Some random war info that might help. (O:
I'm going to go off on a hiatus (or forever idek it's a mind warzone), but before I leave, I'll place this here. Inside contains scorched earth policies (which needs to be treated carefully), the Geneva Convention/morality & ranks/professionalism. Just a quick skim with some research. CLICK FOR ALL THIS USELESS INFORMATION THAT MAKES YOU THINK YOU KNOW WHAT YOU'RE DOING.
Before we start, let me start by saying this might not be 100% accurate. There may be parts where what I've posted is incorrect, but for the most part, I will cite/provide links for validation. Above all, I tried my best and maybe you guys can skim through this as apply it here.
And I am not trying to come off as a know-it-all or holier-than-thou elitist. This is literally what I call fun... You know, researching this stuff. I simply enjoy sharing what I've learned.
**Just because there's a restriction on something doesn't mean it won't be used. There are exceptions where rules are broken.
1. Scorched Earth Policy. Probably the one we are most familiar with. If you haven't come across it in history class yet, then you will (and if you still don't, your teachers need to backtrack and cover the bases again because I am weeping on the inside. Seriously.). The scorched earth policy is essentially burning down/destroying your enemy's supply to starve them out/demoralize/weaken (it is normally through the use of fire but doesn't need to be).
As defined by the merriam-webster dictionary:
relating to or being a military policy involving deliberate and usually widespread destruction of property and resources (as housing and factories) so that an invading enemy cannot use them
This policy has been used countless times throughout history (ex. Napoleon's defeat against the Russians in 1812. [The Russians...adopting a scorched earth policy...As time went by, soldiers began to straggle due to having to forage further away from the roads for food and weakness from lack of food.] ).
Adopting the Scorched Earth policy is prohibited (though this rule is ignored countless times) under those that comply with the Geneva Convention (for a list of those that follow this, click here) if aimed at non-combatants/civilians.
WELL, that was a long ramble about scorched earth, but I've browsed through a few RPs and noticed some minor mistakes. I mean, I'm not going to say you should listen to this post and change it because I really don't want to stuff my nose where it doesn't belong nor do I care enough to go to your ask box and cry about it, but I just wanted to talk about it here if you do choose to regard it for later use. This same concept applies to the even LENGTHIER Geneva Convention topic (and the more important stuff).
2. The Geneva Convention is, as defined by merriam-webster dictionary:
one of a series of international agreements, first made in Geneva, Switzerland, in 1864, establishing rules for the humane treatment of prisoners of war and of the sick, the wounded, and the dead in battle.
**There are a total of four.
Now, people tend to abuse the Geneva Convention (which, again, has happened countless times), but you want to play around this carefully. Doing it wrong will effect validity and you might actually offend people depending on how you're skirting around the guidelines set by these treaties. But, do not forget that if you start violating the rules enforced by the Geneva Convention, there will be consequences. People of high rank (or, if you're playing those of high rank) should be careful about what they're doing to their characters.
For example, you cannot play a ruthless tyrant who goes around killing everything in their path. Things are planned and a good leader can plan. That said, killing a civilian or unarmed combatant should be avoided, even if the non-combatant is a war criminal (in which a trail will be held for them so let the jury take care of it as in YEAH, YOU'RE THE GUY WITH THE GUN BUT UNLESS YOU HAVE A GOD DAMN GABLE, BUZZ OFF). People can get away with it because of setting and timing (ex. Erwin Metz was a sergeant that was in charge of the Berga Camp during WWII. He was to be sentenced do death but, with his information, was let for after a 15 year stint.), but your reputation will be tarnished/morale will be effected.
As is, high ranking officers shouldn't have to go down to killing civilians/enemies under bouts of rage. High officers (though, of course, with exceptions) are normally seen as the level-headed person in the group and must give that sense of safety to his/her men/women. Acting like a blood-thirsty soldier (or wherever you put your person's branch) will either scare the living fuck out of your group or make them think you are insane. And killing an armed man is one thing, but killing civilians is A WHOLE DIFFERENT THING (PLEASE DON'T DO IT THEY NEVER MEANT TO HURT YOU. IDC IF YOU'RE RENEGADE LOOK AT YOUR LIFE AND LOOK AT YOUR CHOICES). You start killing civilians and, well, no surprise here, you're going to stir some immediate trouble. You don't want any of this... I would hope. Or maybe you do in which case you need a serious demoting process.
