Hi. This blog probably isn’t the right place for you if you don’t see Israelis (regardless of our religion or ethnicity) as human. Thanks.
Mike Driver
tumblr dot com
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
No title available

pixel skylines
styofa doing anything

⁂

blake kathryn

JVL

Kaledo Art

No title available
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
ojovivo
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
KIROKAZE

oozey mess
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
will byers stan first human second

祝日 / Permanent Vacation

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from Singapore
seen from United States
seen from Poland

seen from Türkiye

seen from Netherlands

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Ireland
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Singapore
seen from India
seen from Chile

seen from South Africa

seen from Malaysia

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Türkiye
@flyingscanian
Hi. This blog probably isn’t the right place for you if you don’t see Israelis (regardless of our religion or ethnicity) as human. Thanks.
Do you think Michael Crichton had a deep-seated hatred of theme parks because he was too tall for all the rides?
Yes.
[tumblr] is a flat circle.
Damn, it sure is huh
We should do this more on this website.
Person 1: -posts-
Person 2: -pulls out the historical documents-
I have been brought before the scriptures and my heresies found canonical.
I accept the judgement "unoriginal" and "should have looked it up first" but, in my inadequate defence, Tumblr's search function does fucking suck.
Defense found perfectly cromulent. Let Baddywronglegs free, and let no mark be against said blog.
"I have been brought before the scriptures and my heresies found canonical" is an all-time banger line.
so today this comment took me out at the knees
“The day after Columbine, I was interviewed for the Tom Brokaw news program. The reporter had been assigned a theory and was seeking sound bites to support it. “Wouldn’t you say,” she asked, “that killings like this are influenced by violent movies?” No, I said, I wouldn’t say that. “But what about Basketball Diaries?” she asked. “Doesn’t that have a scene of a boy walking into a school with a machine gun?” The obscure 1995 Leonardo Di Caprio movie did indeed have a brief fantasy scene of that nature, I said, but the movie failed at the box office (it grossed only $2.5 million), and it’s unlikely the Columbine killers saw it. The reporter looked disappointed, so I offered her my theory. “Events like this,” I said, “if they are influenced by anything, are influenced by news programs like your own. When an unbalanced kid walks into a school and starts shooting, it becomes a major media event. Cable news drops ordinary programming and goes around the clock with it. The story is assigned a logo and a theme song; these two kids were packaged as the Trench Coat Mafia. The message is clear to other disturbed kids around the country: If I shoot up my school, I can be famous. The TV will talk about nothing else but me. Experts will try to figure out what I was thinking. The kids and teachers at school will see they shouldn’t have messed with me. I’ll go out in a blaze of glory.” In short, I said, events like Columbine are influenced far less by violent movies than by CNN, the NBC Nightly News and all the other news media, who glorify the killers in the guise of “explaining” them. I commended the policy at the Sun-Times, where our editor said the paper would no longer feature school killings on Page 1. The reporter thanked me and turned off the camera. Of course the interview was never used. They found plenty of talking heads to condemn violent movies, and everybody was happy.”
— Roger Ebert (via flowersofthecity)
Just watched Adam Conover (of Adam Ruins Everything) make such a solid point that I think we should spread far and wide. Yes, having AI write your emails is lazy, sure, but people love being lazy. We need to really emphasize that sending AI emails (or using AI responses on social media, or publishing AI flyers, or or or) is rude.
It's rude. You're making someone take their time to read something you couldn't bother to write. You're telling them they were so unimportant you couldn't be bothered to actually take the time to say something yourself. And frankly, you're lying about it while you're at it.
It's rude.
It's not just rude to make me read something you didn't want to write. It is that you expect me to respond to your email written by Claude. You don't even want me to talk to you. You want me to talk to Claude so that you can make Claude respond for you. It is rude to expect me to talk to a chatbot when I wanted to talk to you.
Shout out to the Microsoft employees who were doing a Q&A via Teams about the new Copilot AI functionality and how wonderful it was... and any time somebody asked them a question in the chat they would put the question into copilot and copy-paste the response.
They cheerfully and proudly said they were doing this.
If you can't be assed to actually respond to our questions in this Q&A, why are you even hosting this meeting as if its a meaningful use of an hour of our time if apparently we could get the same experience by asking the chatbot ourselves?
Swarovski can continue to fuck off.
In 2021, Swarovski (the company that makes the very sparkly crystals you see in certain jewelry, on figure-skaters' twinkliest outfits, on red carpet dresses), decided they didn't want the grubby fingers of small-time jewelers, clothing designers and costumers and crafters on their shiny beads and rhinestones anymore. They decided to limit their sales to "luxury" and couture creators, not girls who sell stuff on Etsy. The tenor of their press release on the subject was snide and insulting. Resellers (like your favorite bead shop) would no longer be allowed to carry their product; the average Jane on the street would not be able to purchase them. You could only get them if you had an authorized business agreement that bound you to very strict brand behavior. And those of us who still had good stock of the crystals would no longer be "permitted" to use the brand's name in our listings for sale.
