gojo’s best girl

she/her, 24

[gotorux]

꧁ 𝚠𝚎𝚕𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚎 𝚝𝚘 𝚖𝚢 𝚋𝚕𝚘𝚐

✿ 🩵𝚒’𝚖 𝚔𝚒𝚖𝚒𝚔𝚘. 24. she/her. I am mostly quiet observer. Multi-fandom blog. Mostly lurking. I occasionally write and I post many fandom specific analysis posts and super opinionated things. If that’s not for you—block is free.

✧ Gojo is my favorite character. Please know I do not interact with any of his ships or Gojo hate. ✧ I also like Levi, Yuta, Kakashi, Megumi, Tengen, Giyu, Sasuke, Dazai, Dabi, Eren, Choso, Tanjiro.

I suck at tags. or creating master lists. But if I end up getting more followers and writing more I will create one.

🚫 non-shipper. nsfw content may appear.

credits for dividers

[gotorux]

Japanese fans can be weird, I won’t lie. But Westerners are the weirdest fans I’ve encountered. Go outside. Touch grass. And stop projecting your weird stuff onto characters. Just because some other weirdo online agrees with you, doesn’t mean you’re right.

[gotorux]

I’ve talked about this topic before, but I want to talk about it again. I’m usually just a lurker Tumblr user. I also engage with Reddit, Twitter and AO3. And sometimes it’s just frustrating being in fandom.

Like it’s wild how some fans have gotten really good at making fanon sound like legitimate analysis. They’ll take one or two panels completely out of context, slap some therapy speak on it, and suddenly it becomes “canon” and anything you say to contradict them is wrong. They notice one tiny behavior and create an entire personality around it, using therapy terms and writing these long analytical posts that sound smart and well-researched even when they’re not actually supported by the text. Because they use the right buzzwords and frame it like deep psychological analysis, it becomes really hard to push back without looking like you’re the one in the wrong.

The problem is that real analysis still has to be grounded in what’s actually on the page. You can’t just pick the parts you like, ignore everything that contradicts your interpretation, dismiss what the author says, and call it deeper reading. If your analysis requires disregarding major parts of a character’s actual behavior and personality, or if it conveniently aligns perfectly with popular fanfic tropes, then at the end of the day you’re just creating fanon dressed up in fancy language. And when you point this out, they act like you’re not engaging deeply enough or you’re not smart or they use the stupid “media literacy” argument against you (which is an entirely other chronically online thing that’s for another day). At the end of the day some people want to engage with characters canonically and it’s frustrating when you want to be in a fandom but people bully you for not subscribing to their fanon.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

And let me add, there is nothing wrong with fanon. Having fanon interpretations isn’t inherently wrong. These are fictional characters and people should be able to have fun with them however they choose to. But it gets frustrating when every piece of media gets twisted to fit fandom preferences, and the fanon version becomes so dominant that it’s the only interpretation people ever use. You can see the clear difference between how fandom engages versus casual watchers, or how male fans versus female fans interpret the same character. The issue isn’t that fanon exists, it’s when that fanon becomes treated as canon and gets so widespread that the actual character gets completely lost. At that point it gets messy because you can’t even have conversations about what’s really in the source material without people getting defensive about their preferred version.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

[gotorux]

“Mmm toru that feels good.” You murmur as your boyfriend’s tongue laps at your clit. Your hands are tangled through the snowy white strands, pulling his face further into you as tongue laps at your swollen cunt. He covers your clit with his lips and starts to suck, his tongue darting out to swirl around your swollen nub.

“Satoru please.” You beg, lifting our hips as you chase more of the feeling of his tongue on your most sensitive parts. He licks the moisture pooling from your pussy before moving to hover over you. His hands come up to cup your face.

“Tell me you want it pretty girl. Tell me you want me to fuck this pretty little cunt.”

“Please, Satoru.” You whimper and that’s all it takes before he’s pushing his fat tip past your gummy walls.

“Takin this cock like a good girl.” He says as he bottoms out inside you. He sits there, momentarily as he feels the way your walls pulse around him. 

FInallr, after what feels like forever, he starts to move. “Fuck, pussy feels so good wrapped around me baby.” He says before he starts to pick up the pass, pounding his hips against you.  He pounds mercilessly, but he knows you can take it. After all, your pussy was made for him to ruin.

