten-year-old, go back and hit the books again cause youâre not there yet.
Still REAL gross to say that youâre only okay with bisexuals and bisexual characters so long as theyâre in same sex relationships. Thatâs pretty fucking biphobic pal.
i have literally never said this
why donât you plant some lavender and when it blooms you can squeeze a leaf or two between your fingers and the smell will calm you down. how about you do that. bitch
good idea
thank you. i have a lot of other good ideas as well
such as?
have gay sex
If a character is bi, then you being âgrossed outâ by them being in a âheteroâ ship is low key biphoboc since youâre basically saying that a character, or persons, bisexuality is only valid if they date the same sex. So just admit you donât actually accept bi people and go.
i donât remember what this was about but i assume it was me complaining abt it being icky that people go out of their way to ignore canon wlw ships to put bi (and lesbian! bc ofc) girls in het pairings with no other appealing factors but Being Het, in which case yeah sure i hate bi people and gay people and trans people and those dirty lesbians all of them disgust me thatâs why
Concept: Silent Hill-esque hell town tries to drive protagonist mad with subtle reality-bending brainfuckery, protagonist fails to notice because they have ADHD and are totally accustomed to their environment not matching how they remember it.
what the fuck
Iâm on mobile someone add Mr Mime
There we go!
Lightning McQueen has horny fans??!?
âŠ. what is Mr. Mimeâs last name?
Heâs a Mr., so, I would assume, Mime.
this site is genuinely breathtaking sometimes
Dystopia
Fiction:
Reality:
this is a joke but i think we tend to forget that Big Brother isnât SUPPOSED to be menacing to the citizens in 1984. itâs theoretically comforting, thatâs why itâs called âBig Brother.â youâre supposed to think âaw gee, it sure is nice to know someone is watching out for me 24/7 in case anything bad happens :)â
my point is the Reality basically isnt any different at all lmao.
This is the bare minimum of decent human behavior for ANY gender. If you are an adult and someone who is not an adult wants to have a relationship with you, it is your duty to, at bare minimum, turn them away.
and like... having crushes on adults is a Normal Adolescent Thing, but it doesnât mean theyâre ready for--or for that matter, want--an actual relationship with said adult. itâs a goddamn developmental phase for kids working out their sexuality, and treating it as a chance to get laid is fucking monstrous.
How most people with invisible illnesses are treated by health care âprofessionalsâ
The Golden Girls didnât fuck around
pls watch
honestly i really appreciated this scene when I first saw it bc it took me like two years to get a diagnosis for whatâs wrong with me
Dorothy: Â Dr. Budd?
Dr. Budd: Â Yes?
Dorothy: Â You probably donât remember me, but you told me I wasnât sick. Â Do you remember? Â You told me I was just getting old.
Dr. Budd: Â Iâm sorry, I really donâtâ
Dorothy: Â Remember. Â Maybe youâre getting old. Â Thatâs a little joke. Â Well, I tell you, Dr. Budd, I really am sick. Â I have chronic fatigue syndrome. Â That is a real illness. Â You can check with the Center for Disease Control.
Dr. Budd: Â Huh. Â Well, Iâm sorry about that.
Dorothy: Â Well, Iâm glad! Â At least I know I have something.
Dr. Budd: Â Iâm sure. Â Well, nice seeing you.
Dorothy: Â Not so fast. Â There are some things I have to say. Â There are a lot of things that I have to say. Â Words canât express what I have to say. Â [tearing up] Â What I went through, what you put me throughâI canât do this in a restaurant.
Dr. Budd: Â Good!
Dorothy: Â But I will!
Dr. Buddâs date: Â Louis, who is this person?
Dr. Budd: Â Look, Missâ
Dorothy:  Sit.  I sat for you long enough.  Dr. Budd, I came to you sickâsick and scaredâand you dismissed me.  You didnât have the answer, and instead of saying âIâm sorry, I donât know whatâs wrong with you,â you made me feel crazy, like I had made it all up.  You dismissed me!  You made me feel like a child, a fool, a neurotic who was wasting your precious time.  Is that your caring profession?  Is that healing?  No one deserves that kind of treatment, Dr. Budd, no one.  I suspect had I been a man, I might have been taken a bit more seriously, and not told to go to a hairdresser.
Dr. Budd: Â Look, I am not going to sit here anymoreâ
Dr. Buddâs date: Â Shut up, Louis.
Dorothy: Â I donât know where you doctors lose your humanity, but you lose it. Â You know, if all of you, at the beginning of your careers, could get very sick and very scared for a while, youâd probably learn more from that than anything else. Â Youâd better start listening to your patients. Â They need to be heard. Â They need caring. Â They need compassion. Â They need attending to. Â You know, someday, Dr. Budd, youâre gonna be on the other side of the table, and as angry as I am, and as angry as I always will be, I still wish you a better doctor than you were to me.
Reblogging for any of my mutuals whoâve ever dealt with Dr. Budd.
Bystander apathy is a social psychological construct where it is believed that someone who sees a victim is less likely to offer help when other people are present.
You know, sometimes we really do live in a society
âThe scholars examined video recordings of 219 arguments and assaults in inner cities of Amsterdam (Netherlands), Lancaster (UK) and Cape Town (South Africa).â
âVideo surveillance of actual crimes instead shows that in 91 percent of cases someone helped victims of aggression and violence, and the more people who see it, the more likely more than one person helps. It may be that instead of feeling embarrassment about being inadequate with more witnesses around, as psychologists previously speculated, people are emboldened by having others nearby.â
âSome people are just not going to help, of course, that is the diversity of people, but that is why claiming the bystander effect applied to broad populations was a mistake. There was no difference in the rates of intervention between the three cities, even though inner city Cape Town is less safe than Amsterdam. The high levels of intervention across different national and urban contexts suggests that intervention is the norm in real-life inner-city public conflicts.â
Another nail in the coffin for long held and poorly formulated psychological imperatives.
Or to put it another way, 70 years of psychological research and facts pushed by hack-frauds is finally being re-considered.