Masayuki Murai (Japanese, 1947) - Moonlight (2016)

oozey mess

Origami Around
𓃗

No title available
cherry valley forever
Doug Jones
Show & Tell

blake kathryn
Keni
EXPECTATIONS
Monterey Bay Aquarium
Misplaced Lens Cap

#extradirty

Discoholic 🪩
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

Love Begins
The Stonewall Inn
official daine visual archive
Cosimo Galluzzi
ojovivo
seen from Colombia
seen from United States

seen from Australia
seen from Philippines
seen from France

seen from India
seen from United States
seen from Bangladesh

seen from Philippines
seen from Slovenia

seen from United States

seen from Netherlands

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from Italy
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Oman

seen from United Kingdom

seen from New Zealand
@hotephres
Masayuki Murai (Japanese, 1947) - Moonlight (2016)
the only valid answer for "how many genders are there?" is "not enough"
Something something people not knowing the history something ...
I am increasingly of the view that the besetting flaw of modern, internet-based, leftist-progressive culture is the tendency to take concepts that were intended as consciousness-raising, "have you noticed"/"makes you think" moments and treat them as all-encompassing rules for life. The Bechdel test is not a yardstick for feminism and/or artistic worthiness. It's not a test you were ever meant to apply to any single work. It's a thought experiment intended to illustrate how the entertainment industry as a whole discounts the interiority, desires, and relationships of women except as they relate to men. But again and again you'll see people - and perhaps especially people who define themselves as feminists - who treat it as the one and only meaningful measure of a work's value. In reality, there are feminist works that don't pass the Bechdel test, and works that pass the Bechdel test that are not feminist, and works with tremendous political value that do not foreground feminism because they're about something else.
And if the Bechdel test is a relatively old example, this is a phenomenon that keeps cropping up. "Some artifacts in museums were stolen or looted, with colonialism and racism providing a cover for acts that in other circumstances we'd easily recognize as criminal" has become "all museums are piles of loot and stealing from them is righteous even it it's to melt the artwork down and funnel the profits to organized crime." "Zoos sometimes abuse their animals and the goal should be to reintroduce specimens to the wild" has become "open all the cages and let the animals out (to spaces where they will almost certainly die/be killed to stop them killing people)". "Ethnic foods are sometimes treated as more palatable, and sold for more money, when they're marketed by white people" has become "people should only prepare and eat food from their own ethnicity". Again and again, it feels like these ideas that were meant to make us think, to pause a moment and notice the unspoken assumptions and elisions that exist in our world, have been turned into catchphrases that shut down thought. I think the reason that happens is that people enjoy the feeling of righteousness that comes from calling out institutions like museums or the film industry, but along the way you can become just as dogmatic and tunnel-visioned as the bodies you were calling out.
gay walmart: unexpected item in fagging area or whatever. Fuck it just reblog this shit
once you notice how normalized it is to call women who are public figures by their first names in contexts where you';d refer to any man by surname you'll start going insane
this is such a big thing at university. you start to notice that female teachers are called “dr first name” or “prof first name” as a default. that or people just exclude the title all together in every setting. people don’t seem to notice or think much of it but it’s such a clear textbook example of the misogyny deeply engrained in our education systems.