“Mmmm…Satoru,” You say as you feel yourself clench around your boyfriend’s cock. “Gunna cum, can I?”

Satoru’s response comes as he slows his pace down, ensuring he feels every inch of your gummy walls taking his thick cock, the way you seem to mold to him like you were made for him. And maybe you were.

“Yeah princess, want you to cum all over my cock.”

[gotorux]

Characters sexualities being such a hot topic within fandom spaces is actually insane. Unless the author says differently it’s extremely likely the characters are straight. It’s shonen. 🙄

Ironically these debates don’t happen with people who aren’t weird anime people in the western fandom. Where are all the normal people on Tumblr?

[who-can-touch-my-boob]

<- Sanemi simp posts masterlist

This is a work in progress, but trying to get into drawing again and using Sanemi as my muse. More specifically, drawing non-chibi Sanemi based off of his official chibi art. Dunno if I want to colour this or have it black and white.

And yeah, there’s so many things I see now that needs fixing up, but meh—I’ll get to it.

[gotorux]

I have noticed a pattern on tumblr where people say one thing in private and something completely different on their blog. And this is not about whether I agree or disagree it’s the inconsistency that stands out. If you have a stance, own it.

Everyone is allowed to have unpopular opinions. What is shady is pretending you don’t just because it might not perform well publicly. People are entitled to their views, but it’s hard to take things seriously when the tone shifts depending on the audience.

That is a huge reason why I post what I post. because even though people might take issue…at least I am authentic.

[sixeyesonathiel]

i’m sorry but the mischaracterization of satoru gojo sometimes makes me wanna scream into the void. people really love to take one scene, one line, and twist it into a whole narrative that doesn’t even align with his core. like… are we even watching the same man??

HE DID NOT NEED A MORAL COMPASS. satoru’s been repressing his own desires since he was a child. a literal kid born with a power that could’ve destroyed everything around him—and yet, he didn’t. he never misused it. not once. not even out of spite. not even when he had every right to feel angry and lash out.

and people still act like he was this walking weapon on the verge of snapping if someone didn’t hold his leash. no. this is someone who’s been raised with expectations no one else could ever comprehend, who’s constantly chosen restraint, duty, and control even when it’s agonizing. and he makes those choices alone. over and over again.

i think people overlook how deeply internalized satoru’s moral compass already is. his “should we kill them?” moment wasn’t a breakdown of ethics. it was frustration, grief, anger. it was a TEENAGER who just saw someone he was protecting die in front of him, asking a friend for perspective. he wasn’t lost. he wasn’t about to burn the world. he was trying to process in real time. but people latch onto that line like it’s some confirmation that he needed someone to “save” him from becoming a monster.

no, actually. he saves himself. again. and again. and again.

he chooses to teach. he chooses to protect. he chooses to carry the weight of reforming a broken system—and yeah, he does fail sometimes. but that doesn’t make him any less righteous. if anything, it shows how much he shoulders on his own.

like idk. maybe it’s just me but i’m over people reducing him to “a time bomb that only didn’t go off because someone held his hand.” no. he’s the one who defuses himself. every single time. because he wants to do better. because he knows how powerful he is. because he cares.

satoru gojo isn’t dangerous. he’s the strongest—not just in power, but in how fiercely he holds himself together. he’s been alone at the top his whole life, forced to carry the weight of a world that only ever demanded from him, never asked how he was. he didn’t need saving because he was the safety net for everyone else. and even when it broke him, even when it hurt, he never turned cruel. never lost himself.

THAT’S WHAT MAKES HIM SO SPECIAL.

not just that he could’ve gone dark—but that he chose not to. again and again. that he stayed soft, and kind, and hopeful, even when he had every reason not to.

he deserves the world. and it kills me that he never got it 😔

[thetorturedgojodepartment]

Had to sit and stare at the wall after reading this…THIS is what has gone through my mind about Gojos character! This post is heaven sent thank you so much op🫶🏻

[gotorux]

boyfriend texts.. ft: satoru gojo

⋆·˚ ༘ * S.Gojo x fem!reader fluffy and suggestive

[riritzuu]

first year gojo 🤏

[aliasnnmknt]

Beach date ☀️

[gotorux]

I cannot engage with the Attack on Titan fandom on Tumblr, it is seriously one of the most frustrating and intellectually dishonest fandom spaces to engage with. The anime is one of, if not the, best written animes out there. Even though Gojo is my favorite character, AOT trumps JJK by miles but I rarely engage with or talk about it because it’s really just a minefield of bad-faith discourse, pseudo-intellectualism, and fandom headcanons being pushed as canon. The sheer volume of misinformation and emotional projection passed off as “analysis” is getting ridiculous, and worse, any attempt to correct it is met with hostility, dogpiling, or moral accusations.

