My Angry Lesbian Moms

Here for the Diamonds and Bellow in particular. There is general su here too. 18+. You may know me through writing as t_hanson. You may not; I’ll never know. Diamond prompts and GJ au snippets can be found under #my writing. If you like my work, feel free to leave me a little tip 🥰 twitter: guccibootyellow. Kofi: ko-fi.com/guccibootyellow

[teepooo]

when u cry for the first time in millennia

[steven-universe-heritage-posts]

Steven Universe Heritage post

[awevanity]

T H E R E Y O U A R E

[trixiethunderchild]

blue diamond redraw, happy pride month

[sp0ng3art]

i just know they were lezzing it up in era 1

[storm-of-feathers]

we don't credit rebecca sugar enough for making the episode with the first gay wedding in a kids show extremely plot relevant so it could not be skipped or cut.

[emeraldspiral]

#rebecca sugar has gone on record saying that they knew from the beginning they wanted ruby and sapphire and they put every inch of planning#in to make sure that the studio could not take them out. sugar has said they’d compromised on hundreds of things they’d wanted for steven#so that they had the bargaining power specifically to keep ruby and sapphire’s relationship#and a number of ‘filler’ episodes were created just to establish counter-arguments that might come up when they pitched the wedding episode#the one that comes to mind is the episode about steven and connie getting lost in rose’s room steven’s central conflict about liking their#fave book series’ romantic ending was later weaponised when producer’s were like ‘oh but steven’s a boy he won’t be too interested in them#getting married’ sugar was able to be like ‘no. in this episode it’s established he loves romance and specifically weddings. and in these#episodes it’s shown how much steven cares about ruby and sapphire and their relationship and happiness. you cannot convince me this is not#good and necessary plot development#and they wrapped it up in the season finale and the big climactic point of the diamonds finally coming to attack earth to make the#episode integral to the series no skipping it without confusion. and had ruby wear a wedding dress because international censors took#advantage of her design to give her a masculine va#and sugar made certain that everybody knew This was a queer love story that an entire town supported and admired and that any child watchin#it at home would know they are not alone and that that support is waiting for them out there somewhere#sugar sacrificed the wider story they wanted to tell for that and it was a horrible decision to be given but they made the right choice

[mylordshesacactus]

Hey so I'm gonna be very very honest here.

And this is going to make a lot of people very angry to hear.

But a lot of y'all on this website are truly deeply genuinely never going to be capable of any kind of real narrative analysis--and I don't mean 'being right all the time' I mean 'meaningfully engaging with the text in any way'--

Because you are, fundamentally, incapable of comprehending that writers usually do things on purpose.

[mylordshesacactus]

The themes are there on...purpose.

The match cuts were meticulously designed and put there to communicate something.

The VA's delivery of a line was being directed. Inflection and tone change the meaning of dialogue. This is intentional. There are entire teams of people shaping those choices and deciding which take to use based on what works best for the story.

Information is being revealed in a specific order, on purpose, to craft an emotional arc and guide the audience's understanding.

A character's romantic preferences are only, and SHOULD only be, their primary motivation if the genre is romance. That is why there is a genre called that. Most stories are other genres.

Creators who dislike a character generally give them LESS attention, MORE boring storylines, and LESS screentime.

Sometimes curtains are just blue. But if the shot composition or written narration takes time to HIGHLIGHT, especially more than once, that the curtains are blue, then the blueness of the curtains is by definition narratively important.

"Cite your sources" is not a witch's curse that banishes People With Different Opinions to the shadowrealm of Being Wrong. Someone making points that challenge your perceptions, while including screenshots and explicit examples, cannot be dismissed with "cite your sources" because they are literally doing that. Don't @ me on this one I've seen shit in the wars, y'all.

Failing to understand these things WILL bar you from ever really engaging with or understanding any narrative more complicated than Paw Patrol for the rest of your life.

I am very sorry if that makes you angry.

[beetlebuckaroo]

Some diamond and pearl doodles

[guccibootyellow]

I said I might do a face reveal one day and… I might just delete this later bc I like to remain anonymous but this is me 🤗 the left picture was me in 2019, the same summer that I started In Want of a Wife (and that SU died, rip) and the right is me now. Seven years and seven volumes… here’s to eight and maybe some little bellow surprises 💚

[guccibootyellow]

Lastly, some OCs 🤗

Florence:

Hafsa:

[guccibootyellow]

Some more fashion references! I’ve always imagined Lady Davers being fairly conservative and old-fashioned in her taste, so her fashion is slightly older.

Penny:

Lady Davers:

[guccibootyellow]

Some real life fashion inspiration for my au ☺️ some of these are directly referenced in the story!

There are some clothes that are more accurate for just before or just after the 1830s as it’s quite a hard period to accurately capture, but they’ve helped give me a sense of what they’d wear.

Yvonne:

Bonnie:

[fakedoe]

[guccibootyellow]

An Archive of Our Own, a project of the Organization for Transformative Works

I've uploaded a new chapter for In Want of a Wife's short story collection. It's a bit short but I'm just grateful to have anything to share. I hope you guys like it! 🥰

[bokchois]

Old sticker design of the diamonds (before white diamond reveal)!!

[steven-universe-heritage-posts]

Steven Universe Heritage post

[allthingswhumpyandangsty]

every day I learn bot comments on ao3 are stooping lower and lower

anyway if you get a comment like this, chances are that they are bot and their goal is to do whatever it takes to get you to delete your work, most certainly (from what I’ve heard) it’s because they want to “safely” steal your work, use it to train their ai without you being able to rightfully claim ownership of your work since “there’s no proof that the work was stolen/was posted elsewhere first by you” because the original source has already been deleted.

THEY ARE ALL BOTS. at first it was “ao3 is deleting fics and your entire account will be affected unless you delete the fics yourself” then it was “this work contains contents that are illegal and they have already reported you and your fic to the police” (yes, that’s how desperate these bots are), and now it’s this.

report their comments to ao3 for spam—in this case, specifically, I think you may be able to report them for harassment too—and don’t pay attention to them, most importantly don’t delete your works, don’t feel discouraged by their comments. remember that they are bots and they mass comment something like this on people’s works at random to get people to delete their works. (or even if they’re not bot, they are still pathetic bullies who don’t deserve your time or attention.)

MORE ABOUT BOTS AND SCAMS PLAGUING AO3’S COMMENTS SECTION HERE

[daveyjlocker]

In Want of a Wife by @guccibootyellow / t_hanson on AO3

[guccibootyellow]

I’ve been reflecting on some things - formulating and theorising - and I think I might be cooking right now.

I am so close to creating something even remotely coherent.