I love you superman I love you superman I love you superman I love you superman. unrelated but I love you Clark Kent
will byers stan first human second

No title available
cherry valley forever

oozey mess
KIROKAZE

Andulka
Mike Driver
trying on a metaphor

Kaledo Art

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
Game of Thrones Daily

★
Misplaced Lens Cap

Love Begins
dirt enthusiast
Acquired Stardust
Today's Document
Cosmic Funnies
Sweet Seals For You, Always
Stranger Things

seen from United States

seen from T1

seen from Japan
seen from Finland
seen from Mexico
seen from Germany
seen from Kenya

seen from Germany
seen from Kenya

seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from France

seen from Netherlands
@hernanguerra
I love you superman I love you superman I love you superman I love you superman. unrelated but I love you Clark Kent
a flyboy and his main girl
ever since i learned abt the concept of networking i knew i was going to have to do everything alone and do it the hard way
i believe i can do everything in this life except feign interest and suck up to people
STAR TREK 1.05 “The Enemy Within”
Look. I am tired of catching strays on this. If you're going to invoke the Secret Fourth Sherlock Episode in relation to your own fandom's unhinged post-finale copium behavior, you need to know your fandom history.
Specifically, you need to realize that the origin of the Secret Fourth Episode idea came from a BFI screening Q&A -- specifically a journalist (for RadioTimes, unless my memory fails me) asking the showrunners about the possibility of a Secret Fourth Episode. The Q&A where this hypothesis was first floated took place three days before the finale had actually aired. In response to this question, the showrunners laughed and denied it, but joked that the hypothetical episode could be called "The Lost Special", a reference to The Story of the Lost Special, a crypto-Holmesian detective story about a missing train written by Conan Doyle during the hiatus between The Final Problem and The Hound of the Baskervilles.
Again: the hypothetical fourth Sherlock episode had been given a title by the showrunners three days before anyone except a screening audience had even seen the third episode. The idea, outlandish as it was, had originated with a question from a professional media beat reporter. The answer to that question was one of the few tidbits from the Q&A granted immediate release and not embargoed until after the episode aired.
In the lead up to the finale, this was absolutely mystifying information to receive -- why on earth would a journalist be asking about a secret fourth episode??? After seeing the finale (first when a leaked Russian dub was inexplicably shared by official BBC accounts for some fucking reason, then the official broadcast), the idea that they were attempting to prime hardcore fans for some kind of insane media stunt became one possible explanation.
All this to say: I was there, Gandalf. I watched the premiere of Apple Tree Yard with the best of them, feeling like a lunatic before, during, and after. There was a thread of reasoning that led us there, however tenuous, and it turns out watching a random show that is definitely not a Secret Sherlock Fourth Episode while feeling like a lunatic is still a pretty harmless place to be led in order to rule out a tenuous hypothesis about a tv show.
But if your other fandom's finale debacle doesn't even have a hypothetical title for its secret episode direct from a showrunner's mouth announced three days before you have any reason to think there might be a need for one, your fandom has less a foundation than any Secret Sherlock Fourth Episode theorists did.
Hello bisexual community
Begin killing
reblog to tranquilize the person you reblogged this from
Isaac Chotiner interviews a former Biden-Harris official who tries to sell him on what a great job the Biden-Harris administration did with Gaza, which goes a little awry when the Biden-Harris attempt to rewrite history hinges on "we did a good job only getting the right children killed, not the wrong children".
Teen Killed In U.S. Drone Strike Should Have 'More Responsible Father,' Obama Campaign Official Says
right yeah kill this guy
Chinga La Migra
When someone calls me a man hating misandrist but they don’t know I fw Scott Summers
SUPERMAN 2025, dir. James Gunn
post for me, my angel of tumblr
walking around the dash doing stuff like this
did you hit that elf.
...
you're going to regret that.
