okay i wouldnât date a trans man either, but if someone i found very attractive identified as a man on the inside it wouldnât immediately undo my physical attraction to them. because remember nowadays many trans men are identifying as âfemboysâ and literally are not feminine than me, like they wear dresses and fake lashes and makeup. like if bella hadid said she identified as a man on the inside without changing anything about her appearance and Iâm still sexually attracted to her, does that make me bisexual, because iâm now attracted to a man? really????
and again with the definition changing, and then acting all condescending about it. lesbian has been used to refer to female same-sex attraction and female homosexuality for like a century now, because of Sappho and the isle of lesbos. at the time that the usage of the word âlesbianâ to refer to female homosexuality became popular, no one on earth had uttered the words ânon-binaryâ, ânon-manâ, âorganic strapâ, etc. a singular time, so no thatâs not âquite literallyâ the definition. if i changed the definition of âstraight manâ to be a 5â8 masc lesbian with brown hair, iâd QUITE LITERALLY be the definition of a straight man. i identify as a straight man!!! if i changed the definition of Asian to include white people born and raised below I-10, iâd QUITE LITERALLY be the definition of Asian. see how this language stuff works? if I call an apple a hippo, then yes a hippo is a shiny red fruit that grows on trees. get it? see how itâs stupid to just mix and match these fucking brand new terms and definitions from tumblr and tiktok and then be like âđĽ¸urmmmr thatâs quite literally the definitionâŚ.â you can quite literally blow it out your ass

