the concept of them thinking the other catfished them in different ways genuinely sends me i cant stop thinking about it
"Deadname" dejenselo a los gringos, en español tenemos la hermosa palabra "necronimo" y es un desperdicio que no la usen
There no shame in never becoming fluent in your target language(s). Learning a new language even a little bit is great. Having the ability to communicate even a little bit is great. Learning about the culture(s) is great. You're doing great. Enjoy the experience.
Even if you can’t communicate in the language, learning more about another language helps you learn more about the way other humans communicate, and allows you to communicate and understand others even better in your native tongue and across language barriers. It’s enriching all around!!!
The 18th Babrican Gate of Tollymore Forest, Mourne Mountains, Northern Ireland.
YouTube Channels for Kids by JLPT Levels
(。•̀ᴗ-)✧ resources
こんにちは, Japanese learners! Learning a language is an exciting adventure, isn't it? To add a spark of joy to your Japanese learning journey, here's a collection of YouTube channels tailored for kids. Organized by JLPT levels, these channels offer a blend of education and entertainment for learners at different stages. Keep in mind, though, that JLPT levels aren't an exact science like math – language learning can be subjective in terms of difficulty. However, these resources provide a fantastic starting point and a fun way to explore the world of Japanese language and culture. Let's hop into this delightful world of animated learning and playful discoveries!
Friendly reminder to adjust your way of learning in order to make the most of what you're studying to reach the goal you truly want! read my post about it (ᵔ◡ᵔ)
꒰ა ˚₊ ✧・┈・╴N 5 ╴・┈・𐑺 ‧₊˚໒꒱
— Curious George (N5 level)
— Japanese folk tales/anime series (Japanese audio/Japanese subtitles) from BomBom Academy (N5 level)
みんなが知っている日本の昔ばなしをアニメで読み聞かせ ▶日本の昔ばなしアニメ(日本語版) 桃太郎 MOMOTARO - PEACH BOY/金太郎 KINTARO/牛若丸 USHIWAKAMARU/かぐや姫 SHINING PRINCESS/舌切りすずめ THE TONGUELE
— Peppa Pig (N5-4 level)
ペッパピッグ公式YouTubeチャンネルへようこそ!どんなファンでも喜んでもらえる様に、エピソードやコンピレーションを集めました。ぜひ、楽しんで、登録を忘れずに! かわいいこぶたの女の子ペッパピッグが、弟のジョージピッグ、パパのダディピッグ、ママのマミーピッグと繰り広げる、思わ
— Anpanman (N5-4 level)
「それいけ!アンパンマン」のアニメ公式チャンネルです。 アニメ本編や歌の動画の他、映画最新情報のPVも続々配信していきますので、ぜひご家族でお楽しみください♪ ★TVシリーズの新しいおはなしの更新日は毎月1日頃を予定しています。 ※休日/祝日の場合は翌平日の更新となります ※
— NHK education (N5-4 level)
株式会社NHKエデュケーショナルが運営するYoutubeチャンネルです。 弊社で行うイベントなどの情報をお届けします! お問い合わせは、以下URLよりお送りください。 https://www.nhk-ed.co.jp/personal/contact-event/
꒰ა ˚₊ ✧・┈・╴N4 ╴・┈・𐑺 ‧₊˚໒꒱
— Cinnamon Roll, Sanrio (N4 level)
ぼく、シナモンです。 ぼくの公式YouTubeチャンネルだよ☆ ぼくの事やフレンズの事を みんなにもっと知ってもらえたら嬉しいな! --- 名前:シナモン お誕生日: 3月6日 出身地: 遠いお空の雲の上 性格:おとなしいけれど、とても人なつっこい 趣味:カフェのテラスでお昼寝
— [Anime] Atashin'chi (N4-3 level)
The Tachibanas are the quintessential Japanese family, unassuming and infinitely relatable. There’s Mother, who isn’t the best cook and is q
꒰ა ˚₊ ✧・┈・╴N3 ╴・┈・𐑺 ‧₊˚໒꒱
— Sesame Street Japan (N3 level)
セサミストリート日本公式 YouTube チャンネルへようこそ! ここでは、エルモやクッキーモンスターなどが登場するセサミストリートのビデオをお届けしています。 ぜひチャネル登録して、 セサミストリートのかわいい仲間たちと楽しい時間をお過ごしください。 セサミストリートは、非営
— Chibi Maruko Chan (N3-2 level)
Chibi Maruko Channel is running by Nippon Animation Co.,Ltd. We'd like to have more people to watch and know "Chibi Maruko Chan." There are
꒰ა ˚₊ ✧・┈・╴N2 ╴・┈・𐑺 ‧₊˚໒꒱
— Precure (N2 level)
「ひろがるスカイ!プリキュア」を始めとする、プリキュアに関する映像をお届けするプリキュア公式YouTubeチャンネル!ダンスレッスンや変身シーンなどお楽しみコンテンツ続々更新中。チャンネルを登録すると、映像の更新情報がいち早くゲットできます!
またね~@inkichan
꒰ა ˚₊ ✧・┈・╴﹕꒰ ᐢ。- ༝ -。ᐢ ꒱﹕╴・┈・𐑺 ‧₊˚໒꒱