One of the most annoying problems is the rampant use of therapy-speak to analyze fictional characters in ways that are neither clinically accurate nor narratively grounded. Characters are casually diagnosed with disorders based on fanon interpretations, and this language is often used to shut down any alternative readings. Instead of trying to understand a character’s arc within the worldbuilding and the actual logic of the story, people default to pop psychology to assign them a label. These labels then become a protective shield for their headcanon, so if anyone disagrees, they’re accused of invalidating trauma. It is no longer about engaging with fiction it’s about this weird obsession chronically online people seem to have with moral superiority.

This infantilization of adult men is getting out of hand, particularly Levi. Levi is a grown man in his 30s who has survived war, unimaginable loss, and a lifetime of violence. He’s competent, brutal, and emotionally guarded for a reason. And yet, fandom constantly reduces him to a fragile, baby-coded victim who must be coddled and protected from any narrative complexity. Trauma does not erase adulthood, and it doesn’t mean a character cannot be sexually experienced, morally ambiguous, or able to move forward from their past traumas. But for some reason, fandom sees male trauma as an excuse to strip a character of all agency and maturity, while simultaneously treating female trauma as proof of strength and sexual autonomy.

This selective interpretation of trauma is also glaring in the fandom’s fixation on characters’ sexuality and virginity. You all are seriously deranged when it comes to that shit. It’s glaringly obvious to me a lot of you have very limited life experience. Grown adults spend hours arguing over whether or not Levi is a virgin, as if this has any bearing on his moral worth or emotional capacity. And it always comes back to “he’s too traumatized to have sex,” which is just another way the fandom strips him of agency. Like, sorry, but being traumatized doesn’t make someone a child. It doesn’t mean they can’t be sexual or experienced. That logic is weird, infantilizing, and honestly pretty puritanical. The likelihood he is a virgin is incredibly slim. You can come at me with “well actually” but that’s just rooted in your weird chronically online view, projection and your therapist speak that has no actual substance. 

Then there’s the way people treat smut writers like they’re ruining the fandom. Writers will post some really great and fun smut and it gets torn apart, while the same people are posting 4k word meta essays diagnosing characters with five different personality disorders. Writing Levi as someone who has sex or knows what he’s doing isn’t out of character. Pretending he’s a delicate flower who’s never even thought about sex? That’s way more out of pocket.. Writing Levi with sexual agency does not violate canon, it actually makes sense for his character who’s again, a grown man in his 30s.

People are no longer interested in what a character is, they are invested in what the character can be twisted to mean to them, and they will rewrite the text to protect that meaning at all costs. Canon is only respected when it affirms their feelings. When it doesn’t, it’s either ignored, reinterpreted beyond recognition, or treated like a moral failing of the creators. There is no room for disagreement, no space for nuance, and no tolerance for realism. The fandom is so caught up in its emotional self-projection that it has lost the ability to talk about the story as it was written. And I promise you taking screenshots of the manga and reinterpreting the scene to fit what you want is also just projection. 

I know I will get flooded with hate messages because that’s how the the Attack on Titan fandom operates. Because if you say any of this out loud, even calmly and with evidence, you’re immediately labeled “mean” or “unsafe.” But the truth is, noticing these things isn’t toxic. It’s honest. Wanting to engage with characters as they are, not as you wish they were, isn’t a bad thing.

Just to be clear…I’m not talking about regular headcanons. Headcanons are fun. People are allowed to imagine whatever they want, ship whoever they want, and write characters however they see them. That’s the whole point of fandom. I am not talking about any of that. Feel free to write how you want, or headcanon whatever you want. So if that’s you. You’re awesome keep having fun. What I’m calling out is when people take those headcanons or interpretations and try to pass them off as canon truth. When they write meta that’s really just fanon, and then act like you’re wrong or harmful for not agreeing. That’s where the problem starts. It stops being about personal creativity and becomes about controlling the narrative and that’s not fun fandom stuff anymore. That’s just delusion.

