No title available
Cosimo Galluzzi
hello vonnie

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣

Origami Around
official daine visual archive
Xuebing Du

oozey mess
h
The Stonewall Inn
Not today Justin
$LAYYYTER
ojovivo

izzy's playlists!
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

ellievsbear
art blog(derogatory)
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
EXPECTATIONS

Andulka
seen from Netherlands

seen from Malaysia

seen from Ecuador

seen from United States

seen from China

seen from Russia
seen from Colombia

seen from Colombia

seen from Germany
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Jamaica
seen from Colombia
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Brazil

seen from Brazil
seen from United States
seen from Chile
seen from Colombia
seen from Brazil
@gay-jesus-probably
seeing how much of mainstream cultural life is organized around the standardized myth of The Genders after living outside of it for a long ass time now is uncanny, depressing, and fills me with utter dread at what our species has done to itself and will do to itself.
this post was inspired by looking at the greeting card section in a target. these cards are really out there saying things like “you are a man, and it is your birthday.” “you are my wife and i am a man.” even “you are the best wife for a wife” as the single LGBTQ option. “hi mother, i am your son and i wish you, my mother, a happy birthday. you are a woman”
and if you look with eyes that can see, this is just how everything is now. no wonder everyone is going into a collective psychosis over trans people just existing, their entire sense of self must be tied up in these concepts.
What determines luck?
According to the Talmudic Mishna, it's is a result of tiny beings in our cells called "Mazel-chrolrians" that secrete a force that determines luck. The earliest Amoraim of the Gemara have no comments, but later generations including Rabbi Abbahu felt this was an unnecessary addition to the Hebrew Canon, stating that the mysteries of Hashem are not for us to know and that this only weakened the Torah by attempting to make it "Hard Sci-Fi" at the cost of the Jewish fandom.
Rashi expands on this to state, "Always two there are, a Schlemiel and a Schlimazel. But which is the Schlemiel... And which is the Schlimazel?"
anyway sound off. at what stage do ppl think Han figured out the Force was real. the boring answer is after seeing Obi-wan vanish but i think he could rationalise that away as his eyes playing tricks on him. what do we think.
Let me demonstrate my answer for you:
That's it. That's my answer. Endor.
Please just take a look at Han's face right after witnessing 3po float. The man just had his entire worldview blown to smithereens.
that's so funny. that means he accepted Vader deflecting a blaster bolt with his hand as just something freaky government cyborgs can do, and stuck by Luke for multiple years as he tried to figure this Force stuff out, and just treated it like your friend getting really really into neopaganism to cope with a loss.
like yeah kid good job with the witching. i'm certain it will be more useful against your enemies than your sharpshooting. no i do not think your witchcraft is supplementing your aim but i'm not gonna argue about it.
yeah Luke was like 'I heard Ben Kenobi's voice in my head telling me how to blow up the Death Star :)' and Han was like 'kind of an unusual coping mechanism but I'm not gonna argue with him'
thanks to carbonite han not only misses learning about luke's training montage on dagobah, he's also half-blind during their whole escape on tatooine. luke's out there force-kicking henchmen with his gucci boots and doing flips and shit and han can't see a goddamn thing. now on endor luke's yeeting threepio with the power of his mind and han's just like 'the last time we hung out i had to stuff him in a tauntaun sleeping bag'.
@softness-and-shattering I hate you I hate you I hate you
the thing about the concept of gendered socialization is that so many people use it as like another kind of gender essentialism. you know it's not an immutable trait right. you can literally overcome it.
"i'm like this because women are socialized to be shy and quiet and subservient" okay good on you for recognizing it, but that's only the very first step. the next few steps are that you Stop Doing It. feminist thought vs feminist action.
and when ppl see a trans woman being confident and unafraid to take up space and decide it's because of her evil evil male socialization, i'm always like "wait you're saying this woman was raised as a child to be loud and confident and take up space? that's awesome, i thought that's how we WANTED people to raise girls? why exactly is it a problem now? 🤔"
like WHY are you telling trans women that they literally have to make themselves smaller and conform to the WORST gender exceptations of women to be seen as real women. since when is it evil and masculine to be confident, i thought we were supposed to be doing that. i thought that was feminism.
also, not all kids actually get that sort of gendered socialization in the first place, like I'm AFAB and brother i was NOT 'female socialized'. i was lucky in that my parents weren't big on gender roles in the first place, so I wasn't getting any messaging about that at home, and thanks to the power of autism any sort of general societal pressures for gender expectations just flew right over my head, so it's always wildly confusing to hear about a lot of that shit.