This is Thelockpickinglaywer and what I have for you today is something very interesting. As you can tell by the agonizing screams of the damned, I have recently left the mortal coil and, upon arriving at my destination, was informed that I did not qualify for residence. I was taken by an angel of the Lord to the mouth of Hell, and when the angel left, he closed this rather large red door and sealed it with a divine key. Although I’ve never seen this particular model of lock before, I’ve spent some time investigating the cylinder with this small shard of bone. By sticking it in the back of the keyway and slowly pulling it out, I can tell that this is a five-pin tumbler lock, that can easily be single-pin picked using this shed demon scale as a tensioner tool. Let’s try that right now. Alright, nothing on one. Nothing on two. Three is binding firmly, click out of that. Nothing on four. Five is binding, little click there, back to one. Once again, nothing. Two is binding, and we’ve dropped into a false set. Little click out of three. Nothing on four. Little click on one, counter-rotation on two, and we got this open. Okay folks, I think the main takeaway here is that no matter how much faith you place in a mechanism designed to ensure your safety, be it spiritual or physical, there is always a state in which it can fail. In any case, thank you for watching. Memento mori, and I’ll see you next time.
lpl hell post faq
“what possessed you to write this?”
it was 2 am. i had spent the time i should have been sleeping watching lpl videos and reading through a book on christianity in the middle ages. one thing led to another. here’s the image that inspired me to make the post.
(wikipedia link)
“i can read it in his voice!”
i intentionally emulated his manner of speaking. this was because i had spent several hours that day binging his content. also it makes it much funnier.
“what did lpl do to end up in hell?”
be a lawyer. though breaking into his ex-girlfriend’s backdoor certainly didn’t help his case.
“he didn’t check to see if it was a fluke!”
doylist: yeah, this was an error on my part.
watsonian: the lawyer was trying to get the heck out of dodge before the angels realized he’d escaped.
“i can’t believe hell is locked up with a 5 pin tumbler lock!”
doylist: realistically it would be a warded lock, which is even less secure, but lpl doesn’t make enough videos on warded locks for me to know what he says while picking them.
watsonian: masterlock is in cahoots with the devil. a single spool pin separates us from the writhing masses of the damned.
“mcnally would just hit it with a rock!”
the rock method really only works with padlocks. i imagine this lock as embedded within the door. mcnally would use a single sided jiggler, or a pokey stabby thing, or perhaps a bump hammer. then, once he was out, you’d start to hear the intro of bfg division coming from no particular direction.
“that second- to-last line goes so hard!”
yeah it does. honestly i’m not sure where that came from. i’ve never cooked like that before or since. this person gets it though
“that last line goes even harder!”
remember you will die! but don’t forget to live.
People talk about "The Shape of Water" like it's just the fish fucking movie as if it wasn't about a mute woman feeling truly understood for the first time in her entire life and then yeah fucking a fish
“The things you criticize AI for is stuff most of your tech does” is not whataboutism for a simple reason: AI literally is built into the same industry as the rest of the tech you use, bc it’s the tech industry. Thus, trying to reject AI alone for what is essentially a product of a hyper capitalist tech industry is functionally useless.
For example, it’s very reasonable to be concerned about the new Twitter data center that’s poisoning Memphis right now, and single out the LLM, grok, as a source of it. However, generating an image using locally run stable diffusion does literally nothing to contribute to this. Conversely, using Twitter without using grok absolutely contributes to the polluting Memphis. If we try to simply boycott AI entirely and nothing else, we still contribute to that data center. However, if we single out Twitter/X as a company, then we can actually have an effective boycott.
If your problem is the environmental cost of all data centers, and you single out AI as the source, but still continue to stream video (ie Netflix, YouTube, TikTok etc), use social media, etc, you are still contributing to the stuff that’s at least 90% of current datacenter output. I know this is news to people but data centers didn’t just. Suddenly become a problem post-AI.
People pointing this out are not being contrarian for no reason. Current anti-AI thinking has done literally zero for actually combatting the issues we need to care about, because a lot of these problems go beyond AI. This is the tech equivalent of banning straws.
The point of this isn’t to go “oh and yet you participate in society…interesting”. The point of this is to show how you need to be thinking systemically about these issues beyond the superficial shit you hear in op-eds and tweets, which by the way, frequently misreport the actual data/info regarding the situation.
You want actually effective movements that combat the tech industry? Check out notechforapartheid and BDS’s tech boycott list.