In Japanese language, describing a third person’s emotion is different from describing a first person’s emotion: in English, the sentences "I am happy" and "He is happy" are grammatically structured in the same way. However, in Japanese, this direct equivalence is not possible: you can say "私は嬉しいです" (Watashi wa ureshii desu), but you can't simply say "彼は嬉しいです" (Kare wa ureshii desu).
This is due to cultural and linguistic nuances that emphasize the acknowledgment of another's internal state as somewhat inaccessible. In fact, Japanese typically employs expressions that convey a level of inference or indirectness, such as:
Using observational phrases: one might say 「彼は嬉しそうです」 (Kare wa ureshisō desu), which translates to "He seems happy" or "He/she looks happy." This phrasing respects the notion that one can only observe outward signs of emotion, not definitively know another's internal state.
Adding "ようだ" or "みたい": these suffixes add a sense of speculation. For example, 「彼は嬉しいようだ」 (Kare wa ureshii yō da) or 「彼は嬉しいみたいです」 (Kare wa ureshii mitai desu), both meaning "He appears to be happy."
Using conditional clauses: Another approach is to use conditional forms, like 「彼が嬉しければ」 (Kare ga ureshikereba), meaning "If he is happy," which implicitly acknowledges the uncertainty of truly knowing his feelings.
One characteristic of Japanese syntax is its extreme sensitivity to epistemological considerations based on the ego/nonego distinction or the distinction of I/the other. Our knowledge about the mental state of another person must necessarily come from our interpretation of external evidence, and this is well reflected in the Japanese language.
Source material: http://human.kanagawa-u.ac.jp/gakkai/publ/pdf/no157/15712.pdf
I stumbled across this video on this topic:
SOMEONE FINALLY PUT IT INTO WORDS!!!
guYS THE FUCKING SIGNS
Okay, so:
Latin has this word, sic. Or, if we want to be more diacritically accurate, sīc. That shows that the i is long, so it’s pronounced like “seek” and not like “sick.”
You might recognize this word from Latin sayings like “sic semper tyrannis” or “sic transit gloria mundi.” You might recognize it as what you put in parentheses when you want to be pass-agg about someone’s mistakes when you’re quoting them: “Then he texted me, ‘I want to touch you’re (sic) butt.’”
It means, “thus,” which sounds pretty hoity-toity in this modren era, so maybe think of it as meaning “in this way,” or “just like that.” As in, “just like that, to all tyrants, forever,” an allegedly cool thing to say after shooting a President and leaping off a balcony and shattering your leg. “Everyone should do it this way.”
Anyway, Classical Latin somewhat lacked an affirmative particle, though you might see the word ita, a synonym of sic, used in that way. By Medieval Times, however, sic was holding down this role. Which is to say, it came to mean yes.
Ego: Num edisti totam pitam?
Tu, pudendus: Sic.
Me: Did you eat all the pizza?
You, shameful: That’s the way it is./Yes.
This was pretty well established by the time Latin evolved into its various bastard children, the Romance languages, and you can see this by the words for yes in these languages.
In Spanish, Italian, Asturian, Catalan, Corsican, Galician, Friulian, and others, you say si for yes. In Portugese, you say sim. In French, you say si to mean yes when you’re contradicting a negative assertion (”You don’t like donkey sausage like all of us, the inhabitants of France, eat all the time?” “Yes, I do!”). In Romanian, you say da, but that’s because they’re on some Slavic shit. P.S. there are possibly more Romance languages than you’re aware of.
But:
There was still influence in some areas by the conquered Gaulish tribes on the language of their conquerors. We don’t really have anything of Gaulish language left, but we can reverse engineer some things from their descendants. You see, the Celts that we think of now as the people of the British Isles were Gaulish, originally (in the sense that anyone’s originally from anywhere, I guess) from central and western Europe. So we can look at, for example, Old Irish, where they said tó to mean yes, or Welsh, where they say do to mean yes or indeed, and we can see that they derive from the Proto-Indo-European (the big mother language at whose teat very many languages both modern and ancient did suckle) word *tod, meaning “this” or “that.” (The asterisk indicates that this is a reconstructed word and we don’t know exactly what it would have been but we have a pretty damn good idea.)
So if you were fucking Ambiorix or whoever and Quintus Titurius Sabinus was like, “Yo, did you eat all the pizza?” you would do that Drake smile and point thing under your big beefy Gaulish mustache and say, “This.” Then you would have him surrounded and killed.
Apparently Latin(ish) speakers in the area thought this was a very dope way of expressing themselves. “Why should I say ‘in that way’ like those idiots in Italy and Spain when I could say ‘this’ like all these cool mustache boys in Gaul?” So they started copying the expression, but in their own language. (That’s called a calque, by the way. When you borrow an expression from another language but translate it into your own. If you care about that kind of shit.)
The Latin word for “this” is “hoc,” so a bunch of people started saying “hoc” to mean yes. In the southern parts of what was once Gaul, “hoc” makes the relatively minor adjustment to òc, while in the more northerly areas they think, “Hmm, just saying ‘this’ isn’t cool enough. What if we said ‘this that’ to mean ‘yes.’” (This is not exactly what happened but it is basically what happened, please just fucking roll with it, this shit is long enough already.)
So they combined hoc with ille, which means “that” (but also comes to just mean “he”: compare Spanish el, Italian il, French le, and so on) to make o-il, which becomes oïl. This difference between the north and south (i.e. saying oc or oil) comes to be so emblematic of the differences between the two languages/dialects that the languages from the north are called langues d’oil and the ones from the south are called langues d’oc. In fact, the latter language is now officially called “Occitan,” which is a made-up word (to a slightly greater degree than that to which all words are made-up words) that basically means “Oc-ish.” They speak Occitan in southern France and Catalonia and Monaco and some other places.
The oil languages include a pretty beefy number of languages and dialects with some pretty amazing names like Walloon, and also one with a much more basic name: French. Perhaps you’ve heard of it, n'est-ce pas?
Yeah, eventually Francophones drop the -l from oil and start saying it as oui. If you’ve ever wondered why French yes is different from other Romance yeses, well, now you know.
I guess what I’m getting at is that when you reblog a post you like and tag it with “this,” or affirm a thing a friend said by nodding and saying “Yeah, that”: you’re not new
official linguistics post
Cursing in German 🤬🙊
Damn - Verdammt
Shit - Scheiße
Fuck you! - Fick dich!
fucking [thing] - verfickte /-s,r [Sache]
Shut up! - Halt die Klappe!
Shut the fuck up! - Halt die Fresse!
Fuck off! - Verpiss dich!
asshole - das Arschloch
wanker - der Wichser
Are you serious?! - Ist das dein Ernst?!
Are you kidding me?! - Willst du mich verarschen?!
Really?! - Echt jetzt?!
Fuck that! = Scheiß drauf!
Feel free to add more if i missed any important ones
Hurensohn! (son of a bitch) is very satisfying to say and I don't know how common it is, but I learned 'Halt die Schnauze!' as an alternative for 'Shut up!' today
a bit meaner than "Halt die Schnauze" and "Halt die Klappe" is "Halt's Maul"/ "Halt dein Maul"
Hurensohn is very very strong ! less strong ones: Blödmann/ Idiot
as addition to Scheiße: Scheißdreck is also used often.
YOU don’t have to be perfect to be loved. but I do