There are articles in the convention that are punished more severely than others. Once you have done something too unforgivable (ex. a war crime), you will be tried. They are called grave breaches and examples are as follows:
As taken by wikipedia further restated by ICRC.
willful killing, torture or inhumane treatment, including biological experiments
willfully causing great suffering or serious injury to body or health
compelling someone to serve in the forces of a hostile power
willfully depriving someone of the right to a fair trial if accused of a war crime.
Also considered grave breaches of the Fourth Geneva Convention are the following:
extensive destruction and appropriation of property not justified by military necessity and carried out unlawfully and wantonly
unlawful deportation, transfer, or confinement.
And in regards to YOUR ROLEPLAY SITUATION (I am talking about Mass Effect), I'm not sure if you would say the Geneva Convention applies. Still, the Geneva Convention seems to be an accumulation of 'basic morals' that people find we, as humans, are and should be conscious of even if in times of war. These morals have sprung as a Western View (i.e. North American, European, etc.) but it does hold true that it is not just a 'white-man' thought. And so, when looking at settings like, oh, let's say, Mass Effect, it doesn't seem far fetched that such moral guidelines provided by the Geneva Convention will still be in our heads if not on paper even with Mass Effect's blast in the future.
When facing enemies that do not follow the Geneva Convention, you may still be punished but there may be exceptions weeded out. research on that cuz i ain't your character idk everything bout you or them k
3. Since I mentioned branches, just a quick recap (each is linked to a wiki summary that describes more in depth features)!
Marines: For those enlisted under the marine corps.
Seamen (and usually called sailors): For those under the navy. (whoops can't resist a boy in navy blue holla)
Soldier: For those under the army.
Airman: For those under the air force.
Okay. That was a nice little one. That was good. Let's take a breath sigh sigh. that was nice okay now time to say
4. CALM THE FUCK DOWN. As I said, your COs should be level headed and cool! After all, COs (or commissioned officers) are your persons with authority in a platoon/company/etc, and no man wants to follow someone who is a fruit off the insane-tree. You want someone careful, level-headed and calm under pressure (though having a CO status doesn't seem to be a sure fire way of promising your competence in the heat of combat). Of course, you can still play someone cruel or cold, but making them unnecessarily violent is an extreme (even if there have been extremes, but I'm not sure how comfortable you can be playing someone on the far end? I always play safe, but it's not my character.).
Here is a list of COs and NCOs in varying branches (as provided by Wikipedia).
I know it's different in the Mass Effect universe, but if you are dabbling with other military-like roleplays, here you are. Or, heck, maybe you just want to compare and see where you character falls under this chart.
Look, I'm not here to tell you HOW to play your characters. By all means, make your Shepard or whoever else violent, but if so, apply it in the appropriate places! You don't need to stress your character's blood-thirst every chance you get, you know what I mean? You can deliver a point without having to repeat it constantly (just like in writing!) and so the same is pretty much applicable here. You can't have someone go around killing like it's a turkey shoot. If you think that's how it works, I think you've been watching too many war films, buckaroo. )O:
5. Three quick easy points.
Playing someone in the military doesn't give you an all-rights pass to kill and do whatever you want. That isn't how it works! Just as there is structure in our civilian world, there is a structure in the armed forces of whatever force in any time, place, etc.
Make your character suitable for the rank they are in. Poor leaders should not be COs. Violent psychopaths with no respect to the rules should not be COs (or shouldn't be anywhere near a gun, let's be honest). If they are, be mindful to express such point tastefully and effectively; stating it constantly loses its affect and comes off as redundant/boring/and or just plain silly.
Be mindful of your character's actions. As with the scorched earth policy, remember that there is a time and place for everything. Don't throw something as severe/serious as scorched earth unless it benefits you and is appropriate. Also keep in mind what consequences can effect civilians/etc. because though they are non-combatants, they are-- Wait. Exactly. They're non-combatants, so you should be careful PERIOD.
And, again, I'm not here to tell you that you should play your characters this and that way. You play them as you want to play them. Maybe you read this post and went "oh, hey, that's pretty cool!" or went "okay, this was useless and I don't care". Not my decision.
okay im tired and i would put a whole list of protocols and policies but i have an exam which i'll probably ignore so i can watch football instead jfc #1 life choices tyvm i accept this award (and let's be honest no one has the time for that)
ill accept it by posting a raylan givens gif for no reason
justified fans high 5