so- an interesting interview with shawn hatosy just dropped, and if what he's said about abbot's hypothetical choices for who he would and wouldn't want on night shift are true, it links back in to the part of abbot's character that people want to ignore- the fact that he still consistently defaults to siding with law enforcement by instinct.
he was asked who he would/wouldn't want on night shift, and he singled out langdon and mckay as the people abbot wouldn't want, because he considers them untrustworthy- yes, the only two characters we know to have had addiction and legal issues play a part in their lives are considered by abbot "untrustworthy" (or at least- considered by shawn when thinking about abbot, which is a whole other can of worms..).
abbot is viewed by a lot of the fandom as the uber-woke leftist attending, which is unfortunately canonically completely incorrect (this is usually to mirror their view of robby as evil and bigoted, which is similarly false). while he's shown to hold left wing social views in women's rights, lgbt rights and in insurance matters, he's happily part of SWAT and has no obvious guilt or regret from being complicit in civilian murder while part of the army. he's a walking contradiction, as many (especially army vets) are. but he certainly can't be considered "woke".
this... disclosure? opinion? analysis? of abbot from hatosy confirms more of that part of abbot's character if we take it at face value- it seems jack abbot does not trust those who find themselves on the wrong side of law enforcement, even if they haven't done anything that ought to worry him.
now, he would have every right to be aware/cautious of langdon, who we assume (by s3, I suppose) he knows has stolen drugs/tampered with drugs/treated patients while under the influence very recently. as an attending at a hospital, that is something you want to be aware of and monitor, and perhaps want to wash your hands of altogether- langdon is still a liability in that sense, so his lack of trust for langdon isn't what interests me.
his lack of trust for mckay however, is. this is the situation that reveals abbot's default to law enforcement far clearer. for abbot to be distrustful of mckay, one of the most stable and competent doctors in the ER, we have to wonder how he could've formed that opinion- especially as they don't work closely together. he's snappy with her in season two, but this attitude of his seems to go towards many members of day shift- so we assume he simply doesn't care for people he doesn't consider part of his "team" (with robby and dana being obvious exceptions). so his opinion must have been formed elsewhere.
all we have to go on canonically is their interaction in season one, with mckay being arrested due to her malfunctioning ankle monitor, and the subsequent argument with police. perhaps there's a prior knowledge of his surrounding her ankle monitor as well, but its not confirmed. either way, the only place he could've formed a distrustful view of her is here when she fell foul of the police. is it this specific incident that made him feel that way? is it a prior lack of trust knowing that she was an addict years in the past? is it knowing she had an ankle monitor? no matter what it is specifically, if reinforces the fact that jack abbot is not the ultra-woke people's princess many want him to be, and that he has some kind of belief (at at least surface level) that the police are right and those who cross them are wrong.
to not trust one of the most reliable, mature and skilled doctors on shift because of either very old (canonically 5+ years ago) substance abuse, or an ankle monitor situation that wasn't her fault, is a loaded choice. but it shows very clearly that jack abbot is forming opinions based on his military and policing mindset, and that that very much defines a lot of who he is. the bottom line is that the only people he doesn't trust are those who've crossed paths with the law.
of course, this is all caveated with the fact shawn is saying this, this hasn't yet been proved in any way in canon. IF this is an attitude abbot displays in s3, this will be far more relevant. for now, we don't know if this reflects s3 and what it contains, or if this reflects shawns own view of abbot, or even shawns own views on who he'd find trustworthy. we don't know anything for sure, and its just one interview. but I am very interested the exact source of shawns reasoning for picking out the only two addicts in the show for abbot to mistrust, and what this can mean for how being a part of the american military industrial complex impacts who jack abbot actually is.




