like what do you mean I'm supposed to feel obligated to wear makeup, when were we supposed to learn that? wait, most women actually feel ashamed of having body hair and have to actively work to be okay with it? why am i supposed to feel insecure about being a tall woman, nobody told me that. what do you mean it's scary to be the only woman in a room full of men, why would i feel safer if another woman showed up, how would adding another stranger change the situation? when did y'all learn this stuff, I feel like i've missed some memos here.
And yeah, now that I'm an adult I understand the messaging that causes a lot of this stuff, but it's just. really not something that i've ever personally experienced. like I was mercilessly bullied for most of my childhood, and it was wildly traumatic; i was actively suicidal in elementary school. my peers were the ones doing it, and it was ALL of them, so. no, i don't find women inherently safer than men, i just engage with people as individuals, and I feel unsafe if they're assholes. at no point does gender factor into the equation.
and people trying to use that bioessentialist shit as a talking point kinda fails to impress me given that i'm walking proof that they're wrong. kinda hard to buy into their bullshit when 90% of the time the arguments are just them saying "Everyone raised as a girl has experienced (thing i've literally never experienced before)". especially because i'm agender, and with my general build (tall, broad, deep voice) I do occasionally get mistaken for a trans woman, even though I'm actually AFAB and not actually woman. so it's pretty rich seeing these people talk about how people raised as girls all have a special solidarity with each other, when my invitation to that table has always been very fucking conditional.
the thing about misogyny is that femininity is both devalued AND forced on women (and those misgendered as women). if you fail to meet the arbitrary standard of Womanly Charm you're ugly and unwanted and hate yourself and if you succeed you're shallow and brainless and weak. if you don't try to conform you're lazy and if you do you're vain. it is not possible to beat this system. feminism needs both "feminine doesn't mean weak or less-than" AND "women don't have to be feminine to have value", and if you are fighting for one of these the people fighting for the other are not your enemies, nor are they privileged over you.
this post is inclusive of trans people, including but not limited to trans women and transfeminine people. exclusionary sentiment is not welcome.
straight white people making a romance movie: haha what if it was illegal to have sex? wait what's lawrence v texas. wait what's mclaughlin v florida. wait what's loving v virginia
As preposterous and stupid as this fucking movie's premise sounded (for a light-hearted rom-com, and not The Handmaid's Tale) I didn't want to think about it too much until the movie actually came out, and then I could see if it was somehow more intelligent and subversive than the trailer let on, but guess what, it's even worse!
If this is what it takes to get a rom-com greenlit these days, maybe we should just let them die.
Sex workers are thrown under the bus, shown only as thieves who fleece men in the woods at night, while queer sexuality is relegated to a few scenes with Allie’s roommate (a woefully underused Quintessa Swindell) and a handful of pans past blurry same-sex extras making out in the background. “This night is for the straights,” Swindell’s character says to Allie, before saying that queer people have worked around straight laws for centuries. This is supposed to be a nod to queer resilience, but largely comes off as straightwashing the history of anti-LGBTQ legislation in this country that led towards raids of queer clubs and incarceration of queer people in the not-too-distant past (let alone the current barrage of anti-Trans and LGBTQ legislation currently in the works and on the books). It’s also ignorant of the long and fraught fight for the normalization of age-of-consent laws, which, by the way, did not happen in all states in this very country until 2003. Yes, that’s not even thirty years ago. By the end, our intrepid protagonists have not had sex with anyone, because this is a film about Romance with a Capital R (and I guess sex is not part of romance!) and for that very same reason they ultimately embrace the fascist state of things. They aren’t the only ones who refuse to fight back. No one in this cursed film is protesting this mandate beyond “repeal” signs in various windows and some creative graffiti (...) (...) If we are supposed to believe that the film is making some subversive statement about the state of sex and bodily autonomy in this country, it cannot end with its leads embracing their chains. That’s just warmed-over conservatism running around in sheep’s clothing.
yeah i wrote this post having only seen the trailer, but jesus christ. was this movie a psyop LMAO??