Every bead shop and craft supply place and many, many small clothing makers--wedding shops, prom and dancing dress suppliers, the sort of salt of the Earth mom and pop time machines of shops that are the backbone of the field--scrambled to find something that could replace them. The last of the stock dwindled quickly, all of us grabbing what we could get while there was any chance of it, and then it was gone and we no longer had any access.
I was Big Pissed about it at the time. It was just so goddamn stuck-up, when wholesalers and indie jewelers had made them so much money, when some people I knew--when *I!*--had been brand-loyal for decades. But with no recourse, everyone pivoted fairly quickly, most of us to Preciosa Crystals. Those are Czech, quite sparkly, and considerably less expensive than Swarovski. The faceting method they use is different, but not worse; any differences are hardly noticeable when you're seeing them as a hundred pinpoints of light.
Well, out of nowhere, Swarovski just dropped this: https://www.harmanbeads.com/swarovski-brand-policy-update
"Effective June 1, 2026, Swarovski updated the distribution and brand usage policies introduced in 2021. Businesses may now purchase Swarovski Crystals without signing a Brand Control Agreement, and Authorized Distribution Partners may once again sell Swarovski Crystals to resellers, including bead stores and online retailers. Businesses may also use the Swarovski brand name when following Swarovski’s Proper Use Guidelines. Designers, manufacturers, artists, brands, retailers, and resellers are now eligible to purchase Swarovski Crystals through authorized distribution channels."
They want us back. A lot of the companies who could have kept a brand relationship with them also have swapped to Preciosa, over the last half-decade, in solidarity with indie creators and out of a sour awareness that it could be them, next. And it doesn't hurt that Preciosa was able to expand their line quite a bit now that everyone who wanted sparkle had no choice but to go to them.
And I'm not seeing nearly anyone who intends to return. The feeling is, "Y'all told us to fuck off! Off we fucked! And now, that's what you can do, too!" I'm seeing a lot of "How many of us did you stab in the back?" comments from the people whose money they're hoping to attract.
And personally I'm sitting over here all rubby hands, mean snickering, because they really thought they were going to be able to outclimb the people who actually provided all their profits, and now here they are, hat in hand.
yeah, of course marjane satrapi supported israel and condemned antisemitism you fucking idiots.
you plainly don’t know and don’t care about policy or relations in the middle east, cause if you did, you would know that iranians are skeptical if not outright critical of the palestinian national movement. cause it’s fucking bankrolled by their tyrannical government who rapes and murders teenage girls for showing their hair. go to hell
obligatory i am not an endocrinologist nor do i play one on tv (IANAENDIPOOT), but human biological sex differences affect vastly less than most people think. the major effects are metabolic differences, and a lot of what people point to as gendered emotional/cognitive traits are… socially constructed. i.e. “math is a blue subject, english is a pink one” is some essentialist bullshit
People on here will say shit like “joking about dark or offensive topics is terrible and you should never do it” and then turn around and tell Jews to kill themselves
Some people will believe literally anything as long as it makes Jews look bad and it's important that you avoid these people as much as possible.
idk who needs to hear this but you shouldn’t lump men who share their feelings about how society punishes men for being emotionally vulnerable in with incels and other misogynists and you should instead realize that you’re all on the same side
"Things that make your front door look tacky" "lawn decorations that lower your property value" "why you should never paint your rooms bright colors" "unique styles make your home impossible to sell" "plants that make a garden unattractive to buyers" SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP!!!!!!!!!!!! STOP BASING YOUR HOME DECOR DECISIONS ON WHO WILL LIVE THERE NEXT AND JUST DO WHAT MAKES YOU FEEL HAPPY AND SECURE IN YOUR SPACE AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
We are being encouraged to see our homes, places that many of us will live for years if not decades or our entire lives, as transient spaces that only exist to be sold one day. Don't plant your favorite flowers, buyers don't like them. Don't hang up tacky windchimes, buyers don't like them. Don't paint your living room your favorite color, buyers don't like color. Don't use unique tiles in your bathroom, buyers don't like that. Don't put plastic flamingoes and gnomes in your yard, buyers don't like them. Don't put put pretty knobs on your doors and unique plates on your light switches, buyers don't like that. Don't put up pretty light fixtures, buyers don't like them. Don't do this, don't do that, don't do anything to your home even if you're not planning on selling it anytime soon because someone is always preparing to buy it from you and you don't want to scare away a potential buyer, right?
I think everyone who gives "advice" like that is actually a shill for predatory real estate companies. And if they're not, why are they doing all that work for free?
My grandparents have lived in the same house for half a century.
No, they've never painted the walls. Bad for resale value.
It's so depressing.
If you ever find yourself unironically saying “the Jews are weaponizing the holocaust” I think you have some self reflection to do. To put it mildly.