[dtarouviper]

I had a conversation about the matter you touch about Levi with my girlfriend the other day. She's a therapist and also a fanfic writer for the Banana Fish Fandom.

She specializes in helping adults with different kind of trauma and one of her focuses is to help these people overcome it in order to have a normal life and experience everything naturally.

This often means helping people with sexual trauma understand they can have a normal sex life, helping them navigate their thoughts about it, helping them to separate past experiences with new ones.

And because helping people walk their life safely in this regard is so important to her, she writes a lot about it in her fanfic.

But people is incredibly dense about the matter in said Fandom, often treating her as she, remotely touching the subject of sexuality for a character who has sexual trauma is sacrilegious and should know better because that character is "obviously too traumatized for that and should be treated as a 12 year old for the rest of his life".

Oh, she knows better than chronically onlines on Twitter, Tumblr and Ao3. She's a remarkable professional who has devoted her life to helping these people. She's admirable in her work and how much she helps and it's genuinely inspiring to see how much she understands about the matter and how she really is the kind of professional people really needs in order to continue a healthier lifestyle and overcome trauma.

I wish people knew putting this kind of knowledge out there in fictional work is very important to understand the real behavior of human beings.

Infantilizing adults with trauma will only lead them to continue a life in which their painful experiences keep dictating how they act and how they behave through everything for the rest of it.

Know better.

[gotorux]

Hi. Thank you!

I think trauma is hard and ugly and layered, yes, but it doesn’t mean a person is frozen in time or incapable of intimacy forever. That mindset keeps people trapped. I think that’s such an important thing to understand.

And it’s so frustrating to see fandom reduce adult characters especially men to emotionally stunted children under the guise of “respecting trauma.” And I hope people don’t take my wording and assume I am saying people affected by their trauma are emotionally stunted children. I am not saying that AT ALL. I am just pointing out how often trauma gets used to project certain behaviors on characters because that’s what people want. Levi is a great example. He’s experienced devastating loss and pain, but he’s also capable, grounded, and functional. He’s emotionally guarded, not emotionally incapable. Treating him like he should be permanently desexualized or “too broken” to be a full adult is not trauma-informed. It’s infantilizing. And frankly, it’s disrespectful to people who have actually done the work to live with their trauma instead of being defined by it.

I also want to point out that Isayama explicitly said Levi thought of his mother’s job as normal. So even if there was trauma there, it wouldn’t necessarily manifest in the way people assume. Trauma isn’t one-size-fits-all. Different people process the same experiences in completely different ways. We have to look at what’s actually in the text, not what we project onto it. Levi doesn’t show signs of sexual trauma in the story, and there’s no evidence that he’s afraid of intimacy or incapable of sex.

People forget that healing doesn’t always look like softness. Sometimes it looks like taking control of your own narrative, especially in ways fandom doesn’t find aesthetically comforting.

Your girlfriend sounds incredible, and I genuinely admire what she’s doing both professionally and creatively. We need more of that and a lot less of the faux-clinical gatekeeping that dominates these spaces.

[gotorux]

Tengen make me your forth wife I beg. I hate sharing but I will for a piece of that.

[hazaato]

MMA Fighter Sukuna!! Link for twitter post

(Also a shading study of @kcokaine!!)

[animepolaroid]

by NAO

[gotorux]

I cannot engage with the Attack on Titan fandom on Tumblr, it is seriously one of the most frustrating and intellectually dishonest fandom spaces to engage with. The anime is one of, if not the, best written animes out there. Even though Gojo is my favorite character, AOT trumps JJK by miles but I rarely engage with or talk about it because it’s really just a minefield of bad-faith discourse, pseudo-intellectualism, and fandom headcanons being pushed as canon. The sheer volume of misinformation and emotional projection passed off as “analysis” is getting ridiculous, and worse, any attempt to correct it is met with hostility, dogpiling, or moral accusations.