also, for the unaware: mclaughlin v. florida was a 1964 supreme court case that struck down a florida anti-miscegenation law that criminalized cohabitation (and thus, as implied, sex) between white people and people of color of opposite genders. anti-miscegenation laws made marriage and sexual relationships between white people and people of color, most often specifically black people, a FELONY in several states in the united states up until the 1950s and 1960s. though it was already struck down by the supreme court, the state of alabama didn't repeal their law until 2000! there were THREE ATTEMPTS at codifying anti-miscegenation into the us constitution!
like yes, the issue here is partially straight white people's ignorance on the united states's history of homophobic policy, but it's also really important to recognize that arguably the majority of the issue here is straight white people's ignorance of the united states's history of codifying eugenics and antiblack racism.
the premise could have been interesting as a serious dystopian story, especially taking that history into account, but it wasn't written that way at all. this movie should never have been a fucking romcom making light of the violence the united states (and many other countries) has enacted on any kinds of sexual relationships it deems undesirable.
can y’all maybe reblog this version i feel like people are forgetting about the racism and just focusing on the homophobia
[Plain Text: "can y’all maybe reblog this version i feel like people are forgetting about the racism and just focusing on the homophobia" End PT]
[ID: a screenshot of a comic speech bubble. The black text in it reads "No matter how open-minded, socially conscious, anti-racist I think I am, I still have old learned hidden biases that I need to examine. It is my responsibility to check myself daily for my stereotypes, prejudices and, ultimately, discrimination." /ID end]
antiracism is a constant process. i was raised in a racist village and it's not easy to get rid of it. i moved away over 10 years ago but those ideas are still haunting me.
also keep in mind that shame + guilt are not conducive to growing as a person. when it comes to "checking yourself" it should be a non-judgemental process. it's not about flagellating yourself for every bad thought or trying to purify your mind of all corruption. it's only when acknowledging your own racist thoughts doesn't fill you with dread that you can really progress past the white guilt of it all.
radical self-acceptance & genuine self-critique are not opposites. they need each other. do not let obsessive-compulsive behaviors colonize your desire to grow as a person.
personally i do not prefer when stories engaging with complicated topics attempt to make themselves good educational resources on said complicated topics
and i understand that sometimes it's a very thin line between giving a realistic depiction of a serious topic and ending up in after-school special mode, but i also notice that no one is doing this when a character gets the flu (which kills many people every year) and PERSONALLY i don't love the patterns i'm vaguely sensing about which experiences can be depicted normally and which experiences must always be a learning opportunity
In France if you suffer from hair loss as a teenage girl and cannot afford a real hair wig the school will try and force you to go to class bald. The school will make you buy a chemotherapy turban, you will buy two different so that the school can choose which one they prefer and you will prove that they are chemotherapy turban and not hijab but once you wear it they will change their mind and say it looks too much like a hijab and insist on you going bald or buying a real hair wig that you cannot afford.
If your doctor makes multiple documents confirming that you suffer from alopecia because of stress and the medicine you have to take for your epilepsy and that wearing a bonnet or something is recommended for your mental health as you’re not ready to go out bald in high school as a teenage girl, instead of admitting they are wrong the school will accuse the doctor of lying and report him to the Ordre des Médecins (equivalent of the General Medical council). Your doctor will find himself asking you for a document stating that you are not Muslim in order to defend himself and prove that no he wasn’t colluding with you so you could wear a substitute for hijab.
Source
───────
In France if you are a North African nurse at a public hospital and wear a fabric surgical cap they will try to make you remove it because apparently it’s a hidden hijab. They will accuse you of going against secularism and when you’ll argue that they are discriminating you by assuming you’re Muslim for a surgical cap on your head they will change their angle and claim that you should wear nothing on your hair because you wear the same surgical cap in multiple bedroom which is unhygienic apparently (which is a bullshit argument cause you wear the same scrub/uniform in different bedrooms as well). They will go as far as claiming that disposable scrub caps (you know the thin papery ones?) are not okay to wear in a hospital even if you change it regularly. And then they will fire you for a lack of hygiene because you wear a surgical cap.
Source
───────
All of that will be done in the name of secularism and women’s right despite having nothing do with either quite the opposite.
