“You Couldn’t Make a Mel Brooks Film Today”
One common trend I’ve seen over the years, which many reviewers have critiqued, is the idea that films such as Blazing Saddles could not be made today due to their use of racial humour. Even director Brooks himself claimed “politically correct society is the death of comedy”. In the last year, we have seen the Simpsons character Apu Nahasapeemapetilon reanalysed and discussed as a troubling representation. What do these two examples say about modern society and pop culture?
To begin, it’s worth discussing the two separately. Blazing Saddles is a western comedy about racism and bigotry which actively shows that discrimination could potentially not only stop society progressing but also end it.  Sheriff Bart is chosen to protect a town named Rock Ridge on the basis of being African American. Attorney general Hedley Lamarr plans to use this to make the town collapse so a railroad can be built through it. The only way for the residents to overcome the railroad being built through their town is to accept Sheriff Bart and by extension African Americans as a whole. The film shows racism as regressive and its two protagonists are represented as progressive in their morals. The first line by Gene Wilder’s Jim is “Are we black?” when asked if he is awake. This is strongly connected with the basis of the film. Jim is aware of the prejudice in the town and, while not racist himself, is legitimately surprised about the town having an African American sheriff to the point of questioning if he is still dreaming. This line is also rooted in character as Jim’s reality may be slightly blurred due to his alcoholism revealed soon after.
Most race-related lines have a similar context. An old lady in the town calls Bart the N word which may seems to be just shock humour with a racial angle but also says a great deal about the town. The initial slur isn’t said as a result of the lady not being aware of changing times but as a result of genuine dislike. In having this specific character say the line, it is showing that even characters who would generally be presented as harmless are filled with prejudice. This makes the town’s changing views later in the film more powerful. Context for dialogue is extremely important in discussing this film.
Apu Nahasapeemapetilon is seen as a troubling character. As the key representation of Indian culture in the 90s, he was mostly just a stereotype throughout many of his early appearances until he was slowly fleshed-out over time. Throughout the years, Apu has gotten married, had his wife give birth to octuplets and helped Lisa connect with her newfound vegetarianism. Of the extended characters, Apu is among the most complex and fleshed-out, so why is he troublesome? The idea that Apu owns and works in a 7-11 parody called the Kwik-E-Mart isn’t inherently concerning as many 7-11 workers are Indian. The issue is that, being the key representation of a whole race in the 90s, he should have been given more depth early on. To have the Kwik-E-Mart be a key component of his character is an issue when that’s all people get to see of Indian culture. The forced accent by a voice actor who is not Indian has a similar effect. Most of the Simpsons cast are playing characters they have little in common with. Nancy Cartwright plays a 10 year old boy, Harry Shearer plays a Dr who is a parody of an African American actor (which has since become troubling for other, more complex reasons). The idea of someone playing another race, sex etc in an animated format isn’t inherently offensive, it comes down to, who else was there for Indian actors to play in America? While Apu may not be the sole representation of Indian culture in pop culture now with the success of Big Bang Theory, Life Of Pi, Lion and more, the fact that he was their biggest voice at one point is where much of the concern appears to be rooted.
So how do these two drastically different instances connect and what does it have to do with today? Blazing Saddles successfully used racial humour through great satire, context and making the racism an important part of the film’s moral basis. Apu Nahasapeemapetilon is a troubling stereotype slightly improved over time through context. What is important in overcoming a supposed death of comedy via a politically correct society is to use context correctly. Be aware of what is happening in the world and pop culture and think of how this racial humour may affect others. As long as it is done without malice and is connected to character or plot in some way, it can be extremely powerful. When done purely as a joke or shock humour without the power of character or context, it may receive a negative reaction from the group at the butt of the joke.