One of the most annoying problems is the rampant use of therapy-speak to analyze fictional characters in ways that are neither clinically accurate nor narratively grounded. Characters are casually diagnosed with disorders based on fanon interpretations, and this language is often used to shut down any alternative readings. Instead of trying to understand a character’s arc within the worldbuilding and the actual logic of the story, people default to pop psychology to assign them a label. These labels then become a protective shield for their headcanon, so if anyone disagrees, they’re accused of invalidating trauma. It is no longer about engaging with fiction it’s about this weird obsession chronically online people seem to have with moral superiority.

This infantilization of adult men is getting out of hand, particularly Levi. Levi is a grown man in his 30s who has survived war, unimaginable loss, and a lifetime of violence. He’s competent, brutal, and emotionally guarded for a reason. And yet, fandom constantly reduces him to a fragile, baby-coded victim who must be coddled and protected from any narrative complexity. Trauma does not erase adulthood, and it doesn’t mean a character cannot be sexually experienced, morally ambiguous, or able to move forward from their past traumas. But for some reason, fandom sees male trauma as an excuse to strip a character of all agency and maturity, while simultaneously treating female trauma as proof of strength and sexual autonomy.

This selective interpretation of trauma is also glaring in the fandom’s fixation on characters’ sexuality and virginity. You all are seriously deranged when it comes to that shit. It’s glaringly obvious to me a lot of you have very limited life experience. Grown adults spend hours arguing over whether or not Levi is a virgin, as if this has any bearing on his moral worth or emotional capacity. And it always comes back to “he’s too traumatized to have sex,” which is just another way the fandom strips him of agency. Like, sorry, but being traumatized doesn’t make someone a child. It doesn’t mean they can’t be sexual or experienced. That logic is weird, infantilizing, and honestly pretty puritanical. The likelihood he is a virgin is incredibly slim. You can come at me with “well actually” but that’s just rooted in your weird chronically online view, projection and your therapist speak that has no actual substance. 

Then there’s the way people treat smut writers like they’re ruining the fandom. Writers will post some really great and fun smut and it gets torn apart, while the same people are posting 4k word meta essays diagnosing characters with five different personality disorders. Writing Levi as someone who has sex or knows what he’s doing isn’t out of character. Pretending he’s a delicate flower who’s never even thought about sex? That’s way more out of pocket.. Writing Levi with sexual agency does not violate canon, it actually makes sense for his character who’s again, a grown man in his 30s.

People are no longer interested in what a character is, they are invested in what the character can be twisted to mean to them, and they will rewrite the text to protect that meaning at all costs. Canon is only respected when it affirms their feelings. When it doesn’t, it’s either ignored, reinterpreted beyond recognition, or treated like a moral failing of the creators. There is no room for disagreement, no space for nuance, and no tolerance for realism. The fandom is so caught up in its emotional self-projection that it has lost the ability to talk about the story as it was written. And I promise you taking screenshots of the manga and reinterpreting the scene to fit what you want is also just projection. 

I know I will get flooded with hate messages because that’s how the the Attack on Titan fandom operates. Because if you say any of this out loud, even calmly and with evidence, you’re immediately labeled “mean” or “unsafe.” But the truth is, noticing these things isn’t toxic. It’s honest. Wanting to engage with characters as they are, not as you wish they were, isn’t a bad thing.

Just to be clear…I’m not talking about regular headcanons. Headcanons are fun. People are allowed to imagine whatever they want, ship whoever they want, and write characters however they see them. That’s the whole point of fandom. I am not talking about any of that. Feel free to write how you want, or headcanon whatever you want. So if that’s you. You’re awesome keep having fun. What I’m calling out is when people take those headcanons or interpretations and try to pass them off as canon truth. When they write meta that’s really just fanon, and then act like you’re wrong or harmful for not agreeing. That’s where the problem starts. It stops being about personal creativity and becomes about controlling the narrative and that’s not fun fandom stuff anymore. That’s just delusion.

[gotorux]

"I swear, some of the things they say or do in these fics… no grown man talks/acts like this " Have you got examples or something because I am clueless and curious hahah

I’m not going to go take a specific example from a writer to turn around and shit on a specific fic. That would be super shitty. I meant this as a whole. There is a lot out there. I think often it falls into trends where sometimes people write how they think others want them too, and sometimes it’s people who are inexperienced. Either way, it’s fantasy and some people are into that I guess, but I prefer to read about men acting realistic.