The teenage girl’s story is also not just about racism and Islamophobia it’s also about ableism as the girl is convinced that the real reason the school is trying to push her out is because she had an epilepsy crisis in class and nobody knew what to do and the school nurse was absent. It could have ended badly had her best friend not known what to do to help. Apparently it was bad enough to cancel class for the rest of the day and the teacher was shocked to the point of ending on sick leave.
oh and don't forget that many parts of France mandate by law how much skin women must show in swimsuits, which they claim is about not getting street dirt in public pools but which is disproportionately enforced on Muslim or even just Middle Eastern/North African women
(and of course is also some forced nudity misogynistic bullshit in general, to boot)
The French health system is so racist and ableist all while being on the shoulders of foreign (mostly Romanian and Algerian) health care professionals. But the system is so racist they are paid less than the French (often white) doctors and have to obey and report to French doctors even when they actually have more experience than said doctor.
The system is so racist that when my grandpa goes to the hospital for his annual check up for his diabetes and stuff he always makes sure to find one Black or Arab nurse and get on her schedule cause he knows they won’t dismiss him. He couldn’t get on the schedule of a Black or Arab nurse twice only and both times he almost died because his blood sugar got dangerously low in the middle of the night and he kept ringing for help and the white nurse ignored him. (Once I got involved and the only reason I didn’t punch the nurse and got arrested was because my grandpa told me not to.)
Like when I was between 1 and 2 years old the pediatrician ignored my mom concerns telling her she was just exaggerating that he wouldn’t check on me and that I was okay that she was just wasting his time by insisting. My mom insisted called an other pediatrician in an other city the pediatrician (Vietnamese) took me in despite not working that day. And after a couple minutes checking me she called an ambulance and got me to the hospital. Once at the hospital she told my parents that I wouldn’t have survived the night without the hospital…
Now that I’m an adult I know that this was clearly a case of “syndrome Méditerranée”. Basically during their studies health care professionals are told (unofficially not in the school books) that Black and Arabs don’t feel pain the same way and that we have a “cultural tendency” to exaggerate the pain we feel so we shouldn’t be taken as seriously as a white person. And because it’s France it’s called “Mediterranean” to make it sound less racist but they actually don’t apply it to white Mediterraneans and they apply it to Black non Mediterraneans.
say what you will about roy mustang but i like the point hiromu arakawa makes w his character - ie that an irredeemable person living on and devoting themselves to right their wrongs is infinitely more respectable and effective than that person "redeeming" themselves via death without ever doing anything to improve the lives they've ruined
literally the worst way of ending a series is “all the survivors are happily straight married with tons and tons of babies!”
people still getting mad at this post i made in 2014 so I will add here. in 2026. that the point of this post isn’t “happy endings bad” its when the story’s only way to imagine a happy ending is a heterosexual nuclear family for everyone.
Alberta senator Kristopher Wells partnered with IBBY Canada to launch a publicly available collection of more than 300 LGBTQ2S+ picture book
Alberta senator Kristopher Wells is putting on a different hat on Aug. 6, when he makes his personal collection of over 300 queer picture books available to the public for the first time. Wells is partnering with the International Board on Books for Young People (IBBY) Canada to release the collection, and it is believed to be the largest collection of its kind in the world. The collection includes books dating back nearly 50 years, which document LGBTQ2S+ life for young readers. IBBY Canada is the Canadian chapter of IBBY International, a non-profit organization that, since 1953, has worked to bring together children and books. Wells will participate in the opening ceremonies for IBBY’s 40th World Congress in Ottawa this week, the first held in Canada. The four-day conference will explore the theme “Listening to Each Other’s Voices,” and Wells’s collection fits in perfectly with this theme, which includes a focus on gender, sex and sexuality.
August 5, 2026
Reminder that people have been forever trying to frame antisemitism as being intellectual and not just straight up bigotry.
That's why you'll see me writing antisemitism without the hyphen. Because the term anti-semitism was coined to replace judenhass (jew hate) as an intellectual version of the term. You dont hate jews becuase you hate jews, you now hate jews because they're ruining society. Wdym that's the same thing? They're different words, right? (Sarcasm)
Bigotry will forever be anti-intellectualism. And with the rise in anti-intellectualism, its no surprise judenhass is being framed as being intellectual. No matter what it's called, its the same rhetoric, just framed differently to make you feel good about it